Long-Term Results of Cultured Limbal Stem Cell Versus Limbal Tissue Transplantation in Stage III Limbal Deficiency

Vincent M Borderie, Djida Ghoubay, Cristina Georgeon, Marie Borderie, Céline de Sousa, Anne Legendre, Hélène Rouard, Vincent M Borderie, Djida Ghoubay, Cristina Georgeon, Marie Borderie, Céline de Sousa, Anne Legendre, Hélène Rouard

Abstract

We aimed to evaluate efficiency and safety of transplantation of limbal stem cells (LSC) cultured on human amniotic membrane with no feeders and to compare cultured LSC with limbal tissue transplantation. Thirty eyes with stage III LSC deficiency were treated with autologous (autoLSC) or allogeneic (alloLSC) cultured LSC transplantation (prospective phase II clinical trial; average follow-up time, 72 months) or autologous (autoLT) or allogeneic (alloLT) limbal tissue transplantation (retrospective control group; average follow-up time, 132 months) between 1993 and 2014. The 5-year graft survival defined by absence of recurrence of the clinical signs of limbal deficiency was 71% for autoLSC, 0% for alloLSC, 75% for autoLT, and 33% for alloLT. Visual acuity improved by 9.2 lines for autoLSC and 3.3 lines for autoLT. It decreased by 0.7 lines for alloLSC and 1.9 lines for alloLT. Adverse events were recorded in 1/7 autoLSC, 7/7 alloLSC, 6/8 autoLT, and 8/8 alloLT patients. Corneal epithelial defect was the only adverse event recorded after autoLSC, whereas severe sight-threatening adverse events were recorded in the remaining three groups. Compared with failed grafts, successful grafts featured greater decrease in fluorescein staining, greater superficial vascularization-free corneal area, lower variability of the corneal epithelial thickness, and higher corneal epithelial basal cell density. Autologous cultured LSC transplantation was associated with high long-term survival and dramatic improvement in vision and was very safe. Autologous limbal tissue transplantation resulted in similar efficiency but was less safe. Cadaver allogeneic grafts resulted in low long-term success rate and high prevalence of serious adverse events. Stem Cells Translational Medicine 2019;8:1230&1241.

Keywords: Adverse events; Cornea; Limbal stem cell; Survival; Transplantation; Visual acuity.

Conflict of interest statement

V.M.B. declared consultant/advisory role with Chiesi (Parma, Italy; consulting), Dompe (Milan, Italy; consulting), and Optovue (Fremont, CA; consulting). The other authors indicated no potential conflicts of interest.

© 2019 The Authors. Stem Cells Translational Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of AlphaMed Press.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Morphometric analysis of slit‐lamp images of a patient with stage III limbal stem cell deficiency before (A–D) and 36 months after transplantation of autologous limbal stem cells cultured on human amniotic membrane (E–H). The corneal area free of superficial vessels (C, G) was measured with ImageJ software using the green channel of the native bright light slit‐lamp photograph (A, E). The green channel (D, H) of the native blue cobalt slit‐lamp photograph (B, F) was used to assess fluorescein staining. LSC transplantation was successful in this eye. Visual acuity improved from 20/3,991 preoperatively to 20/50 36 months after transplantation (+19 lines), fluorescein staining decreased from 97.7 to 22.3, and the corneal area free of superficial vessels increased from 21% to 74% of the total corneal area.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Survival of the transplanted epithelium after LSC transplantation. The primary outcome measure was defined as absence of recurrence of the clinical signs of LSC deficiency (opacification of the corneal epithelium, irregularity of the corneal epithelium with late fluorescein staining, superficial corneal vascularization) in the central cornea. Survival was significantly better for autografts than allografts, whereas no significant differences were found between limbal tissue grafts and cultured LSC grafts. Abbreviations: alloLSC, allogeneic cultured LSC transplantation; alloLT, allogeneic limbal tissue transplantation; autoLSC, autologous cultured LSC transplantation; autoLT, autologous limbal tissue transplantation; LSC, limbal stem cell.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Change in visual acuity as a function of postoperative time point in 30 eyes with stage III limbal deficiency treated with transplantation of limbal stem cells. Overall vision improved after transplantation (A). From baseline to last visit, visual acuity improved by an average of 9.2 lines in the autoLSC group and 3.3 lines in the autoLT group, whereas it decreased by 0.7 lines in the alloLSC group and 1.9 lines in the alloLT group (B). Abbreviations: LogMAR, logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution; LSC, limbal stem cell.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Subjective score (A), Schirmer test (B), fluorescein staining (C), and superficial vascularization‐free corneal area (D) as function of postoperative time point after cultured LSC transplantation. The subjective score was calculated as the mean of quantitative evaluations of redness, pain, itching, foreign body sensation, and blurred vision. Fluorescein staining was assessed with blue cobalt slit‐lamp images as the mean grayscale level of the green channel. We show the change in fluorescein staining from baseline. This decreased with postoperative time in the autoLSC group but not in the alloLSC group. Superficial vascularization‐free corneal area was assessed with the green channel of white slit‐lamp image. We show the percentage of the corneal area that was free of superficial vascularization. Abbreviation: LSC, limbal stem cell.

References

    1. Le Q, Xu J, Deng SX. The diagnosis of limbal stem cell deficiency. Ocul Surf 2018;16:58–69.
    1. Dua HS, Azuara‐Blanco A. Limbal stem cells of the corneal epithelium. Surv Ophthalmol 2000;44:415–425.
    1. Pellegrini G, Traverso CE, Franzi AT et al. Long‐term restoration of damaged corneal surfaces with autologous cultivated corneal epithelium. Lancet 1997;349:990–993.
    1. Tsai RJ, Li LM, Chen JK. Reconstruction of damaged corneas by transplantation of autologous limbal epithelial cells. N Engl J Med 2000;343:86–93.
    1. Schwab IR. Cultured corneal epithelia for ocular surface disease. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 1999;97:891–986.
    1. Ghoubay‐Benallaoua D, Basli E, Goldschmidt P et al. Human epithelial cell cultures from superficial limbal explants. Mol Vis 2011;17:341–354.
    1. Ghoubay‐Benallaoua D, Sandali O, Goldschmidt P et al. Kinetics of expansion of human limbal epithelial progenitors in primary culture of explants with no feeders. PLoS One 2013;8:e81965.
    1. Deng SX, Borderie V, Chan CC et al. Global consensus on definition, classification, diagnosis, and staging of limbal stem cell deficiency. Cornea 2019;38:364–375.
    1. Kenyon KR, Tseng SC. Limbal autograft transplantation for ocular surface disorders. Ophthalmology 1989;96:709–722.
    1. Moldovan SM, Borderie V, Baudrimont M et al. Treatment of unilateral limbal stem cell deficiency syndrome by limbal autograft. J Fr Ophtalmol 1999;22:302–309.
    1. Tan DT, Ficker LA, Buckley RJ. Limbal transplantation. Ophthalmology 1996;103:29–36.
    1. Holland EJ. Epithelial transplantation for the management of severe ocular surface disease. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 1996;94:677–743.
    1. Sangwan VS, Basu S, Vemuganti GK et al. Clinical outcomes of xeno‐free autologous cultivated limbal epithelial transplantation: A 10‐year study. Br J Ophthalmol 2011;95:1525–1529.
    1. Rama P, Matuska S, Paganoni G et al. Limbal stem‐cell therapy and long‐term corneal regeneration. N Engl J Med 2010;363:147–155.
    1. Sejpal K, Ali MH, Maddileti S et al. Cultivated limbal epithelial transplantation in children with ocular surface burns. JAMA Ophthalmol 2013;131:731–736.
    1. Dua HS, Azuara‐Blanco A. Autologous limbal transplantation in patients with unilateral corneal stem cell deficiency. Br J Ophthalmol 2000;84:273–278.
    1. Pellegrini G, Rama P, Matuska S et al. Biological parameters determining the clinical outcome of autologous cultures of limbal stem cells. Regen Med 2013;8:553–567.
    1. Corradini F, Venturi B, Pellegrini G et al. Methods for characterization/manipulation of human corneal stem cells and their applications in regenerative medicine. Methods Mol Biol 2012;916:357–372.
    1. Sandali O, Gaujoux T, Goldschmidt P et al. Infectious keratitis in severe limbal stem cell deficiency. Ocul Immunol Inflamm 2012;20:182–189.
    1. Cheung AY, Sarnicola E, Eslani M et al. Infectious keratitis after ocular surface stem cell transplantation. Cornea 2018;37:1395–1399.
    1. Koizumi N, Inatomi T, Suzuki T et al. Cultivated corneal epithelial stem cell transplantation in ocular surface disorders. Ophthalmology 2001;108:1569–1574.
    1. Shimazaki J, Aiba M, Goto E et al. Transplantation of human limbal epithelium cultivated on amniotic membrane for the treatment of severe ocular surface disorders. Ophthalmology 2002;109:1285–1290.
    1. Shortt AJ, Secker GA, Rajan MS et al. Ex vivo expansion and transplantation of limbal epithelial stem cells. Ophthalmology 2008;115:1989–1997.
    1. Shortt AJ, Bunce C, Levis HJ et al. Three‐year outcomes of cultured limbal epithelial allografts in aniridia and Stevens‐Johnson syndrome evaluated using the Clinical Outcome Assessment in Surgical Trials assessment tool. Stem Cells Translational Medicine 2014;3:265–275.
    1. Huang T, Wang Y, Zhang H et al. Limbal allografting from living‐related donors to treat partial limbal deficiency secondary to ocular chemical burns. Arch Ophthalmol 2011;129:1267–1273.
    1. Basu S, Fernandez MM, Das S et al. Clinical outcomes of xeno‐free allogeneic cultivated limbal epithelial transplantation for bilateral limbal stem cell deficiency. Br J Ophthalmol 2012;96:1504–1509.
    1. Miri A, Al‐Deiri B, Dua HS. Long‐term outcomes of autolimbal and allolimbal transplants. Ophthalmology 2010;117:1207–1213.
    1. Holland EJ, Mogilishetty G, Skeens HM et al. Systemic immunosuppression in ocular surface stem cell transplantation: Results of a 10‐year experience. Cornea 2012;31:655–661.
    1. Qi X, Xie L, Cheng J et al. Characteristics of immune rejection after allogeneic cultivated limbal epithelial transplantation. Ophthalmology 2013;120:931–936.
    1. Ang AY, Chan CC, Biber JM et al. Ocular surface stem cell transplantation rejection: Incidence, characteristics, and outcomes. Cornea 2013;32:229–236.
    1. Banayan N, Georgeon C, Grieve K et al. Spectral domain optical coherence tomography in limbal stem cell deficiency. A case control study. Am J Ophthalmol 2018;190:179–190.
    1. Sangwan VS, Basu S, MacNeil S et al. Simple limbal epithelial transplantation (SLET): A novel surgical technique for the treatment of unilateral limbal stem cell deficiency. Br J Ophthalmol 2012;96:931–934.
    1. Basu S, Sureka SP, Shanbhag SS et al. Simple limbal epithelial transplantation: Long‐term clinical outcomes in 125 cases of unilateral chronic ocular surface burns. Ophthalmology 2016;123:1000–1010.
    1. Nakamura T, Inatomi T, Sotozono C et al. Transplantation of cultivated autologous oral mucosal epithelial cells in patients with severe ocular surface disorders. Br J Ophthalmol 2004;88:1280–1284.
    1. Nishida K, Yamato M, Hayashida Y et al. Corneal reconstruction with tissue‐engineered cell sheets composed of autologous oral mucosal epithelium. N Engl J Med 2004;351:1187–1196.

Source: PubMed

3
S'abonner