Ixekizumab Citrate-Free Formulation: Results from Two Clinical Trials

Sanjay Chabra, B J Gill, Gaia Gallo, Danting Zhu, Celine Pitou, Christopher D Payne, Ana Accioly, Luis Puig, Sanjay Chabra, B J Gill, Gaia Gallo, Danting Zhu, Celine Pitou, Christopher D Payne, Ana Accioly, Luis Puig

Abstract

Introduction: Subcutaneous (SC) injection is a common route of drug administration; however, injection site pain (ISP) might create a negative patient experience. We evaluated ISP, bioequivalence, and overall safety of the citrate-free (CF) formulation of ixekizumab, a high-affinity monoclonal antibody that selectively targets interleukin-17A.

Methods: Two phase 1, single-blind studies were conducted in healthy participants. The crossover study A (NCT03848403) evaluated pain intensity on injection as measured by visual analog scale of pain (VAS) scores. Subjects (N = 70) were randomized 1:1:1 at the beginning to three possible treatment sequences and received a 1 mL SC injection of the three formulations sequentially in the abdomen on days 1, 8, and 15, respectively. A mixed-effects repeated measures analysis model was used to analyze VAS score by time post-injection. Study B (NCT04259346) evaluated the bioequivalence of a single 80 mg dose of CF formulation compared to the original commercial formulation. Subjects (N = 245) were randomized 1:1 to either commercial or CF formulation and received a single SC injection into the abdomen, arm, or thigh.

Results: Primary endpoint was achieved in both studies. In study A, least-squares mean (LSM) difference of VAS scores immediately post injection between commercial (n = 61) and CF formulation (n = 63) was - 21.7 (p < 0.0001), indicating a lower degree of pain associated with CF formulation. In study B, bioequivalence of the CF formulation was established as 90% CIs for the ratio of geometric LSM AUC0-tlast, AUC0-∞, and Cmax between treatments were contained within the prespecified limits of 0.8 and 1.25. Except for less ISP in the CF formulation, overall safety profile was comparable.

Conclusion: Ixekizumab CF formulation proved to be bioequivalent, was associated with less ISP, and had no other notable differences in the safety profile compared to the original commercial formulation.

Trail registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03848403, NCT04259346.

Keywords: Bioequivalence; Citrate-free; Injection site pain; Ixekizumab.

© 2022. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
VAS injection-site pain score at the time of injection in study A. Significantly less pain was reported with the citrate-free formulation than with the original commercial formulation at the time of injection (***p < 0.0001). Pain categories were defined as no pain, VAS pain score = 0; mild pain, VAS pain score > 0 and ≤ 30; moderate pain, VAS pain score > 30 and ≤ 70; severe pain, VAS pain score > 70. LSM least-squares means, N number of subjects, VAS visual analog scale
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Mean serum concentrations of citrate-free formulation vs. original commercial formulation to 85 days post-injection in study B. Errors bars represent the standard of deviation. IXE ixekizumab
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Number of injection site pain events in study B. For the original commercial formulation, there were eight cases of moderate injection site pain and one case of severe pain. No severe injection site pain was reported for the CF formulation group

References

    1. Usach I, Martinez R, Festini T, Peris JE. Subcutaneous injection of drugs: literature review of factors influencing pain sensation at the injection site. Adv Ther. 2019;36(11):2986–2996. doi: 10.1007/s12325-019-01101-6.
    1. Heise T, Nosek L, Dellweg S, et al. Impact of injection speed and volume on perceived pain during subcutaneous injections into the abdomen and thigh: a single-centre, randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2014;16(10):971–976. doi: 10.1111/dom.12304.
    1. Laursen T, Hansen B, Fisker S. Pain perception after subcutaneous injections of media containing different buffers. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2006;98(2):218–221. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-7843.2006.pto_271.x.
    1. Veys N, Dhondt A, Lameire N. Pain at the injection site of subcutaneously administered erythropoietin: phosphate-buffered epoetin alpha compared to citrate-buffered epoetin alpha and epoetin beta. Clin Nephrol. 1998;49(1):41–44.
    1. St Clair-Jones A, Prignano F, Goncalves J, Paul M, Sewerin P. Understanding and minimising injection-site pain following subcutaneous administration of biologics: a narrative review. Rheumatol Ther. 2020;7(4):741–757. doi: 10.1007/s40744-020-00245-0.
    1. Zijlstra E, Jahnke J, Fischer A, Kapitza C, Forst T. Impact of injection speed, volume, and site on pain sensation. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2018;12(1):163–168. doi: 10.1177/1932296817735121.
    1. Tangen LF, Lundbom JS, Skarsvåg TI, et al. The influence of injection speed on pain during injection of local anaesthetic. J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2016;50(1):7–9. doi: 10.3109/2000656X.2015.1058269.
    1. Company ELa. Taltz® prescribing information. . Published 2020. Updated 06/2021. Accessed 16 Sep 2021.
    1. Genovese MC, Mysler E, Tomita T, et al. Safety of ixekizumab in adult patients with plaque psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis and axial spondyloarthritis: data from 21 clinical trials. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2020;59(12):3834–3844. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keaa189.
    1. Williamson A, Hoggart B. Pain: a review of three commonly used pain rating scales. J Clin Nurs. 2005;14(7):798–804. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2005.01121.x.
    1. Gely C, Marín L, Gordillo J, et al. Impact of pain associated with the subcutaneous administration of adalimumab. Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;43(1):9–13. doi: 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2019.06.008.
    1. Yoshida T, Otaki Y, Katsuyama N, Seki M, Kubota J. New adalimumab formulation associated with less injection site pain and improved motivation for treatment. Mod Rheumatol. 2019;29(6):949–953. doi: 10.1080/14397595.2018.1520426.
    1. Cohen S, Samad A, Karis E, et al. Decreased injection site pain associated with phosphate-free etanercept formulation in rheumatoid arthritis or psoriatic arthritis patients: a randomized controlled trial. Rheumatol Ther. 2019;6(2):245–254. doi: 10.1007/s40744-019-0152-8.
    1. Nash P, Vanhoof J, Hall S, et al. Randomized crossover comparison of injection site pain with 40 mg/0.4 or 0.8 mL formulations of adalimumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatol Ther. 2016;3(2):257–270. doi: 10.1007/s40744-016-0041-3.
    1. Bergman M, Patel P, Chen N, Jing Y, Saffore CD. Evaluation of adherence and persistence differences between adalimumab citrate-free and citrate formulations for patients with immune-mediated diseases in the United States. Rheumatol Ther. 2021;8(1):109–118. doi: 10.1007/s40744-020-00256-x.

Source: PubMed

3
S'abonner