Cannabis, from plant to pill

Christopher P L Grof, Christopher P L Grof

Abstract

The therapeutic application of cannabis is attracting substantial public and clinical interest. The cannabis plant has been described as a veritable 'treasure trove', producing more than 100 different cannabinoids, although the focus to date has been on the psychoactive molecule delta-9-tetraydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD). Other numerous secondary metabolites of cannabis, the terpenes, some of which share the common intermediary geranyl diphosphate (GPP) with the cannabinoids, are hypothesized to contribute synergistically to their therapeutic benefits, an attribute that has been described as the 'entourage effect'. The effective delivery of such a complex multicomponent pharmaceutical relies upon the stable genetic background and standardized growth of the plant material, particularly if the raw botanical product in the form of the dried pistillate inflorescence (flos) is the source. Following supercritical CO2 extraction of the inflorescence (and possibly bracts), the secondary metabolites can be blended to provide a specific ratio of major cannabinoids (THC : CBD) or individual cannabinoids can be isolated, purified and supplied as the pharmaceutical. Intensive breeding strategies will provide novel cultivars of cannabis possessing elevated levels of specific cannabinoids or other secondary metabolites.

Keywords: cannabinoids; cannabis; flos; flower; terpenoids.

© 2018 The Authors. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Pharmacological Society.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Geographical distribution of the four major domesticated groups 1, 2, 3, 4 of Cannabis sativa, with the centre of origin and ancestral genotype illustrated to be in Central Asia. Significant hybridization, predominantly during the last century, has given rise to two additional groups, hemp and marijuana hybrids (reproduced from 5; ©Government of Canada)
Figure 2
Figure 2
Schematic depiction of cannabinoid and exemplar mono‐, sesqui‐, and diterpenoid biosynthesis. The isoprenoid and prenyl precursors for cannabigerolic acid (CBGA), are provided by the hexanoate and 2‐C‐methyl‐D‐erythritol 4‐phosphate (MEP) pathways, respectively. Geranyl diphosphate (GPP), is a key intermediate metabolite and building block for both cannabinoid and terpenoid biosynthesis. The seven‐step mevalonate (MVA) pathway converts pyruvate and glyceraldehyde‐3‐phosphate (G‐3‐P) into isopentenyl diphosphate (IPP) and dimethylallyl diphosphate (DMAPP). Key catalytic enzymes controlling flux through this pathway include the first two steps, 1‐deoxy‐D‐xylulose 5‐phosphate synthase (DXS) and 1‐deoxy‐D‐xylulose 5‐phosphate reductase (DXR). In the six‐step MEP pathway, three units of acetyl coenzyme A (CoA) are converted to IPP, which is isomerized with DMAPP by IPP isomerase. The enzyme catalysing the synthesis of MEV, 3‐hydroxy‐3‐methylglutaryl‐CoA reductase (HMGR), is considered to control flux through this pathway. The number of consecutive condensations of the five‐carbon monomer isopentenyl diphosphate (IPP) to its isomer, dimethylallyl diphosphate (DMAPP) is indicated by 1x, 2x, 3x. Longer‐chain isoprenoids, GPP, farnesyl diphosphate (FPP) and geranyl geranyl diphosphate (GGPP), are the products of IPP and DMAPP condensation catalysed by GPP synthase, FPP synthase and GGPP synthase, respectively. GPP, FPP and geranyl‐geranyl diphosphate (GGPP) are the precursors for mono‐, sequi‐, and di‐terpines, respectively. The final steps catalysing the synthesis of major active cannabinoids, cannabichromenic acid (CBCA), cannabidiolic acid (CBDA) and Δ9‐tetrahydrocannabinolic acid (THCA), are oxidocyclases, CBCA synthase (CBCAS), CBDA synthase (CBDAS) and THCA synthase (THCAS). Components of Figure 2 are derived from 29. AAE, acyl‐activating enzyme; CBD: cannabidiol; CYP76F39, α/β‐santalene monooxygenase; GPP synthase small subunit; OLS, olivetol synthase; P450: haemoprotein cytochrome P450; PT, prenyltransferase; STS, santalene synthase; TS, gamma‐terpinene synthase; TXS, taxadiene synthase

References

    1. Russo EB, Jiang HE, Li X, Sutton A, Carboni A, Del Bianco F, et al Phytochemical and genetic analyses of ancient cannabis from Central Asia. J Exp Bot 2008; 59: 4171–4182.
    1. Schultes RE, Klein WM, Plowman T, Lockwood TE. Cannabis: an example of taxonomic neglect. Bot Mus Leafl Harv Univ 1974; 23: 337–367.
    1. Small E, Cronquist A. A practical and natural taxonomy for cannabis. Taxon 1976; 25: 405–435.
    1. Clarke RC, Merlin MD. Cannabis: Evolution and Ethnobotany. Los Angeles: University of California Press, 2013.
    1. Small E. Evolution and classification of Cannabis sativa (marijuana, hemp) in relation to human utilization. Bot Rev 2015; 81: 189–294.
    1. Brickell CD, Alexander C, Cubey JJ, David JC, Hoffman MHA, Leslie AC, et al International code of nomenclature for cultivated plants [online]. International Society for Horticultural Science. 2016. Available from: (last accessed 27 February 2018).
    1. Sawler J, Stout JM, Gardner KM, Hudson D, Vidmar J, Butler L, et al The genetic structure of marijuana and hemp. PLoS One 2015; 10: e0133292.
    1. Romano LL, Hazekamp A. Cannabis oil: chemical evaluation of an upcoming cannabis‐based medicine. Cannabinoids 2013; (1): 1–11.
    1. Russo EB. Current therapeutic cannabis controversies and clinical trial design issues. Front Pharmacol 2016; 7: 1–19.
    1. Potter DJ. A review of the cultivation and processing of cannabis (Cannabis sativa L.) for production of prescription medicines in the UK. Drug Test Anal 2014; 6: 31–38.
    1. Russo E, Guy GW. A tale of two cannabinoids: the therapeutic rationale for combining tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabidiol. Med Hypotheses 2005; 66: 234–246.
    1. Russo EB. Taming THC: potential cannabis synergy and phytocannabinoid‐terpenoid entourage effects. Br J Pharmacol 2011; 163: 1344–1364.
    1. Kowal MA, Hazekamp A, Grotenhermen F. Review on clinical studies with cannabis and cannabinoids 2010–2014. Cannabinoids 2016; 11: 1–18.
    1. Brenneisen R. Chemistry and analysis of phytocannabinoids and other Cannabis constituents. Forensic Sci Med Marijuana Cannabinoids 2007; 7: 17–49.
    1. Mehmedic Z, Chandra S, Slade D, Denham H, Foster S, Patel AS, et al Potency trends of Δ9‐THC and other cannabinoids in confiscated cannabis preparations from 1993 to 2008. J Forensic Sci 2010; 55: 1209–1217.
    1. Pertwee RG. Handbook of Cannabis. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199662685.001.0001
    1. Welling MT, Shapter T, Rose TJ, Liu L, Stanger R, King GJ. A belated green revolution for Cannabis: virtual genetic resources to fast‐track cultivar development. Front Plant Sci 2016; 7: 1–17.
    1. Hazekamp A, Tejkalová K, Papadimitriou S. Cannabis: from cultivar to chemovar II – a metabolomics approach to Cannabis classification. Cannabis Cannabinoid Res 2016; (1): 202–215.
    1. Giese MW, Lewis MA, Giese L, Smith KM. Development and validation of a reliable and robust method for the analysis of cannabinoids and terpenes in cannabis. J AOAC Int 2015; 98: 1503–1522.
    1. Bielecka M, Kaminski F, Adams I, Poulson H, Sloan R, Li Y, et al Targeted mutation of Δ12 and Δ15 desaturase genes in hemp produce major alterations in seed fatty acid composition including a high oleic hemp oil. Plant Biotechnol J 2014; 12: 613–623.
    1. Bakel V, Van Bakel H, Stout JM, Cote AG, Tallon CM, Sharpe AG, et al The draft genome and transcriptome of Cannabis sativa . Genome Biol 2011; 12: R102.
    1. Onofri C, De Meijer EPM, Mandolino G. Sequence heterogeneity of cannabidiolic‐ and tetrahydrocannabinolic acid‐synthase in Cannabis sativa L. and its relationship with chemical phenotype. Phytochemistry 2015; 116: 57–68.
    1. Cascini F, Passerotti S, Boschi I. Analysis of THCA synthase gene expression in cannabis: a preliminary study by real‐time quantitative PCR. Forensic Sci Int 2013; 231: 208–212.
    1. De Meijer EPM, Bagatta M, Carboni A, Crucitti P, Moliterni VMC, Ranalli P, et al The inheritance of chemical phenotype in Cannabis sativa L. Genetics 2003; 163: 335–346.
    1. Weiblen GD, Wenger JP, Craft KJ, ElSohly MA, Mehmedic Z, Treiber EL, et al Gene duplication and divergence affecting drug content in Cannabis sativa . New Phytol 2015; 208: 1241–1250.
    1. Chandra S, Lata H, ElSohly MA, Walker LA, Potter D. Cannabis cultivation: methodological issues for obtaining medical‐grade product. Epilepsy Behav 2017; 70: 302–312.
    1. Harding SD, Sharman JL, Faccenda E, Southan C, Pawson AJ, Ireland S, et al The IUPHAR/BPS guide to PHARMACOLOGY in 2018: updates and expansion to encompass the new guide to IMMUNOPHARMACOLOGY. Nucl Acid Res 2018; 46: D1091–D1106.
    1. Alexander SPH, Christopoulos A, Davenport AP, Kelly E, Marrion NV, Peters JA, et al The Concise Guide to PHARMACOLOGY 2017/18: G protein‐coupled receptors. Br J Pharmacol 2017; 174: S17–S129.
    1. Ikram NKBK, Zhan X, Pan X‐W, King BC, Simonsen HT. Stable heterologous expression of biologically active terpenoids in green plant cells. Front Plant Sci 2015; 6: 129.

Source: PubMed

3
S'abonner