A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of minocycline and/or omega-3 fatty acids added to treatment as usual for at-risk mental states (NAYAB): study protocol

Inti Qurashi, Imran B Chaudhry, Ameer B Khoso, Sana Farooque, Steve Lane, Mohammad Omair Husain, Simon Chu, Jane Sarginson, Munir Hamarani, Haider A Naqvi, Bushra Razzaque, Fareed A Minhas, Alison R Yung, J F W Deakin, Nusrat Husain, Inti Qurashi, Imran B Chaudhry, Ameer B Khoso, Sana Farooque, Steve Lane, Mohammad Omair Husain, Simon Chu, Jane Sarginson, Munir Hamarani, Haider A Naqvi, Bushra Razzaque, Fareed A Minhas, Alison R Yung, J F W Deakin, Nusrat Husain

Abstract

Background: The at-risk mental state (ARMS) describes individuals at high risk of developing schizophrenia or psychosis. The use of antipsychotics in this population is not supported, because most individuals with ARMS are unlikely to develop psychosis. Anti-inflammatory treatments and polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) may have some beneficial effects in the treatment of ARMS. There have been no controlled clinical trials in which researchers have investigated the use of minocycline for ARMS and no trials involving PUFAs in combination with other proposed treatments. There is a need to find effective, tolerable and inexpensive interventions for individuals with ARMS that are available in high-, low- and middle-income countries.

Methods/design: A 6-month intervention study of minocycline and/or omega-3 fatty acids added to treatment as usual (TAU) in patients with ARMS will be conducted in Pakistan using a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind factorial design. A total of 320 consenting patients with capacity will be recruited from the community, general practitioner clinics and psychiatric units. Allowing for a 25% dropout rate, we will recruit 59 completing participants into each study arm, and in total 236 will complete the study. We will determine whether the addition of minocycline and/or omega-3 fatty acids to TAU attenuates the rate of transition from ARMS to first-episode psychosis and improves symptoms and/or level of functioning in ARMS. We will also investigate whether any candidate risk factors, such as negative symptoms, influence treatment response in the ARMS group. The primary efficacy endpoint is conversion to psychotic disorder at 12 months after study entry. Analysis will be done according to the intention to treat principle using analysis of variance, chi-square tests and adjusted ORs to assess between-group differences. Cox regression analysis will be used to evaluate potential between-group differences in time to onset of psychosis.

Discussion: The outcomes of this trial will provide evidence of the potential benefits of minocycline and PUFAs in the treatment of ARMS. Both minocycline and PUFAs are inexpensive, are readily available in low-/middle-income countries such as Pakistan, and if proven, may be safe and effective for treating individuals with ARMS.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02569307 . Registered on 3 October 2015.

Keywords: At-risk mental state (ARMS); Global mental health; Minocycline; Omega-3 fatty acids; PUFA; Ultra-high risk (UHR) schizophrenia.

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Institutional review board (IRB) approval has been obtained from the ethics committee of the Karachi Medical and Dental College and Dow University of Health Sciences, Pakistan. Written consent will be obtained from each participant prior to any trial-related data collection.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study flowchart outlining the timetable of study procedures. CAARMS Comprehensive Assessment of At Risk Mental States, MADRS Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale, PQ-16 Prodromal Questionnaire-16, SOFAS Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale, SPQ Schizotypal Personality Questionnaire
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Schedule of enrolment, interventions and assessments. CAARMS Comprehensive Assessment of At Risk Mental States, MADRS Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale, PQ-16 Prodromal Questionnaire-16, SOFAS Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale

References

    1. Yung AR, McGorry PD, McFarlane CA, et al. Monitoring and care of young people at incipient risk of psychosis. Schizophr Bull. 1996;22:283–303. doi: 10.1093/schbul/22.2.283.
    1. Fusar-Poli P, Bonoldi I, Yung AR, et al. Predicting psychosis: meta-analysis of transition outcomes in individuals at high clinical risk. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2012;69:220–9. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.1472.
    1. Yung AR, Yuen HP, Berger G, et al. Declining transition rate in ultra high risk (prodromal) services: dilution or reduction of risk? Schizophr Bull. 2007;33:673–81. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbm015.
    1. Yung AR, McGorry PD. The prodromal phase of first-episode psychosis: past and current conceptualizations. Schizophr Bull. 1996;22(2):353–70. doi: 10.1093/schbul/22.2.353.
    1. Hafner H. Modelling the early course of schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull. 2003;29:325–40. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.schbul.a007008.
    1. Marshall M, Lewis S, Lockwood A, et al. Association between duration of untreated psychosis and outcome in cohorts of first-episode patients: a systematic review. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005;62:975–83. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.62.9.975.
    1. McGlashan TH, Zipursky RB, Perkins D, et al. Randomized, double-blind trial of olanzapine versus placebo in patients prodromally symptomatic for psychosis. Am J Psychiatry. 2006;163:790–9. doi: 10.1176/ajp.2006.163.5.790.
    1. Morrison AP, Stewart SL, French P, et al. Early detection and intervention evaluation for people at high-risk of psychosis-2 (EDIE-2): trial rationale, design and baseline characteristics. Early Interv Psychiatry. 2011;5:24–32. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7893.2010.00254.x.
    1. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) Psychosis and schizophrenia in children and young people: recognition and management. NICE Clinical Guidance 155. London: NICE; 2013.
    1. McGorry PD, Nelson B, Amminger GP, et al. Intervention in individuals at ultra-high risk for psychosis: a review and future directions. J Clin Psychiatry. 2009;70:1206–12. doi: 10.4088/JCP.08r04472.
    1. Oya K, Kishi T, Iwata N. Efficacy and tolerability of minocycline augmentation therapy in schizophrenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Hum Psychopharmacol. 2014;29:483–91. doi: 10.1002/hup.2426.
    1. Smith K, Leyden JJ. Safety of doxycycline and minocycline: a systematic review. Clin Ther. 2005;27:1329–42. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2005.09.005.
    1. Stafford MR, Jackson H, Mayo-Wilson E, et al. Early interventions to prevent psychosis: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2013;346:f185. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f185.
    1. van der Gaag M, Smit F, Bechdolf A, et al. Preventing a first episode of psychosis: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled prevention trials of 12 month and longer-term follow-ups. Schizophr Res. 2013;149:56–62. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2013.07.004.
    1. Hutton P, Taylor PJ. Cognitive behavioural therapy for psychosis prevention: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychol Med. 2014;44:449–68. doi: 10.1017/S0033291713000354.
    1. McGorry PD, Nelson B, Markulev C, et al. Effect of ω-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids in young people at ultrahigh risk for psychotic disorders: the NEURAPRO randomized clinical trial. JAMA Psychiat. 2017;74:19–27. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2016.2902.
    1. Yung AR, Yuen HP, McGorry PD, et al. Mapping the onset of psychosis: the Comprehensive Assessment of At-Risk Mental States. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2005;39:964–71. doi: 10.1080/j.1440-1614.2005.01714.x.
    1. Goldman HH, Skodol AE, Lave TR. Revising axis V for DSM-IV: a review of measures of social functioning. Am J Psychiatry. 1992;149:1148–56. doi: 10.1176/ajp.149.8.1119-a.
    1. Maruff P, Thomas E, Cysique L, et al. Validity of the CogState brief battery: relationship to standardized tests and sensitivity to cognitive impairment in mild traumatic brain injury, schizophrenia, and AIDS dementia complex. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2000;24:165–78. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acp010.
    1. Montgomery SA, Asberg M. A new depression scale designed to be sensitive to change. Br J Psychiatry. 1979;134:382–9. doi: 10.1192/bjp.134.4.382.
    1. Ising HK, Smit F, Veling W, et al. Cost-effectiveness of preventing first-episode psychosis in ultra-high-risk subjects: multi-centre randomized controlled trial. Psychol Med. 2015;45:1435–46. doi: 10.1017/S0033291714002530.
    1. Ising HK, Kraan TC, Rietdijk J, et al. Four-year follow-up of cognitive behavioral therapy in persons at ultra-high risk for developing psychosis: the Dutch Early Detection and Intervention Evaluation (EDIE-NL) trial. Schizophr Bull. 2016;42:1243–52. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbw018.
    1. Loewy RL, Bearden CE, Johnson JK, et al. The Prodromal Questionnaire (PQ): preliminary validation of a self-report screening measure for prodromal and psychotic syndromes. Schizophr Res. 2005;79:117–25. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2005.03.007.
    1. Ising HK, Veling W, Loewy RL, et al. The validity of the 16-item version of the Prodromal Questionnaire (PQ-16) to screen for ultra high risk of developing psychosis in the general help-seeking population. Schizophr Bull. 2012;38:1288–96. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbs068.
    1. Morosini PL, Magliano L, Brambilla L, et al. Development, reliability and acceptability of a new version of the DSM-IV Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale (SOFAS) to assess routine social functioning. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2000;101(4):323–9.
    1. Pietrzak RH, Olver J, Norman T, et al. A comparison of the CogState schizophrenia battery and the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) battery in assessing cognitive impairment in chronic schizophrenia. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2009;31:848–59. doi: 10.1080/13803390802592458.
    1. Davidson J, Turnbull CD, Strickland R, et al. The Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Scale: reliability and validity. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1986;73:544–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1986.tb02723.x.
    1. Raine A. The SPQ: a scale for the assessment of schizotypal personality based on DSM-III-R. Schizophr Bull. 1991;17:555–64. doi: 10.1093/schbul/17.4.555.
    1. Efird J. Blocked randomization with randomly selected block sizes. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2011;8:15–20. doi: 10.3390/ijerph8010015.
    1. Chaudhry I, Hallak J, Husain N, et al. Minocycline benefits negative symptoms in early schizophrenia: a randomised double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial in patients on standard treatment. J Psychopharmacol. 2012;26:1185–93. doi: 10.1177/0269881112444941.
    1. Liu F, Guo X, Wu R, et al. Minocycline supplementation for the treatment of negative symptoms in early-phase schizophrenia: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Schizophr Res. 2014;153:169–76. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2014.01.011.
    1. Amminger GP, Schäfer MR, Schlögelhofer M, et al. Longer-term outcome in the prevention of psychotic disorders by the Vienna omega-3 study. Nat Commun. 2015;6:7934. doi: 10.1038/ncomms8934.

Source: PubMed

3
S'abonner