Effect of Exposure to e-Cigarettes With Salt vs Free-Base Nicotine on the Appeal and Sensory Experience of Vaping: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Adam M Leventhal, Danielle R Madden, Natalia Peraza, Sara J Schiff, Lucas Lebovitz, Lauren Whitted, Jessica Barrington-Trimis, Tyler B Mason, Marissa K Anderson, Alayna P Tackett, Adam M Leventhal, Danielle R Madden, Natalia Peraza, Sara J Schiff, Lucas Lebovitz, Lauren Whitted, Jessica Barrington-Trimis, Tyler B Mason, Marissa K Anderson, Alayna P Tackett
Abstract
Importance: Alkaline free-base nicotine is bitter and a respiratory irritant. High-nicotine electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) products contain acid additives that change nicotine from a free-base to a protonated salt chemical form, which could improve the sensory experience of vaping, particularly among never smokers unaccustomed to inhaling free-base nicotine.
Objective: To determine whether exposure to e-cigarettes with salt vs free-base nicotine formulations improves the appeal and sensory experience of vaping e-cigarettes and whether nicotine formulation effects differ by e-cigarette flavor and ever combustible cigarette smoking status.
Design, setting, and participants: Single-visit double-blind within-participant randomized clinical trial was conducted in an academic medical center outpatient clinical research facility in Southern California. Participants were 119 individuals with past 30-day e-cigarette or combustible cigarette use aged 21 years or older recruited from November 2019 to March 2020.
Interventions: Participants self-administered standardized puffs of each 10 differently flavored e-cigarette solutions using a pod-style device. Each flavor was administered in salt (benzoic acid added) and free-base (no benzoic acid) nicotine formulations with commensurate nicotine concentrations (mean, 23.6 mg/mL). The 20 solutions were administered in randomly assigned sequences. Immediately after puffing each solution, participants rated appeal and sensory attributes.
Main outcomes and measures: Self-reported appeal (mean of like, dislike [reverse-scored], and willingness to use again ratings) and 4 sensory attributes (sweetness, smoothness, bitterness, and harshness; analyzed individually) on visual analog scales with not at all and extremely anchors (range, 0-100).
Results: Of the 119 participants; 39 (32.8%) were female. The mean (SD) age was 42.1 (14.4) years; 105 (88.2%) were ever combustible cigarette smokers, and 66 (55.5%) were current e-cigarette users. Salt vs free-base nicotine formulations produced higher ratings of appeal (salt vs free-base mean difference effect estimate: b = 12.0; 95% CI, 9.9-14.1; P < .001), sweetness (b = 9.3; 95% CI, 7.1-11.4; P < .001), and smoothness (b = 17.4; 95% CI, 15.2-19.6; P < .001) and lower ratings of bitterness (b = -13.3; 95% CI, -15.4 to -11.2; P < .001) and harshness (b = -21.0; 95% CI, -23.2 to -18.7; P < .001). Nicotine formulation effects largely generalized across different flavors and the smoothness-enhancing and harshness-reducing effects of nicotine salt were stronger in never vs ever cigarette smokers.
Conclusions and relevance: In this randomized clinical trial of adult current nicotine or tobacco product users, controlled exposure to e-cigarette puffs with salt vs free-base nicotine formulations appeared to increase product appeal and improve the sensory experience of vaping, particularly among never smokers. Regulatory policies limiting acid additives in e-cigarettes might reduce the appeal of high-nicotine e-cigarettes among populations deterred from vaping e-cigarettes that emit harsh aerosol.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04399031.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.
Figures
References
- Romberg AR, Miller Lo EJ, Cuccia AF, et al. . Patterns of nicotine concentrations in electronic cigarettes sold in the United States, 2013-2018. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2019;203:1-7. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2019.05.029
- Vallone DM, Cuccia AF, Briggs J, Xiao H, Schillo BA, Hair EC. Electronic cigarette and JUUL use among adolescents and young adults. JAMA Pediatr. 2020;174(3):277-286. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.5436
- Leventhal AM, Miech R, Barrington-Trimis J, Johnston LD, O’Malley PM, Patrick ME. Flavors of e-cigarettes used by youths in the United States. JAMA. 2019;322(21):2132-2134. doi:10.1001/jama.2019.17968
- DeVito EE, Krishnan-Sarin S. e-Cigarettes: impact of e-liquid components and device characteristics on nicotine exposure. Curr Neuropharmacol. 2018;16(4):438-459. doi:10.2174/1570159X15666171016164430
- Pankow JF. A consideration of the role of gas/particle partitioning in the deposition of nicotine and other tobacco smoke compounds in the respiratory tract. Chem Res Toxicol. 2001;14(11):1465-1481. doi:10.1021/tx0100901
- Harvanko AM, Havel CM, Jacob P, Benowitz NL. Characterization of nicotine salts in 23 electronic cigarette refill liquids. Nicotine Tob Res. 2020;22(7):1239-1243. doi:10.1093/ntr/ntz232
- Barrington-Trimis JL, Leventhal AM. Adolescents’ use of “pod mod” e-cigarettes: urgent concerns. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(12):1099-1102. doi:10.1056/NEJMp1805758
- Dwan K, Li T, Altman DG, Elbourne D. CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised crossover trials. BMJ. 2019;366:l4378. doi:10.1136/bmj.l4378
- Leventhal A, Cho J, Barrington-Trimis J, Pang R, Schiff S, Kirkpatrick M. Sensory attributes of e-cigarette flavours and nicotine as mediators of interproduct differences in appeal among young adults. Tob Control. 2020;29(6):679-686. doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2019-055172
- Leventhal AM, Mason TB, Kirkpatrick MG, Anderson MK, Levine MD. E-cigarette device power moderates the effects of non-tobacco flavors and nicotine on product appeal in young adults. Addict Behav. 2020;107:106403. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2020.106403
- Leventhal AM, Goldenson NI, Barrington-Trimis JL, Pang RD, Kirkpatrick MG. Effects of non-tobacco flavors and nicotine on e-cigarette product appeal among young adult never, former, and current smokers. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2019;203:99-106. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2019.05.020
- Goldenson NI, Kirkpatrick MG, Barrington-Trimis JL, et al. . Effects of sweet flavorings and nicotine on the appeal and sensory properties of e-cigarettes among young adult vapers: application of a novel methodology. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2016;168:176-180. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.09.014
- Kwak HS, Anh BH, Lee Y, et al. . Comparison of bipolar and bivariate measurements of liking and disliking percepts in novel products. Food Qual Prefer. 2013; 30(2):328-335. doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2013.07.002
- Villanti AC, Johnson AL, Ambrose BK, et al. . Flavored tobacco product use in youth and adults: findings from the first wave of the PATH study (2013-2014). Am J Prev Med. 2017;53(2):139-151. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2017.01.026
- Berg CJ. Preferred flavors and reasons for e-cigarette use and discontinued use among never, current, and former smokers. Int J Public Health. 2016;61(2):225-236. doi:10.1007/s00038-015-0764-x
- Rodu B, Plurphanswat N. e-Cigarette use among US adults: Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) study. Nicotine Tob Res. 2018;20(8):940-948. doi:10.1093/ntr/ntx194
- Foulds J, Veldheer S, Yingst J, et al. . Development of a questionnaire for assessing dependence on electronic cigarettes among a large sample of ex-smoking e-cigarette users. Nicotine Tob Res. 2015;17(2):186-192. doi:10.1093/ntr/ntu204
- Heatherton TF, Kozlowski LT, Frecker RC, Fagerström KO. The Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence: a revision of the Fagerström Tolerance Questionnaire. Br J Addict. 1991;86(9):1119-1127. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.1991.tb01879.x
- Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y.. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J Royal Stat Soc Series B (Methodological). 1995;57(1):289-300. doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x
- StataCorp , Stata statistical software: Release 16. StataCorp LLC. 2019.
- Hammond D, Wackowski OA, Reid JL, O’Connor RJ. Use of JUUL e-cigarettes among youth in the United States. Nicotine Tob Res. 2020;22(5):827-832. doi:10.1093/ntr/nty237
- Hrywna M, Bover Manderski MT, Delnevo CD. Prevalence of electronic cigarette use among adolescents in New Jersey and association with social factors. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(2):e1920961-e1920961. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.20961
- Jackler RK, Ramamurthi D. Nicotine arms race: JUUL and the high-nicotine product market. Tob Control. 2019;28(6):623-628. doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054796
- Dai H, Leventhal AM. Prevalence of e-cigarette use among adults in the United States, 2014-2018. JAMA. 2019. Published online September 16, 2019. doi:10.1001/jama.2019.15331
- Allem J-P, Dharmapuri L, Unger JB, Cruz TB. Characterizing JUUL-related posts on Twitter. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2018;190:1-5. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.05.018
- Keamy-Minor E, McQuoid J, Ling PM. Young adult perceptions of JUUL and other pod electronic cigarette devices in California: a qualitative study. BMJ Open. 2019;9(4):e026306. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026306
- Pullicin AJ, Kim H, Brinkman MC, Buehler SS, Clark PI, Lim J. Impacts of nicotine and flavoring on the sensory perception of e-cigarette aerosol. Nicotine Tob Res. 2020;22(5):806-813. doi:10.1093/ntr/ntz058
- Rosbrook K, Green BG. Sensory effects of menthol and nicotine in an e-cigarette. Nicotine Tob Res. 2016;18(7):1588-1595. doi:10.1093/ntr/ntw019
- Keithly L, Ferris Wayne G, Cullen DM, Connolly GN. Industry research on the use and effects of levulinic acid: a case study in cigarette additives. Nicotine Tob Res. 2005;7(5):761-771. doi:10.1080/14622200500259820
- Kozlowski LT, Kleiman RM. Effects of oral pH on cigarette smoking. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1978;9(4):477-480. doi:10.1016/0091-3057(78)90045-X
- Sakurai T, Misaka T, Nagai T, et al. . pH-Dependent inhibition of the human bitter taste receptor hTAS2R16 by a variety of acidic substances. J Agric Food Chem. 2009;57(6):2508-2514. doi:10.1021/jf8040148
- National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; Health and Medicine Division; Board on Population Health and Public Health Practice; Committee on the Review of the Health Effects of Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems . Public Health Consequences of E-Cigarettes. National Academies Press; 2018.
- US Department of Health and Human Services . E-Cigarette Use Among Youth and Young Adults: A Report of the Surgeon General. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2016.
- Shao XM, Friedman TC. Pod-mod vs conventional e-cigarettes: nicotine chemistry, pH, and health effects. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2020;128(4):1056-1058. doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00717.2019
- Voos N, Goniewicz ML, Eissenberg T. What is the nicotine delivery profile of electronic cigarettes? Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2019;16(11):1193-1203. doi:10.1080/17425247.2019.1665647
- Duell AK, Pankow JF, Peyton DH. Nicotine in tobacco product aerosols: ‘It’s déjà vu all over again’. Tob Control. 2020;29(6):656-662. doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2019-055275
Source: PubMed