Disease severity dictates SARS-CoV-2-specific neutralizing antibody responses in COVID-19

Xiangyu Chen, Zhiwei Pan, Shuai Yue, Fei Yu, Junsong Zhang, Yang Yang, Ren Li, Bingfeng Liu, Xiaofan Yang, Leiqiong Gao, Zhirong Li, Yao Lin, Qizhao Huang, Lifan Xu, Jianfang Tang, Li Hu, Jing Zhao, Pinghuang Liu, Guozhong Zhang, Yaokai Chen, Kai Deng, Lilin Ye, Xiangyu Chen, Zhiwei Pan, Shuai Yue, Fei Yu, Junsong Zhang, Yang Yang, Ren Li, Bingfeng Liu, Xiaofan Yang, Leiqiong Gao, Zhirong Li, Yao Lin, Qizhao Huang, Lifan Xu, Jianfang Tang, Li Hu, Jing Zhao, Pinghuang Liu, Guozhong Zhang, Yaokai Chen, Kai Deng, Lilin Ye

Abstract

COVID-19 patients exhibit differential disease severity after SARS-CoV-2 infection. It is currently unknown as to the correlation between the magnitude of neutralizing antibody (NAb) responses and the disease severity in COVID-19 patients. In a cohort of 59 recovered patients with disease severity including severe, moderate, mild, and asymptomatic, we observed the positive correlation between serum neutralizing capacity and disease severity, in particular, the highest NAb capacity in sera from the patients with severe disease, while a lack of ability of asymptomatic patients to mount competent NAbs. Furthermore, the compositions of NAb subtypes were also different between recovered patients with severe symptoms and with mild-to-moderate symptoms. These results reveal the tremendous heterogeneity of SARS-CoV-2-specific NAb responses and their correlations to disease severity, highlighting the needs of future vaccination in COVID-19 patients recovered from asymptomatic or mild illness.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 in COVID-19 recovered patients with different symptom severity. ac ELISA binding assays of 100-fold diluted COVID-19 patient sera to ELISA plates after coating with SARS-CoV-2 S1 (a), RBD (b), and S2 (c) proteins. The dashed lines in ac represent the average values of the healthy control groups. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, and ****P < 0.0001. ns not significant. Error bars in ac indicate SEM
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Neutralizing antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 in COVID-19 recovered patients. a Scores showing the COVID-19 patient serum-mediated inhibition of the SARS-CoV-2 RBD protein binding to ACE2 protein by ELISA. b Pie charts showing the proportions of patients with high (>50, green) or low (<50, red) RBD-ACE2-binding inhibition score in each indicated situations. c Patient serum-mediated blocking of luciferase-encoding SARS-CoV-2-typed pseudovirus into ACE2/293T cells. The dashed line indicates the cutoff value (7.121) determined by the ROC curve analysis. d Pie charts showing the proportions of patients with pseudovirus neutralization positive (<7.121, green) or negative (>7.121, red) in each indicated situations. e Patient serum-mediated blocking of SARS-CoV-2 virus into Vero E6 cells. f A table showing the fold change of SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA fold reduction between indicated two groups in e. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ****P < 0.0001. ns not significant. Error bars in a, c, e indicate SEM
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Subtypes of neutralizing antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 S proteins in COVID-19 recovered patients. a Blocking of luciferase-encoding SARS-CoV-2 typed pseudovirus into ACE2/293T cells by patient sera (no depletion) or S1 antibody-depleted sera (S1-Abs depletion) or S2 antibody-depleted sera (S2-Abs depletion). The dashed line indicates the cutoff value (6.749) determined by the ROC curve analysis. HC healthy control, NC negative control. b, c Pie charts showing the proportions of patients with different neutralizing antibody (NAb) subtype responses in the total 25 patients (b), 8 severe patients (c, left panel), and 17 moderate and mild patients (c, right panel) of pseudovirus neutralization positive. d Blocking of luciferase-encoding SARS-CoV-2 typed pseudovirus into ACE2/293T cells by “S1-NAbs only” patient sera with RBD antibody depletion (RBD-Abs depletion) or without RBD antibody depletion (no depletion). The dashed line indicates the cutoff value (6.034) determined by the ROC curve analysis. HC healthy control, NC negative control. e Pie chart showing the proportions of “S1-NAbs only” patients with RBD-Nab-dependent or -independent antibody response. Error bars in a, d indicate SEM

References

    1. WHO. Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19): Situation Report-190 (WHO, 2020).
    1. Wu, Z. & McGoogan, J. M. Characteristics of and important lessons from the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak in China: summary of a report of 72314 cases from the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. JAMA. 10.1001/jama.2020.2648 (2020).
    1. Long, Q. X. et al. Antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 in patients with COVID-19. Nat. Med.10.1038/s41591-020-0897-1 (2020).
    1. Amanat, F. et al. A serological assay to detect SARS-CoV-2 seroconversion in humans. Nat. Med.10.1038/s41591-020-0913-5 (2020).
    1. Wu, F. et al. Neutralizing antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 in a COVID-19 recovered patient cohort and their implications. Preprint at 10.1101/2020.03.30.20047365 (2020).
    1. Ni, L. et al. Detection of SARS-CoV-2-specific humoral and cellular immunity in COVID-19 convalescent individuals. Immunity. 10.1016/j.immuni.2020.04.023 (2020).
    1. Huang, A. T. et al. A systematic review of antibody mediated immunity to coronaviruses: antibody kinetics, correlates of protection, and association of antibody responses with severity of disease. Preprint at 10.1101/2020.04.14.20065771 (2020).
    1. Liu, S. T. H. et al. Convalescent plasma treatment of severe COVID-19: a matched control study. Preprint at 10.1101/2020.05.20.20102236 (2020).
    1. Shen, C. et al. Treatment of 5 critically ill patients with COVID-19 with convalescent plasma. JAMA. 10.1001/jama.2020.4783 (2020).
    1. Salazar, E. et al. Treatment of Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) patients with convalescent plasma. Am. J. Pathol. 10.1016/j.ajpath.2020.05.014 (2020).
    1. Duan K, et al. Effectiveness of convalescent plasma therapy in severe COVID-19 patients. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2020;117:9490–9496. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2004168117.
    1. Baum, A. et al. Antibody cocktail to SARS-CoV-2 spike protein prevents rapid mutational escape seen with individual antibodies. Science. 10.1126/science.abd0831 (2020).
    1. Brouwer, P. J. M. et al. Potent neutralizing antibodies from COVID-19 patients define multiple targets of vulnerability. Science. 10.1126/science.abc5902 (2020).
    1. Cao, Y. et al. Potent neutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 identified by high-throughput single-cell sequencing of convalescent patients B cells. Cell10.1016/j.cell.2020.05.025 (2020).
    1. Chen X, et al. Human monoclonal antibodies block the binding of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein to angiotensin converting enzyme 2 receptor. Cell. Mol. Immunol. 2020;17:647–649. doi: 10.1038/s41423-020-0426-7.
    1. Hansen, J. et al. Studies in humanized mice and convalescent humans yield a SARS-CoV-2 antibody cocktail. Science.10.1126/science.abd0827 (2020).
    1. Ju, B. et al. Human neutralizing antibodies elicited by SARS-CoV-2 infection. Nature.10.1038/s41586-020-2380-z (2020).
    1. Rogers, T. F. et al. Isolation of potent SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies and protection from disease in a small animal model. Science. 10.1126/science.abc7520 (2020).
    1. Shi, R. et al. A human neutralizing antibody targets the receptor binding site of SARS-CoV-2. Nature. 10.1038/s41586-020-2381-y (2020).
    1. Wec, A. Z. et al. Broad neutralization of SARS-related viruses by human monoclonal antibodies. Science. 10.1126/science.abc7424 (2020).
    1. Wan, J. et al. Human IgG neutralizing monoclonal antibodies block SARS-CoV-2 infection. Cell Rep. 32, 107918 (2020).
    1. Gao, Q. et al. Rapid development of an inactivated vaccine candidate for SARS-CoV-2. Science. 10.1126/science.abc1932 (2020).
    1. Yu, J. et al. DNA vaccine protection against SARS-CoV-2 in rhesus macaques. Science. 10.1126/science.abc6284 (2020).
    1. Zhu, F. C. et al. Safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of a recombinant adenovirus type-5 vectored COVID-19 vaccine: a dose-escalation, open-label, non-randomised, first-in-human trial. Lancet. 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31208-3 (2020).
    1. Amanat F, Krammer F. SARS-CoV-2 vaccines: status report. Immunity. 2020;52:583–589. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2020.03.007.
    1. Wrapp D, et al. Cryo-EM structure of the 2019-nCoV spike in the prefusion conformation. Science. 2020;367:1260–1263. doi: 10.1126/science.abb2507.
    1. Yan R, et al. Structural basis for the recognition of SARS-CoV-2 by full-length human ACE2. Science. 2020;367:1444–1448. doi: 10.1126/science.abb2762.
    1. Kirchdoerfer RN, et al. Pre-fusion structure of a human coronavirus spike protein. Nature. 2016;531:118–121. doi: 10.1038/nature17200.
    1. Liu, L. et al. Anti-spike IgG causes severe acute lung injury by skewing macrophage responses during acute SARS-CoV infection. JCI Insight. 10.1172/jci.insight.123158 (2019).
    1. Du L, et al. The spike protein of SARS-CoV-a target for vaccine and therapeutic development. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2009;7:226–236. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2090.
    1. Schultheiss, C. et al. Next-generation sequencing of T and B cell receptor repertoires from COVID-19 patients showed signatures associated with severity of disease. Immunity. 10.1016/j.immuni.2020.06.024 (2020).
    1. Ou, X. et al. Characterization of spike glycoprotein of 2019-nCoV on virus entry and its immune cross-reactivity with spike glycoprotein of SARS-CoV. Nat. Commun.10.21203/rs.2.24016/v1 (2020).

Source: PubMed

3
S'abonner