Erector spinae plane block versus its combination with superficial parasternal intercostal plane block for postoperative pain after cardiac surgery: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study
Burhan Dost, Cengiz Kaya, Esra Turunc, Hilal Dokmeci, Semih Murat Yucel, Deniz Karakaya, Burhan Dost, Cengiz Kaya, Esra Turunc, Hilal Dokmeci, Semih Murat Yucel, Deniz Karakaya
Abstract
Background: We aimed to compare the effectiveness of bilateral erector spinae plane (ESP) block and superficial parasternal intercostal plane (S-PIP) + ESP block in acute post-sternotomy pain following cardiac surgery.
Methods: Forty-seven patients aged between 18 and 80 years of age with American Society of Anesthesiologists class II-III due to undergo median sternotomy for cardiac surgery were included in this prospective, randomized, double-blinded study. Following randomization into two groups, one group received bilateral ultrasound-guided ESP and the other S-PIP plus ESP block. Morphine consumption within the first 24 h after surgery was the primary outcome of the study while NRS scores at rest, NRS scores when coughing, time taken until extubation, use of rescue analgesic, presence of nausea/vomiting, length of hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) stay, and patient satisfaction were secondary outcome measures.
Results: Morphine use up to 24 h following surgery was statistically significantly different between the ESP block and ESP + S-PIP block groups (18.63 ± 6.60 [15.84-21.41] mg/24 h vs 14.41 ± 5.38 [12.08-16.74] mg/24 h, p = 0.021). The ESP + S-PIP block group had considerably reduced pain scores compared to the ESP block group across all time points. Rescue analgesics were required in 21 (87.5%) patients in the ESP block group and seven (30.4%) in the ESP + S-PIP group (p < 0.001). PONV, length of stay in the ICU and hospital, and time to extubation were similar between groups.
Conclusions: In open cardiac surgery, the combination of ESP and S-PIP blocks lowers pain scores and postoperative morphine requirement of patients.
Trial registration: Clinicaltrials Registration No: NCT05191953, Registration Date: 14/01/2022.
Keywords: Acute; Cardiac; Median sternotomy; Nerve block; Postoperative pain; Surgical procedures; Ultrasonography.
Conflict of interest statement
None.
© 2022. The Author(s).
Figures
References
- Huang APS, Sakata RK. Pain after sternotomy – review. Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology (English Edition) 2016;66(4):395–401. doi: 10.1016/j.bjane.2014.09.013.
- Mazzeffi M, Khelemsky Y. Poststernotomy pain: a clinical review. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2011;25(6):1163–1178. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2011.08.001.
- Forero M, Adhikary SD, Lopez H, Tsui C, Chin KJ. The erector spinae plane block: a novel analgesic technique in thoracic neuropathic pain. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016;41(5):621–627. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000451.
- Adhikary SD, Bernard S, Lopez H, Chin KJ. Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Retrolaminar Block: A Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Anatomical Study. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018;43(7):756–762.
- Yang HM, Choi YJ, Kwon HJ. O J, Cho TH, Kim SH: Comparison of injectate spread and nerve involvement between retrolaminar and erector spinae plane blocks in the thoracic region: a cadaveric study. Anaesthesia. 2018;73(10):1244–1250. doi: 10.1111/anae.14408.
- Tsui BCH, Navaratnam M, Boltz G, Maeda K, Caruso TJ. Bilateral automatized intermittent bolus erector spinae plane analgesic blocks for sternotomy in a cardiac patient who underwent cardiopulmonary bypass: A new era of Cardiac Regional Anesthesia. J Clin Anesth. 2018;48:9–10. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2018.04.005.
- Macaire P, Ho N, Nguyen T, Nguyen B, Vu V, Quach C, Roques V, Capdevila X. Ultrasound-Guided Continuous Thoracic Erector Spinae Plane Block Within an Enhanced Recovery Program Is Associated with Decreased Opioid Consumption and Improved Patient Postoperative Rehabilitation After Open Cardiac Surgery-A Patient-Matched, Controlled Before-and-After Study. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2019;33(6):1659–1667. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2018.11.021.
- Krishna SN, Chauhan S, Bhoi D, Kaushal B, Hasija S, Sangdup T, Bisoi AK. Bilateral Erector Spinae Plane Block for Acute Post-Surgical Pain in Adult Cardiac Surgical Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2019;33(2):368–375. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2018.05.050.
- Saadawi M, Layera S, Aliste J, Bravo D, Leurcharusmee P, Tran DQ. Erector spinae plane block: A narrative review with systematic analysis of the evidence pertaining to clinical indications and alternative truncal blocks. J Clin Anesth. 2021;68:110063. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2020.110063.
- Tulgar S, Ahiskalioglu A, De Cassai A, Gurkan Y. Efficacy of bilateral erector spinae plane block in the management of pain: current insights. J Pain Res. 2019;12:2597. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S182128.
- Taketa Y, Irisawa Y, Fujitani T. Comparison of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block and thoracic paravertebral block for postoperative analgesia after video-assisted thoracic surgery: a randomized controlled non-inferiority clinical trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2020;45(1):10–15. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2019-100827.
- de la Torre PA, García PD, Álvarez SL, Miguel FJG, Pérez MF. A Novel Ultrasound-Guided Block: A Promising Alternative for Breast Analgesia. Aesthetic Surg J. 2014;34(1):198–200. doi: 10.1177/1090820X13515902.
- Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D. CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMC Med. 2010;8:18. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-8-18.
- Dost B, Kaya C, Ozdemir E, Ustun YB, Koksal E, Bilgin S, Bostancı Y. Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing open radical prostatectomy: A randomized, placebo-controlled trial. J Clin Anesth. 2021;72:110277. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2021.110277.
- Kaya C, Dost B, Dokmeci O, Yucel SM, Karakaya D: Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Pectointercostal Fascial Block and Transversus Thoracic Muscle Plane Block for Acute Poststernotomy Pain Management After Cardiac Surgery: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Pilot Study. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2021.
- Erden S, Karadağ M, Güler Demir S, Atasayar S, Opak Yücel B, Kalkan N, Erdoğan Z, Ay A. Cross-cultural adaptation, validity, and reliability of the Turkish version of revised American Pain Society patient outcome questionnaire for surgical patients. Agri. 2018;30(2):39–50.
- Athar M, Parveen S, Yadav M, Siddiqui OA, Nasreen F, Ali S, Haseen MA. A Randomized Double-Blind Controlled Trial to Assess the Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block in Cardiac Surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2021;35(12):3574–3580. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2021.03.009.
- Karacaer F, Biricik E, Ilgınel M, Tunay D, Topçuoğlu Ş, Ünlügenç H. Bilateral erector spinae plane blocks in children undergoing cardiac surgery: A randomized, controlled study. J Clin Anesth. 2022;80:110797. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2022.110797.
- Ersoy BBG, Tuna E, Aysin: Postoperative analgesic effectiveness of bilateral erector spinae plane block for adult cardiac surgery: a randomized controlled trial. 5 2022.
- Li J, Lin L, Peng J, He S, Wen Y, Zhang M: Efficacy of ultrasound-guided parasternal block in adult cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Minerva Anestesiol 2022.
- Laigaard J, Pedersen C, Rønsbo TN, Mathiesen O, Karlsen APH. Minimal clinically important differences in randomised clinical trials on pain management after total hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic review. Br J Anaesth. 2021;126(5):1029–1037. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2021.01.021.
- Muñoz-Leyva F, El-Boghdadly K, Chan V. Is the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in acute pain a good measure of analgesic efficacy in regional anesthesia? Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2020;45(12):1000–1005. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2020-101670.
- Chin KJ, El-Boghdadly K. Mechanisms of action of the erector spinae plane (ESP) block: a narrative review. Can J Anaesth. 2021;68(3):387–408. doi: 10.1007/s12630-020-01875-2.
- Selvi O, Tulgar S, Serifsoy TE, Lance R, Thomas DT, Gürkan Y. Quadrant and Dermatomal Analysis of Sensorial Block in Ultrasound- Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block. Eurasian J Med. 2022;54(2):121–126. doi: 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2022.21151.
- Taketa Y, Irisawa Y, Fujitani T. Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block elicits sensory loss around the lateral, but not the parasternal, portion of the thorax. J Clin Anesth. 2018;47:84–85. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2018.03.023.
- Khera T, Murugappan KR, Leibowitz A, Bareli N, Shankar P, Gilleland S, Wilson K, Oren-Grinberg A, Novack V, Venkatachalam S, et al. Ultrasound-Guided Pecto-Intercostal Fascial Block for Postoperative Pain Management in Cardiac Surgery: A Prospective, Randomized. Placebo-Controlled Trial J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2021;35(3):896–903. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2020.07.058.
- Kumar AK, Chauhan S, Bhoi D, Kaushal B. Pectointercostal Fascial Block (PIFB) as a Novel Technique for Postoperative Pain Management in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2021;35(1):116–122. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2020.07.074.
- Bousquet P, Labaste F, Gobin J, Marcheix B, Minville V. Bilateral Parasternal Block and Bilateral Erector Spinae Plane Block Reduce Opioid Consumption in During Cardiac Surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2021;35(4):1249–1250. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2020.07.021.
- De Cassai A, Geraldini F, Carere A, Sergi M, Munari M. Complications Rate Estimation After Thoracic Erector Spinae Plane Block. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2021;35(10):3142–3143. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2021.02.043.
Source: PubMed