Valve-in-Valve Challenges: How to Avoid Coronary Obstruction

Fernando L M Bernardi, Danny Dvir, Josep Rodes-Cabau, Henrique B Ribeiro, Fernando L M Bernardi, Danny Dvir, Josep Rodes-Cabau, Henrique B Ribeiro

Abstract

Coronary obstruction is a rare but life-threatening complication in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Aortic valve-in-valve (VIV) procedures to treat failed surgical bioprosthesis is associated with ~6-fold higher risk for coronary obstruction in certain situations. The primary mechanism consists in the occlusion of the coronary ostium by the dislodged leaflet from the bioprosthesis after deployment of the transcatheter heart valve (THV), which most commonly occurs during the index procedure, but in up to 1/3 of cases a delayed presentation ensues. The clinical presentation consists of severe hypotension and ECG changes in most of the patients, with very high mortality rates. Therefore, pre-procedural multi-slice computed tomography is crucial for identifying high-risk features, such as low coronary heights, shallow sinuses of Valsalva, and short virtual THV to coronary ostial distance (VTC). Also, some models of surgical bioprosthesis present an increased risk for this dreadful complication. Preemptive protective strategies with coronary wiring, with or without placement of an undeployed stent, could mitigate the risks associated with this complication in high-risk patients, even though studies are lacking. This review aims to take a clinical perspective on the challenges in avoiding this complication during VIV procedures.

Keywords: coronary obstruction; failed surgical bioprosthesis; transcatheter aortic valve replacement; transcatheter heart valve; valve-in-valve.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(A) Incidence of coronary obstruction in the main studies in the context of valve-in-valve; (B) Incidence of coronary obstruction according to the type of surgical bioprosthesis. Adapted from Ribeiro et al. (10). Copyrights (2017), with permission from Oxford University Press (license number: 4586671024004).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Main surgical bioprosthesis related with an increased risk of coronary obstruction.
Figure 3
Figure 3
MSCT evaluation of a TAVR VIV case with high-risk features for coronary obstruction. (A) Left coronary height to the valve plane of 6.6 mm; (B) Right coronary height to the valve plane of 9.5 mm; (C) Low STJ; (D) Measurement of the SHV internal diameter; (E) Measurement of the SOV diameters; (F) Measurement of the STJ diameters; (G) Identification of SHV (Medtronic Hancock Standard); (H,I) VTC value <4.0 mm for both left and right coronary arteries.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Suggested pre-procedural risk assessment algorithm for coronary obstruction in patients undergoing VIV.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Example of a left coronary artery chimney stenting technique in a high-risk for coronary obstruction patient receiving a Sapien XT valve with a preemptive guidewire protection approach.
Figure 6
Figure 6
BASILICA procedure. (A) A catheter directs an electrified guidewire through the base of the left aortic cusp into a snare in the left ventricular outflow tract; (B) After snare retrieval; (C) The mid-shaft of the guidewire is electrified to lacerate the leaflet; (D) The leaflet splays after transcatheter aortic valve replacement permitting coronary flow. Reprinted from Khan et al. (19). Copyrights (2018), with permission from Elsevier (license number: 4587251472719).

References

    1. Webb JG, Wood DA, Ye J, Gurvitch R, Masson JB, Rodés-Cabau J, et al. . Transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation for failed bioprosthetic heart valves. Circulation. (2010) 121:1848–57. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.924613
    1. Webb JG, Dvir D. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement for bioprosthetic aortic valve failure: the valve-in-valve procedure. Circulation. (2013) 127:2542–50. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.000631
    1. Dvir D, Webb J, Brecker S, Bleiziffer S, Hildick-Smith D, Colombo A, et al. . Transcatheter aortic valve replacement for degenerative bioprosthetic surgical valves: results from the global valve-in-valve registry. Circulation. (2012) 126:2335–44. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.104505
    1. Schmidt T, Frerker C, Alessandrini H, Schlüter M, Kreidel F, Schäfer U, et al. . Redo TAVI: initial experience at two German centres. Eurointervention. (2016) 12:875–82. 10.4244/EIJV12I7A144
    1. Barbanti M, Webb JG, Tamburino C, Van Mieghem NM, Makkar RR, Piazza N, et al. . Outcomes of redo transcatheter aortic valve replacement for the treatment of postprocedural and late occurrence of paravalvular regurgitation and transcatheter valve failure. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. (2016) 9:1–10. 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.116.003930
    1. Smith CR, Leon MB, Mack MJ, Miller DC, Moses JW, Svensson LG, et al. . Transcatheter versus surgical aortic-valve replacement in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med. (2011) 364:2187–98. 10.1056/NEJMoa1103510
    1. Adams DH, Popma JJ, Reardon MJ, Yakubov SJ, Coselli JS, Deeb GM, et al. . Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement with a self-expanding prosthesis. N Engl J Med. (2014) 370:1790–8. 10.1056/NEJMoa1400590
    1. Tuzcu EM, Kapadia SR, Vemulapalli S, Carroll JD, Holmes DR, Mack MJ, et al. . Transcatheter aortic valve replacement of failed surgically implanted bioprostheses: the STS/ACC registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. (2018) 72:370–82. 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.04.074
    1. Gurvitch R, Cheung A, Bedogni F, Webb JG. Coronary obstruction following transcatheter aortic valve-in-valve implantation for failed surgical bioprostheses. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. (2011) 77:439–44. 10.1002/ccd.22861
    1. Ribeiro HB, Rodés-Cabau J, Blanke P, Leipsic J, Kwan Park J, Bapat V, et al. . Incidence, predictors, and clinical outcomes of coronary obstruction following transcatheter aortic valve replacement for degenerative bioprosthetic surgical valves: Insights from the VIVID registry. Eur Heart J. (2018) 39:687–95. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx455
    1. Ribeiro HB, Webb JG, Makkar RR, Cohen MG, Kapadia SR, Kodali S, et al. . Predictive factors, management, and clinical outcomes of coronary obstruction following transcatheter aortic valve implantation: Insights from a large multicenter registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. (2013) 62:1552–62. 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.07.040
    1. Ribeiro HB, Nombela-Franco L, Allende R, Urena M, Amat-Santos I, Pasian S, et al. Coronary obstruction following transcatheter aortic valve implantation for degenerative bioprosthetic surgical valves: a systematic literature review. Rev Bras Cardiol Invasiva. (2013) 21:311–8. 10.1016/S2214-1235(15)30152-6
    1. Dvir D, Leipsic J, Blanke P, Ribeiro HB, Kornowski R, Pichard A, et al. . Coronary obstruction in transcatheter aortic valve-in-valve implantation. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. (2015) 8:1–10. 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.114.002079
    1. Jabbour RJ, Tanaka A, Finkelstein A, Mack M, Tamburino C, Van Mieghem N, et al. . Delayed coronary obstruction after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol. (2018) 71:1513–24. 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.01.066
    1. Bapat V, Mydin I, Chadalavada S, Tehrani H, Attia R, Thomas M. A guide to fluoroscopic identification and design of bioprosthetic valves: a reference for valve-in-valve procedure. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. (2013) 81:853–61. 10.1002/ccd.24419
    1. Blanke P, Soon J, Dvir D, Park JK, Naoum C, Kueh SH, et al. . Computed tomography assessment for transcatheter aortic valve in valve implantation: the vancouver approach to predict anatomical risk for coronary obstruction and other considerations. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. (2016) 10:491–9. 10.1016/j.jcct.2016.09.004
    1. Chakravarty T, Jilaihawi H, Nakamura M, Kashif M, Kar S, Cheng W, et al. . Pre-emptive positioning of a coronary stent in the left anterior descending artery for left main protection: a prerequisite for transcatheter aortic valve-in-valve implantation for failing stentless bioprostheses? Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. (2013) 82:630–6. 10.1002/ccd.25037
    1. Fernandez Gonzalez L, Blanco Mata R, Garcia San Roman K, Alcibar Villa J. Emergent chimney stent to treat left main occlusion following valve-in-valve transfemoral aortic implantation chimney stent following valve-in-valve TAVI. Am J Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. (2018) 3:1–2. 10.15226/2573-864X/3/1/00135
    1. Khan JM, Dvir D, Greenbaum AB, Babaliaros VC, Rogers T, Aldea G, et al. . Transcatheter laceration of aortic leaflets to prevent coronary obstruction during transcatheter aortic valve replacement: concept to first-in-human. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. (2018) 11:677–89. 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.01.247
    1. Medicine C go. B (MD): NL of (US) (2000). Identifier NCT03381989 B or NASIL to PICAO (BASILICA) PI 2018. Available online at:

Source: PubMed

3
S'abonner