Clinical effectiveness of symptomatic therapy compared with standard step-up care for the treatment of low-impact psoriatic oligoarthritis: the two-arm parallel group randomised POISE feasibility study

Ines Rombach, Laura Tucker, William Tillett, Deepak Jadon, Marion Watson, Anne Francis, Yvonne Sinomati, Susan J Dutton, Laura C Coates, Ines Rombach, Laura Tucker, William Tillett, Deepak Jadon, Marion Watson, Anne Francis, Yvonne Sinomati, Susan J Dutton, Laura C Coates

Abstract

Introduction: In psoriatic arthritis (PsA), treatment recommendations support first-line use of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). There are few treatment strategy trials, and no previous studies have investigated tailored treatment choice by disease severity. Studies in oligoarthritis (<5 inflamed joints) are limited but have suggested that some can be managed without DMARDs, preventing unnecessary side effects. This study aimed to assess the feasibility and acceptability of a study comparing standard DMARD treatment against symptomatic therapy in patients with mild psoriatic oligoarthritis.

Methods: This trial was embedded within the MONITOR-PsA cohort, which uses a Trials Within Cohorts (TWiCs) design. Patients with newly diagnosed psoriatic oligoarthritis, with low disease activity (PASDAS ⩽ 3.2) and the absence of poor prognostic factors [C reactive protein (CRP) < 5 mg/dL, HAQ < 1, no radiographic erosions] were randomised open-label to either standard care with 'step-up' DMARD therapy or to symptomatic therapy with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and local corticosteroid injections to inflamed joints. Key outcomes were the proportion of eligible cohort patients, consent and study completion rate.

Results: Over the 15-month study period, only one eligible patient was randomised. Although oligoarthritis patients represented 45% of patients in this early PsA cohort, the majority did not have mild disease (24% raised CRP, 51% moderate disease activity, 13% radiographic damage and/or poor function). Of those meeting trial inclusion criteria, many patients refused treatment in the observational cohort prior to an invitation into the trial as they did not wish to be treated with DMARDs.

Conclusion: The study was not feasible as designed. Oligoarthritis represents around half of initial PsA presentations, but the majority starting therapy have high-impact disease. A small proportion have mild oligoarticular disease but many are not keen on treatment with DMARDs, given the potential side effects of these medications. Further research is needed to support evidence-based treatment in this subgroup.

Trial registration number: - ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03797872) and EudraCT (2018-001085-42).

Keywords: clinical trial; oligoarthritis; psoriatic arthritis.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest statement: The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

© The Author(s), 2021.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
MONITOR-PsA and POISE randomisation and analysis schema.

References

    1. Helliwell PS, Wright V. Psoriatic arthritis: clinical features. In: Klippel JH, Dieppe PA. (eds) Rheumatology. London: Mosby, 1998, pp. 6.21.21–26.21.28.
    1. Gladman DD. Natural history of psoriatic arthritis. Bailliere’s Clin Rheumatol 1994; 8: 379–394.
    1. Bond SJ, Farewell VT, Schentag CT, et al.. Predictors for radiological damage in psoriatic arthritis: results from a single centre. Ann Rheum Dis 2007; 66: 370–376.
    1. Gladman DD, Farewell VT. Progression in psoriatic arthritis: role of time varying clinical indicators. J Rheumatol 1999; 26: 2409–2413.
    1. Gladman DD, Farewell VT, Nadeau C. Clinical indicators of progression in psoriatic arthritis: multivariate relative risk model. J Rheumatol 1995; 22: 675–679.
    1. Marzo-Ortega H, Green MJ, Keenan AM, et al.. A randomized controlled trial of early intervention with intraarticular corticosteroids followed by sulfasalazine versus conservative treatment in early oligoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2007; 57: 154–160.
    1. Marzo-Ortega H, Cawkwell L, Green MJ. Early oligoarthritis. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 2005; 31: 627–639.
    1. Coates LC, FitzGerald O, Gladman DD, et al.. Reduced joint counts misclassify patients with oligoarticular psoriatic arthritis and miss significant numbers of patients with active disease. Arthritis Rheum 2013; 65: 1504–1509. DOI: 10.1002/art.37939.
    1. Gossec L, Smolen JS, Ramiro S, et al.. European League against Rheumatism (EULAR) recommendations for the management of psoriatic arthritis with pharmacological therapies: 2015 update. Ann Rheum Dis 2016; 75: 499–510. DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-208337.
    1. Rombach I, Tillett W, Jadon D, et al.. Treating to target in psoriatic arthritis: assessing real-world outcomes and optimising therapeutic strategy for adults with psoriatic arthritis-study protocol for the MONITOR-PsA study, a trials within cohorts study design. Trials 2021; 22: 185. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-021.
    1. Relton C, Torgerson D, O’Cathain A, et al.. Rethinking pragmatic randomised controlled trials: introducing the ‘cohort multiple randomised controlled trial’ design. BMJ 2010; 340: c1066. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.c1066.
    1. Taylor W, Gladman D, Helliwell P, et al.. Classification criteria for psoriatic arthritis: development of new criteria from a large international study. Arthritis Rheum 2006; 54: 2665–2673.
    1. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Psoriatic arthritis – etanercept, infliximab and adalimumab. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, 2010.
    1. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Golimumab for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, 2011.
    1. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Ustekinumab for treating active psoriatic arthritis. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, 2015.
    1. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Apremilast for treating active psoriatic arthritis. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, 2017.
    1. Julious SA. Sample size of 12 per group rule of thumb for a pilot study. Pharm Stat 2005; 4: 287–291.
    1. Lancaster GA, Dodd S, Williamson PR. Design and analysis of pilot studies: recommendations for good practice. J Eval Clin Pract 2004; 10: 307–312. DOI: 10.1111/j.2002.384.doc.x.
    1. Helliwell PS, FitzGerald O, Fransen J, et al.. The development of candidate composite disease activity and responder indices for psoriatic arthritis (GRACE project). Ann Rheum Dis 2013; 72: 986–991. DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-201341.
    1. Dures E, Hewlett S, Lord J, et al.. Important treatment outcomes for patients with psoriatic arthritis: a multisite qualitative study. Patient 2017; 10: 455–462. DOI: 10.1007/s40271-017.
    1. Wervers K, Vis M, Tchetveriko I, et al.. Burden of psoriatic arthritis according to different definitions of disease activity: comparing minimal disease activity and the disease activity index for psoriatic arthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2018; 70: 1764–1770. DOI: 10.1002/acr.23571.
    1. Gossec L, Baraliakos X, Kerschbaumer A, et al.. EULAR recommendations for the management of psoriatic arthritis with pharmacological therapies: 2019 update. Ann Rheum Dis 2020; 79: 700–712. DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-217159.
    1. Coates LC, Kavanaugh A, Mease PJ, et al.. Group for research and assessment of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis 2015 treatment recommendations for psoriatic arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol 2016; 68: 1060–1071. DOI: 10.1002/art.39573.

Source: PubMed

3
S'abonner