A Randomized Comparative Study between High-Intensity and Low-Level Laser Therapy in the Treatment of Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain

Walid Kamal Abdelbasset, Gopal Nambi, Saud F Alsubaie, Ahmed M Abodonya, Ayman K Saleh, Nahla N Ataalla, Ahmed A Ibrahim, Sayed A Tantawy, Dalia M Kamel, Anju Verma, Samah A Moawd, Walid Kamal Abdelbasset, Gopal Nambi, Saud F Alsubaie, Ahmed M Abodonya, Ayman K Saleh, Nahla N Ataalla, Ahmed A Ibrahim, Sayed A Tantawy, Dalia M Kamel, Anju Verma, Samah A Moawd

Abstract

Objectives: Chronic nonspecific low back pain (chronic nsLBP) is one of the most common musculoskeletal disorders leading to disabilities and physical inactivity. Laser therapy was used in chronic nsLBP treatment; however, no previous studies have assessed the impacts of high-intensity laser therapy (HILT) versus low-level laser therapy (LLLT) on chronic nsLBP. This study compared the effects of HILT versus LLLT on individuals suffering from chronic nsLBP.

Methods: The study was a randomized control trial. Sixty individuals with chronic nsLBP were enrolled in this study between May and November 2019. All participants were clinically diagnosed with chronic nsLBP. They were assigned randomly into three groups, 20 in each group. The first group received a program of LLLT, the second group received a program of HILT, and the third did not receive laser therapy (control group). Pain severity, disability, lumbar mobility, and quality of life were assessed before and after 12-week intervention.

Results: Both LLLT and HILT groups showed a significant improvement of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), visual analogue scale (VAS), lumbar range of motion (ROM), and European Quality of Life (EuroQol) scores (p > 0.05), while the control group did not show significant changes (p > 0.05). Comparison among the three study groups postintervention showed significant differences in the outcome measures (p > 0.05), while comparison between the LLLT and HILT groups showed nonsignificant differences (p > 0.05).

Conclusion: There are no different influences of LLLT versus HILT on chronic nsLBP patients. Both LLLT and HILT reduce pain and disability and improve lumbar mobility and quality of life in chronic nsLBP patients.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Copyright © 2020 Walid Kamal Abdelbasset et al.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The flowchart of the study.

References

    1. Chou R., Qaseem A., Snow V., et al. Diagnosis and treatment of low back pain: a joint clinical practice guideline from the American college of physicians and the American pain society. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2007;147(7):478–491. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-147-7-200710020-00006.
    1. Mohseni B. M., Ehsani F., Behtash H., Ghanipour M. Occupational low back pain in primary and high school teachers: prevalence and associated factors. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics. 2014;37(9):702–708. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2014.09.006.
    1. Mannion A. F., Müntener M., Dvorak J., Taimela S. Comparison of three active therapies for chronic low back pain: results of a randomized clinical trial with one‐year follow‐up. Rheumatology. 2001;40(7):772–778. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/40.7.772.
    1. Rainville J., Hartigan E. C., Martinez C. J., Limke M., Jouve C., Finno M. Exercise as a treatment for chronic low back pain. The Spine Journal. 2004;4(1):106–115. doi: 10.1016/s1529-9430(03)00174-8.
    1. Chou R., Huffman L. H. Nonpharmacologic therapies for acute and chronic low back pain: a review of the evidence for an American pain society/American college of physicians clinical practice guideline. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2007;147(7):492–504. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-147-7-200710020-00007.
    1. Van Tulder M. W., Koes B. W., Metsemakers J. F., Bouter L. M. Chronic low back pain in primary care: a prospective study on the management and course. Family Practice. 1998;15(2):126–132. doi: 10.1093/fampra/15.2.126.
    1. Furlan A. D., Yazdi F., Tsertsvadze A., et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy, cost-effectiveness, and safety of selected complementary and alternative medicine for neck and low-back pain. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine. 2012;2012:11. doi: 10.1155/2012/953139.953139
    1. Yousefi N. R., Schonstein E., Heidari K., et al. Low level laser therapy for nonspecific low back pain. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2008;4(2) doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005107.CD005107
    1. Djavid G. E., Mehrdad R., Ghasemi M., Hasan-Zadeh H., Sotoodeh-Manesh A., Pouryaghoub G. In chronic low back pain, low level laser therapy combined with exercise is more beneficial than exercise alone in the long term: a randomised trial. Australian Journal of Physiotherapy. 2007;53(3):155–160. doi: 10.1016/s0004-9514(07)70022-3.
    1. Unlu Z., Tascı S., Tarhan S., Pabuscu Y., Islak S. Comparison of 3 physical therapy modalities for acute pain in lumbar disc herniation measured by clinical evaluation and magnetic resonance imaging. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics. 2008;31(3):191–198. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2008.02.001.
    1. Awad J. N., Moskovich R. Lumbar disc herniations. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 2006;443:183–197. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000198724.54891.3a.
    1. Brosseau L., Wells G., Marchand S., et al. Randomized controlled trial on low level laser therapy (LLLT) in the treatment of osteoarthritis (OA) of the hand. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine. 2005;36(3):210–219. doi: 10.1002/lsm.20137.
    1. Tantawy S. A., Abdelbasset W. K., Kamel D. M., Alrawaili S. M. A randomized controlled trial comparing helium-neon laser therapy and infrared laser therapy in patients with diabetic foot ulcer. Lasers in Medical Science. 2018;33(9):1901–1906. doi: 10.1007/s10103-018-2553-2.
    1. Tantawy S. A., Abdelbasset W. K., Kamel D. M., Alrawaili S. M., Alsubaie S. F. Laser photobiomodulation is more effective than ultrasound therapy in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain: a comparative study. Lasers in Medical Science. 2019;34(4):793–800. doi: 10.1007/s10103-018-2665-8.
    1. Pekyavas N. O., Baltaci G. Short-term effects of high-intensity laser therapy, manual therapy, and Kinesio taping in patients with subacromial impingement syndrome. Lasers in Medical Science. 2016;31(6):1133–1141. doi: 10.1007/s10103-016-1963-2.
    1. Alayat M. S. M., Mohamed A. A., Helal O. F., Khaled O. A. Efficacy of high-intensity laser therapy in the treatment of chronic neck pain: a randomized double-blind placebo-control trial. Lasers in Medical Science. 2016;31(4):687–694. doi: 10.1007/s10103-016-1910-2.
    1. Santamato A., Solfrizzi V., Panza F., et al. Short-term effects of high-intensity laser therapy versus ultrasound therapy in the treatment of people with subacromial impingement syndrome: a randomized clinical trial. Physical Therapy. 2009;89(7):643–652. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20080139.
    1. Saggini R., Bellomo R. G., Cancelli F. Hilterapia and chronic ankle pain syndromes. Abstract from Energy for Health;International journal of information and scientific culture. 2009;3(3):22–25.
    1. Zati A., Valent A. Physical therapy: new technologies in rehabilitation medicine (translated to english) Edizioni Minerva Medica. 2006;2006:162–185.
    1. Glazov G., Yelland M., Emery J. Low-level laser therapy for chronic non-specific low back pain: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Acupuncture in Medicine. 2016;34(5):328–341. doi: 10.1136/acupmed-2015-011036.
    1. Huang Z., Ma J., Chen J., Shen B., Pei F., Kraus V. B. The effectiveness of low-level laser therapy for nonspecific chronic low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arthritis Research & Therapy. 2015;17:p. 360. doi: 10.1186/s13075-015-0882-0.
    1. Fiore P., Panza F., Cassatella G, et al. Short-term effects of high-intensity laser therapy versus ultrasound therapy in the treatment of low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine. 2011;47(3):367–373.
    1. Gocevska M., Nikolikj-Dimitrova E., Gjerakaroska-Savevska C. Effects of high–intensity laser in treatment of patients with chronic low back pain. Open Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences. 2019;7(6):949–954. doi: 10.3889/oamjms.2019.117.
    1. Lee C. P., Fu T. S., Liu C. Y., Hung C. I. Psychometric evaluation of the oswestry disability index in patients with chronic low back pain: factor and mokken analyses. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017;15(1):p. 192. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0768-8.
    1. Thong I. S. K., Jensen M. P., Miró J., Tan G. The validity of pain intensity measures: what do the NRS, VAS, VRS, and FPS-R measure? Scandinavian Journal of Pain. 2018;18(1):99–107. doi: 10.1515/sjpain-2018-0012.
    1. Rezvani A., Ergin O., Karacan I., Oncu M. Validity and reliability of the metric measurements in the assessment of lumbar spine motion in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Spine. 2012;37(19):E1189–E1196. doi: 10.1097/brs.0b013e31825ef954.
    1. The EuroQol Group. EuroQol-a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy. 1990;16:199–208. doi: 10.1016/0168-8510(90)90421-9.
    1. Abdelbasset W. K., Alsubaie S. F., Tantawy S. A., Abo Elyazed TI, Elshehawy A. A. A cross-sectional study on the correlation between physical activity levels and health related quality of life in community-dwelling middle-aged and older adults. Medicine. 2019;98(11) doi: 10.1097/md.0000000000014895.e14895
    1. Stergioulas A. Low-power laser treatment in patients with frozen shoulder: preliminary results. Photomedicine and Laser Surgery. 2008;26(2):99–105. doi: 10.1089/pho.2007.2138.
    1. Gopal Nambi S., Kamal W., George J., Manssor E. Radiological and biochemical effects (CTX-II, MMP-3, 8, and 13) of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) in chronic osteoarthritis in Al-Kharj, Saudi Arabia. Lasers in Medical Science. 2017;32(2):297–303. doi: 10.1007/s10103-016-2114-5.
    1. Kholoosy L., Elyaspour D., Akhgari M. R., Razzaghi Z., Khodamardi Z., Bayat M. Evaluation of the therapeutic effect of low level laser in controlling low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Lasers in Medical Sciences. 2020;11(2):120–125. doi: 10.34172/jlms.2020.21.
    1. Hagiwara S., Iwasaka H., Hasegawa A., Noguchi T. Pre-irradiation of blood by gallium aluminum arsenide (830 nm) low-level laser enhances peripheral endogenous opioid analgesia in rats. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 2008;107(3):1058–1063. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31817ee43e.
    1. Freitas A. C., Pinheiro A. L., Miranda P., Thiers F. A., Vieira A. L. Assessment of anti-inflammatory effect of 830nm laser light using C-reactive protein levels. Brazilian Dental Journal. 2001;12(3):187–190.
    1. Kheshie A. R., Alayat M. S. M., Ali M. M. E. High-intensity versus low-level laser therapy in the treatment of patients with knee osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled trial. Lasers in Medical Science. 2014;29(4):1371–1376. doi: 10.1007/s10103-014-1529-0.
    1. Dundar U., Turkmen U., Toktas H., Ulasli A. M., Solak O. Effectiveness of high-intensity laser therapy and splinting in lateral epicondylitis; a prospective, randomized, controlled study. Lasers in Medical Science. Sci2015;30(3):1097–1107. doi: 10.1007/s10103-015-1716-7.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors et collaborateurs

Les conditions médicales

Interventions en matière de drogue

3
S'abonner