Basic needs, stress and the effects of tailored health communication in vulnerable populations

Erika R Cappelletti, Matthew W Kreuter, Sonia Boyum, Tess Thompson, Erika R Cappelletti, Matthew W Kreuter, Sonia Boyum, Tess Thompson

Abstract

This study examined whether unmet basic needs (food, housing, personal and neighborhood safety, money for necessities) and perceived stress affect recall of and response to a tailored print intervention one month later. Participants (N = 372) were adults who had called 2-1-1 Missouri between June 2010 and June 2012. A series of path analyses using Mplus were conducted to explore the relationships among basic needs, perceived stress, number of health referrals received in a tailored intervention, recalling the intervention and contacting a health referral. Participants were mainly women (85%) and African-American (59%) with a mean age of 42.2 years (SD = 13.3; range 19-86); 41% had annual household income <$10 000. Unmet basic needs were positively associated with increased levels of perceived stress, which, in turn, were negatively associated with recalling the intervention and calling any of the health referrals provided. Tailored printed interventions may be less effective in populations with acute unmet basic needs. More broadly, the effectiveness of minimal contact behavioral interventions might be enhanced by simultaneous efforts to address unmet basic needs.

© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Direct and indirect paths between study variables.

References

    1. Krebs P, Prochaska JO, Rossi JS. A meta-analysis of computer-tailored interventions for health behavior change. Prev Med 2010; 51: 214–21.
    1. Noar SM, Benac CN, Harris MS. Does tailoring matter? Meta-analytic review of tailored print health behavior change interventions. Psychol Bull 2007; 133: 673–93.
    1. Sohl SJ, Moyer A. Tailored intervention to promote mammography screening: a meta-analytic review. Prev Med 2007; 45: 252–61.
    1. Ryan P, Lauver DR. The efficacy of tailored interventions. J Nurs Scholarsh 2002; 34: 331–7.
    1. Lancaster T, Stead L, Silagy C, et al. Effectiveness of interventions to help people stop smoking: findings from the cochrane library. BMJ 2000; 321: 355–8.
    1. Skinner CS, Campbell MK, Rimer BK, et al. How effective is tailored print communication? Ann Behav Med 1999; 21: 290–8.
    1. Strecher VJ. Computer-tailored smoking cessation materials: a review and discussion. Patient Educ Couns 1999; 36: 107–17.
    1. Brug J, Campbell M, van Assema P. The application and impact of computer-generated personalized nutrition education: a review of the literature. Patient Educ Couns 1999; 36: 145–56.
    1. Skinner CS, Kobrin SC, Monahan PO, et al. Tailored interventions for screening mammography among a sample of initially non-adherent women: When is a booster dose important? Patient Educ Couns 2007; 65: 87–94.
    1. Saywell RM, Jr, Champion VL, Skinner CS, et al. A cost-effectiveness comparison of three tailored interventions to increase mammography screening. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2004; 13: 909–18.
    1. West DS, Greene P, Pulley L, et al. Stepped-care, community clinic interventions to promote mammography use among low-income rural African American women. Health Educ Behav 2004; 31: 29S–44S.
    1. Jibaja-Weiss ML, Volk RJ, Kingery P, et al. Tailored messages for breast and cervical cancer screening of low-income and minority women using medical records data. Patient Educ Couns 2003; 50: 123–32.
    1. McCaul KD, Wold KS. The effects of mailed reminders and tailored messages on mammography screening. J Community Health 2002; 27: 181–90.
    1. Blazer DG, Sachs-Ericsson N, Hybels CF. Perception of unmet basic needs as a predictor of depressive symptoms among community-dwelling older adults. J Gerontol A 2007; 62: 191–5.
    1. Sachs-Ericsson N, Schatschneider C, Blazer DG. Perception of unmet basic needs as a predictor of physical functioning among community-dwelling older adults. J Aging Health 2006; 18: 852–68.
    1. Ng W, Diener E, Arora R, et al. Affluence, feelings of stress, and well-being. Soc Indic Res 2009; 94: 257–71.
    1. Wargo E. Understanding the have-knots: the role of stress in just about everything. ObserveR 2007; 20: 18–23.
    1. Miller GE, Blackwell E. Turning up the heat: inflammation as a mechanism linking chronic stress, depression, and heart disease. Curr Direct Psychol Sci 2006; 15: 269–72.
    1. Haushofer J, Fehr E. On the psychology of poverty. Science 2014; 344: 862–7.
    1. Kerner JF, Dusenbury L, Mandelblatt JS. Poverty and cultural diversity: challenges for health promotion among the medically underserved. Annu Rev Public Health 1993; 14: 355–77.
    1. Mullainathan S, Shafir E. Scarcity: Why Having Too Little Means So Much . New York: Times Books, 2013.
    1. Kreuter MW. Reach, effectiveness, and connections: the case for partnering with 2-1-1 to eliminate health disparities. Am J Prev Med 2012; 43: S420–1.
    1. Purnell JQ, Kreuter MW, Eddens KS, et al. Cancer control needs of 2-1-1 callers in Missouri, North Carolina, Texas, and Washington. J Health Care Poor Underserved 2012; 23: 752–67.
    1. Kreuter MW, Eddens KS, Alcaraz KI, et al. Use of cancer control referrals by 2-1-1 callers: a randomized trial. Am J Prev Med 2012; 43: S425–34.
    1. Eddens KS, Kreuter MW. Proactive screening for health needs in united way's 2-1-1 information and referral service. J Soc Serv Res 2011; 37: 113–23.
    1. Segal S, Silverman C, Temkin T. Empowerment in self-help agency practice. Soc Work 1993; 38: 705–12.
    1. Blazer DG, Sachs-Ericsson N, Hybels CF. Perception of unmet basic needs as a predictor of mortality among community-dwelling older adults. Am J Public Health 2005; 95: 299–304.
    1. Cohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R. A global measure of perceived stress. J Health Soc Behav 1983; 24: 385–96.
    1. Cohen S, Williamson G. Perceived stress in a probability sample of the United States. In: Spacapam S, Oskamp S. (eds). The Social Psychology of Health: Claremont Symposium on Applied Social Psychology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1988.
    1. Hu L, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Eq Model Multidisc J 1999; 6: 1–55.
    1. Radel R, Clement-Guillotin C. Evidence of motivational influences in early visual perception: Hunger modulates conscious access. Psychol Sci 2012; 23: 232–4.
    1. Spears D. Economic decision-making in poverty depletes behavioral control. B.E. J Econ Anal Policy 2011; 11: 1–44.
    1. von Wagner C, Good A, Whitaker KL, et al. Psychosocial determinants of socioeconomic inequalities in cancer screening participation: a conceptual framework. Epidemiol Rev 2011; 33: 135–47.
    1. Kreuter MW, Steger-May K, Bobra S, et al. Sociocultural characteristics and responses to cancer education materials among African American women. Cancer Control 2003; 10: 69–80.
    1. Kreuter MW, Bull FC, Clark EM, et al. Understanding how people process health information: a comparison of tailored and nontailored weight-loss materials. Health Psychol 1999; 18: 487–94.
    1. Webb MS, Simmons VN, Brandon TH. Tailored interventions for motivating smoking cessation: using placebo tailoring to examine the influence of expectancies and personalization. Health Psychol 2005; 24: 179–88.
    1. Hawkins RP, Kreuter MW, Resnicow K, et al. Understanding tailoring in communicating about health. Health Educ Res 2008; 23: 454–66.
    1. The Guide to Community Preventive Services. 2012. Available at: . Accessed: 1 May 2015.
    1. Piette JD, Lun KC, Moura LA, et al. Impacts of e-health on the outcomes of care in low-and middle-income countries: where do we go from here? Bull World Health Organ 2012; 90: 365–72.
    1. Thompson T, Kreuter M, Boyum S. Promoting health by addressing basic needs: effect of problem resolution on contacting health referrals. Health Educ Behav , in press

Source: PubMed

3
S'abonner