Empirically Derived Dehydration Scoring and Decision Tree Models for Children With Diarrhea: Assessment and Internal Validation in a Prospective Cohort Study in Dhaka, Bangladesh

Adam C Levine, Justin Glavis-Bloom, Payal Modi, Sabiha Nasrin, Soham Rege, Chieh Chu, Christopher H Schmid, Nur H Alam, Adam C Levine, Justin Glavis-Bloom, Payal Modi, Sabiha Nasrin, Soham Rege, Chieh Chu, Christopher H Schmid, Nur H Alam

Abstract

Introduction: Diarrhea remains one of the most common and most deadly conditions affecting children worldwide. Accurately assessing dehydration status is critical to determining treatment course, yet no clinical diagnostic models for dehydration have been empirically derived and validated for use in resource-limited settings.

Methods: In the Dehydration: Assessing Kids Accurately (DHAKA) prospective cohort study, a random sample of children under 5 with acute diarrhea was enrolled between February and June 2014 in Bangladesh. Local nurses assessed children for clinical signs of dehydration on arrival, and then serial weights were obtained as subjects were rehydrated. For each child, the percent weight change with rehydration was used to classify subjects with severe dehydration (>9% weight change), some dehydration (3-9%), or no dehydration (<3%). Clinical variables were then entered into logistic regression and recursive partitioning models to develop the DHAKA Dehydration Score and DHAKA Dehydration Tree, respectively. Models were assessed for their accuracy using the area under their receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and for their reliability through repeat clinical exams. Bootstrapping was used to internally validate the models.

Results: A total of 850 children were enrolled, with 771 included in the final analysis. Of the 771 children included in the analysis, 11% were classified with severe dehydration, 45% with some dehydration, and 44% with no dehydration. Both the DHAKA Dehydration Score and DHAKA Dehydration Tree had significant AUCs of 0.79 (95% CI = 0.74, 0.84) and 0.76 (95% CI = 0.71, 0.80), respectively, for the diagnosis of severe dehydration. Additionally, the DHAKA Dehydration Score and DHAKA Dehydration Tree had significant positive likelihood ratios of 2.0 (95% CI = 1.8, 2.3) and 2.5 (95% CI = 2.1, 2.8), respectively, and significant negative likelihood ratios of 0.23 (95% CI = 0.13, 0.40) and 0.28 (95% CI = 0.18, 0.44), respectively, for the diagnosis of severe dehydration. Both models demonstrated 90% agreement between independent raters and good reproducibility using bootstrapping.

Conclusion: This study is the first to empirically derive and internally validate accurate and reliable clinical diagnostic models for dehydration in a resource-limited setting. After external validation, frontline providers may use these new tools to better manage acute diarrhea in children.

© Levine et al.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Flowchart for DHAKA Study Enrollment
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Curves of the DHAKA Dehydration Score and DHAKA Dehydration Tree Abbreviation: AUC, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
DHAKA Dehydration Decision Tree With Assigned Dehydration Categories

References

    1. Fischer Walker CL, Perin J, Aryee MJ, Boschi-Pinto C, Black RE. Diarrhea incidence in low- and middle-income countries in 1990 and 2010: a systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2012;12(1): 220. 10.1186/1471-2458-12-220.
    1. Parashar UD, Hummelman EG, Bresee JS, Miller MA, Glass RI. Global illness and deaths caused by rotavirus disease in children. Emerg Infect Dis. 2003;9(5): 565–572. 10.3201/eid0905.020562.
    1. Walker CLF, Rudan I, Liu L, Nair H, Theodoratou E, et al. Global burden of childhood pneumonia and diarrhoea. Lancet. 2013;381(9875): 1405–1416. 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60222-6.
    1. Fonseca BK, Holdgate A, Craig JC. Enteral vs intravenous rehydration therapy for children with gastroenteritis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2004;158(5): 483–490. 10.1001/archpedi.158.5.483.
    1. World Health Organization (WHO) The treatment of diarrhoea: a manual for physicians and other senior health workers. Geneva: WHO; 2005. Available from:
    1. King CK, Glass R, Bresee JS, Duggan C; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Managing acute gastroenteritis among children: oral rehydration, maintenance, and nutritional therapy. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2003;52(RR-16): 1–16.
    1. National Collaborating Centre for Women's and Children's Health (UK) Diarrhoea and vomiting caused by gastroenteritis: diagnosis, assessment and management in children younger than 5 years. NICE Clinical Guidelines, No. 84 London: RCOG Press; 2009. Available from:
    1. Farthing M, Salam MA, Lindberg G, Dite P, Khalif I, Salazar-Lindo E, et al. WGO . Acute diarrhea in adults and children: a global perspective. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2013;47(1): 12–20. 10.1097/MCG.0b013e31826df662.
    1. Steiner MJ, DeWalt DA, Byerley JS. Is this child dehydrated? JAMA. 2004;291(22): 2746–2754. 10.1001/jama.291.22.2746.
    1. World Health Organization (WHO) Handbook: IMCI integrated management of childhood illness. Geneva: WHO; 2005. Available from:
    1. Pringle K, Shah SP, Umulisa I, Mark Munyaneza RB, Dushimiyimana JM, Stegmann K, et al. Comparing the accuracy of the three popular clinical dehydration scales in children with diarrhea. Int J Emerg Med. 2011;4(1): 58. 10.1186/1865-1380-4-58.
    1. Levine AC, Munyaneza RM, Glavis-Bloom J, Redditt V, Cockrell HC, Kalimba B, et al. Prediction of severe disease in children with diarrhea in a resource-limited setting. PLoS One. 2013;8(12): e82386. 10.1371/journal.pone.0082386.
    1. Jauregui J, Nelson D, Choo E, Stearns B, Levine AC, Liebmann O, et al. External validation and comparison of three pediatric clinical dehydration scales. PLoS One. 2014;9(5): e95739. 10.1371/journal.pone.0095739.
    1. Bardhan PK. Annual statistics of Dhaka Hospital. Dhaka (Bangladesh): International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research; 2012.
    1. World Health Organization (WHO); United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) WHO child growth standards and the identification of severe acute malnutrition in infants and children: a joint statement by the World Health Organization and the United Nations Children’s Fund. Geneva: WHO; 2009. Available from:
    1. Gorelick MH, Shaw KN, Murphy KO. Validity and reliability of clinical signs in the diagnosis of dehydration in children. Pediatrics. 1997;99(5): e6. 10.1542/peds.99.5.e6.
    1. Harrell F, Jr, Lee KL, Mark DB. Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors. Stat Med. 1996;15(4): 361–387. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19960229)15:4%3c361::AID-SIM168%;2-4.
    1. Collins GS, Reitsma JB, Altman DG, Moons KGM. Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD statement. Ann Intern Med. 2015;162(1): 55–63. 10.7326/M14-0697.
    1. Sullivan LM, Massaro JM, D’Agostino RB, Sr. Presentation of multivariate data for clinical use: the Framingham Study risk score functions. Stat Med. 2004;23(10): 1631–1660. 10.1002/sim.1742.
    1. Royston P, Moons KGM, Altman DG, Vergouwe Y. Prognosis and prognostic research: developing a prognostic model. BMJ. 2009;338:b604. 10.1136/bmj.b604.
    1. Goldman L, Cook EF, Brand DA, Lee TH, Rouan GW, Weisberg MC, et al. A computer protocol to predict myocardial infarction in emergency department patients with chest pain. N Engl J Med. 1988;318(13): 797–803. 10.1056/NEJM198803313181301.
    1. Vittinghoff E, McCulloch CE. Relaxing the rule of ten events per variable in logistic and Cox regression. Am J Epidemiol. 2007;165(6): 710–718. 10.1093/aje/kwk052.
    1. Fortin J, Parent MA. Dehydration scoring system for infants. J Trop Pediatr Environ Child Health. 1978;24(3): 110–114.
    1. Santosham M, Brown KH, Sack RB. Oral rehydration therapy and dietary therapy for acute childhood diarrhea. Pediatr Rev. 1987;8(9): 273–278. 10.1542/pir.8-9-273.
    1. Vega RM, Avner JR. A prospective study of the usefulness of clinical and laboratory parameters for predicting percentage of dehydration in children. Pediatr Emerg Care. 1997;13(3): 179–182. 10.1097/00006565-199706000-00001.
    1. Duggan C, Refat M, Hashem M, Wolff M, Fayad I, Santosham M. How valid are clinical signs of dehydration in infants? J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1996;22(1): 56–61. 10.1097/00005176-199601000-00009.
    1. Parkin PC, Macarthur C, Khambalia A, Goldman RD, Friedman JN. Clinical and laboratory assessment of dehydration severity in children with acute gastroenteritis. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2010;49(3): 235–239. 10.1177/0009922809336670.
    1. Bailey B, Gravel J, Goldman RD, Friedman JN, Parkin PC. External validation of the clinical dehydration scale for children with acute gastroenteritis. Acad Emerg Med. 2010;17(6): 583–588. 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2010.00767.x.
    1. Kinlin LM, Freedman SB. Evaluation of a clinical dehydration scale in children requiring intravenous rehydration. Pediatrics. 2012;129(5): e1211–e1219. 10.1542/peds.2011-2985.
    1. Tam RK, Wong H, Plint A, Lepage N, Filler G. Comparison of clinical and biochemical markers of dehydration with the clinical dehydration scale in children: a case comparison trial. BMC Pediatr. 2014;14(1): 149. 10.1186/1471-2431-14-149.
    1. Falszewska A, Dziechciarz P, Szajewska H. The diagnostic accuracy of Clinical Dehydration Scale in identifying dehydration in children with acute gastroenteritis: a systematic review. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2014;53(12): 1181–1188. 10.1177/0009922814538493.
    1. Pruvost I, Dubos F, Chazard E, Hue V, Duhamel A, Martinot A. The value of body weight measurement to assess dehydration in children. PLoS One. 2013;8(1): e55063. 10.1371/journal.pone.0055063.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors et collaborateurs

Les conditions médicales

Interventions en matière de drogue

3
S'abonner