Internet use, eHealth literacy and attitudes toward computer/internet among people with schizophrenia spectrum disorders: a cross-sectional study in two distant European regions

Christina Athanasopoulou, Maritta Välimäki, Katerina Koutra, Eliisa Löttyniemi, Antonios Bertsias, Maria Basta, Alexandros N Vgontzas, Christos Lionis, Christina Athanasopoulou, Maritta Välimäki, Katerina Koutra, Eliisa Löttyniemi, Antonios Bertsias, Maria Basta, Alexandros N Vgontzas, Christos Lionis

Abstract

Background: Individuals with schizophrenia spectrum disorders use the Internet for general and health-related purposes. Their ability to find, understand, and apply the health information they acquire online in order to make appropriate health decisions - known as eHealth literacy - has never been investigated. The European agenda strives to limit health inequalities and enhance mental health literacy. Nevertheless, each European member state varies in levels of Internet use and online health information-seeking. This study aimed to examine computer/Internet use for general and health-related purposes, eHealth literacy, and attitudes toward computer/Internet among adults with schizophrenia spectrum disorders from two distant European regions.

Methods: Data were collected from mental health services of psychiatric clinics in Finland (FI) and Greece (GR). A total of 229 patients (FI = 128, GR = 101) participated in the questionnaire survey. The data analysis included evaluation of frequencies and group comparisons with multiple linear and logistic regression models.

Results: The majority of Finnish participants were current Internet users (FI = 111, 87%, vs. GR = 33, 33%, P < .0001), while the majority of Greek participants had never used computers/Internet, mostly due to their perception that they do not need it. In both countries, more than half of Internet users used the Internet for health-related purposes (FI = 61, 55%, vs. GR = 20, 61%). The eHealth literacy of Internet users (previous and current Internet users) was found significantly higher in the Finnish group (FI: Mean = 27.05, SD 5.36; GR: Mean = 23.15, SD = 7.23, P < .0001) upon comparison with their Greek counterparts. For current Internet users, Internet use patterns were significantly different between country groups. When adjusting for gender, age, education and disease duration, country was a significant predictor of frequency of Internet use, eHealth literacy and Interest. The Finnish group of Internet users scored higher in eHealth literacy, while the Greek group of never Internet users had a higher Interest in computer/Internet.

Conclusions: eHealth literacy is either moderate (Finnish group) or low (Greek group). Thus, exposure to ICT and eHealth skills training are needed for this population. Recommendations to improve the eHealth literacy and access to health information among these individuals are provided.

Keywords: Attitudes; Computers; Efficacy; Interest; Internet; Mental illness; Schizophrenia; Technology; Use; eHealth literacy.

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the Ethical Committees of the participating Hospitals in Finland (157/1802/2014) and Greece (5162/20–4-2015), in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration. All data collected were coded to preserve participants’ anonymity. Participants received written information about the study and signed the consent form if they wanted to be included in the study. Additionally, participants had the contact information (email and phone number) of the research team in case they needed more clarifications. They were clearly informed (written and orally during the information session) that they could withdraw from the study any time they wanted without any explanation or incidence to their treatment.

Consent for publication

All participants provided written informed consent prior to filling the questionnaire. Participants also provided their consent for publication of the study’s findings.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow diagram of Finnish and Greek study participants

References

    1. Ritsner MS. Handbook of schizophrenia Spectrum disorders I. New York: Springer; 2011.
    1. Nadeem Z, McIntosh A, Lawrie S. Schizophrenia. Evid Based Mental Health. 2004; doi: 10.1136/ebmh.7.1.2.
    1. Mamah D, Barch DM. Diagnosis and Classification of the Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders. In: Ritsner MS. Handbook of Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders, Volume I, Conceptual Issues and Neurobiological Advances. Springer Netherlands: Springer Science & Business Media; 2011. .
    1. Fervaha G, Foussias G, Agid O, Remington G. Motivational deficits in early schizophrenia: prevalent, persistent, and key determinants of functional outcome. Schizophr Res. 2015;15:00235–00232.
    1. Connolly M, Kelly C. Lifestyle and physical health in schizophrenia. Adv Psychiatr Treat. 2005; doi: 10.1192/apt.11.2.125.
    1. Wahlbeck K, Westman J, Nordentoft M, Gissler M, Munk LT. Outcomes of Nordic mental health systems: life expectancy of patients with mental disorders. Br J Psychiatry. 2011;199:453–458. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.110.085100.
    1. Correll CU, Detraux J, De Lepeleire J, De Hert M. Effects of antipsychotics, antidepressants and mood stabilizers on risk for physical diseases in people with schizophrenia, depression and bipolar disorder. World Psychiatry. 2015;14:119–136. doi: 10.1002/wps.20204.
    1. Chien WT, Yip AL. Current approaches to treatments for schizophrenia spectrum disorders, part I: an overview and medical treatments. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2013;9:1311–1332. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S37485.
    1. The Finnish Medical Society Duodecim and the Finnish Psychiatric Association. (2015). Schizophrenia (online). Current care guidelines. . Accessed 5 Apr 2017.
    1. WHO – World Health Organization. 2014. Media centre: Schizophrenia . Accessed 18 May 2015.
    1. European Framework for Action on Mental Health and Wellbeing: EU joint action on mental health and wellbeing, Final Conference - Brussels, 21–22 January 2016. . Accessed 14 Mar 2016.
    1. Lieberman JA, Stroup TS, McEvoy JP, Swartz MS, Rosenheck RA, Perkins DO, Keefe RS, Davis SM, Davis CE, Lebowitz BD, Severe J, Hsiao JK. Clinical antipsychotic trials of intervention effectiveness (CATIE) investigators. Effectiveness of antipsychotic drugs in patients with chronic schizophrenia. N Engl J Med. 2005;12:1209–1223. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa051688.
    1. Chong HY, Teoh SL, Wu DB-C, Kotirum S, Chiou C-F, Chaiyakunapruk N. Global economic burden of schizophrenia: a systematic review. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2016;12:357–373.
    1. Jorm AF. Mental health literacy: public knowledge and beliefs about mental disorders. Br J Psychiatry. 2000;177:396–301. doi: 10.1192/bjp.177.5.396.
    1. Ratzan SC, Parker RM. Introduction. In: Seldon CR, Zorn M, Ratzan SC, Parker RM, editors. National Library of medicine current bibliographies in medicine: health literacy. NLM Pub. No. CBM 2000–1 ed. Washington, DC: National Institutes of Health, US Department of Health and Human Services; 2000.
    1. WHO – World Health Organization. 2016. Health promotion . Accessed 28 Apr 2016.
    1. Norman CD, Skinner HA. eHEALS: the eHealth literacy scale. J Med Internet Res. 2006;8:e27. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8.4.e27.
    1. Morahan-Martin JM. How internet users find, evaluate, and use online health information: a cross-cultural review. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2004;7:497–410. doi: 10.1089/cpb.2004.7.497.
    1. Hayes JF, Maughan DL, Grant-Peterkin H. Interconnected or disconnected? Promotion of mental health and prevention of mental disorder in the digital age. Br J Psychiatry. 2016;208:205–207. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.114.161067.
    1. Internet World Stats. 2016. World Internet Users and 2016 Population Stats, Internet World Users on June 30, 2016. Miniwatts arketing Group. . Accessed 28 Jul 2016.
    1. Kalckreuth S, Trefflich F, Rummel-Kluge C. Mental health related internet use among psychiatric patients: a cross-sectional analysis. BMC Psychiatry. 2014;14:368. doi: 10.1186/s12888-014-0368-7.
    1. Schrank B, Sibitz I, Unger A, Amering M. How patients with schizophrenia use the internet: qualitative study. J Med Internet Res. 2010;12:e70. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1550.
    1. Miller BJ, Stewart A, Schrimsher J, Peeples D, Buckley PF. How connected are people with schizophrenia? Cell phone, computer, email, and social media use. Psychiatry Res. 2015;225:458–453. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2014.11.067.
    1. Kummervold P, Chronaki C, Lausen B, Prokosch HU, Rasmussen J, Santana S, Staniszewski A, Wangberg S. eHealth trends in Europe 2005-2007: a population-based survey. J Med Internet Res. 2008;10:e42. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1023.
    1. Norman CD, Skinner HA. eHealth literacy: essential skills for consumer health in a networked world. J Med Internet Res. 2006;8:e9. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8.2.e9.
    1. Kalk NJ, Pothier DD. Patient information on schizophrenia on the internet. Psychiatr Bull. 2008; doi: 10.1192/pb.bp.107.017004.
    1. Välimäki M, Hätönen H, Lahti M, Kuosmanen L, Adams CE. Information and communication technology in patient education and support for people with schizophrenia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;10:CD007198.
    1. Choi NG, DiNitto DM. The digital divide among low-income homebound older adults: internet use patterns, eHealth literacy, and attitudes toward computer/internet use. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15:e93. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2645.
    1. Watkins I, Xie B. eHealth literacy interventions for older adults: a systematic review of the literature. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16:e225. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3318.
    1. Sarkar M, Sanders LM, Kelleher KJ, Chisolm DJ. Psychosocial Health, e-Health Literacy, and Perceptions of e-Health as Predictors and Moderators of e-Health Use Among Caregivers of Children with Special Healthcare Needs. Telem J E Health. 2016;22(2):123-31.
    1. Mitsutake S, Shibata A, Ishii K, Oka K. Associations of eHealth literacy with health behavior among adult internet users. J Med Internet Res. 2016;18:e192. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5413.
    1. Tubaishat A, Habiballah L. eHealth literacy among undergraduate nursing students. Nurse Educ Today. 2016;42:47. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2016.04.003.
    1. Manganello JA, Falisi AL, Roberts KJ, Smith KC, McKenzie LB. Pediatric injury information seeking for mothers with young children: the role of health literacy and ehealth literacy. J Commun Healthc. 2016:1–9.
    1. Jensen JD, King AJ, Davis LA, Guntzviller LM. Utilization of internet technology by low-income adults: the role of health literacy, health numeracy, and computer assistance. J Aging Health. 2010;22:804–826. doi: 10.1177/0898264310366161.
    1. Neter E, Brainin E. eHealth literacy: extending the digital divide to the realm of health information. J Med Internet Res. 2012;14:e19. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1619.
    1. Czaja SJ, Sharit J, Lee CC, Nair SN, Hernández MA, Arana N. Factors influencing use of an e-health website in a community sample of older adults. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013;20:277–284. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2012-000876.
    1. Torous J, Keshavan M. The role of social media in schizophrenia: evaluating risks, benefits, and potential. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2016;29:190–195. doi: 10.1097/YCO.0000000000000246.
    1. Ochoa S, Haro JM, Autonell J, Pendas A, Teba F, Marque M. NEDES Qroup. Met and unmet needs of schizophrenia patients in a Spanish sample. Schizophr Bull. 2003;29:201–210. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.schbul.a006998.
    1. Brown S, Birtwistle J, Roe L, Thompson C. The unhealthy lifestyle of people with schizophrenia. PsycholMed. 1999;29:697–691.
    1. Ivbijaro G, Goldberg SD, Parmentier H, Kolkiewicz L, Riba M, Fradgley R, Khan AA. 2014. The importance of holistic care for people living with schizophrenia. In Living with schizophrenia. World Federation for Mental Health. . Accessed 28 Apr 2016.
    1. EU – European Union. 2014. Flash Eurobarometer 404 European citizens’ digital health literacy.. Accessed 4 Aug 2016.
    1. EUROSTAT. 2016. Internet use and activities: Internet use daily. . Accessed 14 Mar 2016.
    1. EUROSTAT. 2015. Individuals using the internet for seeking health information % of individuals aged 16 to 74 . Accessed 14 Mar 2016.
    1. WHO – World Health Organization. 2014. Mental health Atlas country profile 2014: Finland. . Accessed 29 Apr 2016.
    1. WHO – World Health Organization. 2014. Mental health Atlas country profile 2014: Greece. . Accessed: 2016–04-29.
    1. WHO – World Health Organization. 2007. . Accessed 19 Aug 2016.
    1. Lal S, Adair CE. E-mental health: a rapid review of the literature. Psychiatr Serv. 2014;65:24–22. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201300009.
    1. Population census. 2011. . Accessed 11 Aug 2016.
    1. Finnish Mental Health Act 1066/2009. . Accessed 4 Aug 2016.
    1. WHO – World Health Organization. 2011. Mental Health Atlas 2011: Greece. . Accessed 4 Aug 2016.
    1. Fotiadis P, Mpozikas B, Nimatoudis I. 2015. Guidelines of Greek experts for the pharmaceutical treatment of schizophrenia. . Accessed 25 Apr 2016.
    1. DUODECIM. 2016. Current Care Guidelines: Schizophrenia. . Accessed 25 Apr 2016.
    1. Thornicroft G, Tansella M. Components of a modern mental health service: a pragmatic balance of community and hospital care. Br J Psychiatry 2004;185:283-0.
    1. Finnish Medical Society Duodecim and Finnish Psychiatric Association. 2008. Schizophrenia Current Care. . Accessed 24 Aug 2016.
    1. WHO - World Health Organization . The ICD-10 classification of mental and Behavioural disorders diagnostic criteria for research. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1992.
    1. Nguyen J, Moorhouse M, Curbow B, Christie J, Walsh-Childers K, Islam S. Construct validity of the eHealth literacy scale (eHEALS) among two adult populations: a Rasch analysis. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2016;2:e24. doi: 10.2196/publichealth.4967.
    1. Acquadro C, Conway K, Giroudet C, Mear I. Linguistic validation manual for patient-reported outcomes (PRO) instruments. Lyon: Mapi Research Institute; 2004.
    1. Bastos JL, Duquia RP, González-Chica DA, Mesa JM, Bonamigo RR. 2014. Field work I: selecting the instrument for data collection. An Bras Dermatol. 2014;89:918–923. doi: 10.1590/abd1806-4841.20143884.
    1. Chronaki CE, Kouroubali A, Esterle L, Orphanoudaki E, Roumeliotaki T, Stathopoulou A, Tsiknakis M. 2005. eHealth consumer trends survey in Greece: results of the 1st phase. FORTH-ICS TR-365. . Accessed 4 Aug 2016.
    1. Bear GG, Richards HC, Lancaster P. Attitudes toward computers: validation of a computer attitudes scale. J Educ Comput Res. 1995;3:207–218. doi: 10.2190/1DYT-1JEJ-T8J5-1YC7.
    1. JMP Pro. 2015. Version 9.4. SAS Institute Inc. Cary, North Carolina, 1989–2016.
    1. Corporation IBM. IBM SPSS statistics for windows, version 20.0. Armonk: IBM Corp; 2011.
    1. Tsiligianni I, Anastasiou F, Antonopoulou M, Chliveros K, Dimitrakopoulos S, Duijker G, Kounalakis D, Makri K, Petraki C, Prokopiadou D, Stefanaki I, Symvoulakis E, Tsakountakis N, Vasilopoulos T, Vittorakis C, Lionis C. Greek rural GPs' opinions on how financial crisis influences health, quality of care and health equity. Rural Remote Health. 2013;13:2528.
    1. Jansen J. 2010. Use of the internet in higher-income households households/. Accessed 26 Jul 2016.
    1. Li N, Kirkup G. Gender and cultural differences in internet use: a study of China and the UK. Comput Educ. 2007;48:301–317. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2005.01.007.
    1. Bargh JA, McKenna KY. The internet and social life. Annu Rev Psychol. 2004;55:573–590. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141922.
    1. Bosancianu CM, Powell S, Bratović E. Social capital and pro-social behavior online and offline. IJIS. 2013;8:49–68.
    1. Yannakoulia M, Kontogianni M, Scarmeas N. Cognitive health and Mediterranean diet: just diet or lifestyle pattern? Ageing Res Rev. 2015;20:74–78. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2014.10.003.
    1. Werts N, Hutton-Rogers L. Barriers to achieving E-health literacy. Am J Health Sci. 2013;4:115–120.
    1. Kummervold PE, Wynn R. Health information accessed on the internet: the development in 5 European countries. Int J Telemed Appl. 2012;297416
    1. EUROSTAT. 2016. Level of Internet assess – households. . Accessed 4 Aug 2016.
    1. EUROSTAT. 2015. Types of social media used. . Accessed 4 Aug 2016.
    1. Ziniel SI. 2015. Avoiding Bias in the Research Interview Clinical Research Program, Children’s Hospital Boston Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, . Accessed 4 Aug 2016.
    1. WHO – World Health Organization. 2009. 7th Global Conference on Health Promotion in Nairobi, Kenya on October 26–30 . Accessed 24 Aug 2016.
    1. Schulz PJ, Nakamoto K. Health literacy and patient empowerment in health communication: the importance of separating conjoined twins. Patient Educ Couns. 2013;90:4–11. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2012.09.006.
    1. Neuhauser L, Kreps G. The advent of E-health. How interactive media are transforming health communication. M K. 2003;51:3–4.
    1. Edwards A, Elwyn G, Gwyn R. General practice registrar responses to the use of different risk communication tools in simulated consultations: a focus group study. BMJ. 1999;319(7212):749–752. doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7212.749.

Source: PubMed

3
S'abonner