Signal Increase on Unenhanced T1-Weighted Images in the Rat Brain After Repeated, Extended Doses of Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agents: Comparison of Linear and Macrocyclic Agents

Gregor Jost, Diana Constanze Lenhard, Martin Andrew Sieber, Jessica Lohrke, Thomas Frenzel, Hubertus Pietsch, Gregor Jost, Diana Constanze Lenhard, Martin Andrew Sieber, Jessica Lohrke, Thomas Frenzel, Hubertus Pietsch

Abstract

Objectives: In this prospective preclinical study, we evaluated T1-weighted signal intensity in the deep cerebellar nuclei (CN) and globus pallidus (GP) up to 24 days after repeated administration of linear and macrocyclic gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) using homologous imaging and evaluation methods as in the recently published retrospective clinical studies. In a second part of the study, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) spaces were evaluated for contrast enhancement by fluid-attenuated magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Materials and methods: Sixty adult male Wistar-Han rats were randomly divided into a control and 5 GBCA groups (n = 10 per group). The administered GBCAs were gadodiamide, gadopentetate dimeglumine, and gadobenate dimeglumine (linear GBCAs) as well as gadobutrol and gadoterate meglumine (macrocyclic GBCAs) and saline (control). Over a period of 2 weeks, the animals received 10 intravenous injections at a dose of 2.5 mmol Gd/kg body weight, each on 5 consecutive days per week. Before GBCA administration, as well as 3 and 24 days after the last injection, a whole-brain MRI was performed using a standard T1-weighted 3-dimensional turbo spin echo sequence on a clinical 1.5 T scanner. The ratios of signal intensities in deep CN to pons (CN/Po) and GP to thalamus (GP/Th) were determined. For the evaluation of the CSF spaces, 18 additional rats were randomly divided into 6 groups (n = 3 per group) that received the same GBCAs as in the first part of the study. After MR cisternography for anatomical reference, a fluid-attenuated inversion recovery sequence was performed before and 1 minute after intravenous injection of a dose of 1 mmol Gd/kg body weight GBCA or saline.

Results: A significantly increased signal intensity ratio of CN/Po was observed 3 and 24 days after the last injection of gadodiamide and gadobenate dimeglumine. No significant changes were observed between the 2 time points. Gadopentetate dimeglumine injection led to a moderately elevated but statistically not significant CN/Po signal intensity ratio. No increased CN/Po signal intensity ratios were determined in the MRI scans of rats that received macrocyclic GBCAs gadobutrol and gadoterate meglumine or saline. The ratio of signal intensity in GP/Th was not elevated in any group injected with GBCAs or saline. Enhanced signal intensities of CSF spaces were observed in the postcontrast fluid-attenuated inversion recovery images of all animals receiving GBCAs but not for saline.

Conclusions: In this animal study in rats, increased signal intensity in the CN was found up to 24 days after multiple, extended doses of linear GBCAs. However, in contrast to clinical reports, the signal enhancement in the GP was not reproduced, demonstrating the limitations of this animal experiment. The elevated signal intensities remained persistent over the entire observation period. In contrast, no changes of signal intensities in either the CN or the GP were observed for macrocyclic GBCAs. However, all GBCAs investigated were able to pass the blood-CSF barrier in rats to a certain, not yet quantified extent.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest and sources of funding: HP, GJ, JL, MAS, and TF are empoyees of Bayer Pharma AG. DCL received a research grant from Bayer Pharma.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
A, Study setup and application scheme for GBCAs. Five consecutive daily intravenous injections (blue arrows) per week of 2.5 mmol GBCA/kg b.w. for 2 weeks were given to 10 animals per GBCA group. MRI scans (red arrows) were performed before (BL) GBCA application, and on day 15 (3 days p.i.) for 10 rats per group and on day 36 (24 days p.i.) of study initiation on 5 animals per group. On day 15 and on day 36, 5 rats each per GBCA group were euthanized for dissection. B and C, Examples of the positioning of the ROI for the signal intensity evaluation of deep CN and pons (Po) in B and of GP and thalamus (Th) in C.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Representative T1w MRI scans of CN in the cerebellum before (baseline, left column), at day 3 p.i. (middle column) and at day 24 p.i. (right column) with saline, gadobutrol, gadoterate meglumine, gadopentetate dimeglumine, gadobenate dimeglumine, and gadodiamide. Increased signal intensities of the CN are indicated by white arrows.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
A, Change over time for signal intensity ratios between deep CN and pons (CN/Po) compared with baseline after injection of saline, gadobutrol, gadoterate meglumine, gadopentetate dimeglumine, gadobenate dimeglumine, and gadodiamide. *P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01 indicate statistical significance of CN/Po compared with baseline. B, Percent change of CN/Po for day 3 and day 24 p.i. compared with baseline. *P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01 indicate statistical significance of GBCA group compared with saline.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Percent change of GP/thalamus signal intensity ratio (GP/Th) for day 3 and day 24 p.i. compared with baseline.
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5
Representative transversally acquired MRCs (left column) of the rat brains at a level showing the dorsal (das) and lateral arachnoid space (las) as well as the aqueduct (aq) and inner auditory canal (iac). The middle column illustrates the respective slices acquired with FLAIR before GBCA administration. The right column represents FLAIR images acquired 1 minute p.i. of saline, gadobutrol, gadoterate meglumine, gadopentetate dimeglumine, gadobenate dimeglumine, and gadodiamide.

References

    1. Matsumura T, Hayakawa M, Shimada F, et al. Safety of gadopentetate dimeglumine after 120 million administrations over 25 years of clinical use. Magn Reson Med Sci. 2013; 12: 297– 304.
    1. Caravan P, Ellison JJ, McMurry TJ, et al. Gadolinium(III) chelates as MRI contrast agents: structure, dynamics, and applications. Chem Rev. 1999; 99: 2293– 2352.
    1. Port M, Idée JM, Medina C, et al. Efficiency, thermodynamic and kinetic stability of marketed gadolinium chelates and their possible clinical consequences: a critical review. Biometals. 2008; 21: 469– 490.
    1. Idée JM, Port M, Robic C, et al. Role of thermodynamic and kinetic parameters in gadolinium chelate stability. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2009; 30: 1249– 1258.
    1. Tweedle MF, Wedeking P, Kumar K. Biodistribution of radiolabeled, formulated gadopentetate, gadoteridol, gadoterate, and gadodiamide in mice and rats. Invest Radiol. 1995; 30: 372– 380.
    1. Frenzel T, Lengsfeld P, Schirmer H, et al. Stability of gadolinium-based magnetic resonance imaging contrast agents in human serum at 37 degrees C. Invest Radiol. 2008; 43: 817– 828.
    1. Kanda T, Ishii K, Kawaguchi H, et al. High signal intensity in the dentate nucleus and globus pallidus on unenhanced T1-weighted MR images: relationship with increasing cumulative dose of a gadolinium-based contrast material. Radiology. 2014; 270: 834– 841.
    1. Errante Y, Cirimele V, Mallio CA, et al. Progressive increase of T1 signal intensity of the dentate nucleus on unenhanced magnetic resonance images is associated with cumulative doses of intravenously administered gadodiamide in patients with normal renal function, suggesting dechelation. Invest Radiol. 2014; 49: 685– 690.
    1. McDonald RJ, McDonald JS, Kallmes DF, et al. Intracranial gadolinium deposition after contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology. 2015; 275: 772– 782.
    1. Quattrocchi CC, Mallio CA, Errante Y, et al. Gadodiamide and dentate nucleus T1 hyperintensity in patients with meningioma evaluated by multiple follow-up contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance examinations with no systemic interval therapy. Invest Radiol. 2015; 50: 470– 472.
    1. Radbruch A, Weberling LD, Kieslich PJ, et al. Gadolinium retention in the dentate nucleus and globus pallidus is dependent on the class of contrast agent. Radiology. 2015; 275: 783– 791.
    1. Kanda T, Osawa M, Oba H, et al. High signal intensity in dentate nucleus on unenhanced T1-weighted MR images: association with linear versus macrocyclic gadolinium chelate administration. Radiology. 2015; 275: 803– 809.
    1. Adin ME, Kleinberg L, Vaidya D, et al. Hyperintense dentate nuclei on T1-weighted MRI: relation to repeat gadolinium administration. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015; 36: 1859– 1865.
    1. Weberling LD, Kieslich PJ, Kickingereder P, et al. Increased signal intensity in the dentate nucleus on unenhanced T1-weighted images after gadobenate dimeglumine administration. Invest Radiol. 2015; 50: 743– 748.
    1. Robert P, Lehericy S, Grand S, et al. T1-weighted hypersignal in the deep cerebellar nuclei after repeated administrations of gadolinium-based contrast agents in healthy rats: difference between linear and macrocyclic agents. Invest Radiol. 2015; 50: 473– 480.
    1. Radbruch A, Weberling LD, Kieslich PJ, et al. High-signal intensity in the dentate nucleus and globus pallidus on unenhanced t1-weighted images: evaluation of the macrocyclic gadolinium-based contrast agent gadobutrol. Invest Radiol. 2015; 50: 805– 810.
    1. Stojanov DA, Aracki-Trenkic A, Vojinovic S, et al. Increasing signal intensity within the dentate nucleus and globus pallidus on unenhanced T1W magnetic resonance images in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: correlation with cumulative dose of a macrocyclic gadolinium-based contrast agent, gadobutrol. Eur Radiol. 2015. [Epub ahead of print].
    1. Agris J, Pietsch H, Balzer T. What evidence is there that gadobutrol causes increasing signal intensity within the dentate nucleus and globus pallidus on unenhanced T1W MRI in patients with RRMS? Eur Radiol. 2015. [Epub ahead of print].
    1. Stojanov DA. Reply to letter to the editor re: increasing signal intensity within the dentate nucleus and globus pallidus on unenhanced T1W magnetic resonance images in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: correlation with cumulative dose of a macrocyclic gadolinium-based contrast agent, gadobutrol. Eur Radiol. 2015. [Epub ahead of print].
    1. Naganawa S, Yamazaki M, Kawai H, et al. Contrast enhancement of the anterior eye segment and subarachnoid space: detection in the normal state by heavily T2-weighted 3D FLAIR. Magn Reson Med Sci. 2011; 10: 193– 199.
    1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Devices FaDA, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research 2005. Available at: .
    1. Paxinos G, Watson C. The Rat Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates. 6th ed New York: Academic Press; 2006.
    1. Takahashi M, Tsutsui H, Murayama C, et al. Neurotoxicity of gadolinium contrast agents for magnetic resonance imaging in rats with osmotically disrupted blood-brain barrier. Magn Reson Imaging. 1996; 14: 619– 623.
    1. Lorusso V, Arbughi T, Tirone P, et al. Pharmacokinetics and tissue distribution in animals of gadobenate ion, the magnetic resonance imaging contrast enhancing component of gadobenate dimeglumine 0.5 M solution for injection (MultiHance). J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1999; 23 (suppl 1): S181– S194.
    1. Pietsch H, Lengsfeld P, Jost G, et al. Long-term retention of gadolinium in the skin of rodents following the administration of gadolinium-based contrast agents. Eur Radiol. 2009; 19: 1417– 1424.
    1. Naganawa S, Kawai H, Sone M, et al. Increased sensitivity to low concentration gadolinium contrast by optimized heavily T2-weighted 3D-FLAIR to visualize endolymphatic space. Magn Reson Med Sci. 2010; 9: 73– 80.
    1. Naganawa S, Nakashima T. Visualization of endolymphatic hydrops with MR imaging in patients with Ménière's disease and related pathologies: current status of its methods and clinical significance. Jpn J Radiol. 2014; 32: 191– 204.
    1. Naganawa S, Suzuki K, Yamazaki M, et al. Serial scans in healthy volunteers following intravenous administration of gadoteridol: time course of contrast enhancement in various cranial fluid spaces. Magn Reson Med Sci. 2014; 13: 7– 13.
    1. Brinker T, Stopa E, Morrison J, et al. A new look at cerebrospinal fluid circulation. Fluids Barriers CNS. 2014; 11: 10.

Source: PubMed

3
S'abonner