Smartphone Apps Targeting Alcohol and Illicit Substance Use: Systematic Search in in Commercial App Stores and Critical Content Analysis

Babak Tofighi, Chemi Chemi, Jose Ruiz-Valcarcel, Paul Hein, Lu Hu, Babak Tofighi, Chemi Chemi, Jose Ruiz-Valcarcel, Paul Hein, Lu Hu

Abstract

Background: Smartphone apps promise to enhance the reach of evidence-based interventions (cognitive behavior therapy, contingency management and therapeutic education system) for populations with substance use disorders, with minimal disruption to health systems. However, further studies are needed to systematically evaluate smartphone apps targeting alcohol and illicit substances.

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the functionality, aesthetics, and quality of information of free or low-cost apps claiming to target alcohol, benzodiazepine, cocaine, crack/cocaine, crystal methamphetamine, and heroin use using the validated Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS) and critical content analysis.

Methods: A systematic search of iTunes and Google Play app stores for free or low-cost apps facilitating recovery was conducted in March 2018 and yielded 904 apps using the keywords described in previous studies (eg, recovery, sobriety, sober, alcohol, and heroin). An interdisciplinary team of clinicians, behavioral informatics, and public health reviewers trained in substance use disorders conducted a descriptive analysis of 74 apps categorized as reducing use. In addition to the MARS scale, a descriptive analysis of relevant apps was conducted by the study team to assess for quality indicators emphasized by expert guidelines and review articles.

Results: Most apps (n=74) claimed to reduce use or promote abstinence and yielded an overall low median MARS score of 2.82 (0.55) and a wide range of scores (1.64, 4.20). Ratings were also low for engagement (2.75 (0.72)), functionality (3.64 (0.78)), aesthetics (3.03 (0.87)), information (2.82 (0.62)), and satisfaction (1.76 (0.67)) subdomains. Innovative design and content features elicited in the review included initial assessments of substance use following app download, tracking substance use, and related consequences (eg, cost or calorie intake), remote and proximate peer support per geospatial positioning, and allowing users and family members of individuals with substance use disorders to locate 12-step meetings, treatment programs, and mental health services. Few apps integrated evidence-based psychotherapeutic (eg, cognitive behavioral therapy [CBT] or motivational interviewing) and pharmacologic interventions (eg, naloxone or buprenorphine).

Conclusions: Few commercially available apps yielded in our search integrated evidence-based interventions (eg, extended-release naltrexone, buprenorphine, naloxone, Self-Management and Recovery Training recovery, or CBT), and a concerning number of apps promoted harmful drinking and illicit substance use.

Keywords: alcohol abuse; mHealth; mobile health; substance use disorder.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

©Babak Tofighi, Chemi Chemi, Jose Ruiz-Valcarcel, Paul Hein, Lu Hu. Originally published in JMIR Mhealth and Uhealth (http://mhealth.jmir.org), 22.04.2019.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram for smartphone app selection.

References

    1. Whittaker R, McRobbie H, Bullen C, Rodgers A, Gu Y. Mobile phone-based interventions for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 10;4:CD006611. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006611.pub4.
    1. Gustafson DH, McTavish FM, Chih M, Atwood AK, Johnson RA, Boyle MG, Levy MS, Driscoll H, Chisholm SM, Dillenburg L, Isham A, Shah D. A smartphone application to support recovery from alcoholism: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Psychiatry. 2014 May;71(5):566–72. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.4642. 1847578
    1. Brendryen H, Kraft P. Happy ending: a randomized controlled trial of a digital multi-media smoking cessation intervention. Addiction. 2008 Mar;103(3):478–84; discussion 485. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2007.02119.x.ADD2119
    1. Tofighi B, Nicholson JM, McNeely J, Muench F, Lee JD. Mobile phone messaging for illicit drug and alcohol dependence: a systematic review of the literature. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2017 Dec;36(4):477–91. doi: 10.1111/dar.12535. doi: 10.1111/dar.12535.
    1. Smith A. Pew Research Center. 2017. [2019-03-15]. Record Shares of Americans Now Own Smartphones, Have Home Broadband
    1. Quanbeck AR, Gustafson DH, Marsch LA, McTavish F, Brown RT, Mares M, Johnson R, Glass JE, Atwood AK, McDowell H. Integrating addiction treatment into primary care using mobile health technology: protocol for an implementation research study. Implement Sci. 2014 May 29;9:65. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-9-65. 1748-5908-9-65
    1. Fowler LA, Holt SL, Joshi D. Mobile technology-based interventions for adult users of alcohol: a systematic review of the literature. Addict Behav. 2016 Nov;62:25–34. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.06.008.S0306-4603(16)30213-1
    1. Marsch LA. Leveraging technology to enhance addiction treatment and recovery. J Addict Dis. 2012;31(3):313–8. doi: 10.1080/10550887.2012.694606.
    1. IQVIA. 2017. Nov 7, [2019-03-13]. The Growing Value of Digital Health .
    1. Duncan LG, Mendoza S, Hansen H. Buprenorphine maintenance for opioid dependence in public sector healthcare: benefits and barriers. J Addict Med Ther Sci. 2015;1(2):31–36. doi: 10.17352/2455-3484.000008. doi: 10.17352/2455-3484.000008.
    1. Penzenstadler L, Chatton A, Van Singer M, Khazaal Y. Quality of smartphone apps related to alcohol use disorder. Eur Addict Res. 2016;22(6):329–38. doi: 10.1159/000449097.000449097
    1. Weaver ER, Horyniak DR, Jenkinson R, Dietze P, Lim MS. “Let's get wasted!” and other apps: characteristics, acceptability, and use of alcohol-related smartphone applications. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2013;1(1):e9. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.2709. v1i1e9
    1. Tofighi B, Leonard N, Greco P, Hadavand A, Acosta MC, Lee JD. Technology use patterns among patients enrolled in inpatient detoxification treatment. J Addict Med. 2018 Dec 20; doi: 10.1097/ADM.0000000000000494. doi: 10.1097/ADM.0000000000000494.
    1. Lupton D, Jutel A. Soc Sci Med. 2015. [2019-03-13]. 'It's like having a physician in your pocket!' A critical analysis of self-diagnosis smartphone apps .
    1. Ramo DE, Popova L, Grana R, Zhao S, Chavez K. Cannabis mobile apps: a content analysis. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2015 Aug 12;3(3):e81. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.4405. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.4405.v3i3e81
    1. Bindhim NF, Naicker S, Freeman B, Mcgeechan K, Trevena L. Apps promoting illicit drugs—a need for tighter regulation? J Con Health Internet. 2014 Feb 24;18(1):31–43. doi: 10.1080/15398285.2014.869166. doi: 10.1080/15398285.2014.869166.
    1. Grundy QH, Wang Z, Bero LA. Challenges in assessing mobile health app quality: a systematic review of prevalent and innovative methods. Am J Prev Med. 2016 Dec;51(6):1051–9. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.07.009.S0749-3797(16)30257-4
    1. Stoyanov SR, Hides L, Kavanagh DJ, Zelenko O, Tjondronegoro D, Mani M. Mobile app rating scale: a new tool for assessing the quality of health mobile apps. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2015;3(1):e27. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.3422. v3i1e27
    1. Jahns RG. Research2Guidance. 2015. Jan 1, [2019-03-13]. 500m people will be using healthcare mobile applications in 2015
    1. Saitz R, Cheng DM, Winter M, Kim TW, Meli SM, Allensworth-Davies D, Lloyd-Travaglini CA, Samet JH. Chronic care management for dependence on alcohol and other drugs: the AHEAD randomized trial. J Am Med Assoc. 2013 Sep 18;310(11):1156–67. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.277609. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.277609.1738895
    1. Weiss RD, Potter JS, Provost SE, Huang Z, Jacobs P, Hasson A, Lindblad R, Connery HS, Prather K, Ling W. A multi-site, two-phase, Prescription Opioid Addiction Treatment Study (POATS): rationale, design, and methodology. Contemp Clin Trials. 2010 Mar;31(2):189–99. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2010.01.003. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2010.01.003.S1551-7144(10)00006-6
    1. Tofighi B, Grossman E, Bereket S. Text message content preferences to improve buprenorphine maintenance treatment in primary care. J Addict Dis. 2016;35(2):92–100. doi: 10.1080/10550887.2015.1127716.
    1. Galanter M. Spirituality and recovery in 12-step programs: an empirical model. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2007 Oct;33(3):265–72. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2007.04.016. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2007.04.016.S0740-5472(07)00186-9
    1. Volkow ND, Collins FS. The role of science in addressing the opioid crisis. N Engl J Med. 2017 Jul 27;377(4):391–4. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsr1706626. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsr1706626.
    1. Tinschert P, Jakob R, Barata F, Kramer J, Kowatsch T. The potential of mobile apps for improving asthma self-management: a review of publicly available and well-adopted asthma apps. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2017 Aug 2;5(8):e113. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.7177. v5i8e113
    1. Athilingam P, Jenkins B. Mobile phone apps to support heart failure self-care management: integrative review. JMIR Cardio. 2018 May 2;2(1):e10057. doi: 10.2196/10057. doi: 10.2196/10057.
    1. Adam A, Hellig J, Perera M, Bolton D, Lawrentschuk N. 'Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator' mobile applications (apps): a systematic review and scoring using the validated user version of the Mobile Application Rating Scale (uMARS) World J Urol. 2018 Apr;36(4):565–73. doi: 10.1007/s00345-017-2150-1.10.1007/s00345-017-2150-1
    1. Mani M, Kavanagh DJ, Hides L, Stoyanov SR. Review and evaluation of mindfulness-based iPhone apps. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2015;3(3):e82. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.4328. v3i3e82
    1. BinDhim NF, Hawkey A, Trevena L. A systematic review of quality assessment methods for smartphone health apps. Telemed J E Health. 2015 Feb;21(2):97–104. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2014.0088.
    1. Dallery J, Jarvis B, Marsch L, Xie H. Mechanisms of change associated with technology-based interventions for substance use. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2015 May 1;150:14–23. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2015.02.036. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2015.02.036.S0376-8716(15)00139-8
    1. National Institute on Drug Abuse . Principles Of Drug Addiction Treatment: A Research-based Guide: Third Edition. Bethesda, Maryland: Createspace Independent Publishing Platform; 2018.
    1. Volkow ND. Medications for opioid use disorder: bridging the gap in care. Lancet. 2018 Dec 27;391(10118):285–7. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32893-3. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32893-3.S0140-6736(17)32893-3
    1. Lee JD, Vocci F, Fiellin DA. Unobserved. J Addict Med. 2014;8(5):299–308. doi: 10.1097/ADM.0000000000000059.01271255-201409000-00002
    1. Lee JD, Grossman E, Huben L, Manseau M, McNeely J, Rotrosen J, Stevens D, Gourevitch MN. Extended-release naltrexone plus medical management alcohol treatment in primary care: findings at 15 months. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2012 Dec;43(4):458–62. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2012.08.012. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2012.08.012.S0740-5472(12)00147-X
    1. Anderson P, Scott E. The effect of general practitioners' advice to heavy drinking men. Br J Addict. 1992 Jun;87(6):891–900. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1992.tb01984.x. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1992.tb01984.x.
    1. Spivak K, Sanchez-Craig M, Davila R. Assisting problem drinkers to change on their own: effect of specific and non-specific advice. Addiction. 1994 Sep;89(9):1135–42. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1994.tb02790.x. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1994.tb02790.x.
    1. Kelly PJ, Deane FP, Baker AL. Group cohesion and between session homework activities predict self-reported cognitive-behavioral skill use amongst participants of SMART Recovery groups. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2015 Apr;51:53–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2014.10.008. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2014.10.008.S0740-5472(14)00219-0
    1. . [2019-03-15].
    1. Crane D, Garnett C, Brown J, West R, Michie S. Behavior change techniques in popular alcohol reduction apps: content analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17(5):e118. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4060. v17i5e118
    1. Masterson Creber RM, Maurer M, Reading M, Hiraldo G, Hickey K, Iribarren S. Review and analysis of existing mobile phone apps to support heart failure symptom monitoring and self-care management using the Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS) JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2016 Jun 14;4(2):e74. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.5882. v4i2e74
    1. Gonzalez VM, Dulin PL. Comparison of a smartphone app for alcohol use disorders with an internet-based intervention plus bibliotherapy: a pilot study. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2015 Apr;83(2):335–45. doi: 10.1037/a0038620.2015-02676-001
    1. Dulin PL, Gonzalez VM. Smartphone-based, momentary intervention for alcohol cravings amongst individuals with an alcohol use disorder. Psychol Addict Behav. 2017 Dec;31(5):601–7. doi: 10.1037/adb0000292. doi: 10.1037/adb0000292.2017-30264-001
    1. Shuren J, Patel B, Gottlieb S. FDA regulation of mobile medical apps. J Am Med Assoc. 2018 Jul 24;320(4):337–8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.8832.2687221
    1. BinDhim NF, Freeman B, Trevena L. Pro-smoking apps for smartphones: the latest vehicle for the tobacco industry? Tob Control. 2014 Jan;23(1):e4. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050598.tobaccocontrol-2012-050598
    1. Steinberg J. Inc Magazine. 2018. Feb 1, [2019-03-13]. Google removed 700,000 problematic apps From its android play store in 2017 .
    1. Kellogg S, Kreek MJ. On blending practice and research: the search for commonalities in substance abuse treatment. Subst Abus. 2006 Jun;27(1-2):9–24. doi: 10.1300/J465v27n01_03. doi: 10.1300/J465v27n01_03.
    1. Tofighi B, Grossman E, Sherman S, Nunes EV, Lee JD. Mobile Phone Messaging During Unobserved. J Addict Med. 2016;10(5):309–13. doi: 10.1097/ADM.0000000000000198.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors et collaborateurs

Les conditions médicales

Interventions en matière de drogue

3
S'abonner