Comparison of Tc-99m maraciclatide and Tc-99m sestamibi molecular breast imaging in patients with suspected breast cancer

Michael K O'Connor, Melissa M B Morrow, Katie N Hunt, Judy C Boughey, Dietlind L Wahner-Roedler, Amy Lynn Conners, Deborah J Rhodes, Carrie B Hruska, Michael K O'Connor, Melissa M B Morrow, Katie N Hunt, Judy C Boughey, Dietlind L Wahner-Roedler, Amy Lynn Conners, Deborah J Rhodes, Carrie B Hruska

Abstract

Background: Molecular breast imaging (MBI) performed with 99mTc sestamibi has been shown to be a valuable technique for the detection of breast cancer. Alternative radiotracers such as 99mTc maraciclatide may offer improved uptake in breast lesions. The purpose of this study was to compare relative performance of 99mTc sestamibi and 99mTc maraciclatide in patients with suspected breast cancer, using a high-resolution dedicated gamma camera for MBI. Women with breast lesions suspicious for malignancy were recruited to undergo two MBI examinations-one with 99mTc sestamibi and one with 99mTc maraciclatide. A radiologist interpreted MBI studies in a randomized, blinded fashion to assign an assessment score (1-5) and measured lesion size. Lesion-to-background (L/B) ratio was measured with region-of-interest analysis.

Results: Among 39 analyzable patients, 21 malignant tumors were identified in 21 patients. Eighteen of 21 tumors (86%) were seen on 99mTc sestamibi MBI and 19 of 21 (90%) were seen on 99mTc maraciclatide MBI (p = 1). Tumor extent measured with both radiopharmaceuticals correlated strongly with pathologic size (99mTc sestamibi, r = 0.84; 99mTc maraciclatide, r = 0.81). The L/B ratio in detected breast cancers was similar for the two radiopharmaceuticals: 1.55 ± 0.36 (mean ± S.D.) for 99mTc sestamibi and 1.62 ± 0.37 (mean ± S.D.) for 99mTc maraciclatide (p = 0.53). No correlation was found between the L/B ratio and molecular subtype for 99mTc sestamibi (r s = 0.12, p = 0.63) or 99mTc maraciclatide (r s = -0.12, p = 0.64). Of 20 benign lesions, 10 (50%) were seen on 99mTc sestamibi and 9 of 20 (45%) were seen on 99mTc maraciclatide images (p = 0.1). The average L/B ratio for benign lesions was 1.34 ±0.40 (mean ±S.D.) for 99mTc sestamibi and 1.41 ±0.52 (mean ±S.D.) for 99mTc maraciclatide (p = 0.75). Overall diagnostic performance was similar for both radiopharmaceuticals. AUC from ROC analysis was 0.83 for 99mTc sestamibi and 0.87 for 99mTc maraciclatide (p = 0.64).

Conclusions: 99mTc maraciclatide offered comparable lesion uptake to 99mTc sestamibi, in both malignant and benign lesions. There was good correlation between lesion extent and uptake measured from both radiopharmaceuticals. 99mTc maraciclatide offered a marginal (but not significant) improvement in sensitivity over 99mTc sestamibi. Our findings did not support an association between the uptake of either radiopharmaceutical and tumor molecular subtype.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00888589.

Keywords: Breast cancer; Molecular breast imaging; Tc-99m NC100692; Tc-99m maraciclatide; Tc-99m sestamibi.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Molecular breast images in the mediolateral oblique projection from a 73-year-old patient with biopsy-proven invasive lobular carcinoma (Table 1, tumor #21). At blinded review, MBI performed with 300 MBq 99mTc sestamibi (a) was interpreted as negative; MBI performed 3 days later with 300 MBq 99mTc maraciclatide (b) was interpreted as assessment category 4. The lesion extent was 9.3 cm (arrows). Final pathology revealed grade I invasive lobular carcinoma of luminal A subtype, forming a 2.5-cm mass
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Distribution of assessment scores in a all 78 breasts and b 21 breasts with proven breast cancer
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
a Correlation between largest tumor extent recorded from pathology and largest tumor extent measured from 99mTc sestamibi images in 18 malignant tumors seen on MBI (r = 0.82). Open square = neoadjuvant chemotherapy, size estimated from MRI. b Correlation between largest tumor extent recorded from pathology and largest tumor extent measured from 99mTc maraciclatide images in 19 malignant tumors seen on MBI (r = 0.74). Open square = neoadjuvant chemotherapy, size estimated from MRI. c Correlation between tumor extent measured from 99mTc sestamibi images and from 99mTc maraciclatide images in 18 malignant tumors detected on both scans (r = 0.93)
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Molecular breast images in the mediolateral oblique projection from a 53-year-old patient with a palpable lesion that was suspicious on diagnostic mammography and scheduled for biopsy (Table 1, tumor #16). At blinded review, MBI performed with 300 MBq 99mTc sestamibi (a) was interpreted as having moderate intensity radiotracer uptake in a segmental distribution with maximum extent of 11.0 cm. An assessment of 4 was assigned. MBI performed 1 day later with 300 MBq 99mTc maraciclatide (b) was also interpreted as assessment 4 with lesion extent measuring 9.2 cm. Pathology revealed grade III invasive ductal carcinoma. Patient underwent subsequent neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Tumor extent measured on contrast-enhanced MRI prior to neoadjuvant chemotherapy was estimated at 9.2 cm
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Molecular breast images in the mediolateral oblique projection from a 41-year-old patient with a palpable lesion that was suspicious on diagnostic mammography and scheduled for biopsy (Table 2, benign lesion #16). At blinded review, MBI performed with 300 MBq 99mTc sestamibi (a) was interpreted as having a focal area of moderate intensity radiotracer uptake with maximum extent of 1.3 cm. An assessment of 4 was assigned. MBI performed the same day with 740 MBq 99mTc maraciclatide (b) was also interpreted as assessment 4 with lesion extent measuring 1.6 cm. Biopsy revealed necrotizing granulomatous inflammation and fibrosis
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
a Correlation between L/B ratio measured on malignant and benign lesions from 99mTc sestamibi and 99mTc maraciclatide images (malignant, r = 0.82; benign, r = 0.96; all lesions, r = 0.87). b Correlation between L/B ratio in malignant and benign lesions from 99mTc sestamibi and 99mTc maraciclatide images measured using the 1-day and 2-day protocols (1-day protocol, r = 0.89, solid line; 2-day protocol, r = 0.85, dotted line)
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
ROC analysis of L/B ratio comparing the sensitivity and specificity of 99mTc sestamibi and 99mTc maraciclatide images. The AUC was 0.83 and 0.87 for 99mTc sestamibi and 99mTc maraciclatide respectively (p = 0.64)
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
Distribution of L/B ratios by molecular subtype in the 20 known invasive cancers for 99mTc sestamibi (rs = 0.12, p = 0.63) and 99mTc maraciclatide (rs = −0.12, p = 0.64)

References

    1. Hruska CB. Molecular breast imaging for screening in dense breasts: state of the art and future directions. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016:1–9. doi:10.2214/AJR.16.17131.
    1. Spanu A, Dettori G, Nuvoli S, Porcu A, Falchi A, Cottu P, et al. (99)mTc-tetrofosmin SPET in the detection of both primary breast cancer and axillary lymph node metastasis. Eur J Nucl Med. 2001;28:1781–94. doi: 10.1007/s00259-001-0657-5.
    1. Kim IJ, Kim SJ, Kim YK. Comparison of double phase Tc-99m MIBI and Tc-99m tetrofosmin scintimammography for characterization of breast lesions: visual and quantitative analyses. Neoplasma. 2008;55:526–31.
    1. Papantoniou V, Christodoulidou J, Papadaki E, Valotassiou V, Stipsanelli A, Louvrou A, et al. 99mTc-(V)DMSA scintimammography in the assessment of breast lesions: comparative study with 99mTc-MIBI. Eur J Nucl Med. 2001;28:923–8. doi: 10.1007/s002590100545.
    1. Arslan N, Ozturk E, Ilgan S, Narin Y, Dundar S, Tufan T, et al. The comparison of dual phase Tc-99m MIBI and tc-99m MDP scintimammography in the evaluation of breast masses: preliminary report. Ann Nucl Med. 2000;14:39–46. doi: 10.1007/BF02990477.
    1. Ma Q, Chen B, Gao S, Ji T, Wen Q, Song Y, et al. (99m)Tc-3P(4)-RGD(2) scintimammography in the assessment of breast lesions: comparative study with (99m)Tc-MIBI. PLoS One. 2014;9:e108349. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0108349.
    1. Bernard BF, Krenning EP, Breeman WA, Ensing G, Benjamins H, Bakker WH, et al. 99mTc-MIBI, 99mTc-tetrofosmin and 99mTc-Q12 in vitro and in vivo. Nucl Med Biol. 1998;25:233–40. doi: 10.1016/S0969-8051(97)00201-1.
    1. Conners AL, Jones KN, Hruska CB, Geske JR, Boughey JC, Rhodes DJ. Direct-conversion molecular breast imaging of invasive breast cancer: imaging features, extent of invasive disease, and comparison between invasive ductal and lobular histology. Am J Roentgenol. 2015;205:W374–81. doi: 10.2214/AJR.14.13502.
    1. Dearling JLJ, Barnes JW, Panigrahy D, Zimmerman RE, Fahey F, Treves ST, et al. Specific uptake of 99mTc-NC100692, an αvβ3-targeted imaging probe, in subcutaneous and orthotopic tumors. Nucl Med Biol. 2013;40:788–94. doi: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2013.04.006.
    1. Rak J. Angiogenesis. In: Tannock IF, Hill RP, Bristow RG, Harrington L, editors. The basic science of oncology. 5e ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2013.
    1. Folkman J. Tumor angiogenesis: therapeutic implications. N Engl J Med. 1971;285:1182–6. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197108122850711.
    1. Cai W, Wu Y, Chen K, Cao Q, Tice DA, Chen X. In vitro and in vivo characterization of 64Cu-labeled Abegrin, a humanized monoclonal antibody against integrin alpha v beta 3. Cancer Res. 2006;66:9673–81. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-1480.
    1. Brooks PC, Clark RA, Cheresh DA. Requirement of vascular integrin alpha v beta 3 for angiogenesis. Science. 1994;264:569–71. doi: 10.1126/science.7512751.
    1. Line BR, Mitra A, Nan A, Ghandehari H. Targeting tumor angiogenesis: comparison of peptide and polymer-peptide conjugates. J Nucl Med. 2005;46:1552–60.
    1. Hua J, Dobrucki LW, Sadeghi MM, Zhang J, Bourke BN, Cavaliere P, et al. Noninvasive imaging of angiogenesis with a 99mTc-labeled peptide targeted at alphavbeta3 integrin after murine hindlimb ischemia. Circulation. 2005;111:3255–60. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.104.485029.
    1. Bach-Gansmo T, Danielsson R, Saracco A, Wilczek B, Bogsrud TV, Fangberget A, et al. Integrin receptor imaging of breast cancer: a proof-of-concept study to evaluate 99mTc-NC100692. J Nucl Med. 2006;47:1434–9.
    1. Bach-Gansmo T, Bogsrud TV, Skretting A. Integrin scintimammography using a dedicated breast imaging, solid-state gamma-camera and (99m)Tc-labelled NC100692. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2008;28:235–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-097X.2008.00801.x.
    1. Sickles EA, D’Orsi CJ, Bassett LW. ACR BI-RADS® Atlas, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. 5. Reston: American College of Radiology; 2013. ACR BI-RADS® mammography.
    1. Weinmann AL, Hruska CB, O’Connor MK. Design of optimal collimation for dedicated molecular breast imaging systems. Med Phys. 2009;36:845–56. doi: 10.1118/1.3077119.
    1. Hruska CB, Weinmann AL, O’Connor MK. Proof of concept for low-dose molecular breast imaging with a dual-head CZT gamma camera. Part I. Evaluation in phantoms. Med Phys. 2012;39:3466–75. doi: 10.1118/1.4718665.
    1. Hruska CB, Weinmann AL, Tello Skjerseth CM, Wagenaar EM, Conners AL, Tortorelli CL, et al. Proof of concept for low-dose molecular breast imaging with a dual-head CZT gamma camera. Part II. Evaluation in patients. Med Phys. 2012;39:3476–83. doi: 10.1118/1.4719959.
    1. O’Connor MK, Hruska CB, Tran TD, Swanson T, Conners AL, Jones K, et al. Factors influencing the uptake of 99mTc-sestamibi in breast tissue on molecular breast imaging. J Nucl Med Technol. 2015;43:13–20. doi: 10.2967/jnmt.114.150128.
    1. Conners AL, Hruska CB, Tortorelli CL, Maxwell RW, Rhodes DJ, Boughey JC, et al. Lexicon for standardized interpretation of gamma camera molecular breast imaging: observer agreement and diagnostic accuracy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2012;39:971–82. doi: 10.1007/s00259-011-2054-z.
    1. Conners AL, Maxwell RW, Tortorelli CL, Hruska CB, Rhodes DJ, Boughey JC, et al. Gamma camera breast imaging lexicon. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;199:W767–74. doi: 10.2214/AJR.11.8298.
    1. Bluff JE, Menakuru SR, Cross SS, Higham SE, Balasubramanian SP, Brown NJ, et al. Angiogenesis is associated with the onset of hyperplasia in human ductal breast disease. Br J Cancer. 2009;101:666–72. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605196.
    1. Kit for the preparation of technetium Tc 99m sestamibi injection package insert. Hazelwood: Mallinckrodt Inc; 2006.
    1. Rhodes DJ, Hruska CB, Conners AL, Tortorelli CL, Maxwell RW, Jones KN, et al. Journal club: molecular breast imaging at reduced radiation dose for supplemental screening in mammographically dense breasts. Am J Roentgenol. 2015;204:241–51. doi: 10.2214/AJR.14.13357.
    1. Shermis RB, Wilson KD, Doyle MT, Martin TS, Merryman D, Kudrolli H, et al. Supplemental breast cancer screening with molecular breast imaging for women with dense breast tissue. Am J Roentgenol. 2016:1-8. doi:10.2214/AJR.15.15924.
    1. Brem RF, Ruda RC, Yang JL, Coffey CM, Rapelyea JA. Breast-specific gamma-imaging for the detection of mammographically occult breast cancer in women at increased risk. J Nucl Med. 2016;57:678–84. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.115.168385.
    1. Silberstein EB. Prevalence of adverse events to radiopharmaceuticals from 2007 to 2011. J Nucl Med. 2014;55:1308–10. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.114.138057.
    1. Piwnica-Worms D, Holman BL. Noncardiac applications of hexakis(alkylisonitrile) technetium-99m complexes. J Nucl Med. 1990;31:1166–7.
    1. Rhodes DJ, O’Connor MK, Phillips SW, Smith RL, Collins DA. Molecular breast imaging: a new technique using technetium Tc 99m scintimammography to detect small tumors of the breast. Mayo Clin Proc. 2005;80:24–30. doi: 10.1016/S0025-6196(11)62953-4.
    1. Hruska CB, Phillips SW, Whaley DH, Rhodes DJ, O’Connor MK. Molecular breast imaging: use of a dual-head dedicated gamma camera to detect small breast tumors. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;191:1805–15. doi: 10.2214/AJR.07.3693.
    1. NC100692 Kit (for the preparation of technetium (99mTc) NC100692 injection) [package insert]. 3.0 ed. Little Chalfont, Buckinghamshire: GE Healthcare Limited.
    1. Andersson M. Erratum to: effective dose to adult patients from 338 radiopharmaceuticals estimated using ICRP biokinetic data, ICRP/ICRU computational reference phantoms and ICRP 2007 tissue weighting factors. EJNMMI Phys. 2015;2:22. doi: 10.1186/s40658-015-0121-4.
    1. Mitchell D, Hruska CB, Boughey JC, Wahner-Roedler DL, Jones KN, Tortorelli C, et al. 99mTc-sestamibi using a direct conversion molecular breast imaging system to assess tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in women with locally advanced breast cancer. Clin Nucl Med. 2013;38:949–56. doi: 10.1097/RLU.0000000000000248.

Source: PubMed

3
S'abonner