Pancreatic stone protein predicts postoperative infection in cardiac surgery patients irrespective of cardiopulmonary bypass or surgical technique

Holger J Klein, Adam Csordas, Volkmar Falk, Ksenija Slankamenac, Alain Rudiger, Felix Schönrath, Hector Rodriguez Cetina Biefer, Christoph T Starck, Rolf Graf, Holger J Klein, Adam Csordas, Volkmar Falk, Ksenija Slankamenac, Alain Rudiger, Felix Schönrath, Hector Rodriguez Cetina Biefer, Christoph T Starck, Rolf Graf

Abstract

Introduction: We investigated the role of pancreatic stone protein (PSP) in predicting the occurrence of infection in the postoperative course of cardiac surgery patients. Several biomarkers indicating the presence of inflammation and infection are available in the clinical routine; yet, their utility in the postoperative course of patients following cardiac surgery remains uncertain. Moreover, cardiopulmonary bypass, also referred to as "on-pump surgery", increases the susceptibility to an exaggerated inflammatory state. However, the impact of such extracorporeal circulation on circulating PSP levels remains poorly understood.

Methods: In a prospective cohort of unselected patients undergoing cardiac surgery, we set out to elucidate the diagnostic accuracy of serum PSP levels as opposed to canonical biomarkers (CRP, WBC) of inflammation to discriminate between the presence of infection and surgical trauma,. In addition, we investigated whether the biomarkers were influenced by the surgical technique employed, i.e. on-pump vs. off-pump and minimally invasive surgery vs. sternotomy. Levels of circulating PSP and routine inflammatory biomarkers (CRP, WBC) were measured in samples taken from 120 patients at baseline as well as at postoperative day 1-3.

Results: Univariate analysis showed that among the biomarkers investigated, only PSP levels had discriminatory power to differentiate infection from surgical trauma in the postoperative course of the entire cohort of patients following cardiac surgery. With regard to cardiac surgical interventions, there was no significant association between the absence or presence of extracorporeal circulation and PSP levels. However, there was a significant difference in the slope of the rise of postoperative PSP between minimally invasive surgery as opposed to patients subjected to sternotomy.

Conclusion: In an unselected population of cardiac surgery patients, post-operative serum PSP levels were significantly associated with the presence of infection in both the on-pump and off-pump setting. Of note, the surgical technique employed (sternotomy vs. minimally invasive approach) had a significant impact on postoperative PSP levels.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: Rolf Graf (RG) is inventor of an assay covered by patent No: EP 2185937 B2 "METHOD FOR ASSAYING SEPSIS IN HUMANS", which is owned by the University of Zurich (Zurich, Switzerland). This does not alter the authors' adherence to all the PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Figures

Fig 1. Association of PSP, CRP and…
Fig 1. Association of PSP, CRP and WBC levels with age (A), gender (B) and diabetes (C).
Shown are values at baseline (preoperative values). The groups were compared by one-way ANOVA. Asterisks indicate significant differences (*p

Fig 2. Time course of biomarkers (A-C)…

Fig 2. Time course of biomarkers (A-C) following cardiac surgery.

All inflammatory markers investigated showed…

Fig 2. Time course of biomarkers (A-C) following cardiac surgery.
All inflammatory markers investigated showed a statistically significant rise in the course of postoperative day 1–3 (p

Fig 3. Discriminatory power of biomarkers for…

Fig 3. Discriminatory power of biomarkers for postoperative infection.

PSP levels showed a significantly stronger…

Fig 3. Discriminatory power of biomarkers for postoperative infection.
PSP levels showed a significantly stronger postoperative rise at day 1–3 in patients receiving a diagnosis of infection during their hospital stay as opposed to patients exhibiting an uneventful course. (p

Fig 4. Time course of biomarkers as…

Fig 4. Time course of biomarkers as related to the absence or presence of cardiopulmonary…

Fig 4. Time course of biomarkers as related to the absence or presence of cardiopulmonary bypass.
All inflammatory markers investigated showed a steeper rise in patients subjected to cardiopulmonary bypass without reaching statistical significance. (p>0.05 for interaction for all biomarkers, determined by a linear mixed effects regression model).

Fig 5. Time course of biomarkers as…

Fig 5. Time course of biomarkers as related to the surgical technique employed.

PSP levels…

Fig 5. Time course of biomarkers as related to the surgical technique employed.
PSP levels showed a significantly steeper rise in the postoperative course of patients subjected to sternotomy compared to those receiving minimally invasive surgery (p

Fig 6. Receiver operating characteristics curve to…

Fig 6. Receiver operating characteristics curve to predict infection for PSP (A), CRP (B) and…

Fig 6. Receiver operating characteristics curve to predict infection for PSP (A), CRP (B) and WBC (C) at postoperative 1–3.
A cutoff of 48.1 ng/ml for PSP levels at postoperative day 2 reveals a sensitivity of 64% and a specificity of 70%. PLR (positive likelihood ratio) = 2.1. NLR (negative likelihood ratio) = 0.51.
Similar articles
Cited by
References
    1. Martin GS, Mannino DM, Eaton S, Moss M. The epidemiology of sepsis in the United States from 1979 through 2000. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(16):1546–54. - PubMed
    1. Angus DC, van der Poll T. Severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(21):2063 10.1056/NEJMc1312359#SA3 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pierrakos C, Vincent JL. Sepsis biomarkers: a review. Critical care. 2010;14(1):R15 10.1186/cc8872 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zhang Q, Raoof M, Chen Y, Sumi Y, Sursal T, Junger W, et al. Circulating mitochondrial DAMPs cause inflammatory responses to injury. Nature. 2010;464(7285):104–7. 10.1038/nature08780 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chen GY, Nunez G. Sterile inflammation: sensing and reacting to damage. Nature reviews Immunology. 2010;10(12):826–37. 10.1038/nri2873 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Show all 26 references
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grant support
This study was supported by a grant from the Gebert-Ruef Foundation. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
[x]
Cite
Copy Download .nbib
Format: AMA APA MLA NLM

NCBI Literature Resources

MeSH PMC Bookshelf Disclaimer

The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.

Follow NCBI
Fig 2. Time course of biomarkers (A-C)…
Fig 2. Time course of biomarkers (A-C) following cardiac surgery.
All inflammatory markers investigated showed a statistically significant rise in the course of postoperative day 1–3 (p

Fig 3. Discriminatory power of biomarkers for…

Fig 3. Discriminatory power of biomarkers for postoperative infection.

PSP levels showed a significantly stronger…

Fig 3. Discriminatory power of biomarkers for postoperative infection.
PSP levels showed a significantly stronger postoperative rise at day 1–3 in patients receiving a diagnosis of infection during their hospital stay as opposed to patients exhibiting an uneventful course. (p

Fig 4. Time course of biomarkers as…

Fig 4. Time course of biomarkers as related to the absence or presence of cardiopulmonary…

Fig 4. Time course of biomarkers as related to the absence or presence of cardiopulmonary bypass.
All inflammatory markers investigated showed a steeper rise in patients subjected to cardiopulmonary bypass without reaching statistical significance. (p>0.05 for interaction for all biomarkers, determined by a linear mixed effects regression model).

Fig 5. Time course of biomarkers as…

Fig 5. Time course of biomarkers as related to the surgical technique employed.

PSP levels…

Fig 5. Time course of biomarkers as related to the surgical technique employed.
PSP levels showed a significantly steeper rise in the postoperative course of patients subjected to sternotomy compared to those receiving minimally invasive surgery (p

Fig 6. Receiver operating characteristics curve to…

Fig 6. Receiver operating characteristics curve to predict infection for PSP (A), CRP (B) and…

Fig 6. Receiver operating characteristics curve to predict infection for PSP (A), CRP (B) and WBC (C) at postoperative 1–3.
A cutoff of 48.1 ng/ml for PSP levels at postoperative day 2 reveals a sensitivity of 64% and a specificity of 70%. PLR (positive likelihood ratio) = 2.1. NLR (negative likelihood ratio) = 0.51.
Similar articles
Cited by
References
    1. Martin GS, Mannino DM, Eaton S, Moss M. The epidemiology of sepsis in the United States from 1979 through 2000. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(16):1546–54. - PubMed
    1. Angus DC, van der Poll T. Severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(21):2063 10.1056/NEJMc1312359#SA3 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pierrakos C, Vincent JL. Sepsis biomarkers: a review. Critical care. 2010;14(1):R15 10.1186/cc8872 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zhang Q, Raoof M, Chen Y, Sumi Y, Sursal T, Junger W, et al. Circulating mitochondrial DAMPs cause inflammatory responses to injury. Nature. 2010;464(7285):104–7. 10.1038/nature08780 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chen GY, Nunez G. Sterile inflammation: sensing and reacting to damage. Nature reviews Immunology. 2010;10(12):826–37. 10.1038/nri2873 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Show all 26 references
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grant support
This study was supported by a grant from the Gebert-Ruef Foundation. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
[x]
Cite
Copy Download .nbib
Format: AMA APA MLA NLM

NCBI Literature Resources

MeSH PMC Bookshelf Disclaimer

The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.

Follow NCBI
Fig 3. Discriminatory power of biomarkers for…
Fig 3. Discriminatory power of biomarkers for postoperative infection.
PSP levels showed a significantly stronger postoperative rise at day 1–3 in patients receiving a diagnosis of infection during their hospital stay as opposed to patients exhibiting an uneventful course. (p

Fig 4. Time course of biomarkers as…

Fig 4. Time course of biomarkers as related to the absence or presence of cardiopulmonary…

Fig 4. Time course of biomarkers as related to the absence or presence of cardiopulmonary bypass.
All inflammatory markers investigated showed a steeper rise in patients subjected to cardiopulmonary bypass without reaching statistical significance. (p>0.05 for interaction for all biomarkers, determined by a linear mixed effects regression model).

Fig 5. Time course of biomarkers as…

Fig 5. Time course of biomarkers as related to the surgical technique employed.

PSP levels…

Fig 5. Time course of biomarkers as related to the surgical technique employed.
PSP levels showed a significantly steeper rise in the postoperative course of patients subjected to sternotomy compared to those receiving minimally invasive surgery (p

Fig 6. Receiver operating characteristics curve to…

Fig 6. Receiver operating characteristics curve to predict infection for PSP (A), CRP (B) and…

Fig 6. Receiver operating characteristics curve to predict infection for PSP (A), CRP (B) and WBC (C) at postoperative 1–3.
A cutoff of 48.1 ng/ml for PSP levels at postoperative day 2 reveals a sensitivity of 64% and a specificity of 70%. PLR (positive likelihood ratio) = 2.1. NLR (negative likelihood ratio) = 0.51.
Similar articles
Cited by
References
    1. Martin GS, Mannino DM, Eaton S, Moss M. The epidemiology of sepsis in the United States from 1979 through 2000. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(16):1546–54. - PubMed
    1. Angus DC, van der Poll T. Severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(21):2063 10.1056/NEJMc1312359#SA3 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pierrakos C, Vincent JL. Sepsis biomarkers: a review. Critical care. 2010;14(1):R15 10.1186/cc8872 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zhang Q, Raoof M, Chen Y, Sumi Y, Sursal T, Junger W, et al. Circulating mitochondrial DAMPs cause inflammatory responses to injury. Nature. 2010;464(7285):104–7. 10.1038/nature08780 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chen GY, Nunez G. Sterile inflammation: sensing and reacting to damage. Nature reviews Immunology. 2010;10(12):826–37. 10.1038/nri2873 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Show all 26 references
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grant support
This study was supported by a grant from the Gebert-Ruef Foundation. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
[x]
Cite
Copy Download .nbib
Format: AMA APA MLA NLM
Fig 4. Time course of biomarkers as…
Fig 4. Time course of biomarkers as related to the absence or presence of cardiopulmonary bypass.
All inflammatory markers investigated showed a steeper rise in patients subjected to cardiopulmonary bypass without reaching statistical significance. (p>0.05 for interaction for all biomarkers, determined by a linear mixed effects regression model).
Fig 5. Time course of biomarkers as…
Fig 5. Time course of biomarkers as related to the surgical technique employed.
PSP levels showed a significantly steeper rise in the postoperative course of patients subjected to sternotomy compared to those receiving minimally invasive surgery (p

Fig 6. Receiver operating characteristics curve to…

Fig 6. Receiver operating characteristics curve to predict infection for PSP (A), CRP (B) and…

Fig 6. Receiver operating characteristics curve to predict infection for PSP (A), CRP (B) and WBC (C) at postoperative 1–3.
A cutoff of 48.1 ng/ml for PSP levels at postoperative day 2 reveals a sensitivity of 64% and a specificity of 70%. PLR (positive likelihood ratio) = 2.1. NLR (negative likelihood ratio) = 0.51.
Fig 6. Receiver operating characteristics curve to…
Fig 6. Receiver operating characteristics curve to predict infection for PSP (A), CRP (B) and WBC (C) at postoperative 1–3.
A cutoff of 48.1 ng/ml for PSP levels at postoperative day 2 reveals a sensitivity of 64% and a specificity of 70%. PLR (positive likelihood ratio) = 2.1. NLR (negative likelihood ratio) = 0.51.

References

    1. Martin GS, Mannino DM, Eaton S, Moss M. The epidemiology of sepsis in the United States from 1979 through 2000. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(16):1546–54.
    1. Angus DC, van der Poll T. Severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(21):2063 10.1056/NEJMc1312359#SA3
    1. Pierrakos C, Vincent JL. Sepsis biomarkers: a review. Critical care. 2010;14(1):R15 10.1186/cc8872
    1. Zhang Q, Raoof M, Chen Y, Sumi Y, Sursal T, Junger W, et al. Circulating mitochondrial DAMPs cause inflammatory responses to injury. Nature. 2010;464(7285):104–7. 10.1038/nature08780
    1. Chen GY, Nunez G. Sterile inflammation: sensing and reacting to damage. Nature reviews Immunology. 2010;10(12):826–37. 10.1038/nri2873
    1. Holmes JHt, Connolly NC, Paull DL, Hill ME, Guyton SW, Ziegler SF, et al. Magnitude of the inflammatory response to cardiopulmonary bypass and its relation to adverse clinical outcomes. Inflammation research: official journal of the European Histamine Research Society [et al.]. 2002;51(12):579–86.
    1. Litmathe J, Boeken U, Bohlen G, Gursoy D, Sucker C, Feindt P. Systemic inflammatory response syndrome after extracorporeal circulation: a predictive algorithm for the patient at risk. Hellenic journal of cardiology: HJC = Hellenike kardiologike epitheorese. 2011;52(6):493–500.
    1. Sablotzki A, Friedrich I, Muhling J, Dehne MG, Spillner J, Silber RE, et al. The systemic inflammatory response syndrome following cardiac surgery: different expression of proinflammatory cytokines and procalcitonin in patients with and without multiorgan dysfunctions. Perfusion. 2002;17(2):103–9.
    1. Sinning JM, Scheer AC, Adenauer V, Ghanem A, Hammerstingl C, Schueler R, et al. Systemic inflammatory response syndrome predicts increased mortality in patients after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Eur Heart J. 2012;33(12):1459–68. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs002
    1. Kopterides P, Siempos II, Tsangaris I, Tsantes A, Armaganidis A. Procalcitonin-guided algorithms of antibiotic therapy in the intensive care unit: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Crit Care Med. 2010;38(11):2229–41. 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181f17bf9
    1. Hotchkiss RS, Karl IE. The pathophysiology and treatment of sepsis. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(2):138–50.
    1. Que YA, Delodder F, Guessous I, Graf R, Bain M, Calandra T, et al. Pancreatic stone protein as an early biomarker predicting mortality in a prospective cohort of patients with sepsis requiring ICU management. Critical care. 2012;16(4):R114 10.1186/cc11406
    1. Boeck L, Graf R, Eggimann P, Pargger H, Raptis DA, Smyrnios N, et al. Pancreatic stone protein: a marker of organ failure and outcome in ventilator-associated pneumonia. Chest. 2011;140(4):925–32. 10.1378/chest.11-0018
    1. Llewelyn MJ, Berger M, Gregory M, Ramaiah R, Taylor AL, Curdt I, et al. Sepsis biomarkers in unselected patients on admission to intensive or high-dependency care. Critical care. 2013;17(2):R60 10.1186/cc12588
    1. Keel M, Harter L, Reding T, Sun LK, Hersberger M, Seifert B, et al. Pancreatic stone protein is highly increased during posttraumatic sepsis and activates neutrophil granulocytes. Crit Care Med. 2009;37(5):1642–8. 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31819da7d6
    1. Keim V, Iovanna JL, Dagorn JC. The acute phase reaction of the exocrine pancreas. Gene expression and synthesis of pancreatitis-associated proteins. Digestion. 1994;55(2):65–72.
    1. Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Faul F, Brandt M. GPOWER: Teststärkenanalyse leicht gemacht In: Erdfelder E, Funke J, editors. Allgemeine und deduktivistische Methodologie. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht; 2004. p. 148–66.
    1. Levy MM, Fink MP, Marshall JC, Abraham E, Angus D, Cook D, et al. 2001 SCCM/ESICM/ACCP/ATS/SIS International Sepsis Definitions Conference. Intensive care medicine. 2003;29(4):530–8.
    1. Cremer J, Martin M, Redl H, Bahrami S, Abraham C, Graeter T, et al. Systemic inflammatory response syndrome after cardiac operations. Ann Thorac Surg. 1996;61(6):1714–20.
    1. Iovanna J, Frigerio JM, Dusetti N, Ramare F, Raibaud P, Dagorn JC. Lithostathine, an inhibitor of CaCO3 crystal growth in pancreatic juice, induces bacterial aggregation. Pancreas. 1993;8(5):597–601.
    1. De Caro A, Lohse J, Sarles H. Characterization of a protein isolated from pancreatic calculi of men suffering from chronic calcifying pancreatitis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1979;87(4):1176–82.
    1. Carrere J, Figarella-Branger D, Senegas-Balas F, Figarella C, Guy-Crotte O. Immunohistochemical study of secretory proteins in the developing human exocrine pancreas. Differentiation; research in biological diversity. 1992;51(1):55–60.
    1. Gukasjan R, Raptis DA, Schulz HU, Halangk W, Graf R. Pancreatic stone protein predicts outcome in patients with peritonitis in the ICU. Crit Care Med. 2013;41(4):1027–36. 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182771193
    1. Busani S, Girardis M. PSP/reg: a new stone in sepsis biomarkers? Critical care. 2012;16(4):143 10.1186/cc11433
    1. Prondzinsky R, Knupfer A, Loppnow H, Redling F, Lehmann DW, Stabenow I, et al. Surgical trauma affects the proinflammatory status after cardiac surgery to a higher degree than cardiopulmonary bypass. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005;129(4):760–6.
    1. Yang J, Li L, Raptis D, Li X, Li F, Chen B, et al. Pancreatic stone protein/regenerating protein (PSP/reg): a novel secreted protein up-regulated in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Endocrine. 2014.

Source: PubMed

3
S'abonner