"Teaching: Individual" to increase adherence to therapeutic regimen in people with hypertension and type-2 diabetes: protocol of the controlled clinical trial ENURSIN

Sandra Lucrecia Romero Guevara, Dora Inés Parra, Lyda Z Rojas, Sandra Lucrecia Romero Guevara, Dora Inés Parra, Lyda Z Rojas

Abstract

Background: Worldwide, hypertension affects approximately 25% of the adult population and diabetes about 8.5%. Lack of adherence to prescribed treatment regimen remains a problem among patients undergoing long-term treatment, showing high non-adherence rates, at estimated range of between 36 and 93%. In our city, patients with hypertension and diabetes in primary care are looked after mainly by doctors with little nursing support; also, there is no published dataset among Colombian populations on the effect of nursing intervention to increase adherence to therapeutic regimen. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of nursing intervention "Teaching: Individual" compared with usual care, to increase adherence to therapeutic regimen in people with hypertension and/or type-2 diabetes, and to analyze the impact to glycosylated hemoglobin and systolic blood pressure levels.

Methods: A two-arm, single-blinded, randomized controlled trial, with participants allocated to either intervention group with "Teaching: Individual" provided by two nurses, or control group receiving routine care only. Two Hundred patients attending cardiovascular risk programs of Bucaramanga, Colombia were included. Nursing intervention consisted of six educational sessions about Coping Enhancement; Behavior Modification; Teaching: Disease Process, Prescribed Medication, Prescribed Diet and Prescribed Exercise. The outcomes were Treatment Behavior: Illness or Injury (adherence to treatment), levels of both glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and systolic blood pressure for 24 h, to be measured at baseline and two follow-up time points. Basic characteristics of the groups were compared through chi-square/Fisher's exact or Students-T/Mann-Whitney U test. Outcomes were evaluated with repeated data methods and investigated changes in the outcomes over time and to compare these changes among treatment groups, and statistical significance with p-value < 0.05 were considered.

Discussion: The nursing intervention "Teaching: Individual" to increase adherence to therapeutic regimen in people with hypertension and/or type-2 diabetes represents an innovative care approach intended for low-income population. The study will advise district health system policy makers and managers as to the efficacy of implementing this intervention. Should this intervention turn out efficacious, it can potentially achieve wide application in cardiovascular risk programs.

Trial registration: ENURSIN was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02758275) on April 27, 2016, protocol number 01.

Keywords: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Hypertension; Medication Adherence; Nursing Process; Patient Compliance; Patient Education as a Topic.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interestsThe authors SLR, DIP, LZR declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Consort flow diagram
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Picture of the booklet used for the Teaching: Individual. Source: authors

References

    1. Dawkins RC, Oliver GF, Sharma M, Pinto BM, Jeronimo B, Pereira B, Magno J, Motta LA, Verma N, Shephard M. An estimation of the prevalence of diabetes mellitus and diabetic retinopathy in adults in Timor-Leste. BMC Res Notes. 2015;8:249. doi: 10.1186/s13104-015-1171-3.
    1. Golshahi J, Ahmadzadeh H, Sadeghi M, Mohammadifard N, Pourmoghaddas A. Effect of self-care education on lifestyle modification, medication adherence and blood pressure in hypertensive adults: randomized controlled clinical trial. Adv Biomed Res. 2015;4:204.
    1. An J, Nichol MB. Multiple medication adherence and its effect on clinical outcomes among patients with comorbid type 2 diabetes and hypertension. Med Care. 2013;51(10):879–887. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31829fa8ed.
    1. Bener A, Kim EJ, Mutlu F, Eliyan A, Delghan H, Nofal E, Shalabi L, Wadi N. Burden of diabetes mellitus attributable to demographic levels in Qatar: an emerging public health problem. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2014;8(4):216–220. doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2014.09.005.
    1. Yang G, Ma Y, Wang S, Su Y, Rao W, Fu Y, Yu Y, Kou C. Prevalence and correlates of prehypertension and hypertension among adults in northeastern China: a cross-sectional study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016;13(1):82. doi: 10.3390/ijerph13010082.
    1. Perl S, Niederl E, Kos C, Mrak P, Ederer H, Rakovac I, Beck P, Kraler E, Stoff I, Klima G, et al. Randomized evaluation of the effectiveness of a structured educational program for patients with essential hypertension. Am J Hypertens. 2016;29(7):866–872. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpv186.
    1. Fadare J, Olamoyegun M, Gbadegesin BA. Medication adherence and direct treatment cost among diabetes patients attending a tertiary healthcare facility in Ogbomosho, Nigeria. Malawi Med J. 2015;27(2):65–70. doi: 10.4314/mmj.v27i2.7.
    1. López LA, Romero SL, Parra DI, Rojas LZ. Adherencia al tratamiento: Concepto y medición. Hacia promoc salud. 2016;21(11):117–137. doi: 10.17151/hpsal.2016.21.1.10.
    1. Odnoletkova I, Goderis G, Nobels F, Aertgeerts B, Annemans L, Ramaekers D. Nurse-led telecoaching of people with type 2 diabetes in primary care: rationale, design and baseline data of a randomized controlled trial. BMC Fam Pract. 2014;15:24. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-15-24.
    1. Conn VS, Ruppar TM, Chase JA, Enriquez M, Cooper PS. Interventions to improve medication adherence in hypertensive patients: systematic review and meta-analysis. Curr Hypertens Rep. 2015;17(12):94. doi: 10.1007/s11906-015-0606-5.
    1. Bulechek GM, Butcher HK, Dochterman JM, Wagner C: Nursing interventions classification (NIC), sixth edn; 2012.
    1. Chan AW, Tetzlaff JM, Gotzsche PC, Altman DG, Mann H, Berlin JA, Dickersin K, Hrobjartsson A, Schulz KF, Parulekar WR, et al. SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials. BMJ. 2013;346:e7586. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e7586.
    1. Rosselli D, Ardila A, Pradilla G, Morillo L, Bautista L, Rey O, Camacho M. The mini-mental state examination as a selected diagnostic test for dementia: a Colombian population study. GENECO Revista de neurologia. 2000;30(5):428–432. doi: 10.33588/rn.3005.99125.
    1. Bacca A, González A, Uribe AF. Validación de la escala de depresión de Yesavage (versión reducida) en adultos mayores colombianos. Pensamiento Psicológico. 2005;1(5):53–63.
    1. Crowley MJ, Powers BJ, Olsen MK, Grubber JM, Koropchak C, Rose CM, Gentry P, Bowlby L, Trujillo G, Maciejewski ML, et al. The cholesterol, hypertension, and glucose education (CHANGE) study: results from a randomized controlled trial in African Americans with diabetes. Am Heart J. 2013;166(1):179–186. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2013.04.004.
    1. Heisler M, Vijan S, Makki F, Piette JD. Diabetes control with reciprocal peer support versus nurse care management: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2010;153(8):507–515. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-153-8-201010190-00007.
    1. Moorhead S, Johnson M, Meridean M, E. S: nursing outcomes classification (NOC), 4th edn: ELSEVIER 2008.
    1. Ma Y, Mazumdar M, Memtsoudis SG. Beyond repeated-measures analysis of variance: advanced statistical methods for the analysis of longitudinal data in anesthesia research. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2012;37(1):99–105. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e31823ebc74.
    1. Albert PS. Longitudinal data analysis (repeated measures) in clinical trials. Stat Med. 1999;18(13):1707–1732. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19990715)18:13<1707::AID-SIM138>;2-H.
    1. Sapkota S, Brien J-A, Greenfield J, Aslani P. A systematic review of interventions addressing adherence to anti-diabetic medications in patients with type 2 diabetes-components of interventions. PLoSONE. 2015;10(6):0128581. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0128581.
    1. Mills K, Obst K, Shen W, Molina S, Zhang H, He H, Cooper L, He J. Comparative effectiveness of implementation strategies for blood pressure control in hypertensive patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2017;168(2):110–120. doi: 10.7326/M17-1805.

Source: PubMed

3
S'abonner