Biomarkers of rapid chronic kidney disease progression in type 2 diabetes

Helen C Looker, Marco Colombo, Sibylle Hess, Mary J Brosnan, Bassam Farran, R Neil Dalton, Max C Wong, Charles Turner, Colin N A Palmer, Everson Nogoceke, Leif Groop, Veikko Salomaa, David B Dunger, Felix Agakov, Paul M McKeigue, Helen M Colhoun, SUMMIT Investigators, Helen C Looker, Marco Colombo, Sibylle Hess, Mary J Brosnan, Bassam Farran, R Neil Dalton, Max C Wong, Charles Turner, Colin N A Palmer, Everson Nogoceke, Leif Groop, Veikko Salomaa, David B Dunger, Felix Agakov, Paul M McKeigue, Helen M Colhoun, SUMMIT Investigators

Abstract

Here we evaluated the performance of a large set of serum biomarkers for the prediction of rapid progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD) in patients with type 2 diabetes. We used a case-control design nested within a prospective cohort of patients with baseline eGFR 30-60 ml/min per 1.73 m(2). Within a 3.5-year period of Go-DARTS study patients, 154 had over a 40% eGFR decline and 153 controls maintained over 95% of baseline eGFR. A total of 207 serum biomarkers were measured and logistic regression was used with forward selection to choose a subset that were maximized on top of clinical variables including age, gender, hemoglobin A1c, eGFR, and albuminuria. Nested cross-validation determined the best number of biomarkers to retain and evaluate for predictive performance. Ultimately, 30 biomarkers showed significant associations with rapid progression and adjusted for clinical characteristics. A panel of 14 biomarkers increased the area under the ROC curve from 0.706 (clinical data alone) to 0.868. Biomarkers selected included fibroblast growth factor-21, the symmetric to asymmetric dimethylarginine ratio, β2-microglobulin, C16-acylcarnitine, and kidney injury molecule-1. Use of more extensive clinical data including prebaseline eGFR slope improved prediction but to a lesser extent than biomarkers (area under the ROC curve of 0.793). Thus we identified several novel associations of biomarkers with CKD progression and the utility of a small panel of biomarkers to improve prediction.

References

    1. Am J Nephrol. 2011;34(3):268-80
    1. Kidney Int. 2014 May;85(5):1214-24
    1. Clin Res Cardiol. 2013 Mar;102(3):193-202
    1. Metabolism. 2010 Nov;59(11):1656-62
    1. Endocrinology. 2013 Sep;154(9):3366-76
    1. QJM. 2015 Feb;108(2):127-34
    1. Metabolism. 2012 Jun;61(6):853-9
    1. Kidney Int. 2009 Feb;75(4):408-14
    1. Mol Endocrinol. 2010 Oct;24(10):2050-64
    1. JAMA. 2011 Jun 15;305(23):2432-9
    1. Clin Lab. 2012;58(7-8):659-71
    1. Biochem J. 2005 May 15;388(Pt 1):379-86
    1. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014 Oct;25(10 ):2177-86
    1. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2013 Nov;33(11):2682-8
    1. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015 Jan;26(1):192-200
    1. Kidney Int. 2011 May;79(10 ):1113-8
    1. Ann Intern Med. 2013 Apr 16;158(8):596-603
    1. Clin Chem. 2007 Jul;53(7):1264-72
    1. Kidney Int. 2012 Oct;82(7):812-8
    1. J Bone Miner Res. 2004 Mar;19(3):429-35
    1. Am J Kidney Dis. 2012 Aug;60(2):197-206
    1. PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e51334
    1. Curr Diabetes Rev. 2012 Jul 1;8(4):285-93
    1. Metabolomics. 2012 Feb;8(1):109-119
    1. Kidney Int. 2015 Apr;87(4):812-9
    1. Diabetes. 2012 Dec;61(12):3304-13
    1. Diabetes Care. 2009 Jan;32(1):126-8
    1. Diabetes. 2007 Aug;56(8):2178-82
    1. Clin Chem. 2011 Jan;57(1):112-21
    1. PLoS One. 2011 Apr 15;6(4):e18398
    1. J Anim Sci. 2014 Feb;92(2):407-13
    1. Ann Intern Med. 2006 Aug 15;145(4):247-54

Source: PubMed

3
S'abonner