Understanding the Steps Toward Mobile Early Intervention for Mothers and Their Infants Exiting the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: Descriptive Examination

Kathleen M Baggett, Betsy Davis, Susan H Landry, Edward G Feil, Anna Whaley, Alana Schnitz, Craig Leve, Kathleen M Baggett, Betsy Davis, Susan H Landry, Edward G Feil, Anna Whaley, Alana Schnitz, Craig Leve

Abstract

Background: Neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) history, combined with systemic inequities for mothers of nondominant cultures and mothers who are socioeconomically disadvantaged, places infants at an extraordinary risk for poor developmental outcomes throughout life. Although receipt of early intervention (EI) is the best single predictor of developmental outcomes among children with and at risk for early developmental delays, mothers and infants with the greatest needs are least likely to receive EI. Mobile internet-based interventions afford substantial advantages for overcoming logistical challenges that often prevent mothers who are economically disadvantaged from accessing EI. However, the bridge from the NICU to a mobile internet intervention has been virtually unexplored.

Objective: This study aims to examine progression flow from NICU exit referral to an early mobile internet intervention to increase EI access and promote parent mediation of infant social-emotional and communication development.

Methods: Three NICUs serving the urban poor in a Midwestern city were provided support in establishing an electronic NICU exit referral mechanism into a randomized controlled trial of a mobile internet intervention for mothers and their infants. Measurement domains to reflect the bridge to service included each crucial gateway required for navigating the path into Part C EI, including referral, screening, assessment, and intervention access. An iterative process was used and documented to facilitate each NICU in establishing an individualized accountability plan for sharing referral materials with mothers before their NICU exit. Subsequent to the referral, progression flow was documented on the basis of a real-time electronic recording of service receipt and contact records. Mother and infant risk characteristics were also assessed. Descriptive analyses were conducted to summarize and characterize each measurement domain.

Results: NICU referral rates for EI were 3 to 4 times higher for open-shared versus closed-single gatekeeper referral processes. Of 86 referred dyads, 67 (78%) were screened, and of those screened, 51 (76%) were eligible for assessment. Of the 51 assessment-eligible mothers and infants, 35 dyads (69%) completed the assessment and 31 (89%) went on to complete at least one remote coaching intervention session. The dyads who accessed and engaged in intervention were racially and ethnically diverse and experiencing substantial adversity.

Conclusions: The transition from the NICU to home was fraught with missed opportunities for an EI referral. Beyond the referral, the most prominent reason for not participating in screening was that mothers could not be located after exiting the NICU. Stronger NICU referral mechanisms for EI are needed. It may be essential to initiate mobile interventions before exiting the NICU for maintaining post-NICU contact with some mothers. In contrast to a closed, single point of referral gatekeeper systems in NICUs, open, shared referral gating systems may be less stymied by individual service provider biases and disruptions.

Keywords: NICU; early intervention; equity; infants; low birthweight; mobile internet intervention; mothers; transition.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: SL developed the Play and Learning Strategies intervention program. KB, BD, EF, and SL are the developers of the InfantNet program, the original intervention platform on which the ePALS Mom and Baby Net for the NICU program is based.

©Kathleen M Baggett, Betsy Davis, Susan H Landry, Edward G Feil, Anna Whaley, Alana Schnitz, Craig Leve. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 22.09.2020.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Quarterly referral rates by NICU referral site. NICU: neonatal intensive care unit; SW: software.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Mean quarterly referral rate.

References

    1. Ritchie K, Bora S, Woodward L. Peer relationship outcomes of school-age children born very preterm. J Pediatr. 2018 Oct;201:238–44. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.05.034.
    1. Choi KH, Martinson ML. The relationship between low birthweight and childhood health: disparities by race, ethnicity, and national origin. Ann Epidemiol. 2018 Oct;28(10):704–9.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2018.08.001.
    1. Aarnoudse-Moens C, Weisglas-Kuperus N, van Goudoever JB, Oosterlaan J. Meta-analysis of neurobehavioral outcomes in very preterm and/or very low birth weight children. Pediatrics. 2009 Aug;124(2):717–28. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-2816.
    1. Enlow E, Faherty L, Wallace-Keeshen S, Martin A, Shea J, Lorch S. Perspectives of low socioeconomic status mothers of premature infants. Pediatrics. 2017 Mar;139(3) doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-2310.
    1. Landa RJ. Efficacy of early interventions for infants and young children with, and at risk for, autism spectrum disorders. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2018 Feb;30(1):25–39. doi: 10.1080/09540261.2018.1432574.
    1. McManus BM, Richardson Z, Schenkman M, Murphy N, Morrato EH. Timing and intensity of early intervention service use and outcomes among a safety-net population of children. JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Jan 4;2(1):e187529. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.7529.
    1. Landry SH, Smith KE, Swank PR, Guttentag C. A responsive parenting intervention: the optimal timing across early childhood for impacting maternal behaviors and child outcomes. Dev Psychol. 2008 Sep;44(5):1335–53. doi: 10.1037/a0013030.
    1. Tang BG, Feldman HM, Huffman LC, Kagawa KJ, Gould JB. Missed opportunities in the referral of high-risk infants to early intervention. Pediatrics. 2012 Jun;129(6):1027–34. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-2720.
    1. Rosenberg S, Robinson C, Shaw E, Ellison M. Part C early intervention for infants and toddlers: percentage eligible versus served. Pediatrics. 2013 Jan;131(1):38–46. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-1662.
    1. Giurgescu C, Engeland CG, Zenk SN, Kavanaugh K. Stress, inflammation and preterm birth in African American women. Newborn Infant Nurs Rev. 2013 Dec;13(4):171–7. doi: 10.1053/j.nainr.2013.09.004.
    1. Collins JW, David RJ, Handler A, Wall S, Andes S. Very low birthweight in African American infants: the role of maternal exposure to interpersonal racial discrimination. Am J Public Health. 2004 Dec;94(12):2132–8. doi: 10.2105/ajph.94.12.2132.
    1. Feinberg E, Silverstein M, Donahue S, Bliss R. The impact of race on participation in part C early intervention services. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2011 May;32(4):284–91. doi: 10.1097/DBP.0b013e3182142fbd.
    1. Horbar JD, Edwards EM, Greenberg LT, Profit J, Draper D, Helkey D, Lorch SA, Lee HC, Phibbs CS, Rogowski J, Gould JB, Firebaugh G. Racial segregation and inequality in the neonatal intensive care unit for very low-birth-weight and very preterm infants. JAMA Pediatr. 2019 May 1;173(5):455–61. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.0241.
    1. Holditch-Davis D, Santos H, Levy J, White-Traut R, O'Shea TM, Geraldo V, David R. Patterns of psychological distress in mothers of preterm infants. Infant Behav Dev. 2015 Nov;41:154–63. doi: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2015.10.004.
    1. Penner A, Dovidio F, West V, Gaertner L, Albrecht L, Dailey K, Markova T. Aversive racism and medical interactions with black patients: a field study. J Exp Soc Psychol. 2010 Mar 1;46(2):436–40. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2009.11.004.
    1. Garel M, Dardennes M, Blondel B. Mothers' psychological distress 1 year after very preterm childbirth. Results of the EPIPAGE qualitative study. Child Care Health Dev. 2007 Mar;33(2):137–43. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2006.00663.x.
    1. Blair K, Lee I, Cho S, Dunlap G. Positive behavior support through family–school collaboration for young children with autism. Top Early Child Spec Educ. 2010 Aug 6;31(1):22–36. doi: 10.1177/0271121410377510. doi: 10.1177/0271121410377510.
    1. Barger B, Rice C, Simmons CA, Wolf R. A systematic review of part c early identification studies. Topics Early Child Spec Educ. 2018 May;38(1):4–16. doi: 10.1177/0271121416678664.
    1. Roberts H, Needelman H, Jackson B, McMorris C, Munyon A. Effect of community size on eligibility for early intervention for infants with a neonatal intensive care experience. J Rural Health. 2014;30(3):259–64. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12055.
    1. Feil E, Baggett K, Davis B, Landry S, Sheeber L, Leve C, Johnson U. Randomized control trial of an internet-based parenting intervention for mothers of infants. Early Child Res Q. 2020;50:36–44. doi: 10.1016/j.ecresq.2018.11.003. doi: 10.1016/j.ecresq.2018.11.003.
    1. Beyer F, Sidarus N, Bonicalzi S, Haggard P. Beyond self-serving bias: diffusion of responsibility reduces sense of agency and outcome monitoring. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2017 Jan 1;12(1):138–45. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsw160.
    1. Conger R, Elder JG. Families in Troubled Times: Adapting to Change in Rural America. New York, USA: Aldine de Gruyter; 1994. Families in troubled times: the Iowa youth and families project; pp. 3–19.
    1. Beck C, Gable R. Postpartum depression screening scale (PDSS) Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services. 2002 doi: 10.1037/t42726-000.
    1. Vogeli M, Hooker A, Everhart D, Kaplan S. Psychometric properties of the postpartum depression screening scale beyond the postpartum period. Res Nurs Health. 2018 Apr;41(2):185–94. doi: 10.1002/nur.21861.
    1. McCabe K, Blucker R, Gillaspy JJ, Cherry A, Mignogna M, Roddenberry A, McCaffree M, Gillaspy S. Reliability of the postpartum depression screening scale in the neonatal intensive care unit. Nurs Res. 2012;61(6):441–5. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0b013e318268d06c.
    1. Squires J, Bricker D, Twombly E. Parent-completed screening for social emotional problems in young children: the effects of risk/disability status and gender on performance. Infant Ment Health J. 2003 Jan;25(1):62–73. doi: 10.1002/imhj.10084. doi: 10.1002/imhj.10084.
    1. Yovanoff P, Squires J. Determining cutoff scores on a developmental screening measure: use of receiver operating characteristics and item response theory. J Early Interv. 2016 Jul 25;29(1):48–62. doi: 10.1177/105381510602900104. doi: 10.1177/105381510602900104.
    1. MIECHV Issue Brief on Family Enrollment and Engagement. Maternal and Child Health Bureau - HRSA. [2020-07-07]. .
    1. Miech E, Rattray N, Flanagan M, Damschroder L, Schmid A, Damush T. Inside help: an integrative review of champions in healthcare-related implementation. SAGE Open Med. 2018;6:2050312118773261. doi: 10.1177/2050312118773261.
    1. Powell G, Mackrain M, LeBuffe P, Lewisville N. Devereux Early Childhood Assessment for Infants and Toddlers Technical Manual. Lewisville, NC: Kaplan Early Learning Corporation; 2007.

Source: PubMed

3
S'abonner