Comparison of tests used to distinguish smokers from nonsmokers

M J Jarvis, H Tunstall-Pedoe, C Feyerabend, C Vesey, Y Saloojee, M J Jarvis, H Tunstall-Pedoe, C Feyerabend, C Vesey, Y Saloojee

Abstract

Questionnaire and biochemical measures of smoking were studied in 211 hospital outpatients. Eleven different tests of smoke intake were compared for their ability to categorize smokers and nonsmokers correctly. The concentration of cotinine, whether measured in plasma, saliva, or urine, was the best indicator of smoking, with sensitivity of 96-97 per cent and specificity of 99-100 per cent. Thiocyanate provided the poorest discrimination. Carbon monoxide measured as blood carboxyhaemoglobin or in expired air gave sensitivity and specificity of about 90 per cent. Sensitivities of the tests were little affected by the presence among the claimed nonsmokers of a group of 21 "deceivers" who concealed their smoking. It is concluded that cotinine is the measure of choice, but for most clinical applications carbon monoxide provides an acceptable degree of discrimination and is considerably cheaper and simpler to apply.

References

    1. Thorax. 1982 Jul;37(7):521-5
    1. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1982 May 22;284(6328):1516-8
    1. Am J Public Health. 1983 Oct;73(10):1204-7
    1. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1984 May 19;288(6429):1499-503
    1. Clin Chem. 1984 Aug;30(8):1377-80
    1. Clin Chem. 1985 Feb;31(2):270-4
    1. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1985 Oct 5;291(6500):927-9
    1. Thorax. 1986 Nov;41(11):886-7
    1. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1976 Sep 29;49(3):263-5
    1. Am J Public Health. 1977 Jun;67(6):545-9
    1. Br Med J. 1978 Oct 28;2(6146):1185-6
    1. Br Med J. 1979 Oct 27;2(6197):1026-8
    1. J Pharm Pharmacol. 1980 Mar;32(3):178-81
    1. Br Med J. 1980 Aug 16;281(6238):484-5
    1. Analyst. 1980 Oct;105(1255):998-1001
    1. Thorax. 1981 May;36(5):366-9
    1. Clin Chem. 1982 Jun;28(6):1272-6
    1. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1983 Jun;37(2):132-6

Source: PubMed

3
S'abonner