Psychoeducation for schizophrenia

Jun Xia, Lars Bertil Merinder, Madhvi R Belgamwar, Jun Xia, Lars Bertil Merinder, Madhvi R Belgamwar

Abstract

Background: Schizophrenia can be a severe and chronic illness characterised by lack of insight and poor compliance with treatment. Psychoeducational approaches have been developed to increase patients' knowledge of, and insight into, their illness and its treatment. It is supposed that this increased knowledge and insight will enable people with schizophrenia to cope in a more effective way with their illness, thereby improving prognosis.

Objectives: To assess the effects of psychoeducational interventions compared with standard levels of knowledge provision.

Search strategy: We searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group Trials Register (February 2010).

Selection criteria: All relevant randomised controlled trials focusing on psychoeducation for schizophrenia and/or related serious mental illnesses involving individuals or groups. We excluded quasi-randomised trials.

Data collection and analysis: At least two review authors extracted data independently from included papers. We contacted authors of trials for additional and missing data. We calculated risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of homogeneous dichotomous data. We used a fixed-effects model for heterogeneous dichotomous data. Where possible we also calculated the numbers needed to treat (NNT), as well as weighted means for continuous data.

Main results: This review includes a total of 5142 participants (mostly inpatients) from 44 trials conducted between 1988 and 2009 (median study duration ˜ 12 weeks, risk of bias - moderate). We found that incidences of non-compliance were lower in the psychoeducation group in the short term (n = 1400, RR 0.52 CI 0.40 to 0.67, NNT 11 CI 9 to 16). This finding holds for the medium and long term. Relapse appeared to be lower in psychoeducation group (n = 1214, RR 0.70 CI 0.61 to 0.81, NNT 9 CI 7 to 14) and this also applied to readmission (n = 206, RR 0.71 CI 0.56 to 0.89, NNT 5 CI 4 to 13). Scale-derived data also suggested that psychoeducation promotes better social and global functioning. In the medium term, treating four people with schizophrenia with psychoeducation instead of standard care resulted in one additional person showing a clinical improvement. Evidence suggests that participants receiving psychoeducation are more likely to be satisfied with mental health services (n = 236, RR 0.24 CI 0.12 to 0.50, NNT 5 CI 5 to 8) and have improved quality of life.

Authors' conclusions: Psychoeducation does seem to reduce relapse, readmission and encourage medication compliance, as well as reduce the length of hospital stay in these hospital-based studies of limited quality. The true size of effect is likely to be less than demonstrated in this review - but, nevertheless, some sort of psychoeducation could be clinically effective and potentially cost beneficial. It is not difficult to justify better, more applicable, research in this area aimed at fully investigating the effects of this promising approach.

Conflict of interest statement

None.

Figures

1
1
Methodological quality summary: review authors' judgements about each methodological quality item for each included study.
2
2
Forest plot of comparison: 1 ANY FORM OF PSYCHOEDUCATION vs STANDARD CARE, outcome: 1.1 Compliance: 1a. With medication ‐ non‐compliance.
1.1. Analysis
1.1. Analysis
Comparison 1 ANY FORM OF PSYCHOEDUCATION vs STANDARD CARE, Outcome 1 Compliance: 1a. With medication ‐ non‐compliance.
1.2. Analysis
1.2. Analysis
Comparison 1 ANY FORM OF PSYCHOEDUCATION vs STANDARD CARE, Outcome 2 Compliance: 1b. With medication ‐ partial compliance.
1.4. Analysis
1.4. Analysis
Comparison 1 ANY FORM OF PSYCHOEDUCATION vs STANDARD CARE, Outcome 4 Compliance: 2a. With follow up ‐ loss to follow‐up for any reason.
1.5. Analysis
1.5. Analysis
Comparison 1 ANY FORM OF PSYCHOEDUCATION vs STANDARD CARE, Outcome 5 Compliance: 2b. With follow‐up ‐ received intervention but left the study early.
1.6. Analysis
1.6. Analysis
Comparison 1 ANY FORM OF PSYCHOEDUCATION vs STANDARD CARE, Outcome 6 Compliance: 2c. With follow‐up ‐ allocated but never accepted treatment.
1.7. Analysis
1.7. Analysis
Comparison 1 ANY FORM OF PSYCHOEDUCATION vs STANDARD CARE, Outcome 7 Relapse: 1. Relapse for any reason.
1.8. Analysis
1.8. Analysis
Comparison 1 ANY FORM OF PSYCHOEDUCATION vs STANDARD CARE, Outcome 8 Relapse: 2. Relapse with readmission.
1.9. Analysis
1.9. Analysis
Comparison 1 ANY FORM OF PSYCHOEDUCATION vs STANDARD CARE, Outcome 9 Knowledge: 1a. Average endpoint scale scores on various knowledge scales.
1.11. Analysis
1.11. Analysis
Comparison 1 ANY FORM OF PSYCHOEDUCATION vs STANDARD CARE, Outcome 11 Knowledge: 2. Average endpoint scores on various insight scales.
1.12. Analysis
1.12. Analysis
Comparison 1 ANY FORM OF PSYCHOEDUCATION vs STANDARD CARE, Outcome 12 Knowledge: 3. Average endpoint score on illness‐related attitudes ‐ 4 months (KK, high = high expressed).
1.13. Analysis
1.13. Analysis
Comparison 1 ANY FORM OF PSYCHOEDUCATION vs STANDARD CARE, Outcome 13 Knowledge: 4. level of knowledge did not improve.
1.14. Analysis
1.14. Analysis
Comparison 1 ANY FORM OF PSYCHOEDUCATION vs STANDARD CARE, Outcome 14 Behaviour: Average score (NOSIE‐30, endpoint, high = poor).
1.15. Analysis
1.15. Analysis
Comparison 1 ANY FORM OF PSYCHOEDUCATION vs STANDARD CARE, Outcome 15 Social functioning: 1a. Average change scores on various scales ‐ medium term (high = poor).
1.16. Analysis
1.16. Analysis
Comparison 1 ANY FORM OF PSYCHOEDUCATION vs STANDARD CARE, Outcome 16 Social functioning: 1b. Average endpoint scores on various scales (high = poor).
1.18. Analysis
1.18. Analysis
Comparison 1 ANY FORM OF PSYCHOEDUCATION vs STANDARD CARE, Outcome 18 Global functioning: 1. No clinically significant improvement.
1.19. Analysis
1.19. Analysis
Comparison 1 ANY FORM OF PSYCHOEDUCATION vs STANDARD CARE, Outcome 19 Global functioning: 2. Average endpoint scale score.
1.20. Analysis
1.20. Analysis
Comparison 1 ANY FORM OF PSYCHOEDUCATION vs STANDARD CARE, Outcome 20 Service utilisation: days in hospital.
1.22. Analysis
1.22. Analysis
Comparison 1 ANY FORM OF PSYCHOEDUCATION vs STANDARD CARE, Outcome 22 Global state: 1. Average endpoint score ‐ medium term (CGI, high = poor).
1.23. Analysis
1.23. Analysis
Comparison 1 ANY FORM OF PSYCHOEDUCATION vs STANDARD CARE, Outcome 23 Global state: 2. Increased medication dose by 25%.
1.24. Analysis
1.24. Analysis
Comparison 1 ANY FORM OF PSYCHOEDUCATION vs STANDARD CARE, Outcome 24 Global state: 3. Disability ‐ long term.
1.25. Analysis
1.25. Analysis
Comparison 1 ANY FORM OF PSYCHOEDUCATION vs STANDARD CARE, Outcome 25 Mental state: 1a. Global ‐ continuous ‐ average total endpoint scale scores (high = poor).
1.26. Analysis
1.26. Analysis
Comparison 1 ANY FORM OF PSYCHOEDUCATION vs STANDARD CARE, Outcome 26 Mental state: 1b. Global ‐ continuous ‐ average change scale scores ‐ medium term (high = good).
1.28. Analysis
1.28. Analysis
Comparison 1 ANY FORM OF PSYCHOEDUCATION vs STANDARD CARE, Outcome 28 Mental state: 2a. Specific ‐ binary ‐ specific symptoms ‐ short term.
1.29. Analysis
1.29. Analysis
Comparison 1 ANY FORM OF PSYCHOEDUCATION vs STANDARD CARE, Outcome 29 Mental state: 2b. Specific ‐ continuous ‐ average endpoint PANSS scores (high = poor).
1.30. Analysis
1.30. Analysis
Comparison 1 ANY FORM OF PSYCHOEDUCATION vs STANDARD CARE, Outcome 30 Expressed emotion: Participants with high EE relatives (FQ).
1.31. Analysis
1.31. Analysis
Comparison 1 ANY FORM OF PSYCHOEDUCATION vs STANDARD CARE, Outcome 31 Quality of life: Average endpoint scores on various scales (high = favourable).
1.32. Analysis
1.32. Analysis
Comparison 1 ANY FORM OF PSYCHOEDUCATION vs STANDARD CARE, Outcome 32 Quality of life: Average endpoint scores on various scales (high = poor).
1.33. Analysis
1.33. Analysis
Comparison 1 ANY FORM OF PSYCHOEDUCATION vs STANDARD CARE, Outcome 33 Satisfaction with mental health services: 1. Short term ‐ average change score (VSS, high = good).
1.34. Analysis
1.34. Analysis
Comparison 1 ANY FORM OF PSYCHOEDUCATION vs STANDARD CARE, Outcome 34 Satisfaction with mental health services: 2. Average change ‐ at 1 year (VSS Scale, high = good).
1.35. Analysis
1.35. Analysis
Comparison 1 ANY FORM OF PSYCHOEDUCATION vs STANDARD CARE, Outcome 35 Satisfaction with mental health services: 3. Binary outcome.
1.36. Analysis
1.36. Analysis
Comparison 1 ANY FORM OF PSYCHOEDUCATION vs STANDARD CARE, Outcome 36 Adverse event: Death.
2.1. Analysis
2.1. Analysis
Comparison 2 SUBGROUP ANALYSES 1. BRIEF PSYCHOEDUCATION/STANDARD PSYCHOEDUCATION vs STANDARD CARE, Outcome 1 Compliance: 1a. With medication ‐ binary outcomes.
2.2. Analysis
2.2. Analysis
Comparison 2 SUBGROUP ANALYSES 1. BRIEF PSYCHOEDUCATION/STANDARD PSYCHOEDUCATION vs STANDARD CARE, Outcome 2 Compliance: 2. With follow‐up ‐ loss to follow‐up for any reason.
2.3. Analysis
2.3. Analysis
Comparison 2 SUBGROUP ANALYSES 1. BRIEF PSYCHOEDUCATION/STANDARD PSYCHOEDUCATION vs STANDARD CARE, Outcome 3 Compliance: 2a. with follow‐up ‐ received intervention but left the study early.
2.4. Analysis
2.4. Analysis
Comparison 2 SUBGROUP ANALYSES 1. BRIEF PSYCHOEDUCATION/STANDARD PSYCHOEDUCATION vs STANDARD CARE, Outcome 4 Relapse: Relapse for any reason.
3.1. Analysis
3.1. Analysis
Comparison 3 SUBGROUP ANALYSES 2. GROUP PSYCHOEDUCATION/INDIVIDUAL PSYCHOEDUCATION vs STANDARD CARE, Outcome 1 Compliance: 1a. With medication ‐ binary outcomes.
3.2. Analysis
3.2. Analysis
Comparison 3 SUBGROUP ANALYSES 2. GROUP PSYCHOEDUCATION/INDIVIDUAL PSYCHOEDUCATION vs STANDARD CARE, Outcome 2 Compliance: 2. With follow‐up ‐ leaving the study early/loss to follow‐up.
3.3. Analysis
3.3. Analysis
Comparison 3 SUBGROUP ANALYSES 2. GROUP PSYCHOEDUCATION/INDIVIDUAL PSYCHOEDUCATION vs STANDARD CARE, Outcome 3 Relapse: Relapse for any reason.
4.1. Analysis
4.1. Analysis
Comparison 4 SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS ‐ Chinese studies vs non‐Chinese studies, Outcome 1 Compliance: 1a. With medication ‐ non‐compliance.
4.2. Analysis
4.2. Analysis
Comparison 4 SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS ‐ Chinese studies vs non‐Chinese studies, Outcome 2 Compliance: 2a. With follow‐up ‐ loss to follow‐up for any reason.
4.3. Analysis
4.3. Analysis
Comparison 4 SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS ‐ Chinese studies vs non‐Chinese studies, Outcome 3 Compliance: 2b. With follow‐up ‐ received intervention but left the study early.
4.4. Analysis
4.4. Analysis
Comparison 4 SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS ‐ Chinese studies vs non‐Chinese studies, Outcome 4 Relapse: 1. Relapse for any reason.

Source: PubMed

3
S'abonner