Five-Year Survival Outcomes From the PACIFIC Trial: Durvalumab After Chemoradiotherapy in Stage III Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

David R Spigel, Corinne Faivre-Finn, Jhanelle E Gray, David Vicente, David Planchard, Luis Paz-Ares, Johan F Vansteenkiste, Marina C Garassino, Rina Hui, Xavier Quantin, Andreas Rimner, Yi-Long Wu, Mustafa Özgüroğlu, Ki H Lee, Terufumi Kato, Maike de Wit, Takayasu Kurata, Martin Reck, Byoung C Cho, Suresh Senan, Jarushka Naidoo, Helen Mann, Michael Newton, Piruntha Thiyagarajah, Scott J Antonia, David R Spigel, Corinne Faivre-Finn, Jhanelle E Gray, David Vicente, David Planchard, Luis Paz-Ares, Johan F Vansteenkiste, Marina C Garassino, Rina Hui, Xavier Quantin, Andreas Rimner, Yi-Long Wu, Mustafa Özgüroğlu, Ki H Lee, Terufumi Kato, Maike de Wit, Takayasu Kurata, Martin Reck, Byoung C Cho, Suresh Senan, Jarushka Naidoo, Helen Mann, Michael Newton, Piruntha Thiyagarajah, Scott J Antonia

Abstract

Purpose: The phase III PACIFIC trial compared durvalumab with placebo in patients with unresectable, stage III non-small-cell lung cancer and no disease progression after concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Consolidation durvalumab was associated with significant improvements in the primary end points of overall survival (OS; stratified hazard ratio [HR], 0.68; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.87; P = .00251) and progression-free survival (PFS [blinded independent central review; RECIST v1.1]; stratified HR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.42 to 0.65; P < .0001), with manageable safety. We report updated, exploratory analyses of survival, approximately 5 years after the last patient was randomly assigned.

Methods: Patients with WHO performance status 0 or 1 (any tumor programmed cell death-ligand 1 status) were randomly assigned (2:1) to durvalumab (10 mg/kg intravenously; administered once every 2 weeks for 12 months) or placebo, stratified by age, sex, and smoking history. Time-to-event end point analyses were performed using stratified log-rank tests. Medians and landmark survival rates were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Results: Seven hundred and nine of 713 randomly assigned patients received durvalumab (473 of 476) or placebo (236 of 237). As of January 11, 2021 (median follow-up, 34.2 months [all patients]; 61.6 months [censored patients]), updated OS (stratified HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.59 to 0.89; median, 47.5 v 29.1 months) and PFS (stratified HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.45 to 0.68; median, 16.9 v 5.6 months) remained consistent with the primary analyses. Estimated 5-year rates (95% CI) for durvalumab and placebo were 42.9% (38.2 to 47.4) versus 33.4% (27.3 to 39.6) for OS and 33.1% (28.0 to 38.2) versus 19.0% (13.6 to 25.2) for PFS.

Conclusion: These updated analyses demonstrate robust and sustained OS and durable PFS benefit with durvalumab after chemoradiotherapy. An estimated 42.9% of patients randomly assigned to durvalumab remain alive at 5 years and 33.1% of patients randomly assigned to durvalumab remain alive and free of disease progression, establishing a new benchmark for standard of care in this setting.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02125461.

Conflict of interest statement

David R. SpigelLeadership: ASCO (Inst)Consulting or Advisory Role: Genentech/Roche (Inst), Novartis (Inst), Bristol Myers Squibb (Inst), AstraZeneca (Inst), Pfizer (Inst), GlaxoSmithKline (Inst), Takeda (Inst), Evelo Therapeutics (Inst), Bayer (Inst), EMD Serono (Inst), Molecular Templates (Inst), Amgen (Inst), Curio Science (Inst), Intellisphere (Inst), Ipsen (Inst), Jazz Pharmaceuticals (Inst), Mirati Therapeutics (Inst), Puma Biotechnology (Inst), Sanofi/Aventis (Inst), Exelixis (Inst), Novocure (Inst), Regeneron (Inst), Lilly (Inst), Janssen (Inst), Evidera (Inst)Research Funding: Genentech/Roche (Inst), Novartis (Inst), Celgene (Inst), Bristol Myers Squibb (Inst), Lilly (Inst), AstraZeneca (Inst), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center—Simmons Cancer Center (Inst), Merck (Inst), G1 Therapeutics (Inst), Neon Therapeutics (Inst), Takeda (Inst), Nektar (Inst), Celldex (Inst), Clovis Oncology (Inst), Daiichi Sankyo (Inst), EMD Serono (Inst), Astellas Pharma (Inst), GRAIL (Inst), Transgene (Inst), Aeglea Biotherapeutics (Inst), Ipsen (Inst), BIND Therapeutics (Inst), Eisai (Inst), ImClone Systems (Inst), Immunogen (Inst), Janssen Oncology (Inst), MedImmune (Inst), Molecular Partners (Inst), Agios (Inst), GlaxoSmithKline (Inst), Tesaro (Inst), Cyteir (Inst), Apollomics (Inst), Novocure (Inst), Elevation Oncology (Inst), Calithera Biosciences (Inst), Arcus Biosciences (Inst), Arrys Therapeutics (Inst), Bayer (Inst), BeiGene (Inst), BioNTech (Inst), Blueprint Medicines (Inst), Boehringer Ingelheim (Inst), Denovo Biopharma (Inst), Hutchison MediPharma (Inst), Incyte (Inst), Kronos Bio (Inst), Loxo Oncology (Inst), Macrogenics (Inst), Molecular Templates (Inst), Oncologie (Inst), Pfizer (Inst), PTC Therapeutics (Inst), PureTech (Inst), Razor Genomics (Inst), Repare Therapeutics (Inst), Rgenix (Inst), Tizona Therapeutics Inc (Inst), Verastem (Inst)Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: AstraZeneca, Genentech, Novartis Corinne Faivre-FinnTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: AstraZeneca Jhanelle E. GrayHonoraria: Merck Sharp & Dohme, Axiom Healthcare Strategies, InivataConsulting or Advisory Role: Novartis, AstraZeneca, Blueprint Medicines, Bristol Myers Squibb, EMD Serono, Lilly, AstraZeneca, Sanofi, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Janssen Scientific AffairsResearch Funding: Array BioPharma (Inst), Merck (Inst), AstraZeneca (Inst), Bristol Myers Squibb (Inst), Boehringer Ingelheim (Inst), Genentech/Roche (Inst), G1 Therapeutics (Inst), Novartis (Inst), Pfizer (Inst), Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research (Inst)Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Merck Sharp & Dohme, Inivata, Merck, EMD Serono, Novartis David VicenteHonoraria: AstraZenecaConsulting or Advisory Role: Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme Oncology, Roche/Genentech, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Boehringer IngelheimTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: AstraZeneca David PlanchardHonoraria: Prime Oncology, PeerVoiceConsulting or Advisory Role: AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis, Roche, Pfizer, Merck Sharp & Dohme Oncology, Celgene, MedImmune, BeiGene, Samsung, AbbVie, Janssen, Daiichi Sankyo/Astra ZenecaResearch Funding: AstraZeneca/MedImmune (Inst), Bristol Myers Squibb (Inst), Boehringer Ingelheim (Inst), Lilly (Inst), Merck (Inst), Novartis (Inst), Pfizer (Inst), Roche (Inst), Sanofi/Aventis (Inst), Taiho Pharmaceutical (Inst), Daiichi Sankyo (Inst), AbbVie (Inst), Janssen (Inst) Johan F. VansteenkisteHonoraria: Bristol Myers Squibb (Inst), AstraZeneca (Inst), Merck Sharp & Dohme Oncology (Inst), Roche (Inst), Lilly (Inst), Daiichi-Sankyo (Inst)Consulting or Advisory Role: Novartis (Inst), Boehringer Ingelheim (Inst), AstraZeneca (Inst), Merck Sharp & Dohme Oncology (Inst), Bristol Myers Squibb (Inst), Roche (Inst), Daiichi-Sankyo (Inst)Research Funding: Merck Sharp & Dohme (Inst) Marina C. GarassinoHonoraria: Merck Sharp & Dohme Oncology, AstraZeneca/MedImmune, GlaxoSmithKline, Takeda, Roche, Bristol Myers SquibbConsulting or Advisory Role: Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Takeda, Roche, Tiziana Life Sciences, Sanofi, Celgene, Daiiki Sankyo, Inivata, Incyte, Pfizer, Seattle Genetics, Lilly, GlaxoSmithKline, Bayer, Blueprint Medicines, Janssen, RegeneronSpeakers' Bureau: AstraZeneca, Takeda, Merck Sharp & Dohme Oncology, Celgene, Incyte, Roche, Bristol Myers Squibb, Otsuka, LillyResearch Funding: Bristol Myers Squibb (Inst), Merck Sharp & Dohme (Inst), Roche/Genentech (Inst), AstraZeneca/MedImmune (Inst), AstraZeneca (Inst), Pfizer (Inst), GlaxoSmithKline (Inst), Novartis (Inst), Merck (Inst), Incyte (Inst), Takeda (Inst), Spectrum Pharmaceuticals (Inst), Blueprint Medicines (Inst), Lilly (Inst), AstraZeneca (Inst), Ipsen (Inst), Janssen (Inst), Exelixis (Inst), MedImmune (Inst), Sanofi (Inst), Pfizer (Inst), Amgen (Inst)Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Pfizer, Roche, AstraZeneca Rina HuiHonoraria: Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Roche, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Lilly, Pfizer, Seattle Genetics, Oncosec, MerckConsulting or Advisory Role: Merck Sharp & Dohme, AstraZeneca, Roche, Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis, Lilly, Pfizer, Seattle Genetics, Oncosec, MerckResearch Funding: AstraZeneca (Inst), Lilly (Inst), Merck Sharp & Dohme (Inst), Roche (Inst), Seattle Genetics (Inst), OncoSec (Inst), Novartis (Inst)Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Novartis Xavier QuantinHonoraria: Bristol Myers Squibb France, AstraZeneca, AmgenTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Merck Sharp & Dohme Oncology Andreas RimnerHonoraria: More HealthConsulting or Advisory Role: AstraZeneca, Merck, Boehringer IngelheimResearch Funding: Varian Medical Systems (Inst), Boehringer Ingelheim (Inst), Pfizer (Inst), AstraZeneca (Inst), Merck (Inst) Yi-Long WuHonoraria: AstraZeneca, Lilly, Roche, Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Merck Sharp & Dohme Oncology, Bristol Myers Squibb/China, Hengrui PharmaceuticalConsulting or Advisory Role: AstraZeneca, Roche, Boehringer Ingelheim, TakedaResearch Funding: Boehringer Ingelheim (Inst), Roche (Inst), Pfizer (Inst) Mustafa ÖzgüroğluHonoraria: Astellas Pharma, Novartis, Janssen Oncology (Inst)Consulting or Advisory Role: Merck Sharp & Dohme Oncology, AstraZenecaSpeakers' Bureau: AstraZenecaTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: AstraZeneca Ki H. LeeConsulting or Advisory Role: Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Lilly Terufumi KatoEmployment: Lilly (I)Honoraria: Chugai Pharma, Boehringer Ingelheim, Ono Pharmaceutical, Lilly, AstraZeneca, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Pfizer, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Takeda, Daiichi Sankyo, Merck SeronoConsulting or Advisory Role: AstraZeneca, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Lilly, Pfizer, Merck SeronoResearch Funding: Chugai Pharma (Inst), Merck Sharp & Dohme (Inst), Pfizer (Inst), Taiho Pharmaceutical (Inst), AstraZeneca (Inst), Lilly (Inst), AbbVie (Inst), Ono Pharmaceutical (Inst), Regeneron (Inst), Bristol Myers Squibb (Inst), Novartis (Inst), Amgen (Inst), Merck Serono Maike de WitConsulting or Advisory Role: AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Ipsen, AbbVie, Jazz PharmaceuticalsSpeakers' Bureau: AstraZeneca, Ipsen, Janssen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, SanofiResearch Funding: AstraZeneca (Inst), Bristol Myers Squibb (Inst), Novartis (Inst), Janssen (Inst), Merck Sharp & Dohme (Inst), Boehringer Ingelheim (Inst), Pierre Fabre (Inst), Ipsen (Inst), Amgen (Inst), Genzyme (Inst), Pfizer (Inst), Takeda (Inst), Noona Healthcare (Inst), AbbVie (Inst), Nucana (Inst), MorphoSys (Inst)Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Astellas Pharma, AstraZeneca, Takeda, Pfizer Takayasu KurataHonoraria: AstraZeneca, Ono Pharmaceutical, Bristol Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharma, Lilly, Boehringer Ingelheim, Merck Sharp & Dohme OncologyResearch Funding: Merck Sharp & Dohme Oncology (Inst), AstraZeneca (Inst), Lilly (Inst), Ono Pharmaceutical (Inst), Novartis (Inst), Takeda (Inst), Bristol Myers Squibb (Inst) Martin ReckConsulting or Advisory Role: Lilly, Merck Sharp & Dohme Oncology, Merck Serono, Bristol Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Pfizer, Novartis, Roche/Genentech, AbbVie, Amgen, Mirati Therapeutics, Samsung Bioepis, Sanofi/RegeneronSpeakers' Bureau: Roche/Genentech, Lilly, Merck Sharp & Dohme Oncology, Merck Serono, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Pfizer, Novartis, Amgen, Mirati Therapeutics, Sanofi/Aventis Byoung C. ChoLeadership: Gencurix, Interpark BioStock and Other Ownership Interests: Theravance, Gencurix, Bridgebio, Kanaph Therapeutics, Cyrus therapeutics, Interpark BioConsulting or Advisory Role: Novartis, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, Bristol Myers Squibb, Yuhan, Pfizer, Janssen, Takeda, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Ono Pharmaceutical, Lilly, Medpacto, Blueprint Medicines, Kanaph Therapeutics, Bridgebio, Cyrus Therapeutics, Guardant Health, Joseah BiopharmaResearch Funding: Novartis, Bayer, AstraZeneca, Mogam Biotechnology Research Institute, Dong-A ST, Champions Oncology, Janssen, Yuhan, Ono, Dizal Pharma, Merck Sharp & Dohme, AbbVie, Medpacto, GI Innovation, Lilly, Blueprint Medicines, Interpark BioPatents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: Champions OncologyOther Relationship: DAAN Biotherapeutics Suresh SenanHonoraria: AstraZenecaConsulting or Advisory Role: AstraZeneca, Merck Sharp & Dohme Oncology, BeiGene, PfizerResearch Funding: ViewRay (Inst), AstraZeneca (Inst), Varian Medical Systems (Inst), Bristol Myers Squibb (Inst) Jarushka NaidooHonoraria: Bristol Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca/MedImmune, Merck, Daiichi Sankyo/Lilly, TakedaConsulting or Advisory Role: Bristol Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca/MedImmune, Roche/Genentech, Daiichi Sankyo/Lilly, Takeda, Pfizer, Kaleido BiosciencesResearch Funding: Merck (Inst), AstraZeneca (Inst), Roche/Genentech (Inst)Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Bristol Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca/MedImmune Helen MannEmployment: AstraZenecaStock and Other Ownership Interests: AstraZeneca Michael NewtonEmployment: AstraZenecaStock and Other Ownership Interests: AstraZeneca Piruntha ThiyagarajahEmployment: AstraZeneca/MedImmune, Reckitt Benckiser (I)Stock and Other Ownership Interests: AstraZeneca/MedImmune Scott J. AntoniaConsulting or Advisory Role: Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, Memgen, Achilles Therapeutics, Amgen, Celsius Therapeutics, EMD Serono, G1 Therapeutics, GlaxoSmithKline, Glympse Bio, RAPT Therapeutics, Samyang, Venn Therapeutics, Tarus TherapeuticsPatents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: Oncolytic VirusTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: RAPT Therapeutics, Celsius Therapeutics, Amgen, Achilles TherapeuticsNo other potential conflicts of interest were reported.

Figures

FIG 1.
FIG 1.
CONSORT diagram. Study data collected up to the DCO date of January 11, 2021. Patients who completed 12 months of study treatment are those for whom the electronic case report form showed that they had received the maximum number of cycles of study treatment. aInformed consent received. bFour patients did not receive their assigned study treatment because of neutropenia (n = 1), worsening chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (n = 1), and patient decision (n = 2). cNine patients (durvalumab, n = 4; placebo, n = 5) who terminated the study because of patient decision have subsequently died; one additional patient (placebo arm) with missing termination reason has subsequently died. AE, adverse event; DCO, data cutoff.
FIG 2.
FIG 2.
Updated (A) OS and (B) PFS (blinded independent central review) in the intent-to-treat population. The vertical dashed lines indicate yearly landmarks; the associated numerical values represent the OS and PFS rates at the landmark. OS was defined as time from random assignment until death from any cause. PFS was defined as time from random assignment to the date of the first documented event of tumor progression or death in the absence of disease progression. For PFS, patients who had not progressed or died at the time of the data cutoff were censored at the time of their last evaluable RECIST assessment; however, if the patient progressed or died after ≥ 2 missed visits, they were censored at the time of the latest evaluable RECIST assessment before the two missed visits. HR, hazard ratio; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival.
FIG 3.
FIG 3.
Updated OS by prespecified and exploratory, post hoc subgroups. aHRs and 95% CIs were not calculated if the subgroup had < 20 events. bThree patients with missing WHO PS were included in the PS 1 subgroup. cThe other race category includes American Indian or Alaskan Native (n = 9), Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander (n = 2), and Other (n = 1). dThe subgroup includes 35 patients with tumors harboring EGFR mutations and, on the basis of local testing, eight patients with tumors harboring ALK alterations. ALK, anaplastic lymphoma kinase; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; HR, hazard ratio; NSCLC, non–small-cell lung cancer; OS, overall survival; PD-L1, programmed cell death-ligand 1; PS, performance status.
FIG 4.
FIG 4.
Updated TTDM (blinded independent central review) in the intent-to-treat population. The vertical dashed lines indicate yearly landmarks; the associated numerical values represent the TTDM rates at the landmark. TTDM was defined as time from random assignment until the first date of distant metastasis or death in the absence of distant metastasis. HR, hazard ratio; TTDM, time to death or distant metastasis.
FIG A1.
FIG A1.
Updated PFS (blinded independent central review) by prespecified and exploratory, post hoc subgroups. aHRs and 95% CIs were not calculated if the subgroup had < 20 events. bThree patients with missing WHO PS were included in the PS 1 subgroup. cThe other race category includes American Indian or Alaskan Native (n = 9), Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander (n = 2), and Other (n = 1). dThe subgroup includes 35 patients with tumors harboring EGFR mutations and, on the basis of local testing, eight patients with tumors harboring ALK alterations. ALK, anaplastic lymphoma kinase; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; HR, hazard ratio; NSCLC, non–small-cell lung cancer; PD-L1, programmed cell death-ligand 1; PFS, progression-free survival; PS, performance status.
FIG A2.
FIG A2.
Updated OS by tumor PD-L1 expression level: (A) PD-L1 TC ≥ 25%, (B) PD-L1 TC

FIG A3.

Updated PFS (blinded independent central…

FIG A3.

Updated PFS (blinded independent central review) by tumor PD-L1 expression level: (A) PD-L1…

FIG A3.
Updated PFS (blinded independent central review) by tumor PD-L1 expression level: (A) PD-L1 TC ≥ 25%, (B) PD-L1 TC

FIG A4.

Updated times to (A) first…

FIG A4.

Updated times to (A) first and (B) second subsequent therapy or death in…

FIG A4.
Updated times to (A) first and (B) second subsequent therapy or death in the intent-to-treat population. The vertical dashed lines indicate yearly landmarks; the associated numerical values represent the TFST and TSST rates at the landmark. TFST was defined as time from random assignment to the start of the first subsequent anticancer therapy after discontinuation of study treatment, or death, whichever occurred earlier. TSST was defined as the time from random assignment to the start of the second subsequent anticancer therapy after discontinuation of study treatment, or death, whichever occurred earlier. HR, hazard ratio; TFST, time to first subsequent therapy or death; TSST, time to second subsequent therapy or death.
All figures (8)
Comment in
Similar articles
Cited by
References
    1. Antonia SJ, Villegas A, Daniel D, et al. : Durvalumab after chemoradiotherapy in stage III non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 377:1919-1929, 2017 - PubMed
    1. Antonia SJ, Villegas A, Daniel D, et al. : Overall survival with durvalumab after chemoradiotherapy in stage III NSCLC. N Engl J Med 379:2342-2350, 2018 - PubMed
    1. European Medicines Agency (EMA) : Imfinzi (Durvalumab) Product Information. 2021. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/product-information/imfizi-epar-p...
    1. Gray JE, Villegas A, Daniel D, et al. : Three-year overall survival with durvalumab after chemoradiotherapy in stage III NSCLC - update from PACIFIC. J Thorac Oncol 15:288-293, 2019 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Faivre-Finn C, Vicente D, Kurata T, et al. : Four-year survival with durvalumab after chemoradiotherapy in stage III NSCLC - an update from the PACIFIC trial. J Thorac Oncol 16:860-867, 2021 - PubMed
Show all 27 references
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
Full text links [x]
[x]
Cite
Copy Download .nbib .nbib
Format: AMA APA MLA NLM
FIG A3.
FIG A3.
Updated PFS (blinded independent central review) by tumor PD-L1 expression level: (A) PD-L1 TC ≥ 25%, (B) PD-L1 TC

FIG A4.

Updated times to (A) first…

FIG A4.

Updated times to (A) first and (B) second subsequent therapy or death in…

FIG A4.
Updated times to (A) first and (B) second subsequent therapy or death in the intent-to-treat population. The vertical dashed lines indicate yearly landmarks; the associated numerical values represent the TFST and TSST rates at the landmark. TFST was defined as time from random assignment to the start of the first subsequent anticancer therapy after discontinuation of study treatment, or death, whichever occurred earlier. TSST was defined as the time from random assignment to the start of the second subsequent anticancer therapy after discontinuation of study treatment, or death, whichever occurred earlier. HR, hazard ratio; TFST, time to first subsequent therapy or death; TSST, time to second subsequent therapy or death.
All figures (8)
FIG A4.
FIG A4.
Updated times to (A) first and (B) second subsequent therapy or death in the intent-to-treat population. The vertical dashed lines indicate yearly landmarks; the associated numerical values represent the TFST and TSST rates at the landmark. TFST was defined as time from random assignment to the start of the first subsequent anticancer therapy after discontinuation of study treatment, or death, whichever occurred earlier. TSST was defined as the time from random assignment to the start of the second subsequent anticancer therapy after discontinuation of study treatment, or death, whichever occurred earlier. HR, hazard ratio; TFST, time to first subsequent therapy or death; TSST, time to second subsequent therapy or death.

References

    1. Antonia SJ, Villegas A, Daniel D, et al. : Durvalumab after chemoradiotherapy in stage III non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 377:1919-1929, 2017
    1. Antonia SJ, Villegas A, Daniel D, et al. : Overall survival with durvalumab after chemoradiotherapy in stage III NSCLC. N Engl J Med 379:2342-2350, 2018
    1. European Medicines Agency (EMA) : Imfinzi (Durvalumab) Product Information. 2021.
    1. Gray JE, Villegas A, Daniel D, et al. : Three-year overall survival with durvalumab after chemoradiotherapy in stage III NSCLC - update from PACIFIC. J Thorac Oncol 15:288-293, 2019
    1. Faivre-Finn C, Vicente D, Kurata T, et al. : Four-year survival with durvalumab after chemoradiotherapy in stage III NSCLC - an update from the PACIFIC trial. J Thorac Oncol 16:860-867, 2021
    1. Hui R, Özgüroğlu M, Villegas A, et al. : Patient-reported outcomes with durvalumab after chemoradiotherapy in stage III, unresectable non-small-cell lung cancer (PACIFIC): A randomised, controlled, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol 20:1670-1680, 2019
    1. FDA : Durvalumab Prescribing Information. 2020.
    1. Pmda : List of Approved Products: Financial Year 2018.
    1. Yoon SM, Shaikh T, Hallman M: Therapeutic management options for stage III non-small cell lung cancer. World J Clin Oncol 8:1-20, 2017
    1. Auperin A, Le Pechoux C, Rolland E, et al. : Meta-analysis of concomitant versus sequential radiochemotherapy in locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 28:2181-2190, 2010
    1. Bradley JD, Hu C, Komaki RR, et al. : Long-term results of NRG oncology RTOG 0617: Standard- versus high-dose chemoradiotherapy with or without cetuximab for unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 38:706-714, 2020
    1. Hansen RN, Zhang Y, Seal B, et al. : Long-term survival trends in patients with unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer receiving chemotherapy and radiation therapy: A SEER cancer registry analysis. BMC Cancer 20:276, 2020
    1. Vokes EE, Herndon JE, II, Kelley MJ, et al. : Induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy compared with chemoradiotherapy alone for regionally advanced unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer: Cancer and Leukemia Group B. J Clin Oncol 25:1698-1704, 2007
    1. Hanna N, Neubauer M, Yiannoutsos C, et al. : Phase III study of cisplatin, etoposide, and concurrent chest radiation with or without consolidation docetaxel in patients with inoperable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer: The Hoosier Oncology Group and U.S. Oncology. J Clin Oncol 26:5755-5760, 2008
    1. Senan S, Brade A, Wang LH, et al. : PROCLAIM: Randomized phase III trial of pemetrexed-cisplatin or etoposide-cisplatin plus thoracic radiation therapy followed by consolidation chemotherapy in locally advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 34:953-962, 2016
    1. Ahn JS, Ahn YC, Kim JH, et al. : Multinational randomized phase III trial with or without consolidation chemotherapy using docetaxel and cisplatin after concurrent chemoradiation in inoperable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer: KCSG-LU05-04. J Clin Oncol 33:2660-2666, 2015
    1. Bradley JD, Paulus R, Komaki R, et al. : Standard-dose versus high-dose conformal radiotherapy with concurrent and consolidation carboplatin plus paclitaxel with or without cetuximab for patients with stage IIIA or IIIB non-small-cell lung cancer (RTOG 0617): A randomised, two-by-two factorial phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol 16:187-199, 2015
    1. Faivre-Finn C, Spigel DR, Senan S, et al. : Impact of prior chemoradiotherapy-related variables on outcomes with durvalumab in unresectable stage III NSCLC (PACIFIC). Lung Cancer 151:30-38, 2021
    1. Paz-Ares L, Spira A, Raben D, et al. : Outcomes with durvalumab by tumour PD-L1 expression in unresectable, stage III non-small-cell lung cancer in the PACIFIC trial. Ann Oncol 31:798-806, 2020
    1. Faehling M, Schumann C, Christopoulos P, et al. : Durvalumab after definitive chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced unresectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Real-world data on survival and safety from the German expanded-access program (EAP). Lung Cancer 150:114-122, 2020
    1. Taugner J, Käsmann L, Eze C, et al. : Real-world prospective analysis of treatment patterns in durvalumab maintenance after chemoradiotherapy in unresectable, locally advanced NSCLC patients. Invest New Drugs 39:1189-1196, 2021
    1. Jung HA, Noh JM, Sun JM, et al. : Real world data of durvalumab consolidation after chemoradiotherapy in stage III non-small-cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer 146:23-29, 2020
    1. Berghmans T, Paesmans M, Sculier JP: Prognostic factors in stage III non-small cell lung cancer: A review of conventional, metabolic and new biological variables. Ther Adv Med Oncol 3:127-138, 2011
    1. Peters S, Dafni U, Boyer M, et al. : Position of a panel of international lung cancer experts on the approval decision for use of durvalumab in stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) by the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP). Ann Oncol 30:161-165, 2019
    1. Garassino MC, Paz-Ares L, Hui R, et al. : Patient-reported outcomes with durvalumab by PD-L1 expression and prior chemoradiotherapy-related variables in unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer. Future Oncol 17:1165-1184, 2021
    1. Antonia SJ, Balmanoukian A, Brahmer J, et al. : Clinical activity, tolerability, and long-term follow-up of durvalumab in patients with advanced NSCLC. J Thorac Oncol 14:1794-1806, 2019
    1. Melillo G, Chand V, Yovine A, et al. : Curative-intent treatment with durvalumab in early-stage cancers. Adv Ther 38:2759-2778, 2021

Source: PubMed

3
S'abonner