Molecular differences of adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells between non-responders and responders in treatment of transphincteric perianal fistulas

Michaela Tencerova, Lilli Lundby, Steen Buntzen, Stig Norderval, Helene Tarri Hougaard, Bodil Ginnerup Pedersen, Moustapha Kassem, Michaela Tencerova, Lilli Lundby, Steen Buntzen, Stig Norderval, Helene Tarri Hougaard, Bodil Ginnerup Pedersen, Moustapha Kassem

Abstract

Background: Injection of autologous adipose tissue (AT) has recently been demonstrated to be an effective and safe treatment for anal fistulas. AT mesenchymal stem cells (AT-MSCs) mediate the healing process, but the relationship between molecular characteristics of AT-MSCs of the injected AT and fistula healing has not been adequately studied. Thus we aimed to characterize the molecular and functional properties of AT-MSCs isolated from autologous AT injected as a treatment of cryptogenic high transsphincteric perianal fistulas and correlate these findings to the healing process.

Methods: 27 patients (age 45 ± 2 years) diagnosed with perianal fistula were enrolled in the study and treated with autologous AT injected around the anal fistula tract. AT-MSCs were isolated for cellular and molecular analyses. The fistula healing was evaluated by MRI scanning after 6 months of treatment. AT-MSC phenotype was compared between responders and non-responders with respect to fistula healing.

Results: 52% of all patients exhibited clinical healing of the fistulas as evaluated 6 months after last injection. Cultured AT-MSCs in the responder group had a lower short-term proliferation rate and higher osteoblast differentiation potential compared to non-responder AT-MSCs. On the other hand, adipocyte differentiation potential of AT-MSCs was higher in non-responder group. Interestingly, AT-MSCs of responders exhibited lower expression of inflammatory and senescence associated genes such as IL1B, NFKB, CDKN2A, TPB3,TGFB1.

Conclusion: Our data suggest that cellular quality of the injected AT-MSCs including cell proliferation, differentiation capacity and secretion of proinflammatory molecules may provide a possible mechanism underlying fistula healing. Furthermore, these biomarkers may be useful to predict a positive fistula healing outcome.

Trial registration: NTC04834609, Registered 6 April 2021. https://ichgcp.net/clinical-trials-registry/NCT04834609.

Keywords: Adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells; Autologous adipose tissue graft injection; Fistula healing; Stem cell potency; Transsphincteric perianal fistula.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have nothing to disclose.

© 2021. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The flow chart of the enrollment of the patients and outcome of the study 6 months after last AT injection
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Cellular characteristics of AT-MSCs from responders and non-reponders in fistula treatment. AT-MSCs were established from non-responders (n = 15) and responders (n = 12) in AT graft fistula treatment. The cells were examined in undifferentiated state in passage 1. A Short-term proliferative rate, area under the curve (AUC) and cell proliferation rate measured by MTT assay (from left to right) of AT-MSCs in non-responder and responder group (n = 12–15). *p < 0.05, non-responders versus responders. Screening of stem cell surface marker expression, such as B CD44, CD90, CD105 and C CD49a, LEPR, and SOX2 measured using flow cytometry in AT-MSCs isolated from non-responder and responder subjects (n = 12–15). Data are presented as means ± SEM; *p < 0.05, non-responders versus responders, (two-tailed unpaired Student’s t test)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Differentiation potential and inflammatory profile of AT-MSCs from responders and non-responders in fistula treatment. AT-MSCs were established from non-responders (n = 15) and responders (n = 12) in AT graft fistula treatment. The cells were examined in undifferentiated and differentiated state in passage 2. Osteoblast differentiation potential of AT-MSCs evaluated by A Alizarin S staining and using quantification of alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity represented as fold change (F.C.) over non-induced cells (day 7); B and gene expression of RUNX2 and BGALP mRNA levels (n = 12–15); *p < 0.05: non-responders versus responders (two-tailed unpaired Student’s t test). Adipocyte differentiation potential of AT-MSCs evaluated by C Oil red O staining of mature adipocytes (magnification 10x, scale bar 100 μm) and gene expression of PPARG and LPL (n = 12–15); D Gene expression profile of pro-inflammatory (NFKB, IL1B and TNFA) and anti-inflammatory genes (IL10) in non-responder and responder AT-MSCs (n = 12–15). E Gene expression profile of senescence associated secretory phenotype (SASP) (CDKN2A, TPB3, TGFB1, VEGFA, IFNG, IL6) in non-responder and responder AT-MSCs (n = 5); F Gene expression profile of matrix metalloproteinases (MMP2, MMP9) in non-responder and responder AT-MSCs (n = 5). Data are presented as means ± SEM; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001: non-responders versus responders (two-tailed unpaired Student’s t test)

References

    1. Zanotti C, et al. An assessment of the incidence of fistula-in-ano in four countries of the European Union. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2007;22:1459–1462. doi: 10.1007/s00384-007-0334-7.
    1. Owen HA, Buchanan GN, Schizas A, Cohen R, Williams AB. Quality of life with anal fistula. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2016;98:334–338. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2016.0136.
    1. Balciscueta Z, Uribe N, Balciscueta I, Andreu-Ballester JC, Garcia-Granero E. Rectal advancement flap for the treatment of complex cryptoglandular anal fistulas: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2017;32:599–609. doi: 10.1007/s00384-017-2779-7.
    1. Elfeki H, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the safety and efficacy of fistula laser closure. Tech Coloproctol. 2020;24:265–274. doi: 10.1007/s10151-020-02165-1.
    1. Emile SH, Elfeki H, Shalaby M, Sakr A. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of video-assisted anal fistula treatment (VAAFT) Surg Endosc. 2018;32:2084–2093. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5905-2.
    1. Sugrue J, et al. Sphincter-sparing anal fistula repair: are we getting better? Dis Colon Rectum. 2017;60:1071–1077. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000885.
    1. Kontovounisios C, et al. Adoption and success rates of perineal procedures for fistula-in-ano: a systematic review. Colorectal Dis. 2016;18:441–458. doi: 10.1111/codi.13330.
    1. Herreros MD, et al. Stem cell therapy: a compassionate use program in perianal fistula. Stem Cells Int. 2019;2019:6132340. doi: 10.1155/2019/6132340.
    1. Zhang Y, et al. Autologous adipose-derived stem cells for the treatment of complex cryptoglandular perianal fistula: a prospective case-control study. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2020;11:475. doi: 10.1186/s13287-020-01995-y.
    1. Garcia-Olmo D, et al. A phase I clinical trial of the treatment of Crohn’s fistula by adipose mesenchymal stem cell transplantation. Dis Colon Rectum. 2005;48:1416–1423. doi: 10.1007/s10350-005-0052-6.
    1. Panes J, et al. Expanded allogeneic adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (Cx601) for complex perianal fistulas in Crohn’s disease: a phase 3 randomised, double-blind controlled trial. Lancet. 2016;388:1281–1290. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31203-X.
    1. Garcia-Arranz M, et al. Autologous adipose-derived stem cells for the treatment of complex cryptoglandular perianal fistula: a randomized clinical trial with long-term follow-up. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2020;9:295–301. doi: 10.1002/sctm.19-0271.
    1. Herreros MD, et al. Autologous expanded adipose-derived stem cells for the treatment of complex cryptoglandular perianal fistulas: a phase III randomized clinical trial (FATT 1: fistula Advanced Therapy Trial 1) and long-term evaluation. Dis Colon Rectum. 2012;55:762–772. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e318255364a.
    1. Naldini G, Sturiale A, Fabiani B, Giani I, Menconi C. Micro-fragmented adipose tissue injection for the treatment of complex anal fistula: a pilot study accessing safety and feasibility. Tech Coloproctol. 2018;22:107–113. doi: 10.1007/s10151-018-1755-8.
    1. de la Portilla F, et al. Treatment of transsphincteric fistula-in-ano with growth factors from autologous platelets: results of a phase II clinical trial. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2017;32:1545–1550. doi: 10.1007/s00384-017-2866-9.
    1. de Weerd L, Weum S, Norderval S. Novel treatment for recalcitrant rectovaginal fistulas: fat injection. Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26:139–144. doi: 10.1007/s00192-014-2497-4.
    1. Norderval S, et al. Efficacy of autologous fat graft injection in the treatment of anovaginal fistulas. Tech Coloproctol. 2018;22:45–51. doi: 10.1007/s10151-017-1739-0.
    1. Serena C, et al. Crohn's disease disturbs the immune properties of human adipose-derived stem cells related to inflammasome activation. Stem Cell Rep. 2017;9:1109–1123. doi: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2017.07.014.
    1. Serena C, et al. Obesity and type 2 diabetes alters the immune properties of human adipose derived stem cells. Stem Cells. 2016;34:2559–2573. doi: 10.1002/stem.2429.
    1. Parks AG, Gordon PH, Hardcastle JD. A classification of fistula-in-ano. Br J Surg. 1976;63:1–12. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800630102.
    1. Vaizey CJ, Carapeti E, Cahill JA, Kamm MA. Prospective comparison of faecal incontinence grading systems. Gut. 1999;44:77–80. doi: 10.1136/gut.44.1.77.
    1. Altomare DF, et al. Set-up and statistical validation of a new scoring system for obstructed defaecation syndrome. Colorectal Dis. 2008;10:84–88. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2007.01262.x.
    1. Avery K, et al. ICIQ: a brief and robust measure for evaluating the symptoms and impact of urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn. 2004;23:322–330. doi: 10.1002/nau.20041.
    1. Dige A, et al. Efficacy of injection of freshly collected autologous adipose tissue into perianal fistulas in patients with Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterology. 2019;156:2208–2216.e2201. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.02.005.
    1. Yu G, Floyd ZE, Wu X, Halvorsen YD, Gimble JM. Isolation of human adipose-derived stem cells from lipoaspirates. Methods Mol Biol. 2011;702:17–27. doi: 10.1007/978-1-61737-960-4_2.
    1. Tencerova M, et al. Obesity-associated hypermetabolism and accelerated senescence of bone marrow stromal stem cells suggest a potential mechanism for bone fragility. Cell Rep. 2019;27:2050–2062.e2056. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.04.066.
    1. Abdallah BM, Haack-Sorensen M, Fink T, Kassem M. Inhibition of osteoblast differentiation but not adipocyte differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells by sera obtained from aged females. Bone. 2006;39:181–188. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2005.12.082.
    1. Qiu W, et al. Patients with high bone mass phenotype exhibit enhanced osteoblast differentiation and inhibition of adipogenesis of human mesenchymal stem cells. J Bone Miner Res. 2007;22:1720–1731. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.070721.
    1. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205–213. doi: 10.1097/.
    1. Rider DA, Nalathamby T, Nurcombe V, Cool SM. Selection using the alpha-1 integrin (CD49a) enhances the multipotentiality of the mesenchymal stem cell population from heterogeneous bone marrow stromal cells. J Mol Histol. 2007;38:449–458. doi: 10.1007/s10735-007-9128-z.
    1. Feng R, Wen J. Overview of the roles of Sox2 in stem cell and development. Biol Chem. 2015;396:883–891. doi: 10.1515/hsz-2014-0317.
    1. Zhou BO, Yue R, Murphy MM, Peyer JG, Morrison SJ. Leptin-receptor-expressing mesenchymal stromal cells represent the main source of bone formed by adult bone marrow. Cell Stem Cell. 2014;15:154–168. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2014.06.008.
    1. Zubkova ES, et al. Regulation of adipose tissue stem cells angiogenic potential by tumor necrosis factor-alpha. J Cell Biochem. 2016;117:180–196. doi: 10.1002/jcb.25263.
    1. Niklason LE. Understanding the extracellular matrix to enhance stem cell-based tissue regeneration. Cell Stem Cell. 2018;22:302–305. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2018.02.001.
    1. Globus RK, Moursi A, Zimmerman D, Lull J, Damsky C. Integrin-extracellular matrix interactions in connective tissue remodeling and osteoblast differentiation. ASGSB Bull. 1995;8:19–28.
    1. Arvidson K, et al. Bone regeneration and stem cells. J Cell Mol Med. 2011;15:718–746. doi: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2010.01224.x.

Source: PubMed

3
S'abonner