Serious adverse events and lifetime risk of reoperation after elective shoulder replacement: population based cohort study using hospital episode statistics for England

Richard S Craig, Jennifer C E Lane, Andrew J Carr, Dominic Furniss, Gary S Collins, Jonathan L Rees, Richard S Craig, Jennifer C E Lane, Andrew J Carr, Dominic Furniss, Gary S Collins, Jonathan L Rees

Abstract

Objectives: To provide accurate risk estimates of serious adverse events after elective shoulder replacement surgery for arthritis, including age and sex specific estimates of the lifetime risk of revision surgery.

Design: Population based cohort study.

Setting: Hospital episode statistics for NHS England, including civil registration mortality data.

Participants: 58 054 elective shoulder replacements in 51 895 adults (aged ≥50 years) between April 1998 and April 2017.

Main outcome measures: The lifetime risk of revision surgery, calculated using an actuarial life table approach and the cumulative probability method. Rates of serious adverse events at 30 and 90 days post-surgery: pulmonary embolism, myocardial infarction, lower respiratory tract infection, acute kidney injury, urinary tract infection, cerebrovascular events, and all cause death. Secondary outcome measures were the number of surgeries performed each year and Kaplan-Meier estimates of revision risk at 3, 5, 10, and 15 years.

Results: The number of shoulder replacements performed each year increased 5.6-fold between 1998 and 2017. Lifetime risks of revision surgery ranged from 1 in 37 (2.7%, 95% confidence interval 2.6% to 2.8%) in women aged 85 years and older to 1 in 4 (23.6%, 23.2% to 24.0%) in men aged 55-59 years. The risks of revision were highest during the first five years after surgery. The risk of any serious adverse event at 30 days post-surgery was 1 in 28 (3.5%, 3.4% to 3.7%), and at 90 days post-surgery was 1 in 22 (4.6%, 4.4% to 4.8%). At 30 days, the relative risk of pulmonary embolism compared with baseline population risk was 61 (95% confidence interval 50 to 73) for women aged 50-64. Serious adverse events were associated with increasing age, comorbidity, and male sex. 1 in 5 (21.2%, 17.9% to 25.1%) men aged 85 years and older experienced at least one serious adverse event within 90 days.

Conclusions: Younger patients, particularly men, need to be aware of a higher likelihood of early failure of shoulder replacement and the need for further and more complex revision replacement surgery. All patients should be counselled about the risks of serious adverse events. These risks are higher than previously considered, and for some could outweigh any potential benefits. Our findings caution against unchecked expansion of shoulder replacement surgery in both younger and older patients. The more accurate age and sex specific estimates of risk from this study are long overdue and should improve shared decision making between patients and clinicians.

Study registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03573765.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf and declare: no support from any organisation for the submitted work other than that listed above; no other financial relationships with organisations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous three years; no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Study data flowchart
Fig 2
Fig 2
Lifetime risk of revision and reoperation after elective primary shoulder replacement, stratified by age and sex at time of primary procedure
Fig 3
Fig 3
1 minus Kaplan-Meier estimates of revision risk, stratified by age and sex
Fig 4
Fig 4
Point estimates of revision risk (95% confidence interval) at 5, 10, and 15 years, stratified by age and sex

References

    1. Fevang B-TS, Lygre SHL, Bertelsen G, Skredderstuen A, Havelin LI, Furnes O. Good function after shoulder arthroplasty. Acta Orthop 2012;83:467-73. 10.3109/17453674.2012.720118.
    1. Fevang B-TS, Lygre SHL, Bertelsen G, Skredderstuen A, Havelin LI, Furnes O. Pain and function in eight hundred and fifty nine patients comparing shoulder hemiprostheses, resurfacing prostheses, reversed total and conventional total prostheses. Int Orthop 2013;37:59-66. 10.1007/s00264-012-1722-3.
    1. Boorman RS, Kopjar B, Fehringer E, Churchill RS, Smith K, Matsen FA., 3rd The effect of total shoulder arthroplasty on self-assessed health status is comparable to that of total hip arthroplasty and coronary artery bypass grafting. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2003;12:158-63. 10.1067/mse.2003.18.
    1. Lübbeke A, Rees JL, Barea C, Combescure C, Carr AJ, Silman AJ. International variation in shoulder arthroplasty. Acta Orthop 2017;88:592-9. 10.1080/17453674.2017.1368884.
    1. Dillon MT, Chan PH, Inacio MCS, Singh A, Yian EH, Navarro RA. Yearly Trends in Elective Shoulder Arthroplasty, 2005-2013. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2017;69:1574-81. 10.1002/acr.23167.
    1. Dillon MT, Inacio MCS, Burke MF, Navarro RA, Yian EH. Shoulder arthroplasty in patients 59 years of age and younger. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2013;22:1338-44. 10.1016/j.jse.2013.01.029.
    1. Good GMC. Medical Practice. (accessed 26 Jul 2018).
    1. Consent GMC. Patients and doctors making decisions together. (accessed 26 Jul 2018).
    1. Zipkin DA, Umscheid CA, Keating NL, et al. Evidence-based risk communication: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med 2014;161:270-80. 10.7326/M14-0295.
    1. Khan T. Survival analysis of time-to-event data in orthopaedic surgery. Bone Jt 360 2017;6:37-9.
    1. Fortin JM, Hirota LK, Bond BE, O’Connor AM, Col NF. Identifying patient preferences for communicating risk estimates: a descriptive pilot study. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2001;1:2. 10.1186/1472-6947-1-2.
    1. Bayliss LE, Culliford D, Monk AP, et al. Articles The effect of patient age at intervention on risk of implant revision after total replacement of the hip or knee: a population-based cohort study. Lancet. Published Online First, 2017, 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30059-4.
    1. Jameson SS, James P, Howcroft DWJ, et al. Venous thromboembolic events are rare after shoulder surgery: analysis of a national database. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2011;20:764-70. 10.1016/j.jse.2010.11.034.
    1. NHS Digital. Hospital Episode Statistics. (accessed 26 Jul 2018).
    1. NJR. Third Annual NJR Data Quality Audit launched. (accessed 1 Feb 2018).
    1. Herbert A, Wijlaars L, Zylbersztejn A, Cromwell D, Hardelid P. Data Resource Profile: Hospital Episode Statistics Admitted Patient Care (HES APC). Int J Epidemiol 2017;46:1093-1093i. 10.1093/ije/dyx015.
    1. Office for National Statistics. Mortality statistics - underlying cause, sex and age 2016. (accessed 4 Sep 2018).
    1. Hunt LP, Ben-Shlomo Y, Clark EM, et al. National Joint Registry for England, Wales and Northern Ireland 90-day mortality after 409,096 total hip replacements for osteoarthritis, from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales: a retrospective analysis. Lancet 2013;382:1097-104. 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61749-3.
    1. Quan H, Li B, Couris CM, et al. Updating and validating the Charlson comorbidity index and score for risk adjustment in hospital discharge abstracts using data from 6 countries. Am J Epidemiol 2011;173:676-82. 10.1093/aje/kwq433.
    1. NJR. National Joint Registry for England, Wales and Northern Ireland. 14th Annual Report. 2017.
    1. Esteve J, Benhamou E, Raymond L. Descriptive Epidemiology. Vol 128, Lyon, International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1994. (IARC Scientific Publications.).
    1. Schouten LJ, Straatman H, Kiemeney LA, Verbeek AL. Cancer incidence: life table risk versus cumulative risk. J Epidemiol Community Health 1994;48:596-600. 10.1136/jech.48.6.596
    1. Sasieni PD, Adams J. Standardized lifetime risk. Am J Epidemiol 1999;149:869-75. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009903
    1. Cancer Research UK. Lifetime risk calculations. (accessed 4 Apr 2018).
    1. Sweetland S, Green J, Liu B, et al. Million Women Study collaborators Duration and magnitude of the postoperative risk of venous thromboembolism in middle aged women: prospective cohort study. BMJ 2009;339:b4583. 10.1136/bmj.b4583
    1. Rangan A, Upadhaya S, Regan S, Toye F, Rees JL. Research priorities for shoulder surgery: results of the 2015 James Lind Alliance patient and clinician priority setting partnership. BMJ Open 2016;6:e010412. 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010412.
    1. NJR. National Joint Registry for England and Wales. 6th Annual Report. 2009.
    1. NJR. National Joint Registry for England and Wales. 9th Annual Report. 2012.
    1. Wright FL, Green J, Canoy D, Cairns BJ, Balkwill A, Beral V, Million Women Study Collaborators Vascular disease in women: comparison of diagnoses in hospital episode statistics and general practice records in England. BMC Med Res Methodol 2012;12:161. 10.1186/1471-2288-12-161.
    1. Woodhead MA, Macfarlane JT, McCracken JS, Rose DH, Finch RG. Prospective study of the aetiology and outcome of pneumonia in the community. Lancet 1987;1:671-4. 10.1016/S0140-6736(87)90430-2
    1. Mata R, Josef AK, Hertwig R. Propensity for Risk Taking Across the Life Span and Around the Globe. Psychol Sci 2016;27:231-43. 10.1177/0956797615617811.
    1. Singh JA, Sperling JW, Cofield RH. Revision surgery following total shoulder arthroplasty: analysis of 2588 shoulders over three decades (1976 to 2008). J Bone Joint Surg Br 2011;93:1513-7. 10.1302/0301-620X.93B11.26938.
    1. Singh JA, Sperling JW, Cofield RH. Risk factors for revision surgery after humeral head replacement: 1,431 shoulders over 3 decades. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2012;21:1039-44. 10.1016/j.jse.2011.06.015.
    1. Guery J, Favard L, Sirveaux F, Oudet D, Mole D, Walch G. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Survivorship analysis of eighty replacements followed for five to ten years. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006;88:1742-7. 10.2106/JBJS.E.00851.
    1. Rothwell A, Hobbs T, Frampton C, et al. The New Zealand Joint Registry Eighteen Year Report - January 1999 to December 2016. 2017.
    1. Favard L, Levigne C, Nerot C, Gerber C, De Wilde L, Mole D. Reverse prostheses in arthropathies with cuff tear: are survivorship and function maintained over time? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011;469:2469-75. 10.1007/s11999-011-1833-y.
    1. Murphy AB, Menendez ME, Watson SL, Ponce BA. Metabolic syndrome and shoulder arthroplasty: epidemiology and peri-operative outcomes. Int Orthop 2016;40:1927-33. 10.1007/s00264-016-3214-3.
    1. Jiang JJ, Toor AS, Shi LL, Koh JL. Analysis of perioperative complications in patients after total shoulder arthroplasty and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2014;23:1852-9. 10.1016/j.jse.2014.04.008.
    1. Anthony CA, Westermann RW, Gao Y, Pugely AJ, Wolf BR, Hettrich CM. What Are Risk Factors for 30-day Morbidity and Transfusion in Total Shoulder Arthroplasty? A Review of 1922 Cases. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2015;473:2099-105. 10.1007/s11999-014-4107-7.
    1. Newman JM, Stroud SG, Yang A, et al. Total shoulder arthroplasty in octogenarians: Is there a higher risk of adverse outcomes? J Orthop 2018;15:671-5. 10.1016/j.jor.2018.05.035.
    1. Cancienne JM, Brockmeier SF, Gulotta LV, Dines DM, Werner BC. Ambulatory Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Comprehensive Analysis of Current Trends, Complications, Readmissions, and Costs. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2017;99:629-37. 10.2106/JBJS.16.00287.
    1. Tashjian RZ, Lilly DT, Isaacson AM, et al. Incidence of and Risk Factors for Symptomatic Venous Thromboembolism After Shoulder Arthroplasty. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 2016;45:E379-85.
    1. Iriberri I, Candrian C, Freehill MT, Raiss P, Boileau P, Walch G. Anatomic shoulder replacement for primary osteoarthritis in patients over 80 years: outcome is as good as in younger patients. Acta Orthop 2015;86:298-302. 10.3109/17453674.2015.1006036.
    1. Churchill RS. Elective shoulder arthroplasty in patients older than ninety years of age. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2008;17:376-9. 10.1016/j.jse.2007.09.005.

Source: PubMed

3
S'abonner