Techniques of facial nerve block

F Schimek, M Fahle, F Schimek, M Fahle

Abstract

The efficacy of different techniques of facial nerve block for cataract surgery was investigated. Forty four patients underwent either modified O'Brien, Atkinson, van Lint, or lid blocks. Intentional muscle activity of the orbicularis oculi muscle was recorded and the area under the EMG curve calculated for quantitative comparison of muscle activity between the groups before and after injection of lignocaine with the vasoconstrictor naphazoline nitrate. In addition, the force of lid closure was measured and lid motility determined on a subjective score scale. Whereas the modified O'Brien and lid blocks nearly abolished the muscle activity recorded in the EMG (p < 0.003), the Atkinson and van Lint blocks did not significantly affect these variables. The O'Brien and lid blocks decreased the force of lid closure and lid movements far more effectively than the Atkinson and van Lint blocks (p < 0.0001). The topographic distribution of a mixture of metrizamide and lignocaine solutions was evaluated radiographically in eight additional patients, to assess potential causes for differences in the efficacy of the block techniques. The radiological results showed involvement of the region of the facial nerve trunk and its temporal and cervical divisions by the modified O'Brien block. The lid block, on the other hand, affected terminal branches of the facial nerve's temporal division. In this study, complete lid akinesia was achieved by both the modified O'Brien block and the lid block. However, because the modified O'Brien block involves the risk of neural injury to the facial nerve or its main divisions, the lid block is recommended as the most effective and safe method to achieve akinesia of the orbicularis oculi muscle.

References

    1. Am J Ophthalmol. 1963 Jan;55:143-6
    1. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1979 Apr;23(2):127-36
    1. Br J Ophthalmol. 1954 Sep;38(9):560-6
    1. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1956 Apr;102(4):385-412
    1. Am J Ophthalmol. 1961 Jan;51:1-14
    1. Arch Ophthalmol. 1986 Aug;104(8):1114-5
    1. Arch Ophthalmol. 1985 Oct;103(10):1454, 1456
    1. Am J Ophthalmol. 1953 Sep;36(9):1255-8
    1. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1977;21(3):182-8
    1. Arch Ophthalmol. 1986 Aug;104(8):1115
    1. Can J Anaesth. 1993 Nov;40(11):1028-33
    1. Ophthalmic Surg. 1976 Spring;7(1):105-9
    1. Arch Otolaryngol. 1971 Jan;93(1):29-33
    1. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol. 1956 May-Jun;60(3):376-80
    1. Anaesthesia. 1993 May;48(5):428-31
    1. Ophthalmology. 1990 Nov;97(11):1499-501
    1. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1968;66:746-87
    1. Mayo Clin Proc. 1968 Apr;43(4):297-305
    1. Am J Ophthalmol. 1964 Jan;57:144-5
    1. J Anat. 1948 Jul;82(Pt 3):183-186.1
    1. Anesthesiology. 1960 Mar-Apr;21:178-85
    1. J Physiol. 1952 Aug;117(4):492-9
    1. Br J Ophthalmol. 1946 Nov;30(11):668-75
    1. Fortschr Ophthalmol. 1990;87(6):696-702
    1. Ophthalmic Surg. 1992 Jun;23(6):414-7
    1. Arch Ophthalmol. 1986 Mar;104(3):337

Source: PubMed

3
S'abonner