Supportive Accountability and Mobile App Use in a Tobacco Control Intervention Targeting Low-Income Minority Mothers Who Smoke: Observational Study

Stephen J Lepore, Bradley N Collins, Howard W Killam, Barbara Barry, Stephen J Lepore, Bradley N Collins, Howard W Killam, Barbara Barry

Abstract

Background: Smartphone mobile apps are frequently used in standalone or multimodal smoking cessation interventions. However, factors that impede or improve app usage are poorly understood.

Objective: This study used the supportive accountability model to investigate factors that influence app usage in the context of a trial designed to reduce maternal smoking in low-income and predominantly minority communities.

Methods: We conducted a secondary analysis of data (N=181) from a randomized controlled trial that included a smoking cessation app (QuitPal-m). Supportive accountability was measured by the number of times a participant was advised by their cessation counselor to use QuitPal-m. Participants reported app use helpfulness and barriers. Investigators tracked reported phone and technical problems that impeded app use.

Results: Most participants rated the app as very helpful (103/155, 66.5%), but daily use declined rapidly over time. App use was positively related to the level of perceived app helpfulness (P=.02) and education (P=.002) and inversely related to perceived barriers (P=.003), phone technical problems (P<.001), and cigarettes smoked per day at the end of treatment (P<.001). Participants used the app a greater proportion of the days following app advice than those preceding app advice (0.45 versus 0.34; P<.001). The positive relation between counselor app advice and app usage 24 hours after receiving advice was stronger among smokers with no plan to quit than in those planning to quit (P=.03), independent of education and phone or app problems.

Conclusions: Findings show the utility of supportive accountability for increasing smoking cessation app use in a predominantly low-income, minority population, particularly if quit motivation is low. Results also highlight the importance of addressing personal and phone/technical barriers in addition to adding supportive accountability.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02602288; https://ichgcp.net/clinical-trials-registry/NCT02602288.

Keywords: adherence; engagement; mHealth; minority health; mobile apps; mobile phone; smartphone; smoking; tobacco cessation.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

©Stephen J Lepore, Bradley N Collins, Howard W Killam, Barbara Barry. Originally published in JMIR mHealth and uHealth (https://mhealth.jmir.org), 02.07.2021.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
QuitPal-m app features and illustration of web-enabled counselor dashboard.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Percent of participants using QuitPal-m app by intervention week (N=181).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Relation between counselor app advice and proportion of days app was used within 24 hours after advice as a function of motivation to quit smoking (N=171).

References

    1. Borrelli B, Bartlett YK, Tooley E, Armitage CJ, Wearden A. Prevalence and Frequency of mHealth and eHealth Use Among US and UK Smokers and Differences by Motivation to Quit. J Med Internet Res. 2015 Jul 04;17(7):e164. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4420.
    1. Heffner JL, Mull KE. Smartphone Ownership Among US Adult Cigarette Smokers: 2014 Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS) Data. J Med Internet Res. 2017 Dec 31;19(8):e305. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7953.
    1. Abroms LC, Lee WJ, Bontemps-Jones J, Ramani R, Mellerson J. A content analysis of popular smartphone apps for smoking cessation. Am J Prev Med. 2013 Dec;45(6):732–6. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.07.008.
    1. Ubhi HK, Michie S, Kotz D, Wong WC, West R. A mobile app to aid smoking cessation: preliminary evaluation of SmokeFree28. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17(1):e17. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3479.
    1. Rodde T. 21% of users abandon an app after one use. Localytics Blog. 2018. Feb 28, [2020-02-15]. .
    1. Perro J. Mobile apps: what's a good retention rate. Technopreneurph. 2016. Mar 29, [2020-02-15].
    1. Zeng EY, Heffner JL, Copeland WK, Mull KE, Bricker JB. Get with the program: Adherence to a smartphone app for smoking cessation. Addict Behav. 2016 Dec;63:120–4. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.07.007.
    1. Mohr DC, Cuijpers P, Lehman K. Supportive accountability: a model for providing human support to enhance adherence to eHealth interventions. J Med Internet Res. 2011;13(1):e30. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1602.
    1. DiMatteo MR. Social support and patient adherence to medical treatment: a meta-analysis. Health Psychol. 2004 Mar;23(2):207–18. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.23.2.207.
    1. de Dios MA, Stanton CA, Cano. Lloyd-Richardson E, Niaura R. The Influence of Social Support on Smoking Cessation Treatment Adherence Among HIV+ Smokers. Nicotine Tob Res. 2016 May;18(5):1126–33. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntv144.
    1. Fiore M, Jaen C, Baker T, Bailey W, Benowitz N, Curry S. Clinical Guidelines and Recommendations | Treating Tobacco Use and Dependence. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. [2020-02-15]. .
    1. Oussedik E, Foy CG, Masicampo EJ, Kammrath LK, Anderson RE, Feldman SR. Accountability: a missing construct in models of adherence behavior and in clinical practice. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2017;11:1285–1294. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S135895. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S135895.
    1. Ryan RM, Deci EL. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am Psychol. 2000 Jan;55(1):68–78.
    1. Ajzen I, Kruglanski AW. Reasoned action in the service of goal pursuit. Psychol Rev. 2019 Oct;126(5):774–786. doi: 10.1037/rev0000155.
    1. Pai C, Edington DW. Association between behavioral intention and actual change for physical activity, smoking, and body weight among an employed population. J Occup Environ Med. 2008 Sep;50(9):1077–83. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0b013e31817d0795.
    1. Nayak P, Pechacek TF, Weaver SR, Eriksen MP. Electronic nicotine delivery system dual use and intention to quit smoking: Will the socioeconomic gap in smoking get greater? Addict Behav. 2016 Oct;61:112–6. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.05.020.
    1. Collins BN, Lepore SJ. BMC Public Health. 2017 Mar 14;17(1):249. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4145-7.
    1. Homa DM, Neff LJ, King BA, Caraballo RS, Bunnell RE, Babb SD, Garrett BE, Sosnoff CS, Wang L, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Vital signs: disparities in nonsmokers' exposure to secondhand smoke--United States, 1999-2012. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2015 Feb 06;64(4):103–8.
    1. Cokkinides VE, Halpern MT, Barbeau EM, Ward E, Thun MJ. Racial and ethnic disparities in smoking-cessation interventions: analysis of the 2005 National Health Interview Survey. Am J Prev Med. 2008 May;34(5):404–12. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.02.003.
    1. Counseling about smoking cessation. American Academy of Pediatrics. [2020-02-15]. .
    1. Massett H, Atkinson NL, Kraiger A, Grady M, Killam B, Barry B. NCI Quitpal: an evidence-based app to help people quit smoking. American Public Health Association (APHA) 141st Annual Meeting; American Public Health Association (APHA) 141st Annual Meeting; November 6, 2013; Boston, MA. 2013.
    1. Regmi D, Tobutt C, Shaban S. Quality and use of free smoking cessation apps for smartphones. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2018 Jan;34(5):476–480. doi: 10.1017/S0266462318000521.
    1. Ryan C, Bergin M, Wells JS. Theoretical Perspectives of Adherence to Web-Based Interventions: a Scoping Review. Int J Behav Med. 2017 Jul 20;:17–29. doi: 10.1007/s12529-017-9678-8.
    1. Imtiaz MH, Ramos-Garcia RI, Wattal S, Tiffany S, Sazonov E. Wearable Sensors for Monitoring of Cigarette Smoking in Free-Living: A Systematic Review. Sensors (Basel) 2019 Oct 28;19(21):4678. doi: 10.3390/s19214678.
    1. Rajani NB, Weth D, Mastellos N, Filippidis FT. Use of gamification strategies and tactics in mobile applications for smoking cessation: a review of the UK mobile app market. BMJ Open. 2019 Jun 17;9(6):e027883. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027883.

Source: PubMed

3
S'abonner