Assessments of different batches and dose levels of a two-dose Ad26.ZEBOV and MVA-BN-Filo vaccine regimen

Viki Bockstal, Auguste Gaddah, Neil Goldstein, Georgi Shukarev, Stephan Bart, Kerstin Luhn, Cynthia Robinson, Dickson Anumendem, Maarten Leyssen, Macaya Douoguih, Viki Bockstal, Auguste Gaddah, Neil Goldstein, Georgi Shukarev, Stephan Bart, Kerstin Luhn, Cynthia Robinson, Dickson Anumendem, Maarten Leyssen, Macaya Douoguih

Abstract

Two phase 3 clinical studies were conducted in the USA to bridge across different Ad26.ZEBOV manufacturing processes and sites, and to evaluate the immunogenicity of different dose levels of Ad26.ZEBOV and MVA-BN-Filo. Study 1 evaluated the immunological equivalence of three batches of Ad26.ZEBOV administered as dose 1, followed by one batch of MVA-BN-Filo as dose 2. In Study 2, immunogenic non-inferiority of intermediate (Ad26.ZEBOV: 2 × 1010 viral particles [vp], MVA-BN-Filo: 5 × 107 infectious units [Inf.U]) and low (8 × 109 vp, 5 × 107 Inf.U) doses of Ad26.ZEBOV and MVA-BN-Filo were evaluated against the full clinical dose (5 × 1010 vp, 1 × 108 Inf.U). In Study 1, equivalence was demonstrated for two of three batch comparisons post-dose 1 and all three batches after the full regimen. Study 2 demonstrated a dose-dependent response; however, non-inferiority against the full clinical dose was not met. All regimens were well tolerated and immune responses were observed in all participants, regardless of manufacturing process or dose. Consistency of immunogenicity of different Ad26.ZEBOV batches was demonstrated and a dose-dependent response was observed after Ad26.ZEBOV, MVA-BN-Filo vaccination. ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT02543268; NCT02543567.

Conflict of interest statement

Janssen Vaccines & Prevention B.V. was the clinical trial Sponsor and was involved in the design and conduct of the trial, and in the collection and analysis of data. V.B., A.G., N.G., G.S., K.L., C.R., D.A., M.L. and M.D. were full-time employees of Janssen, Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson at the time of the study, and may own shares in Janssen, Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson. SB reports grants from Janssen, Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson during the conduct of the study, paid to Optimal Research LLC.

© 2021. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1. Study flow.
Fig. 1. Study flow.
Panel a shows the study flow for Study 1. Panel b shows the study flow for Study 2. Inf.U: infectious units; MVS: master virus seed; vp: viral particles; WVS: working virus seed. *Same Leiden MVS batch as used in phase 1/2 studies.
Fig. 2. Geometric mean concentrations of EBOV-specific…
Fig. 2. Geometric mean concentrations of EBOV-specific binding antibodies in the two studies.
Panel a (Study 1) shows the geometric mean profile of the three different batches of Ad26.ZEBOV (5 × 1010 vp) (Group 1: Leiden WVS, batch #33831; Group 2: Bern WVS, batch #33488; Group 3: Leiden MVS*, batch #32642), MVA-BN-Filo (1 × 108 Inf.U), or placebo, placebo (Group 4) administered 56 days apart. Panel b (Study 2) shows the geometric mean profile of the different dose levels - Group 1 (full clinical dose: Ad26.ZEBOV [5 × 1010 vp], MVA-BN-Filo [1 × 108 Inf.U]), Group 2 (intermediate dose: Ad26.ZEBOV [2 × 1010 vp], MVA-BN-Filo [5 × 107 Inf.U]), Group 3 (low dose: Ad26.ZEBOV [8 × 109 vp], MVA-BN-Filo [5 × 107 Inf.U]), or Group 4 (placebo, placebo), administered 56 days apart. Both panels show the change in geometric mean concentrations over time (for actual values, see Table 2). Error bars in both panels represent the 95% confidence intervals. Inf.U: infectious units; LLOQ: lower limit of quantification; MVS: master virus seed; vp: viral particles; WVS: working virus seed. *Same Leiden MVS batch as used in phase 1/2 studies.

References

    1. Piot P, Spencer J. From 1976 to 2018: reflections on early investigations into the Ebola virus. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med Hyg. 2018;112:527–528. doi: 10.1093/trstmh/try088.
    1. World Health Organization. Situation Report: Ebola Virus Disease 10 June 2016. (2016).
    1. Jacob ST, et al. Ebola virus disease. Nat. Rev. Dis. Prim. 2020;6:13. doi: 10.1038/s41572-020-0147-3.
    1. World Health Organization. News – 10th Ebola outbreak in the Democratic Republic of the Congo declared over; vigilance against flare-ups and support for survivors must continue. News Release Update 25 June 2020. (2020).
    1. Sridhar S. Clinical development of Ebola vaccines. Ther. Adv. Vaccines. 2015;3:125–138. doi: 10.1177/2051013615611017.
    1. Henao-Restrepo AM, et al. Efficacy and effectiveness of an rVSV-vectored vaccine in preventing Ebola virus disease: final results from the Guinea ring vaccination, open-label, cluster-randomised trial (Ebola Ça Suffit!) Lancet. 2017;389:505–518. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32621-6.
    1. World Health Organization. Preliminary results on the efficacy of rVSV-ZEBOV-GP Ebola vaccine using the ring vaccination strategy in the control of an Ebola outbreak in the Democratic Republic of the Congo: an example of integration of research into epidemic response. (2019).
    1. U. S. Food & Drug Administration. First FDA-approved vaccine for the prevention of Ebola virus disease, marking a critical milestone in public health preparedness and response. News Release 19 December 2019 (2019).
    1. European Commission. Vaccine against Ebola: commission grants first-ever market authorisation. Press Release 11 November 2019. (2019).
    1. World Health Organization. WHO prequalifies Ebola vaccine, paving the way for its use in high-risk countries. News Release 12 November 2019. (2019).
    1. World Health Organization. Strategic Advisory Group of Experts (SAGE) on Immunization Interim Recommendations on Vaccination against Ebola Virus Disease (EVD) 7 May 2019. (2019).
    1. European Medicines Agency. New vaccine for prevention of Ebola virus disease recommended for approval in the European Union. News Release 29 May 2020. (2020).
    1. European Medicines Agency. Zabdeno; EPAR. (2020).
    1. European Medicines Agency. Mvabea; EPAR. (2020).
    1. Ministry of Health. The Ministry of Health launched Umurinzi Ebola vaccine program campaign. News Release 8 December 2019. (2019).
    1. Milligan ID, et al. Safety and immunogenicity of novel Adenovirus type 26- and modified vaccinia Ankara-vectored Ebola vaccines: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2016;315:1610–1623. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.4218.
    1. Mutua G, et al. Safety and immunogenicity of a 2-dose heterologous vaccine regimen with Ad26.ZEBOV and MVA-BN-Filo Ebola vaccines: 12-month data from a phase 1 randomized clinical trial in Nairobi, Kenya. J. Infect. Dis. 2019;220:57–67. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiz071.
    1. Anywaine Z, et al. Safety and immunogenicity of a 2-dose heterologous vaccination regimen with Ad26.ZEBOV and MVA-BN-Filo Ebola vaccines: 12-month data from a phase 1 randomized clinical trial in Uganda and Tanzania. J. Infect. Dis. 2019;220:46–56. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiz070.
    1. Pollard AJ, et al. Safety and immunogenicity of a two-dose heterologous Ad26.ZEBOV and MVA-BN-Filo Ebola vaccine regimen in adults in Europe (EBOVAC2): a randomised, observer-blind, participant-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2021;21:493–506. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30476-X.
    1. Ishola, D. et al. Safety and long-term immunogenicity of the two-dose heterologous Ad26.ZEBOV, MVA-BN-Filo Ebola vaccine regimen in adults in Sierra Leone: a combined open-label, non-randomised stage 1, and a randomised, double-blind, controlled stage 2 trial. Lancet Infect. Dis. (2021) 10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00125-0 [Epub ahead of print].
    1. Afolabi, M. O. et al. Safety and immunogenicity of the two-dose heterologous Ad26.ZEBOV and MVA-BN-Filo Ebola vaccine regimen in children in Sierra Leone: a randomised, double-blind, controlled trial. Lancet Infect. Dis. (2021) 10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00128-6. [Epub ahead of print].
    1. . NCT02313077. .
    1. . NCT02376426. .
    1. . NCT02376400. .
    1. . NCT02325050. .
    1. . NCT02416453. .
    1. . NCT02564523. .
    1. . NCT02509494. .
    1. . NCT02543268. .
    1. . NCT02543567.
    1. . NCT04228783. .
    1. Goldstein, N. et al. Safety and immunogenicity of heterologous and homologous 2-dose regimens of adenovirus serotype 26- and modified vaccinia Ankara-vectored Ebola vaccines: a randomized, controlled phase 1 study. J. Infect. Dis. (2020) 10.1093/infdis/jiaa586 [Epub ahead of print].
    1. Logue J, et al. Use of the Filovirus Animal Non-Clinical Group (FANG) Ebola virus immuno-assay requires fewer study participants to power a study than the Alpha Diagnostic International assay. J. Virol. Methods. 2018;255:84–90. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2018.02.018.

Source: PubMed

3
S'abonner