SmartPill® as an objective parameter for determination of severity and duration of postoperative ileus: study protocol of a prospective, two-arm, open-label trial (the PIDuSA study)

Tim O Vilz, Dimitrios Pantelis, Philipp Lingohr, Rolf Fimmers, Anke Esmann, Thomas Randau, Jörg C Kalff, Martin Coenen, Sven Wehner, Tim O Vilz, Dimitrios Pantelis, Philipp Lingohr, Rolf Fimmers, Anke Esmann, Thomas Randau, Jörg C Kalff, Martin Coenen, Sven Wehner

Abstract

Introduction: Postoperative ileus (POI) is a frequent complication after abdominal surgery (AS). Until today, neither a prophylaxis nor an evidence-based therapy exists. This originates from the absence of objective parameters evaluating the severity and duration of POI resulting in clinical trials of modest quality. The SmartPill(®), a capsule which frequently measures pH value, temperature and intraluminal pressure after swallowing, offers an elegant option for analysing gastrointestinal (GI) transit times and smooth muscle activity in vivo. As the use in patients in the first months after AS is not covered by the marketing authorisation, we aim to investigate the safety and feasibility of the SmartPill(®) immediately after surgery. Additionally, we analyse the influence of prokinetics and laxatives as well as standardised physiotherapy on postoperative bowel contractility, as scientific evidence of its effects is still lacking.

Methods and analysis: The PIDuSA study is a prospective, single-centre, two-arm, open-label trial. The SmartPill(®) will be applied to 55 patients undergoing AS having a high risk for POI and 10 patients undergoing extra-abdominal surgery rarely developing POI. The primary objective is the safety of the SmartPill(®) in patients after surgery on the basis of adverse device effects/serious adverse device effects (ADE/SADE). The sample size suggests that events with a probability of 3% could be seen with a certainty of 80% for at least once in the sample. Secondary objective is the analysis of postoperative intestinal activity in the GI tract in both groups. Furthermore, clinical signs of bowel motility disorders will be correlated to the data measured by the SmartPill(®) to evaluate its significance as an objective parameter for assessing POI severity. Additionally, effects of prokinetics, laxatives and physiotherapy on postoperative peristaltic activity recorded by the SmartPill(®) will be analysed.

Ethics and dissemination: The protocol was approved by the federal authority (94.1.05-5660-8976) and the local ethics committee (092/14-MPG). Findings will be disseminated through publications and conference presentations.

Trial registration number: NCT02329912; Pre-results.

Keywords: SmartPill®; physiotherapy; postoperative ileus; prokinetic substances; safety; wireless motility capsule.

Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
SmartPill®.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Analysis of gastrointestinal passage and peristaltic activity in a healthy man aged 37 years (A and C) and a woman aged 57 years after laparoscopic sigmoid resection demonstrating decelerated transit times (B and D). Gastric emptying time can be measured by a sudden increase in pH value (figure 2A, B). Small bowel passage is characterised by a slow pH increase followed by a sudden decrease at the ileocecal junction (figure 2B, C). Excretion of the SmartPill® is determined by a sudden temperature drop and a loss of capsule signals (figure 2C, D). Furthermore, peristaltic activity can be analysed using frequency, minimum and maximum pressure of peristalsis as well as the motility index calculated by MotiliGI software. Exemplary, a highlighted period was added in figure 2C after using the ‘event button’, allowing an easy analysis of bowel contractions during the marked period.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Data receiver with ‘event button’.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Decelerated gastrointestinal transit times in patients with gastroparesis, intestinal bacterial overgrowth or liver cirrhosis compared with healthy probands.

References

    1. Kehlet H. Postoperative ileus. Gut 2000;47(Suppl 4):iv85–iv6; discussion iv87 10.1136/gut.47.suppl_4.iv85
    1. Dong G, Liu C, Xu B et al. . Postoperative abdominal complications after cardiopulmonary bypass. J Cardiothorac Surg 2012;7:108 10.1186/1749-8090-7-108
    1. Al Maaieh MA, Du JY, Aichmair A et al. . Multivariate analysis on risk factors for postoperative ileus after lateral lumbar interbody fusion. Spine 2014;39:688–94. 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000238
    1. van den Heijkant TC, Costes LM, van der Lee DG et al. . Randomized clinical trial of the effect of gum chewing on postoperative ileus and inflammation in colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 2015;102:202–11. 10.1002/bjs.9691
    1. Iyer S, Saunders WB, Stemkowski S. Economic burden of postoperative ileus associated with colectomy in the United States. J Manag Care Pharm 2009;15:485–94. 10.18553/jmcp.2009.15.6.485
    1. Vather R, Bissett I. Management of prolonged post-operative ileus: evidence-based recommendations. ANZ J Surg 2013;83:319–24. 10.1111/ans.12102
    1. Traut U, Brügger L, Kunz R et al. . Systemic prokinetic pharmacologic treatment for postoperative adynamic ileus following abdominal surgery in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008(1):CD004930 10.1002/14651858.CD004930.pub3
    1. van Bree SH, Bemelman WA, Hollmann MW et al. . Identification of clinical outcome measures for recovery of gastrointestinal motility in postoperative ileus. Ann Surg 2014;259:708–14. 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318293ee55
    1. Wu Z, Boersema GS, Dereci A et al. . Clinical endpoint, early detection, and differential diagnosis of postoperative ileus: a systematic review of the literature. Eur Surg Res 2015;54:127–38. 10.1159/000369529
    1. Müller SA, Rahbari NN, Schneider F et al. . Randomized clinical trial on the effect of coffee on postoperative ileus following elective colectomy. Br J Surg 2012;99:1530–8. 10.1002/bjs.8885
    1. Vather R, Trivedi S, Bissett I. Defining postoperative ileus: results of a systematic review and global survey. J Gastrointest Surg 2013;17:962–72. 10.1007/s11605-013-2148-y
    1. Vilz TO, Sommer N, Kahl P et al. . Oral CPSI-2364 treatment prevents postoperative ileus in swine without impairment of anastomotic healing. Cell Physiol Biochem 2013;32:1362–73. 10.1159/000356575
    1. Wehner S, Meder K, Vilz TO et al. . Preoperative short-term parenteral administration of polyunsaturated fatty acids ameliorates intestinal inflammation and postoperative ileus in rodents. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2012;397:307–15. 10.1007/s00423-011-0862-z
    1. Toyomasu Y, Mochiki E, Morita H et al. . Mosapride citrate improves postoperative ileus of patients with colectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 2011;15:1361–7. 10.1007/s11605-011-1567-x
    1. The FO, Buist MR, Lei A et al. . The role of mast cell stabilization in treatment of postoperative ileus: a pilot study. Am J Gastroenterol 2009;104:2257–66. 10.1038/ajg.2009.268
    1. Cassilly D, Kantor S, Knight LC et al. . Gastric emptying of a non-digestible solid: assessment with simultaneous SmartPill™ pH and pressure capsule, antroduodenal manometry, gastric emptying scintigraphy. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2008;20:311–19. 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2007.01061.x
    1. Rao SS, Kuo B, McCallum RW et al. . Investigation of colonic and whole-gut transit with wireless motility capsule and radiopaque markers in constipation. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2009;7:537–44. 10.1016/j.cgh.2009.01.017
    1. Kuo B, Maneerattanaporn M, Lee AA et al. . Generalized transit delay on wireless motility capsule testing in patients with clinical suspicion of gastroparesis, small intestinal dysmotility, or slow transit constipation. Dig Dis Sci 2011;56:2928–38. 10.1007/s10620-011-1751-6
    1. Tran K, Brun R, Kuo B. Evaluation of regional and whole gut motility using the wireless motility capsule: relevance in clinical practice. Therap Adv Gastroenterol 2012;5:249–60. 10.1177/1756283X12437874
    1. Green AD, Belkind-Gerson J, Surjanhata BC et al. . Wireless motility capsule test in children with upper gastrointestinal symptoms. J Pediatr 2013;162:1181–7. 10.1016/j.jpeds.2012.11.040
    1. Chander Roland B, Garcia-Tsao G, Ciarleglio MM et al. . Decompensated cirrhotics have slower intestinal transit times as compared with compensated cirrhotics and healthy controls. J Clin Gastroenterol 2013;47:888–93. 10.1097/MCG.0b013e31829006bb
    1. Roland BC, Ciarleglio MM, Clarke JO et al. . Small intestinal transit time is delayed in small intestinal bacterial overgrowth. J Clin Gastroenterol 2015;49:571–6. 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000257
    1. Gelfond D, Ma C, Semler J et al. . Intestinal pH and gastrointestinal transit profiles in cystic fibrosis patients measured by wireless motility capsule. Dig Dis Sci 2013;58:2275–81. 10.1007/s10620-012-2209-1
    1. Rauch S, Krueger K, Turan A et al. . Use of wireless motility capsule to determine gastric emptying and small intestinal transit times in critically ill trauma patients. J Crit Care 2012;27:534.e7–12. 10.1016/j.jcrc.2011.12.002
    1. Sarosiek I, Selover KH, Katz LA et al. . The assessment of regional gut transit times in healthy controls and patients with gastroparesis using wireless motility technology. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2010;31:313–22. 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2009.04162.x
    1. Wehner S, Vilz TO, Stoffels B et al. . Immune mediators of postoperative ileus. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2012;397:591–601. 10.1007/s00423-012-0915-y
    1. Parker CE, Spada C, McAlindon M et al. . Capsule endoscopy--not just for the small bowel: a review. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2015;9:79–89. 10.1586/17474124.2014.934357
    1. De Palma GD, Masone S, Persico M et al. . Capsule impaction presenting as acute small bowel perforation: a case series. J Med Case Rep 2012;6:121 10.1186/1752-1947-6-121
    1. Purdy M, Heikkinen M, Juvonen P et al. . Characteristics of patients with a retained wireless capsule endoscope (WCE) necessitating laparotomy for removal of the capsule. In Vivo 2011;25:707–10.
    1. Skovsen AP, Burcharth J, Burgdorf SK. Capsule endoscopy: a cause of late small bowel obstruction and perforation. Case Rep Surg. 2013;2013:458108 10.1155/2013/458108
    1. Neumann H, Fry LC, Nägel A et al. . Wireless capsule endoscopy of the small intestine: a review with future directions. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 2014;30:463–71. 10.1097/MOG.0000000000000101
    1. Liao Z, Gao R, Xu C et al. . Indications and detection, completion, and retention rates of small-bowel capsule endoscopy: a systematic review. Gastrointest Endosc 2010;71:280–6. 10.1016/j.gie.2009.09.031
    1. Repici A, Barbon V, De Angelis C et al. . Acute small-bowel perforation secondary to capsule endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2008;67:180–3. 10.1016/j.gie.2007.05.044
    1. Lin OS, Brandabur JJ, Schembre DB et al. . Acute symptomatic small bowel obstruction due to capsule impaction. Gastrointest Endosc 2007;65:725–8. 10.1016/j.gie.2006.11.033
    1. Gonzalez Carro P, Picazo Yuste J, Fernández Diez S et al. . Intestinal perforation due to retained wireless capsule endoscope. Endoscopy 2005;37:684 10.1055/s-2005-861424
    1. Peters EG, Smeets BJ, Dekkers M et al. . The effects of stimulation of the autonomic nervous system via perioperative nutrition on postoperative ileus and anastomotic leakage following colorectal surgery (SANICS II trial): a study protocol for a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Trials 2015;16:20 10.1186/s13063-014-0532-x
    1. Beck DE, Sweeney WB, McCarter MD. Prospective, randomized, controlled, proof-of-concept study of the Ghrelin mimetic ipamorelin for the management of postoperative ileus in bowel resection patients. Int J Colorectal Dis 2014;29:1527–34. 10.1007/s00384-014-2030-8
    1. Vather R, Josephson R, Jaung R et al. . Gastrografin in Prolonged Postoperative Ileus: a Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Surg 2015;262:23–30. 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001062
    1. Basse L, Hjort Jakobsen D, Billesbølle P et al. . A clinical pathway to accelerate recovery after colonic resection. Ann Surg 2000;232:51–7. 10.1097/00000658-200007000-00008
    1. Waldhausen JH, Schirmer BD. The effect of ambulation on recovery from postoperative ileus. Ann Surg 1990;212:671–7. 10.1097/00000658-199012000-00004
    1. Lee SM, Kang SB, Jang JH et al. . Early rehabilitation versus conventional care after laparoscopic rectal surgery: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Surg Endosc 2013;27:3902–9. 10.1007/s00464-013-3006-4

Source: PubMed

3
S'abonner