The protocol and design of a randomised controlled study on training of attention within the first year after acquired brain injury

Aniko Bartfai, Gabriela Markovic, Kristina Sargenius Landahl, Marie-Louise Schult, Aniko Bartfai, Gabriela Markovic, Kristina Sargenius Landahl, Marie-Louise Schult

Abstract

Background: To describe the design of the study aiming to examine intensive targeted cognitive rehabilitation of attention in the acute (<4 months) and subacute rehabilitation phases (4-12 months) after acquired brain injury and to evaluate the effects on function, activity and participation (return to work).

Methods/design: Within a prospective, randomised, controlled study 120 consecutive patients with stroke or traumatic brain injury were randomised to 20 hours of intensive attention training by Attention Process Training or by standard, activity based training. Progress was evaluated by Statistical Process Control and by pre and post measurement of functional and activity levels. Return to work was also evaluated in the post-acute phase. Primary endpoints were the changes in the attention measure, Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test and changes in work ability. Secondary endpoints included measurement of cognitive functions, activity and work return. There were 3, 6 and 12-month follow ups focussing on health economics.

Discussion: The study will provide information on rehabilitation of attention in the early phases after ABI; effects on function, activity and return to work. Further, the application of Statistical Process Control might enable closer investigation of the cognitive changes after acquired brain injury and demonstrate the usefulness of process measures in rehabilitation. The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov Protocol.

Trial registration: NCT02091453, registered: 19 March 2014.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study plan.

References

    1. Tagliaferri F, Compagnone C, Korsic M, Servadei F, Kraus J. A systematic review of brain injury epidemiology in Europe. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2006;148:255–268. doi: 10.1007/s00701-005-0651-y.
    1. Feigin VL, Lawes CMM, Bennett DA, Anderson CS. Stroke epidemiology: a review of population-based studies of incidence, prevalence, and case-fatality in the late 20th century. Lancet Neurol. 2003;2:43–45. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(03)00266-7.
    1. Cicerone KD, Langenbahn DM, Braden C, Malec JF, Kalmar K, Fraas M, Felicetti T, Laatsch L, Harley JP, Bergquist T, Azulay J, Cantor J, Ashman T. Evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation: updated review of the literature from 2003 through 2008. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;92:519–530. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.11.015.
    1. Sohlberg MM, Mateer CA. Effectiveness of an attention-training program. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1987;9:117–130. doi: 10.1080/01688638708405352.
    1. Rohling ML, Faust ME, Beverly B. Effectiveness of cognitive rehabilitation following acquired brain injury: a meta-analytic re-examination of Cicerone et al.’s (2000, 2005) systematic reviews. Neuropsychology. 2009;23:20–39.
    1. Nowack TA, Caldwell SG, Duke LW, Bergquist TF, Gage RJ. Focused versus unstructured interventions for attention deficits after traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 1996;11:52–60. doi: 10.1097/00001199-199606000-00008.
    1. Ponsford J, Kinsella G. Attentional deficits following closed head injury. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1992;14:822–838. doi: 10.1080/01688639208402865.
    1. Sturm W, Wilmes K. Efficacy of reaction training on various attentional and cognitive functions in stroke patients. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 1991;1:259–270. doi: 10.1080/09602019108402258.
    1. Cicerone KD, Dahlberg C, Kalmar K, Langenbahn DM, Malec JF, Bergquist TF, Felicetti T, Giacino JT, Harley JP, Harrington DE, Herzog J, Kneipp S, Laatsch L, Morse PA. Evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation: recommendations for clinical practice. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000;81:1596–1615. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2000.19240.
    1. Raskin SA. In: Neuroplasticity and rehabilitation. Raskin SA, editor. New York: The Guilford Press; 2011. Current approaches to rehabilitation.
    1. Kolb B, Cioe J, Williams P. In: Neuroplasticity and rehabilitation. Raskin SA, editor. New York: The Guilford Press; 2011. Neural organization and change after brain injury.
    1. Wheeler DJ, Chambers DS. Understanding statistical process control. 2. Knoxville, TN: SPC Press; 1992.
    1. Thor J, Lundberg J, Ask J, Olsson J, Carli C, Pukk Härenstam K, Brommels M. Application of statistical process control in healthcare improvement: systematic review. Qual Saf Health Care. 2007;16:387–399. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2006.022194.
    1. Chu J, Neuhauser DV, Schwartz I, Aye HH. The efficacy of automated/electrical twitch obtaining intramuscular stimulation for chronic pain control: evaluation with statistical process control methods. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol. 2002;42:393–401.
    1. Callahan CD, Barisa MT. Statistical process control and rehabilitation outcome: the single-subject design reconsidered. Rehabil Psychol. 2005;50:24–33.
    1. van’t Hooft I, Andersson K, Bergman B, Sejersen T, von Wendt L, Bartfai A. Beneficial effect from cognitive training programme on children with acquired brain injuries demonstrated in a controlled study. Brain Inj. 2005;18:511–518.
    1. Boman IL, Lindstedt M, Hemmingsson H, Bartfai A. Cognitive training in home environment. Brain Inj. 2004;18:985–995. doi: 10.1080/02699050410001672396.
    1. Björkdahl A, Akerlund E, Svensson S, Esbjörnsson E. A randomized study of computerized working memory training and effects on functioning in everyday life for patients with brain injury. Brain Inj. 2013;27:1658–1665. doi: 10.3109/02699052.2013.830196.
    1. Radford K, Phillips J, Drummond A, Sach T, Walker M, Tyerman A, Haboubi N, Jones T. Return to work after traumatic brain injury: cohort comparison and economic evaluation. Brain Inj. 2013;27:507–520. doi: 10.3109/02699052.2013.766929.
    1. Foy CM. Long term efficacy of an integrated neurological and vocational rehabilitation programme for young adults with acquired brain injury. J Occup Rehabil. 2013. [Epub ahead of print]
    1. Saltychev M, Eskola M, Tenovuo O, Laimi K. Return to work after traumatic brain injury: systematic review. Brain Inj. 2013;27:1516–1527. doi: 10.3109/02699052.2013.831131.
    1. Johansson U, Bernspång B. Predicting return to work after brain injury using occupational therapy assessments. Disabil Rehabil. 2001;23:474–480. doi: 10.1080/09638280010010688.
    1. Oddy M, da Silva R. The clinical and cost-benefits of investing in neurobehavioral rehabilitation: A multi-centre study. Brain Inj. 2013;27:1500–1507. doi: 10.3109/02699052.2013.830332.
    1. Gronwall DM. Paced auditory serial-addition task: a measure of recovery from concussion. Percept Mot Skills. 1977;44:367–373. doi: 10.2466/pms.1977.44.2.367.
    1. Schönberger M, Ponsford J. The factor structure of the hospital anxiety and depression scale in individuals with traumatic brain injury. J Psychiatry Res. 2010;179:342–349. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2009.07.003.
    1. Sohlberg M, Johnson L, Paule L, Raskin SA, Mateer KA. Attention Process Training-II (APT-II) USA: The Psychological Corporation; 1995.
    1. Sandqvist J, Törnquist K, Henriksson C. Assessment of work performance (AWP) – development of an instrument. Work. 2006;4:379–387.
    1. Sandqvist J, Henriksson C. Work functioning – a conceptual framework. Work. 2004;23:147–157.
    1. Lezak MD, Howieson DB, Bigler ED, Tranel D. Neuropsychological Assessment. 5. New York: Oxford University Press; 2012.
    1. Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: the Barthel index. Md State Med J. 1965;14:61–65.
    1. Wilson B, Cockburn J, Baddeley A. The Rivermead Behavioural Memory Test. 2. Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk IP 286EL, England: Thames Valley Test Company; 1991. Swedish Version Stockholm: Psykologiförlaget AB; 2000.
    1. Tuomi K, Oja G. Work Ability Index. 2nd rev. ed. Helsinki: Institute of Occupational Health; 1998.
    1. Ruff RM, Allen CC. 2& 7 Selective Attention Test. Lutz, Florida: Psychological Assessment Resources; 1999.
    1. Delis D, Kaplan E, Kramer J. Delis - Kaplan Executive Function Scale. San Antonio: Psychological Corporation; 2001.
    1. Bridger RS, Kjøs Johnsen SA, Brasher K, Kjøs Johnsen SA, Brasher K. Psychometric properties of the cognitive failures questionnaire. Ergonomic. 2013;56:1515–1524. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2013.821172.
    1. Ponsford J, Kinsella G. The use of a rating scale of attentional behaviour. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 1991;1:241–257. doi: 10.1080/09602019108402257.
    1. Wilson BA, Alderman N, Burgess PW, Emslie H, Evans JJ. Behavioural Assessment of the Dysexecutive Syndrome. Bury St Edmunds, UK: Thames Valley Test; 1996.
    1. Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists. Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. 4. Toronto ON: Publications ACE; 2002.
    1. Drummond MF, O’Brien B, Stoddart G, Torrance GW. Methods for the economic evaluation of health care. 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1997.
    1. Mohammed MA, Worthington P, Woodall WH. Plotting basic control charts: tutorial notes for healthcare practitioners. Qual Saf Health Care. 2008;17:137–145. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2004.012047.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors et collaborateurs

Les conditions médicales

Interventions en matière de drogue

3
S'abonner