Flares in Biopsy-Proven Giant Cell Arteritis in Northern Italy: Characteristics and Predictors in a Long-Term Follow-Up Study

Giovanna Restuccia, Luigi Boiardi, Alberto Cavazza, Mariagrazia Catanoso, Pierluigi Macchioni, Francesco Muratore, Luca Cimino, Raffaella Aldigeri, Filippo Crescentini, Nicolò Pipitone, Carlo Salvarani, Giovanna Restuccia, Luigi Boiardi, Alberto Cavazza, Mariagrazia Catanoso, Pierluigi Macchioni, Francesco Muratore, Luca Cimino, Raffaella Aldigeri, Filippo Crescentini, Nicolò Pipitone, Carlo Salvarani

Abstract

This study evaluated the frequency, timing, and characteristics of flares in a large cohort of Italian patients with biopsy-proven giant cell arteritis (GCA) and to identify factors at diagnosis able to predict the occurrence of flares. We evaluated 157 patients with biopsy-proven transmural GCA diagnosed and followed at the Rheumatology Unit of Reggio Emilia Hospital (Italy) for whom sufficient information was available from the time of diagnosis until at least 4 years of follow-up. Fifty-seven patients (36.5%) experienced ≥1 flares. Fifty-one (46.4%) of the 110 total flares (88 relapses and 22 recurrences) were experienced during the first 2 years after diagnosis. The majority of relapses occurred with doses of prednisone ≤ 10 mg/day (82.9%), whereas only 3.4% of relapses occurred for doses ≥ 25 mg/day. Polymyalgia rheumatica (46.5%) and cranial symptoms (41.9%) were the most frequent manifestations at the time of the first relapse. Cumulative prednisone dose during the first year and total cumulative prednisone dose were significantly higher in flaring patients compared with those without flares (7.8 ± 2.4 vs 6.7 ± 2.4 g, P = 0.02; 15.5 ± 8.9 vs 10.0 ± 9.2 g, P = 0.0001, respectively). The total duration of prednisone treatment was longer in flaring patients (58 ± 44 vs 30 ± 30 months, P = 0.0001).Patients with disease flares had at diagnosis more frequently systemic manifestations (P = 0.02) and fever ≥ 38°C (P = 0.02), significantly lower hemoglobin levels (P = 0.05), more frequent presence at temporal artery biopsy (TAB) specimens of giant cells (P = 0.04) and intraluminal acute thrombosis (P = 0.007), and more moderate/severe arterial inflammation (P = 0.009) compared with those without flares. In the multivariate model fever ≥ 38 °C (hazard ratio 2.14; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-4.32, P = 0.03) and the severity of inflammatory infiltrate (moderate/severe versus mild) (hazard ratio 5.41; 95% confidence interval, 1.64-17.87, P = 0.006) were significantly associated with an increased risk of flares. In conclusion, a flaring course is common in GCA and it is associated with prolonged GC requirements. Fever at diagnosis and severity of inflammation at TAB appear to predict the development of disease flares.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Different intensity of transmural inflammation in temporal artery biopsy specimens: mild (A), moderate (B) and severe (C). (A) Hematoxylin-Eosin, 40×; (B,C) Hematoxylin-Eosin, 20×.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Kaplan-Meier estimate of the probability of flare (relapse or recurrence) over time.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
(A) Survival curve showing the time required to reach a maintenance prednisone dose P = 0.19). (B) Survival curve showing the time required to reach a maintenance prednisone dose <5 mg/day in patients with (broken line) and without (solid line) flares. The median time in patients with flares was 48 weeks (95% CI: 40.6–56.8 weeks), whereas in patients without flares was 38.9 weeks (95% CI: 33.7–44.0 weeks) (P = 0.014). (C) Survival curve showing the time required to reach a stable dose of prednisone 0 mg/day in patients with (broken line) and without (solid line) flares. The median time in patients with flares was 151.9 weeks (95% CI: 109.9–193.8 weeks), whereas in patients without flares was 73.3 weeks (95% CI: 64.2–82.3 weeks) (P = 0.002).

References

    1. Salvarani C, Cantini F, Boiardi L, et al. Polymyalgia rheumatica and giant-cell arteritis. N Engl J Med 2002; 347:261–271.
    1. Salvarani C, Cantini F, Hunder GG. Polymyalgia rheumatica and giant-cell arteritis. Lancet 2008; 372:234–245.
    1. Weyand CM, Goronzy JJ. Giant-cell arteritis and polymyalgia rheumatica. N Engl J Med 2014; 371:50–57.
    1. Andersson R, Malmvall BE, Bengtsson BA. Long-term corticosteroid treatment in giant cell arteritis. Acta Med Scand 1986; 220:465–469.
    1. Martinez-Lado L, Calvino-Diaz C, Pineiro A, et al. Relapses and recurrences in giant cell arteritis: a population-based study of patients with biopsy-proven disease from northwestern Spain. Medicine (Baltimore) 2011; 90:186–193.
    1. Alba MA, García-Martínez A, Prieto-González S, et al. Relapses in patients with giant cell arteritis: prevalence, characteristics, and associated clinical findings in a longitudinally followed cohort of 106 patients. Medicine (Baltimore) 2014; 93:194–201.
    1. Liozon E, Roblot P, Paire D, et al. Anticardiolipin antibody levels predict flares and relapses in patients with giant-cell (temporal) arteritis. A longitudinal study of 58 biopsy-proven cases. Rheumatology 2000; 39:1089–1094.
    1. Proven A, Gabriel SE, Orces C, et al. Glucocorticoid therapy in giant cell arteritis: duration and adverse outcomes. Arthritis Rheum 2003; 49:703–708.
    1. Labarca C, Koster MJ, Crowson C, et al. Relapse rates and characteristics in biopsy-proven giant cell arteritis: a single-institution cohort study. Ann Rheum Dis 2015; 74 Suppl 2:517.
    1. Nesher G, Nesher R, Mates M, et al. Giant cell arteritis: intensity of the initial systemic inflammatory response and the course of the disease. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2008; 26 (3 Suppl 49):S30–534.
    1. Kermani TA, Warrington KJ, Cuthbertson D, et al. Disease Relapses among Patients with Giant Cell Arteritis: A Prospective, Longitudinal Cohort Study. J Rheumatol 2015; 42:1213–1217.
    1. Hernandez-Rodriguez J, Garcia-Martinez A, Casademont J, et al. A strong initial systemic inflammatory response is associated with higher corticosteroid requirements and longer duration of therapy in patients with giant-cell arteritis. Arthritis Rheum 2002; 47:29–35.
    1. Hachulla E, Boivin V, Pasturel-Michon U, et al. Prognostic factors and long-term evolution in a cohort of 133 patients with giant cell arteritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2001; 19:171–176.
    1. Graham E, Holland A, Avery A, et al. Prognosis in giant-cell arteritis. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1981; 282:269–271.
    1. Salvarani C, Della Bella C, Cimino L, et al. Risk factors for severe cranial ischaemic events in an Italian population-based cohort of patients with giant cell arteritis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2009; 48:250–253.Epub 2008 Dec 24.
    1. Salvarani C, Cimino L, Macchioni P, et al. Risk factors for visual loss in an Italian population-based cohort of patients with giant cell arteritis. Arthritis Rheum 2005; 53:293–297.
    1. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, et al. STROBE Initiative. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Ann Intern Med 2007; 147:573–577.
    1. Cavazza A, Muratore F, Boiardi L, et al. Inflamed temporal artery: histologic findings in 354 biopsies, with clinical correlations. Am J Surg Pathol 2014; 38:1360–1370.
    1. Muratore F, Pipitone N, Hunder GG, et al. Discontinuation of therapies in polymyalgia rheumatica and giant cell arteritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2013; 31 (4 Suppl 78):S86–92.
    1. Jamilloux Y, Liozon E, Pugnet G, et al. Recovery of adrenal function after long-term glucocorticoid therapy for giant cell arteritis: a cohort study. PLoS One 2013; 8:e68713.

Source: PubMed

3
S'abonner