Pembrolizumab with low-dose carboplatin for recurrent platinum-resistant ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer: survival and immune correlates

John B Liao, William R Gwin, Renata R Urban, Katie M Hitchcock-Bernhardt, Andrew L Coveler, Doreen M Higgins, Jennifer S Childs, Hania N Shakalia, Ron E Swensen, Sasha E Stanton, Anna V Tinker, Tanya A Wahl, Richard G Ancheta, Kathryn F McGonigle, James Y Dai, Mary L Disis, Barbara A Goff, John B Liao, William R Gwin, Renata R Urban, Katie M Hitchcock-Bernhardt, Andrew L Coveler, Doreen M Higgins, Jennifer S Childs, Hania N Shakalia, Ron E Swensen, Sasha E Stanton, Anna V Tinker, Tanya A Wahl, Richard G Ancheta, Kathryn F McGonigle, James Y Dai, Mary L Disis, Barbara A Goff

Abstract

Background: Anti-programmed death 1 (PD1)/programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) therapies have shown modest activity as monotherapy in recurrent ovarian cancer. Platinum chemotherapies induce T-cell proliferation and enhance tumor recognition. We assessed activity and safety of pembrolizumab with carboplatin in recurrent platinum-resistant ovarian cancer.

Patients and methods: This phase I/II, single-arm clinical trial studied concurrent carboplatin and pembrolizumab in recurrent platinum-resistant ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer. Primary platinum refractory patients were excluded. Patients were treated after progression on subsequent non-platinum systemic therapy after becoming platinum resistant or refractory. Pembrolizumab 200 mg was given on day 1 and carboplatin area under the curve 2 on days 8 and 15 of a 3-week cycle until progression. Imaging was assessed by blinded independent review. PD-L1 expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry. Flow cytometry on peripheral blood mononuclear cells was performed for CD3, CD4, CD8, PD1, CTLA4 and Ki67.

Results: The most common treatment-related adverse events were lymphopenia (18%) and anemia (9%) with most being grade 1 or 2 (93%). Of 29 patients treated, 23 patients were evaluable for best objective response: 10.3% (95% CI 2.2 to 27.4) had partial response (PR), 51.7% (95% CI 32.5 to 70.6) had stable disease (SD). 56.5% of patients had decreases in target lesions from baseline. All PD-L1-positive patients achieved PR (3/7, 42.8%) or SD (4/7, 57.2%). Median progression-free survival was 4.63 months (95% CI 4.3 to 4.96). Median OS was 11.3 months (95% CI 6.094 to 16.506). Peripheral CD8+PD1+Ki67+ T cells expanded after 3 (p=0.0015) and 5 (p=0.0023) cycles. CTLA4+PD1+CD8+ T cells decreased through the course of treatment up to the 12th cycle (p=0.004). When stratified by ratio of peripheral CD8+PD1+Ki67+ T cells to tumor burden at baseline, patients with a ratio ≥0.0375 who had a significantly longer median OS of 18.37 months compared with those with a ratio <0.0375 who had a median OS of 8.72 months (p=0.0099). No survival advantage was seen with stratification by tumor burden alone (p=0.24) or by CD8+PD1+Ki67+ T cells alone (p=0.53).

Conclusions: Pembrolizumab with carboplatin was well-tolerated and active in recurrent platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. A ratio of peripheral T-cell exhaustion to radiographic tumor burden may identify patients more likely to benefit from this chemoimmunotherapy.

Trial registration number: NCT03029598.

Keywords: CD8-positive t-lymphocytes; combination; drug therapy; female; genital neoplasms; immunotherapy.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: JL received research funding through his institution from Merck, Forty-Seven, Sanofi-Aventis US, Harpoon Therapeutics, Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma Oncology, and Precigen. AC has a consulting or advisory role with Halozyme, Seattle Genetics, Merrimack, and AbbVie. AC received research funding from XBiotech, Newlink Genetics, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Immunomedics, Onconova Therapeutics, Lilly, Gilead Sciences, Genentech, Seattle Genetics, AbGenomics International, Halozyme, Novocure, MedImmune, and Amgen. KMcG has a consulting or advisory role with Ambry Genetics. KMcG has stock ownership of AbbVie. MLD received research funding from Pfizer, Bavarian Nordisk, Precigen, and EMD Serono. MLD has stock ownership of Epithany. BG has an immediate family member employed by Lilly.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(A) Waterfall plot. Best percentage change in tumor size from baseline by RECIST V.1.1. (B) Spider plot. Percentage change in tumor size over time from baseline by RECIST V.1.1.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Symbols at censored patients. (A) PFS median (95% CI)=4.633 (4.301 to 4.966), 6-month PFS rate=44.14%. (B) OS median (95% CI)=11.3 (6.094 to 16.506) months.
Figure 3
Figure 3
(A) Change in Ki67+PD1+CD8+ T cells throughout treatment, p=0.0004. Cycle 1 vs cycle 4 p=0.0015, cycle 1 vs cycle 6 p=0.0023. Dots at mean, error bars SD. (B) Change in CTLA-4+PD1+CD8+ T cells throughout treatment, p=0.0004. Dots at mean, error bars SD. Tukey’s multiple comparisons test showed the following significant comparisons: cycle 1 vs cycle 4 p=0.0034; cycle 1 vs cycle 6 p=0.0010; cycle 1 vs cycle 12 p=0.0336. (C) Change in CD8+CD4+ T cells throughout treatment. No significant difference was observed in the total peripheral CD8+ population after 3 cycles (p=0.81) and 5 cycles (p=0.21). Dots at mean, error bars SD.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Kaplan-Meier plot of baseline Ki67/tumor burden (TB) ratio stratified by less than and greater than the median ratio (0.0375);

Figure 5

(A) Overall response rate (ORR)…

Figure 5

(A) Overall response rate (ORR) comparison. (B) Progression-free survival (PFS) comparison with other…

Figure 5
(A) Overall response rate (ORR) comparison. (B) Progression-free survival (PFS) comparison with other monotherapies for platinum-resistant ovarian cancer: KEYNOTE (pembrolizumab), JAVELIN (avelumab), nivolumab, and AURELIA Chemo (paclitaxel, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, topotecan).
Figure 5
Figure 5
(A) Overall response rate (ORR) comparison. (B) Progression-free survival (PFS) comparison with other monotherapies for platinum-resistant ovarian cancer: KEYNOTE (pembrolizumab), JAVELIN (avelumab), nivolumab, and AURELIA Chemo (paclitaxel, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, topotecan).

References

    1. Matulonis UA, Shapira-Frommer R, Santin AD, et al. . Antitumor activity and safety of pembrolizumab in patients with advanced recurrent ovarian cancer: results from the phase II KEYNOTE-100 study. Ann Oncol 2019;30:1080–7. 10.1093/annonc/mdz135
    1. Disis ML, Taylor MH, Kelly K, et al. . Efficacy and safety of Avelumab for patients with recurrent or refractory ovarian cancer: phase 1B results from the javelin solid tumor trial. JAMA Oncol 2019;5:393-401. 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.6258
    1. Hamanishi J, Mandai M, Ikeda T, et al. . Safety and antitumor activity of anti-PD-1 antibody, nivolumab, in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol 2015;33:4015–22. 10.1200/JCO.2015.62.3397
    1. Konstantinopoulos PA, Waggoner S, Vidal GA, et al. . Single-Arm phases 1 and 2 trial of Niraparib in combination with pembrolizumab in patients with recurrent platinum-resistant ovarian carcinoma. JAMA Oncol 2019;5:1141. 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.1048
    1. Zsiros E, Lynam S, Attwood KM, et al. . Efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab in combination with bevacizumab and oral metronomic cyclophosphamide in the treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer: a phase 2 nonrandomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol 2021;7:78. 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.5945
    1. Lee EK, Xiong N, Cheng S-C, et al. . Combined pembrolizumab and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in platinum resistant ovarian cancer: a phase 2 clinical trial. Gynecol Oncol 2020;159:72–8. 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.07.028
    1. Zamarin D, Burger RA, Sill MW, et al. . Randomized phase II trial of nivolumab versus nivolumab and ipilimumab for recurrent or persistent ovarian cancer: an NRG oncology study. J Clin Oncol 2020;38:1814–23. 10.1200/JCO.19.02059
    1. Bracci L, Schiavoni G, Sistigu A, et al. . Immune-Based mechanisms of cytotoxic chemotherapy: implications for the design of novel and rationale-based combined treatments against cancer. Cell Death Differ 2014;21:15–25. 10.1038/cdd.2013.67
    1. Hato SV, Khong A, de Vries IJM, et al. . Molecular pathways: the immunogenic effects of platinum-based chemotherapeutics. Clin Cancer Res 2014;20:2831–7. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-3141
    1. Di Gioacchino M, Di Giampaolo L, Verna N, et al. . In vitro effects of platinum compounds on lymphocyte proliferation and cytokine release. Ann Clin Lab Sci 2004;34:195–202.
    1. Markasz L, Skribek H, Uhlin M, et al. . Effect of frequently used chemotherapeutic drugs on cytotoxic activity of human cytotoxic T-lymphocytes. J Immunother 2008;31:283–93. 10.1097/CJI.0b013e3181628b76
    1. Grabosch S, Bulatovic M, Zeng F, et al. . Cisplatin-Induced immune modulation in ovarian cancer mouse models with distinct inflammation profiles. Oncogene 2019;38:2380–93. 10.1038/s41388-018-0581-9
    1. Lesterhuis WJ, Punt CJA, Hato SV, et al. . Platinum-Based drugs disrupt STAT6-mediated suppression of immune responses against cancer in humans and mice. J Clin Invest 2011;121:3100–8. 10.1172/JCI43656
    1. Varga A, Piha-Paul S, Ott PA, et al. . Pembrolizumab in patients with programmed death ligand 1-positive advanced ovarian cancer: analysis of KEYNOTE-028. Gynecol Oncol 2019;152:243–50. 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.11.017
    1. Lo CS, Sanii S, Kroeger DR, et al. . Neoadjuvant chemotherapy of ovarian cancer results in three patterns of tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte response with distinct implications for immunotherapy. Clin Cancer Res 2017;23:925–34. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-1433
    1. Zhang L, Conejo-Garcia JR, Katsaros D, et al. . Intratumoral T cells, recurrence, and survival in epithelial ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med 2003;348:203–13. 10.1056/NEJMoa020177
    1. Sato E, Olson SH, Ahn J, et al. . Intraepithelial CD8+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and a high CD8+/regulatory T cell ratio are associated with favorable prognosis in ovarian cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2005;102:18538–43. 10.1073/pnas.0509182102
    1. Milne K, Alexander C, Webb JR, et al. . Absolute lymphocyte count is associated with survival in ovarian cancer independent of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. J Transl Med 2012;10:33. 10.1186/1479-5876-10-33
    1. Huang AC, Postow MA, Orlowski RJ, et al. . T-Cell invigoration to tumour burden ratio associated with anti-PD-1 response. Nature 2017;545:60–5. 10.1038/nature22079
    1. Bogaerts J, Ford R, Sargent D, et al. . Individual patient data analysis to assess modifications to the RECIST criteria. Eur J Cancer 2009;45:248–60. 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.027
    1. Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, et al. . New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer 2009;45:228–47. 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026
    1. Pujade-Lauraine E, Hilpert F, Weber B, et al. . Bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy for platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer: the aurelia open-label randomized phase III trial. J Clin Oncol 2014;32:1302–8. 10.1200/JCO.2013.51.4489
    1. Pignata S, Scambia G, Katsaros D, et al. . Carboplatin plus paclitaxel once a week versus every 3 weeks in patients with advanced ovarian cancer (MITO-7): a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2014;15:396–405. 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70049-X
    1. Havrilesky LJ, Alvarez Secord A, Ehrisman JA, et al. . Patient preferences in advanced or recurrent ovarian cancer. Cancer 2014;120:3651–9. 10.1002/cncr.28940
    1. Wu J, Waxman DJ. Immunogenic chemotherapy: dose and schedule dependence and combination with immunotherapy. Cancer Lett 2018;419:210–21. 10.1016/j.canlet.2018.01.050
    1. Matulonis UA, Shapira-Frommer R, Santin A, et al. . Antitumor activity and safety of pembrolizumab in patients with advanced recurrent ovarian cancer: interim results from the phase 2 KEYNOTE-100 study. Journal of Clinical Oncology 2018;36:5511. 10.1200/JCO.2018.36.15_suppl.5511
    1. Leitao MM, Hummer A, Dizon DS, et al. . Platinum retreatment of platinum-resistant ovarian cancer after nonplatinum therapy. Gynecol Oncol 2003;91:123–9. 10.1016/S0090-8258(03)00464-5
    1. Lindemann K, Gao B, Mapagu C, et al. . Response rates to second-line platinum-based therapy in ovarian cancer patients challenge the clinical definition of platinum resistance. Gynecol Oncol 2018;150:239–46. 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.05.020
    1. Alvarez RD, Matulonis UA, Herzog TJ, et al. . Moving beyond the platinum sensitive/resistant paradigm for patients with recurrent ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2016;141:405–9. 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.03.005
    1. Herzog TJ, Ison G, Alvarez RD, et al. . Fda ovarian cancer clinical trial endpoints workshop: a Society of gynecologic oncology white paper. Gynecol Oncol 2017;147:3–10. 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.08.012
    1. Liu YL, Zhou Q, Iasonos A, et al. . Subsequent therapies and survival after immunotherapy in recurrent ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2019;155:51–7. 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.08.006
    1. Strickland KC, Howitt BE, Shukla SA, et al. . Association and prognostic significance of BRCA1/2-mutation status with neoantigen load, number of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and expression of PD-1/PD-L1 in high grade serous ovarian cancer. Oncotarget 2016;7:13587–98. 10.18632/oncotarget.7277
    1. Griffiths CT, Fuller AF. Intensive surgical and chemotherapeutic management of advanced ovarian cancer. Surg Clin North Am 1978;58:131–42. 10.1016/S0039-6109(16)41440-4
    1. Winter WE, Maxwell GL, Tian C, et al. . Tumor residual after surgical cytoreduction in prediction of clinical outcome in stage IV epithelial ovarian cancer: a gynecologic Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol 2008;26:83–9. 10.1200/JCO.2007.13.1953
    1. Böhm S, Montfort A, Pearce OMT, et al. . Neoadjuvant chemotherapy modulates the immune microenvironment in metastases of tubo-ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 2016;22:3025–36. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-2657
    1. Giuliani M, Gui B, Valentini AL, et al. . Early detection of recurrence or progression disease in patients with ovarian cancer after primary debulking surgery. Correlation between CT findings and Ca 125 levels. Minerva Ginecol 2017;69:538–47. 10.23736/S0026-4784.17.04062-X

Source: PubMed

3
S'abonner