Women's suggestions on how to improve the quality of maternal and newborn hospital care: a qualitative study in Italy using the WHO standards as framework for the analysis

Marzia Lazzerini, Chiara Semenzato, Jaspreet Kaur, Benedetta Covi, Giorgia Argentini, Marzia Lazzerini, Chiara Semenzato, Jaspreet Kaur, Benedetta Covi, Giorgia Argentini

Abstract

Background: A recent systematic review identified very few studies on women's views on how to improve the quality of maternal and newborn care (QMNC). This study aimed at exploring the suggestions provided by women, after hospital delivery in Italy, on how to improve the QMNC.

Methods: A questionnaire, containing open questions to capture suggestions on how to improve QMNC, was used to collect suggestions of mothers who gave birth a tertiary care referral hospital in Northeast Italy, between December 2016 and September 2018. Two authors independently used thematic analysis to analyse women's comments, using the WHO Standards for improving the QMNC as framework for the analysis.

Results: Overall 392 mothers provided a total of 966 comments on how to improve the QMNC. Overall 45 (11.5%) women made suggestions pertinent to "provision of care", 222 (56.6%) to the "experience of care", 217 (55.4%) to "physical or to human resources". The top five suggestions were: 1) increase presence of a companion during the whole hospitalization (28.3% of women); 2) improve bathrooms and showers (18.4%); 3) improve effective communication from staff (14.0%); 4) improve staff professionalism, empathy, and kindness (13.5%); 5) increase support and information on how to provide care to the newborn (11.2%). Overall, 158 (16.4%) suggestions could not be classified in any WHO Standards, and among these most (72.1%) were related to physical structures, such as: decrease the number of patients per room; create areas for visitors; avoid case mixing in the same room; reduce rooming-in/better support the mother. Overall 62 (15.8%) women expressed appreciations.

Conclusions: Collecting the women's views on how to improve the QMNC after hospital delivery highlighted critical inputs on aspects of care that should be improved in the opinion of service-users. More investments should be made for establishing routine systems for monitoring patients experience of care. Data collected should be used to improve QMNC. WHO Standards may be further optimized by adding items emerging as relevant for women in high-income countries.

Keywords: Hospital; Newborn; Qualitative study; Quality of care; Service users; Standards; WHO; Women.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

    1. Word Health Organization . Health 2020. A European policy framework and strategy for the 21st century. Copenhagen: Word Health Organization; 2013.
    1. World Health Organization . Promoting health through the life-course. Global Strategy for Women’s, Children's and Adolescent's Health 2016-2030. Geneva: Word Health Organization; 2015.
    1. United Nation . Sustainable Development knowledge Platform. Transforming our World: The 2030 Agenda for sustainable development. New York: United Nations; 2015.
    1. Spotlight on Sustainable Development (2016). Development Alternatives with Women for a New Era (DAWN). The “Health SDG”: Some progress, but critical concerns remain. (accessed 15 Jun 2018).
    1. White Ribbon Alliance (2018). ().
    1. Evento nascita, il Rapporto CeDAP, 2015 Direzione Generale della Digitalizzazione, del Sistema Informativo Sanitario e della Statistica, Ufficio di statistica Rome, Italy, 2015. (accessed 26 July 2019).
    1. Freedman LP, Kruk ME. Disrespect and abuse of women in childbirth: challenging the global quality and accountability agendas. Lancet. 2014;384(9948):e42–e44. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60859-X.
    1. Bohren MA, Vogel JP, Hunter EC, Lutsiv O, Makh SK, Souza JP, Aguiar C, Saraiva Coneglian F, Diniz AL, Tunçalp Ö, Javadi D, Oladapo OT, Khosla R, Hindin MJ, Gülmezoglu AM. The Mistreatment of Women during Childbirth in Health Facilities Globally: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review. PLoS Med. 2015;12(6):e1001847. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001847.
    1. Bohren MA, Mehrtash H, Fawole B, Maung TM, Balde MD, Maya E, Thwin SS, Aderoba AK, Vogel JP, Irinyenikan TA, Adeyanju AO, Mon NO, Adu-Bonsaffoh K, Landoulsi S, Guure C, Adanu R, Diallo BA, Gülmezoglu AM, Soumah AM, Sall AO, Tunçalp Ö. How.women are treated during facility-based childbirth in four countries: a cross-sectional study with labour observations and community-based surveys. Lancet. 2019;394(10210):1750–1763. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31992-0.
    1. Miller S, Abalos E, Chamillard M, Ciapponi A, Colaci D, Comandé D, Diaz V, Geller S, Hanson C, Langer A, Manuelli V, Millar K, Morhason-Bello I, Castro CP, Pileggi VN, Robinson N, Skaer M, Souza JP, Vogel JP, Althabe F. Beyond too little, too late and too much, too soon: a pathway towards evidence-based, respectful maternity care worldwide. Lancet. 2016;388(10056):2176–2192. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31472-6.
    1. Brizuela V, Leslie HH, Sharma J, Langer A, Tunçalp Ö. Measuring quality of care for all women and newborns: how do we know if we are doing it right? A review of facility assessment tools. Lancet Glob Health. 2019;7(5):e624–e632. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30033-6.
    1. World Health Organisazation . WHO recommendations: intrapartum care for a positive childbirth experience. Geneva: World Health Organisazation; 2018.
    1. Shaw D, Guise JM, Shah N, et al. Drivers of maternity care in high-income countries: can health systems support women-centred care? Lancet. 2016;388:2282–2295. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31527-6.
    1. Flenady V, Wojcieszek AM, Middleton P, et al. Stillbirths: recall to action in high-income countries. Lancet. 2016;387:691–702. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01020-X.
    1. European Perinatal Health Reporth . Health and Care of Pregnant Women and Babies in Europe in. 2010.
    1. University of Oxford (2018). National Maternity Survey 2014. In: Redshaw M, Henderson J, editors. Safely delivered a national survey of women's experience of maternity care: The National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit; 2014. (accessed 08 Jun 2018).
    1. Habiba M, Kaminski M, Da Frè M, Marsal K, Bleker O, Librero J, Grandjean H, Gratia P, Guaschino S, Heyl W, Taylor D, Cuttini M. Caesarean section on request: a comparison of obstetricians' attitudes in eight European countries. BJOG. 2006;113(6):647–656. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.00933.x.
    1. Tunçalp Ӧ, Were WM, MacLennan C, et al. Quality of care for pregnant women and newborns-the WHO vision. BJOG. 2015;122(8):1045–1049. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13451.
    1. World Health Organization . Sexual and reproductive health. Standards for improving quality of maternal and newborn care in health facilities. Geneva: Word Health Organization; 2016.
    1. Downe S, Finlayson K, Oladapo OT, Bonet M, Gülmezoglu AM. What matters to women during childbirth: a systematic qualitative review. PLoS One. 2018;13(4):e0194906. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194906.
    1. Rilby L, Jansson S, Lindblom B, Martensson LB. A qualitative study of women's feelings about future childbirth: Dread and delight. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2012;57:120–125. doi: 10.1111/j.1542-2011.2011.00113.
    1. Fenwick J, Hauck Y, Downie J, Butt J. The childbirth expectations of a self-selected cohort of Western Australian women. Midwifery. 2005;21(1):23–35. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2004.07.001.
    1. Sharma B, Giri G, Christensson K, Ramani KV, Johansson E. The transition of childbirth practices among tribal women in Gujarat, India: A grounded theory approach. BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2013;13:41. doi: 10.1186/1472-698X-13-41.
    1. O’Brien BC, Harris IB, Beckman TJ, Reed DA, Cook DA. Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations. Acad Med. 2014;89:1245–1251. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000388.
    1. Lazzerini M, Valente EP, Covi B, Semenzato C, Ciuch M. Use of WHO standards to improve quality of maternal and newborn hospital care: a study collecting both mothers' and staff perspective in a tertiary care hospital in Italy. BMJ Open Qual. 2019;8(1):e000525. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2018-000525.
    1. Charmaz K. Constructing grounded theory. London: SageGoogle Scholar; 2006.
    1. Thomas J, Harden A. Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008;8:45. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-8-45.
    1. Lazzerini M, Ciuch M, Rusconi S, Covi B. Facilitators and barriers to the effective implementation of the individual maternal near-miss case reviews in low/middle-income countries: a systematic review of qualitative studies. BMJ Open. 2018;8(6):e021281. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021281.
    1. Skoko E, Ravaldi C, Vannacci A, Nespoli A, Akooji N, Balaam MC, Battisti A, Cericco M, Iannuzzi L, Morano S, Downe S. Findings from the Italian Babies Born Better Survey. Minerva Ginecol. 2018;70(6):663–675. doi: 10.23736/S0026-4784.18.04296-X.
    1. Ravaldi C, Skoko E, Battisti A, Cericco M, Vannacci A. Abuse and disrespect in childbirth assistance in Italy: a community-based survey. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018;224:208–209. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.03.055.
    1. Shakibazadeh E, Namadian M, Bohren M, et al. Respectful care during childbirth in health facilities globally: a qualitative evidence synthesis. BJOG. 2017. 10.1111/1471-0528.15015 Published Online First: 8 November.
    1. Afulani PA, Moyer CA. Accountability for respectful maternity care. Lancet. 2019;394(10210):1692–1693. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32258-5.
    1. Simkin P. Just another day in a woman's life? Part II: nature and consistency of women's long-term memories of their first birth experiences. Birth. 1992;19(2):64–81. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.1992.tb00382.x.
    1. Keller AC, Bergman MM, Heinzmann C, Todorov A, Weber H, Heberer M. The relationship between hospital patients' ratings of quality of care and communication. Int J Qual Health Care. 2014;26(1):26–33. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzt083.
    1. Sami J, Quack Lötscher KC, Eperon I, Gonik L, Martinez de Tejada B, Epiney M, Schmidt NC. Giving birth in Switzerland: a qualitative study exploring migrant women's experiences during pregnancy and childbirth in Geneva and Zurich using focus groups. Reprod Health. 2019;16(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s12978-019-0771-0.
    1. Watson HL, Downe S. Discrimination against childbearing Romani women in maternity care in Europe: a mixed-methods systematic review. Reprod Health. 2017;14(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s12978-016-0263-4.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors et collaborateurs

Les conditions médicales

Interventions en matière de drogue

3
S'abonner