Effect of tiotropium bromide on circadian variation in airflow limitation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

P M A Calverley, A Lee, L Towse, J van Noord, T J Witek, S Kelsen, P M A Calverley, A Lee, L Towse, J van Noord, T J Witek, S Kelsen

Abstract

Background: In chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), the degree of circadian variation in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) and the influence of anticholinergic blockade is not known. Tiotropium is a long acting inhaled anticholinergic bronchodilator that increases daytime FEV1 in COPD. We hypothesised that tiotropium would modify the overnight change in FEV1, and this would be unaffected by the timing of drug administration.

Methods: A double blind, randomised, placebo controlled trial was conducted with tiotropium 18 mg once daily in the morning (09.00 hours), evening (21.00 hours), or an identical placebo. Patients with stable COPD (n=121, FEV1=41% predicted) underwent spirometric tests every 3 hours for 24 hours at baseline and after 6 weeks of treatment.

Results: There were no significant differences at baseline between the groups. Tiotropium improved mean (SE) FEV1 (over 24 hours) in the morning (1.11 (0.03) l) and evening (1.06 (0.03) l) groups compared with placebo (0.90 (0.03) l), and nocturnal FEV1 (mean of 03.00 and 06.00 hours) in the morning (1.03 (0.03) l) and evening (1.04 (0.03) l) groups compared with placebo (0.82 (0.03) l) at the 6 week visit (p<0.01). FEV1 before morning or evening dosing was similar, while the peak FEV1 moved later in the day with active treatment. The mean percentage change in FEV1 from 09.00 hours to 03.00 hours (the nocturnal decline in FEV1) was -2.8% in the morning group, -1.0% in the evening group, and -12.8% in the placebo group. The magnitude of the peak to trough change in FEV1 was not statistically different.

Conclusions: Tiotropium produced sustained bronchodilation throughout the 24 hour day without necessarily abolishing circadian variation in airway calibre.

References

    1. Thorax. 2000 Apr;55(4):289-94
    1. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999 Apr;159(4 Pt 1):1163-71
    1. Life Sci. 2001 Apr 27;68(22-23):2557-64
    1. Br J Ind Med. 1969 Apr;26(2):121-5
    1. Thorax. 1975 Jun;30(3):300-5
    1. Thorax. 1981 Jul;36(7):481-6
    1. Thorax. 1981 Aug;36(8):618-21
    1. Chest. 1985 May;87(5):653-7
    1. Clin Sci (Lond). 1985 Sep;69(3):251-8
    1. Chest. 1986 Oct;90(4):485-8
    1. Am J Med. 1986 Nov 14;81(5A):81-90
    1. Thorax. 1987 Jul;42(7):487-90
    1. Am J Med. 1988 Jul 29;85(1B):48-53
    1. J Asthma. 1987;24(2):91-134
    1. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1989 Jun;39(323):239-43
    1. Thorax. 1990 Mar;45(3):190-4
    1. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1991 May;143(5 Pt 1):916-21
    1. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1992 Mar;145(3):540-4
    1. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1992 Mar;145(3):588-93
    1. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1992 Dec;146(6):1524-30
    1. Eur Respir J Suppl. 1993 Mar;16:5-40
    1. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1995 Apr;151(4):945-51
    1. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1995 Jun;95(6):1172-8
    1. Eur Respir J. 1995 Sep;8(9):1506-13
    1. Chest. 1996 Sep;110(3):648-53
    1. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1996 Oct;154(4 Pt 1):876-80
    1. Lung. 1997;175(1):53-61
    1. Respiration. 1997;64(4):251-6
    1. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998 Sep;158(3):1002-7
    1. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999 Jan;159(1):112-8
    1. Life Sci. 1999;64(6-7):457-64
    1. Life Sci. 1995;56(11-12):853-9
    1. Eur Respir J. 2000 May;15(5):878-85

Source: PubMed

3
S'abonner