Differences between young and older adults in the control of weight shifting within the surface of support

Elisabeth A de Vries, Simone R Caljouw, Milou J M Coppens, Klaas Postema, Gijsbertus J Verkerke, Claudine J C Lamoth, Elisabeth A de Vries, Simone R Caljouw, Milou J M Coppens, Klaas Postema, Gijsbertus J Verkerke, Claudine J C Lamoth

Abstract

An important reason for falling in elderly is incorrect weight-shifting. In many daily life activities quick and accurate weight-shifting is needed to maintain balance and to prevent from falling. The present study aims to gain more insight in age-related differences in the control of weight-shifting. Nine healthy older adults (70.3 ± 6.9 years) and twelve young adults (20.9 ± 0.5 years) participated in the study. They performed a weight shifting task by moving the body's center of pressure, represented by a red dot on a screen, in different directions, towards targets of different sizes and at different distances projected on a screen. Movement time, fluency and accuracy of the movement were determined. Accuracy was quantified by the number of times the cursor hit the goal target before a target switch was realized (counts on goal) and by the time required to realize a target switch after the goal target was hit by the cursor for the first time (dwelling time). Fluency was expressed by the maximal deviation of the performed path with respect to the ideal path and the number of peaks, or inflections in the performed path. Significant main effects of target size, target distance and age on all outcome measures were found. With decreasing target size, increasing target distance and increasing age, movement time significantly increased and fluency and accuracy significantly decreased (i.e. increased number of peaks, maximal deviation, number of times on the goal target and longer dwelling time around the goal target). In addition, significant interaction effects of size*age and distance*age were found. Older adults needed more time to perform the weight-shifting task and their movements were less fluent and accurate compared to younger adults, especially with increasing task difficulty. This indicates that elderly might have difficulties with executing an adequate adaptation to a perturbation in daily life.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1. Experimental Setup.
Figure 1. Experimental Setup.
A person standing on the platform looking at the projection screen in front of him and performing the task by moving the red dot (COP position) to the white target, by shifting his weight as fast and accurate as possible.
Figure 2. Schematic overview of all possible…
Figure 2. Schematic overview of all possible target positions.
The white square is the home target, the grey squares are the goal targets. In reality only one target was visible during the task. The letters W, NW, N, NE and E indicate the different wind directions (west, northwest, north, northeast and east respectively).
Figure 3. Schematic overview of the outcome…
Figure 3. Schematic overview of the outcome parameters.
Figure 4. COP trajectories of one block…
Figure 4. COP trajectories of one block of 45 experimental trials of a young subject (A) and an older subject (B) and COP trajectory of one experimental trial of a young subject (C) and an older subject (D); COP position in x direction is plotted against COP position in y direction.
Figure 5. Mean values for all outcome…
Figure 5. Mean values for all outcome measures for the young and older adults group (triangles, squares respectively) for the three different target sizes and target distances.
Error bars represent group standard deviations. Averaged over sub values and standard deviations of all outcome measures for each size and distance.

References

    1. Stalenhoef PA, Crebolder HFJH, Knottnerus JA, van der Horst FGEM (1997) Incidence, risk factors and consequences of falls among elderly subjects living in the community. Eur J Public Health 7: 328–334 10.1093/eurpub/7.3.328
    1. Huang MH, Brown SH (2013) Age differences in the control of postural stability during reaching tasks. Gait Posture 38: 837–842 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.04.004
    1. Horak FB, Shupert CL, Mirka A (1989) Components of postural dyscontrol in the elderly: a review. Neurobiol Aging 10: 727–738 10.1016/0197-4580(89)90010-9
    1. Robinovitch SN, Feldman F, Yang Y, Schonnop R, Leung PM, et al. (2013) Video capture of the circumstances of falls in elderly people residing in long-term care: an observational study. Lancet 381: 47–54 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61263-X
    1. Winter DA (1995) Human balance and posture control during standing and walking. Gait & posture 3: 193–214 10.1016/0966-6362(96)82849-9
    1. Hernandez ME, Ashton-Miller JA, Alexander NB (2012a) Age-related changes in speed and accuracy during rapid targeted center of pressure movements near the posterior limit of the base of support. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 27: 910–916 doi:
    1. Fitts PM (1954) The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. J Exp Psychol 47: 381–391.
    1. Ketcham CJ, Seidler RD, van Gemmert AW, Stelmach GE (2002) Age-related kinematic differences as influenced by task difficulty, target size, and movement amplitude. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 57: 54v64 10.1093/geronb/57.1.P54
    1. Danion F, Duarte M, Grosjean M (1999) Fitts' law in human standing: the effect of scaling. Neurosci Lett 277: 131–133 10.1016/S0304-3940(99)00842-3
    1. Duarte M, Freitas SMSF (2005) Speed-accuracy trade-off in voluntary postural movements. Motor Control 9: 180–196.
    1. Tucker MG, Kavanagh JJ, Morrison S, Barrett RS (2009) Voluntary sway and rapid orthogonal transitions of voluntary sway in young adults, and low and high fall-risk older adults. Clinical Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 24: 597–605 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2009.06.002
    1. Hernandez ME, Ashton-Miller JA, Alexander NB (2012b) The effect of age, movement direction, and target size on the maximum speed of targeted COP movements in healthy women. Hum Mov Sci 31: 1213–1223 10.1016/j.humov.2011.11.002
    1. Thelen DG, Schultz AB, Alexander NB, Ashton-Miller JA (1996) Effects of age on rapid ankle torque development. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 51: 226–232 10.1093/gerona/51A.5.M226
    1. Jongman V, Lamoth CJ, van Keeken H, Caljouw SR (2012) Postural control of elderly: moving to predictable and unpredictable targets. Stud Health Technol Inform 181: 93–97 10.3233/978-1-61499-121-2-93
    1. Spreitzer L, Perkins J, Ustinova KI (2013) Challenging stability limits in old and young individuals with a functional reaching task. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 92: 36–44 10.1097/PHM.0b013e318269d8f9
    1. Prado JM, Dinato MC, Duarte M (2011) Age-related difference on weight transfer during unconstrained standing. Gait Posture 33: 93–97 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2010.10.003
    1. Laughton CA, Slavin M, Katdare K, Nolan L, Bean JF, et al. (2003) Aging, muscle activity and balance control: physiological changes associated with balance impairment. Gait Posture 18: 101–108 10.1016/S0966-6362(02)00200-X
    1. Tucker MG, Kavanagh JJ, Morrison S, Barret RS (2010) What are the relations between voluntary postural sway measures and falls-history in community-dwelling older adults? Arch Phys Med Rehabil 91: 750–758 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.01.004
    1. Chapman GJ, Hollands MA (2010) Age-related differences in visual sampling requirements during adaptive locomotion. Exp Brain Res 201: 467–478 10.1007/s00221-009-2058-0
    1. Young WR, Hollands MA (2012) Evidence for age-related decline in visuomotor function and reactive stepping adjustments. Gait Posture 36: 477–481 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2012.04.009
    1. Cheng KC, McKay SM, King EC, Maki BE (2012) Does aging impair the capacity to use stored visuospatial information or online visual control to guide reach-to-grasp reactions evoked by unpredictable balance perturbation? J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 67: 1238–1245 10.1093/gerona/gls116
    1. Toledo DR, Barela JA (2010) Sensory and motor differences between young and older adults: somatosensory contribution to postural control. Rev Bras Fysioter 14: 267–275 10.1590/S1413-35552010000300004
    1. Stapley P, Pozzo T, Grishin A (1998) The role of anticipatory postural adjustments during whole body forward reaching movements. Neuroreport 9: 395–401.
    1. Bouisset S, Do MC (2008) Posture, dynamic stability, and voluntary movement. Neurophysiol Clin 38: 345–362 10.1016/j.neucli.2008.10.001
    1. Bleuse S, Cassim F, Blatt JL, Labyt E, Derambure P (2006) Effect of age on postural adjustments in unilateral arm movement. Gait Posture 24: 203–210 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2005.09.001
    1. Kanekar N, Aruin AS (2014) The effect of aging on anticipatory postural control. Exp Brain Res 232: 1127–1136 10.1007/s00221-014-3822-3
    1. Kanekar N, Aruin AS (2014) Aging and balance control in response to external perturbations: role of anticipatory and compensatory postural mechanisms. Age (Dordr) In press. doi: 10.1007/s11357-014-9621-8
    1. Sihvonen SE, Sipilä S, Era PA (2004) Changes in postural balance in frail elderly women during a 4-week visual feedback training: a randomized controlled trial. Gerontology 50: 87–95 10.1159/000075559
    1. Kosse NM, Caljouw SR, Vuijk PJ, Lamoth CJC (2011) Exergaming: Interactive balance training in healthy community-dwelling older adults. J Cyber Ther Rehabil 4: 399–407.
    1. Lamoth CJ, Caljouw SR, Postema K (2011) Active video gaming to improve balance in the elderly. Stud Health Technol Inform 167: 159–164 10.3233/978-1-60750-766-6-159

Source: PubMed

3
S'abonner