Patient Characteristics and Preferences Regarding Anticoagulant Treatment in Venous Thromboembolic Disease

Damien Lanéelle, Charles Le Brun, Chadi Mauger, Jérôme Guillaumat, Estelle Le Pabic, Loukman Omarjee, Guillaume Mahé, SFMV VTE Study Group, Damien Lanéelle, Charles Le Brun, Chadi Mauger, Jérôme Guillaumat, Estelle Le Pabic, Loukman Omarjee, Guillaume Mahé, SFMV VTE Study Group

Abstract

Background: Anticoagulants are the recommended treatment for venous thromboembolic disease (VTE). The mode of anticoagulant administration may influence compliance, and therefore the effectiveness of the treatment. Unlike in atrial fibrillation or cancer-associated thrombosis, there is only limited data on patient preferences regarding the choice of anticoagulation in VTE. This study aims to evaluate patient preferences regarding anticoagulants in terms of administration: types (oral or injectable treatment) and number of doses or injections per day. Patients and Methods: This is a national survey through a questionnaire sent by e-mail to 1936 French vascular physicians between February and April 2019. They recorded the responses for each patient admitted for VTE. Results: Three hundred and eleven (response rate of 16%) of the 1936 contacted physicians responded for 364 patients. Among these, there were 167 fully completed questionnaires. Most patients (63%) express concerns about VTE and prefer oral treatment (81.5%), justified by the ease of administration (74%) and a fear of the injections (22%). When patients were taking more than three oral treatments they statistically chose injectable treatment more often (54%) than oral treatment (25%, p = 0.002). Patients who chose injectable treatment were also older (70 ± 16 vs. 58 ± 17 years old, p = 0.001). There was no statistically difference in anticoagulation preference according to gender or to the expected duration of treatment (6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months or unlimited). When oral treatment was preferred (81%), most chose oral treatment without dose adjustment and biomonitoring (74.3%). Among them, very few (5.8%) preferred a twice-daily intake. Conclusion: Patient preference in terms of anticoagulant treatment in VTE disease is in favor of oral treatment without adjustment or biomonitoring and with once-daily intake. When an injectable treatment is chosen, a prolonged duration of treatment does not seem to be a constraint for the patient. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier [NCT03889457].

Keywords: anticoagulation management; anticoagulation/administration and dosing; patient concern; patient preference (MeSH); venous thromboembolism disease (VTE disease).

Conflict of interest statement

GM has received fees as speaker from Bristol-Myers-Squibb, Leo Pharma, GSK, and Bayer. DL has received fees as speaker from Bristol-Myers-Squibb, Leo Pharma, and Bayer. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Copyright © 2021 Lanéelle, Le Brun, Mauger, Guillaumat, Le Pabic, Omarjee, Mahé and SFMV VTE Study Group.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Patient preferences in terms of administration modality according to expected duration of treatment.

References

    1. Heit JA. Epidemiology of venous thromboembolism. Nat Rev Cardiol. (2015) 12:464–74. 10.1038/nrcardio.2015.83
    1. Kearon C, Akl EA, Ornelas J, Blaivas A, Jimenez D, Bounameaux H, et al. . Antithrombotic therapy for VTE disease: CHEST guideline and expert panel report. Chest. (2016) 149:315–52. 10.1016/j.chest.2015.11.026
    1. Cimminiello C, Anderson FA. Physician and patient perceptions of the route of administration of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis: results from an international survey. Thromb Res. (2012) 129:139–45. 10.1016/j.thromres.2011.07.017
    1. Wilke T, Bauer S, Mueller S, Kohlmann T, Bauersachs R. Patient preferences for oral anticoagulation therapy in atrial fibrillation: a systematic literature review. Patient. (2017) 10:17–37. 10.1007/s40271-016-0185-9
    1. Noble S, Matzdorff A, Maraveyas A, Holm MV, Pisa G. Assessing patients' anticoagulation preferences for the treatment of cancer-associated thrombosis using conjoint methodology. Haematologica. (2015) 100:1486–92. 10.3324/haematol.2015.127126
    1. Prins MH, Lensing AWA, Prandoni P, Wells PS, Verhamme P, Beyer-Westendorf J, et al. . Risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism according to baseline risk factor profiles. Blood Adv. (2018) 2:788–96. 10.1182/bloodadvances.2018017160
    1. Cabellos-García AC, Martínez-Sabater A, Castro-Sánchez E, Kangasniemi M, Juárez-Vela R, Gea-Caballero V. Relation between health literacy, self-care and adherence to treatment with oral anticoagulants in adults: a narrative systematic review. BMC Public Health. (2018) 18:1157. 10.1186/s12889-018-6070-9
    1. Vasanthamohan L, Boonyawat K, Chai-Adisaksopha C, Crowther M. Reduced-dose direct oral anticoagulants in the extended treatment of venous thromboembolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Thromb Haemost JTH. (2018) 16:1288–95. 10.1111/jth.14156
    1. Hutchinson A, Rees S, Young A, Maraveyas A, Date K, Johnson MJ. Oral anticoagulation is preferable to injected, but only if it is safe and effective: an interview study of patient and carer experience of oral and injected anticoagulant therapy for cancer-associated thrombosis in the select-d trial. Palliat Med. (2019) 33:510–7. 10.1177/0269216318815377
    1. Lutsey PL, Horvath KJ, Fullam L, Moll S, Rooney MR, Cushman M, et al. . Anticoagulant preferences and concerns among venous thromboembolism patients. Thromb Haemost. (2018) 118:553–61. 10.1055/s-0038-1625985
    1. Tripodi A, Marongiu F, Moia M, Palareti G, Pengo V, Poli D, et al. . The vexed question of whether or not to measure levels of direct oral anticoagulants before surgery or invasive procedures. Intern Emerg Med. (2018) 13:1029–36. 10.1007/s11739-018-1854-6
    1. Picker N, Cohen AT, Maraveyas A, Beyer-Westendorf J, Lee AYY, Mantovani LG, et al. . Patient preferences regarding anticoagulation therapy in patients with cancer having a VTE event - a discrete choice experiment in the cosimo study. Blood. (2019) 134(Suppl. 1):2159. 10.1182/blood-2019-128095
    1. Etxeandia-Ikobaltzeta I, Zhang Y, Brundisini F, Florez ID, Wiercioch W, Nieuwlaat R, et al. . Patient values and preferences regarding VTE disease: a systematic review to inform American Society of hematology guidelines. Blood Adv. (2020) 4:953–68. 10.1182/bloodadvances.2019000462
    1. Sanchez O, Benhamou Y, Bertoletti L, Constant J, Couturaud F, Delluc A, et al. . Recommendations of good practice for the management of thromboembolic venous disease in adults. Short version. Rev Mal Respir. (2019) 36:249–83. 10.1016/j.rmr.2019.01.003

Source: PubMed

3
S'abonner