Serial prophylactic exchange blood transfusion in pregnant women with sickle cell disease (TAPS-2): study protocol for a randomised controlled feasibility trial

Laura L Oakley, Moji Awogbade, Sarah Brien, Annette Briley, Maria Chorozoglou, Emma Drasar, Jemma Johns, Elizabeth Rhodes, Vicky Robinson, Paul Seed, Joseph Sharif, Claire Singh, Paul Telfer, Hilary Thompson, Ingrid Watt-Coote, Jo Howard, Eugene Oteng-Ntim, Laura L Oakley, Moji Awogbade, Sarah Brien, Annette Briley, Maria Chorozoglou, Emma Drasar, Jemma Johns, Elizabeth Rhodes, Vicky Robinson, Paul Seed, Joseph Sharif, Claire Singh, Paul Telfer, Hilary Thompson, Ingrid Watt-Coote, Jo Howard, Eugene Oteng-Ntim

Abstract

Background: Pregnancies in women with sickle cell disease (SCD) are associated with a higher risk of sickle and pregnancy complications. Limited options exist for treating SCD during pregnancy. Serial prophylactic exchange blood transfusion (SPEBT) has been shown to be effective in treating SCD outside pregnancy, but evidence is lacking regarding its use during pregnancy. The aim of this study is to assess the feasibility and acceptability of conducting a future phase 3 randomised controlled trial (RCT) to establish the clinical and cost effectiveness of SPEBT in pregnant women with SCD.

Methods: The study is an individually randomised, two-arm, feasibility trial with embedded qualitative and health economic studies. Fifty women, 18 years of age and older, with SCD and a singleton pregnancy at ≤ 18 weeks' gestation will be recruited from six hospitals in England. Randomisation will be conducted using a secure online database and minimised by centre, SCD genotype and maternal age. Women allocated to the intervention arm will receive SPEBT commencing at ≤ 18 weeks' gestation, performed using automated erythrocytapheresis every 6-10 weeks until the end of pregnancy, aiming to maintain HbS% or combined HbS/HbC% below 30%. Women in the standard care arm will only receive transfusion when clinically indicated. The primary outcome will be the recruitment rate. Additional endpoints include reasons for refusal to participate, attrition rate, protocol adherence, and maternal and neonatal outcomes. Women will be monitored throughout pregnancy to assess maternal, sickle, and foetal complications. Detailed information about adverse events (including hospital admission) and birth outcomes will be extracted from medical records and via interview at 6 weeks postpartum. An embedded qualitative study will consist of interviews with (a) 15-25 trial participants to assess experiences and acceptability, (b) 5-15 women who decline to participate to identify barriers to recruitment and (c) 15-20 clinical staff to explore fidelity and acceptability. A health economic study will inform a future cost effectiveness and cost-utility analysis.

Discussion: This feasibility study aims to rigorously evaluate SPEBT as a treatment for SCD in pregnancy and its impact on maternal and infant outcomes.

Trial registration: NIH registry (www.clinicaltrials.gov), registration number NCT03975894 (registered 05/06/19); ISRCTN (www.isrctn.com), registration number ISRCTN52684446 (retrospectively registered 02/08/19).

Keywords: Sickle cell disease, Pregnancy, Blood transfusion, Feasibility, Randomised controlled trial, Economic evaluation, Qualitative.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study flowchart
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Schedule of enrolment, interventions, and assessments for TAPS2

References

    1. Piel FB, Steinberg MH, Rees DC. Sickle cell disease. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(16):1561–1573. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1510865.
    1. Ware RE, de Montalembert M, Tshilolo L, Abboud MR. Sickle cell disease. Lancet. 2017;390(10091):311–323. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30193-9.
    1. Oteng-Ntim E, Ayensah B, Knight M, Howard J. Pregnancy outcome in patients with sickle cell disease in the UK–a national cohort study comparing sickle cell anaemia (H b SS) with H b SC disease. Br J Haematol. 2015;169(1):129–137. doi: 10.1111/bjh.13270.
    1. Oteng-Ntim E, Meeks D, Seed PT, Webster L, Howard J, Doyle P, Chappell LC. Adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes in pregnant women with sickle cell disease: systematic review and meta-analysis. Blood. 2015;125(21):3316–3325. doi: 10.1182/blood-2014-11-607317.
    1. Piel FB, Patil AP, Howes RE, Nyangiri OA, Gething PW, Dewi M, Temperley WH, Williams TN, Weatherall DJ, Hay SI. Global epidemiology of sickle haemoglobin in neonates: a contemporary geostatistical model-based map and population estimates. Lancet. 2013;381(9861):142–151. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61229-X.
    1. Public Health England . NHS sickle cell and thalassaemia screening programme, data report 2016 to 2017: trends and performance analysis. London: Public Health England; 2018.
    1. Oteng-Ntim E, Howard J. Management of sickle cell disease in pregnancy (RCOG Green-top Guideline) London: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists; 2011.
    1. Willits I, Cole H, Jones R, Carter K, Arber M, Jenks M, Craig J, Sims A. Spectra Optia® for automated red blood cell exchange in patients with sickle cell disease: a NICE medical technology guidance. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2017;15(4):455–468. doi: 10.1007/s40258-016-0302-x.
    1. Okusanya BO, Oladapo OT. Prophylactic versus selective blood transfusion for sickle cell disease in pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;12:CD010378.
    1. Koshy M, Burd L, Wallace D, Moawad A, Baron J. Prophylactic red-cell transfusions in pregnant patients with sickle cell disease. N Engl J Med. 1988;319(22):1447–1452. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198812013192204.
    1. Malinowski AK, Shehata N, D'Souza R, Kuo KH, Ward R, Shah PS, Murphy K. Prophylactic transfusion for pregnant women with sickle cell disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Blood. 2015;126(21):2424–2435. doi: 10.1182/blood-2015-06-649319.
    1. Benites BD, Benevides TCL, Valente IS, Marques JF, Jr, Gilli SCO, Saad STO. The effects of exchange transfusion for prevention of complications during pregnancy of sickle hemoglobin C disease patients. Transfusion. 2016;56(1):119–124. doi: 10.1111/trf.13280.
    1. Malinowski AK, Parrish J, Shehata N, Ward R, Kuo KH. Approach to transfusion in pregnant women with sickle cell disease: a survey of physicians. Br J Haematol. 2017;183(3):516–519. doi: 10.1111/bjh.14993.
    1. Dolan P, Gudex C, Kind P, Williams A. A social tariff for EuroQol: results from a UK general population survey. Working Papers 138chedp. York: Centre for Health Economics, University of York; 1995.
    1. O’Cathain A, Hoddinott P, Lewin S, Thomas KJ, Young B, Adamson J, Jansen YJ, Mills N, Moore G, Donovan JL. Maximising the impact of qualitative research in feasibility studies for randomised controlled trials: guidance for researchers. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2015;1(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s40814-015-0026-y.
    1. Eldridge SM, Chan CL, Campbell MJ, Bond CM, Hopewell S, Thabane L, Lancaster GA. CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2016;2(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s40814-016-0105-8.
    1. Howard J, Malfroy M, Llewelyn C, Choo L, Hodge R, Johnson T, Purohit S, Rees DC, Tillyer L, Walker I, et al. The transfusion alternatives preoperatively in sickle cell disease (TAPS) study: a randomised, controlled, multicentre clinical trial. Lancet. 2013;381(9870):930–938. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61726-7.
    1. Lee MT, Piomelli S, Granger S, Miller ST, Harkness S, Brambilla DJ, Adams RJ. Stroke prevention trial in sickle cell anemia (STOP): extended follow-up and final results. Blood. 2006;108(3):847–852. doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-10-009506.

Source: PubMed

3
S'abonner