Laparoscopic vs open complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation for right-sided colon cancer

Mehmet Ali Koc, Suleyman Utku Celik, Volkan Guner, Cihangir Akyol, Mehmet Ali Koc, Suleyman Utku Celik, Volkan Guner, Cihangir Akyol

Abstract

Complete mesocolic excision (CME) is being performed more frequently and has recently become an established oncologic surgical method for right hemicolectomy. Despite its advantages, such as its association with early mobilization, a short hospital stay, early bowel movement, mild postoperative pain, and good cosmesis, CME is technically demanding and carries the risk of severe complications. This study aims to compare the clinical, pathological, and oncological results of open and laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with CME.The data of 76 patients who underwent right hemicolectomy with CME and high vascular ligation were reviewed retrospectively. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to whether the open or laparoscopic technique was used.Thirty-two patients underwent open right hemicolectomy, and 44 patients underwent laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. The 2 groups were similar in age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists class, abdominal surgical history, tumor localization, and operation time. No significant differences were found regarding the specimen length, tumor size, harvested lymph nodes, number of metastatic lymph nodes, or tumor grade. According to the Clavien-Dindo classification system, the laparoscopic group had significantly fewer complications than did the open group (11.4% vs 31.2%; P = .04). The open group had a longer postoperative hospital stay than did the laparoscopic hemicolectomy group (9.9 ± 4.7 vs 7.2 ± 3.1 days; P = .002). In addition, the groups were similar with respect to disease-free survival (P = .14) and overall survival (P = .06).The data in this study demonstrated that no differences exist between the open and laparoscopic techniques concerning pathological and oncological results. However, significantly fewer complications and a shorter length of hospital stay were observed in the laparoscopic group than in the open group. Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with CME and central vascular ligation is a safe and feasible surgical procedure and should be considered the standard technique for right-sided colon cancer.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no funding and conflicts of interest to disclose.

Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
CONSORT flow diagram of the study.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Pathologic specimens after resection. The mesorectal envelope was preserved.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Several pictures of different patients during surgery and after resection was completed. A: Ileocolic pedicle dissection, B: Gastropancreaticocolic trunk, C: The appearance of the stripped SMV, centrally ligated veins, and ligated arteries at the SMV level in the laparoscopic group after resection was completed, D: The appearance of the stripped SMV, centrally ligated veins and arteries in the open group after resection was completed. SMV = superior mesenteric vein.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Kaplan−Meier survival probability plots. A: Disease-free survival curves; B: Overall survival curves.

References

    1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. . Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2018;68:394–424.
    1. Hohenberger W, Weber K, Matzel K, et al. . Standardized surgery for colonic cancer: complete mesocolic excision and central ligation - Technical notes and outcome. Color Dis 2009;11:354–64.
    1. Feng B, Sun J, Ling TL, et al. . Laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision (CME) with medial access for right-hemi colon cancer: Feasibility and technical strategies. Surg Endosc 2012;26:3669–75.
    1. Kuzu MA, Ismail E, Çelik S, et al. . Variations in the vascular anatomy of the right colon and implications for right-sided colon surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 2017;60:290–8.
    1. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004;240:205–13.
    1. Jessup J, Goldberg R, Aware E. Amin J, et al.. Colon and rectum. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual 8th ed.New York, NY: Springer:2017;251.
    1. Koh FH, Tan KK. Complete mesocolic excision for colon cancer: is it worth it? J Gastrointest Oncol 2019;10:1215–21.
    1. Chow CFK, Kim SH. Laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision: West meets East. World J Gastroenterol 2014;20:14301–7.
    1. Wang Y, Zhang C, Zhang D, et al. . Clinical outcome of laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision in the treatment of right colon cancer. World J Surg Oncol 2017;15:174.
    1. Adamina M, Manwaring ML, Park KJ, et al. . Laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision for right colon cancer. Surg Endosc 2012;26:2976–80.
    1. Yamamoto S, Inomata M, Katayama H, et al. . Short-term surgical outcomes from a randomized controlled trial to evaluate laparoscopic and open D3 dissection for stage II/III colon cancer: Japan clinical oncology group study JCOG 0404. Ann Surg 2014;260:23–30.
    1. Kang J, Kim IK, Kang SI, et al. . Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with complete mesocolic excision. Surg Endosc 2014;28:2747–51.
    1. Shin JW, Amar AHY, Kim SH, et al. . Complete mesocolic excision with D3 lymph node dissection in laparoscopic colectomy for stages II and III colon cancer: long-term oncologic outcomes in 168 patients. Tech Coloproctol 2014;18:795–803.
    1. Kim IY, Kim BR, Choi EH, et al. . Short-term and oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic and open complete mesocolic excision and central ligation. Int J Surg 2016;27:151–7.
    1. Huang JL, Wei HB, Fang JF, et al. . Comparison of laparoscopic versus open complete mesocolic excision for right colon cancer. Int J Surg 2015;23:12–7.
    1. Bae SU, Saklani AP, Lim DR, et al. . Laparoscopic-assisted versus open complete mesocolic excision and central vascular ligation for right-sided colon cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2014;21:2288–94.
    1. Mori S, Baba K, Yanagi M, et al. . Laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision with radical lymph node dissection along the surgical trunk for right colon cancer. Surg Endosc 2015;29:34–40.
    1. Storli KE, Søndenaa K, Furnes B, et al. . Outcome after introduction of complete mesocolic excision for colon cancer is similar for open and laparoscopic surgical treatments. Dig Surg 2014;30:317–27.
    1. West NP, Hohenberger W, Weber K, et al. . Complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation produces an oncologically superior specimen compared with standard surgery for carcinoma of the colon. J Clin Oncol 2010;28:272–8.
    1. West NP, Kennedy RH, Magro T, et al. . Morphometric analysis and lymph node yield in laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision performed by supervised trainees. Br J Surg 2014;101:1460–7.
    1. Benson AB, Venook AP, Al-Hawary MM, et al. . NCCN Guidelines Version 2.2021 Colon Cancer [National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Web site]. Available at: . Accessed January 21, 2021.
    1. Croner RS, Ptok H, Merkel S, et al. . Implementing complete mesocolic excision for colon cancer - mission completed? Innov Surg Sci 2020;3:17–29.
    1. Negoi I, Hostiuc S, Negoi RI, et al. . Laparoscopic vs open complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation for colon cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2017;9:475–91.

Source: PubMed

3
S'abonner