Incretin based drugs and the risk of pancreatic cancer: international multicentre cohort study

Laurent Azoulay, Kristian B Filion, Robert W Platt, Matthew Dahl, Colin R Dormuth, Kristin K Clemens, Madeleine Durand, David N Juurlink, Laura E Targownik, Tanvir C Turin, J Michael Paterson, Pierre Ernst, Canadian Network for Observational Drug Effect Studies Investigators, Samy Suissa, Colin R Dormuth, Brenda R Hemmelgarn, Gary F Teare, Patricia Caetano, Dan Chateau, David A Henry, J Michael Paterson, Jacques LeLorier, Adrian R Levy, Pierre Ernst, Robert W Platt, Ingrid S Sketris, Laurent Azoulay, Kristian B Filion, Robert W Platt, Matthew Dahl, Colin R Dormuth, Kristin K Clemens, Madeleine Durand, David N Juurlink, Laura E Targownik, Tanvir C Turin, J Michael Paterson, Pierre Ernst, Canadian Network for Observational Drug Effect Studies Investigators, Samy Suissa, Colin R Dormuth, Brenda R Hemmelgarn, Gary F Teare, Patricia Caetano, Dan Chateau, David A Henry, J Michael Paterson, Jacques LeLorier, Adrian R Levy, Pierre Ernst, Robert W Platt, Ingrid S Sketris

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether the use of incretin based drugs compared with sulfonylureas is associated with an increased risk of incident pancreatic cancer in people with type 2 diabetes.

Design: Population based cohort.

Setting: Large, international, multicentre study combining the health records from six participating sites in Canada, the United States, and the United Kingdom.

Participants: A cohort of 972,384 patients initiating antidiabetic drugs between 1 January 2007 and 30 June 2013, with follow-up until 30 June 2014.

Main outcome measures: Within each cohort we conducted nested case-control analyses, where incident cases of pancreatic cancer were matched with up to 20 controls on sex, age, cohort entry date, duration of treated diabetes, and duration of follow-up. Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals for incident pancreatic cancer were estimated, comparing use of incretin based drugs with use of sulfonylureas, with drug use lagged by one year for latency purposes. Secondary analyses assessed whether the risk varied by class (dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists) or by duration of use (cumulative duration of use and time since treatment initiation). Site specific hazard ratios were pooled using random effects models.

Results: During 2,024,441 person years of follow-up (median follow-up ranging from 1.3 to 2.8 years; maximum 8 years), 1221 patients were newly diagnosed as having pancreatic cancer (incidence rate 0.60 per 1000 person years). Compared with sulfonylureas, incretin based drugs were not associated with an increased risk of pancreatic cancer (pooled adjusted hazard ratio 1.02, 95% confidence interval 0.84 to 1.23). Similarly, the risk did not vary by class and evidence of a duration-response relation was lacking.

Conclusions: In this large, population based study the use of incretin based drugs was not associated with an increased risk of pancreatic cancer compared with sulfonylureas. Although this potential adverse drug reaction will need to be monitored long term owing to the latency of the cancer, these findings provide some reassurance on the safety of incretin based drugs.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02475499.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf (available on request from the corresponding author) and declare: LET is on the speaker’s panel for Janssen Canada, Takeda Canada, Pfizer Canada, and Shire Canada, has received grant support from Pfizer Canada and Abbvie Canada, and is on advisory boards for Takeda Canada, Abbvie Canada, and Janssen Canada. RWP received consulting fees for work unrelated to this project from Pfizer, Amgen, Abbvie, and Novartis.

Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.

Figures

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/4772785/bin/azol029703.f1_default.jpg
Fig 1 Flow of base and study cohorts
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/4772785/bin/azol029703.f2_default.jpg
Fig 2 Forest plot of association between use of incretin based drugs and risk of pancreatic cancer among patients with type 2 diabetes. Reference category was use of sulfonylureas. Box size is proportional to weight of participating site in random effects meta-analysis (I2=0%)
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/4772785/bin/azol029703.f3_default.jpg
Fig 3 Sensitivity analyses for association between use of incretin based drugs and incidence of pancreatic cancer. Reference category for all analyses was use of sulfonylureas. Site specific hazard ratios were pooled using random effects meta-analysis. Stricter exposure definition: defined as receiving at least four prescriptions within any 12 month period. *Adjusted for alcohol related disorders, history of acute or chronic pancreatitis, composite variable of microvascular complications of diabetes, number of hospital admissions (continuous), number of unique non-diabetic drugs in previous year (continuous), number of antidiabetic drugs received before entry to study cohort (continuous), and ever use of statins. In CPRD, we further adjusted for body mass index, smoking status, and glycated haemoglobin A1c level (≤7.0% (53 mmol/mol), 7.1-8.0% (54-64 mmol/mol), and >8.0% (64 mmol/mol)). †Adjusted for Deyo version of Charlson comorbidity index and history of acute or chronic pancreatitis

References

    1. Holst JJ. The physiology of glucagon-like peptide 1. Physiol Rev 2007;87:1409-39. 10.1152/physrev.00034.2006. .
    1. Gale EA. GLP-1-based therapies and the exocrine pancreas: more light, or just more heat?Diabetes 2012;61:986-8. 10.2337/db11-1838. .
    1. Kabuzek K, Kozłowski M, Szkudłapski D, Sikorska P, Kozłowska M, Okopień B. Incretin-based therapies in the treatment of type 2 diabetes—more than meets the eye?Eur J Intern Med 2013;24:207-12. 10.1016/j.ejim.2013.01.009. .
    1. Elashoff M, Matveyenko AV, Gier B, Elashoff R, Butler PC. Pancreatitis, pancreatic, and thyroid cancer with glucagon-like peptide-1-based therapies. Gastroenterology 2011;141:150-6. 10.1053/j.gastro.2011.02.018. .
    1. Shyangdan DS, Royle PL, Clar C, Sharma P, Waugh NR. Glucagon-like peptide analogues for type 2 diabetes mellitus: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Endocr Disord 2010;10:20. 10.1186/1472-6823-10-20. .
    1. Monami M, Dicembrini I, Martelli D, Mannucci E. Safety of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Curr Med Res Opin 2011;27(Suppl 3):57-64. 10.1185/03007995.2011.602964. .
    1. Jeong KH, Yoo BK. The efficacy and safety of liraglutide. Int J Clin Pharm 2011;33:740-9. 10.1007/s11096-011-9552-8. .
    1. Scirica BM, Bhatt DL, Braunwald E, et al. SAVOR-TIMI 53 Steering Committee and Investigators. Saxagliptin and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 2013;369:1317-26. 10.1056/NEJMoa1307684. .
    1. White WB, Cannon CP, Heller SR, et al. EXAMINE Investigators. Alogliptin after acute coronary syndrome in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2013;369:1327-35. 10.1056/NEJMoa1305889. .
    1. Green JB, Bethel MA, Armstrong PW, et al. TECOS Study Group. Effect of sitagliptin on cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2015;373:232-42. 10.1056/NEJMoa1501352. .
    1. Pfeffer MA, Claggett B, Diaz R, et al. ELIXA Investigators. Lixisenatide in patients with type 2 diabetes and acute coronary syndrome. N Engl J Med 2015;373:2247-57. 10.1056/NEJMoa1509225. .
    1. Dore DD, Seeger JD, Chan KA. Incidence of health insurance claims for thyroid neoplasm and pancreatic malignancy in association with exenatide: signal refinement using active safety surveillance. Ther Adv Drug Saf 2012;3:157-64. 10.1177/2042098612446473. .
    1. Romley JA, Goldman DP, Solomon M, McFadden D, Peters AL. Exenatide therapy and the risk of pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer in a privately insured population. Diabetes Technol Ther 2012;14:904-11. 10.1089/dia.2012.0075. .
    1. Funch D, Gydesen H, Tornøe K, Major-Pedersen A, Chan KA. A prospective, claims-based assessment of the risk of pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer with liraglutide compared to other antidiabetic drugs. Diabetes Obes Metab 2014;16:273-5. 10.1111/dom.12230. .
    1. Gokhale M, Buse JB, Gray CL, Pate V, Marquis MA, Stürmer T. Dipeptidyl-peptidase-4 inhibitors and pancreatic cancer: a cohort study. Diabetes Obes Metab 2014;16:1247-56. 10.1111/dom.12379. .
    1. Tseng CH. Sitagliptin and pancreatic cancer risk in patients with type 2 diabetes. Eur J Clin Invest 2016;46:70-9. 10.1111/eci.12570. .
    1. Knapen LM, van Dalem J, Keulemans YC, et al. Use of incretin agents and risk of pancreatic cancer: a population-based cohort study. Diabetes Obes Metab 2015; published online 5 November. 10.1111/dom.12605. .
    1. Azoulay L. Incretin-based drugs and adverse pancreatic events: almost a decade later and uncertainty remains. Diabetes Care 2015;38:951-3. 10.2337/dc15-0347. .
    1. Egan AG, Blind E, Dunder K, et al. Pancreatic safety of incretin-based drugs—FDA and EMA assessment. N Engl J Med 2014;370:794-7. 10.1056/NEJMp1314078. .
    1. Suissa S, Henry D, Caetano P, et al. Canadian Network for Observational Drug Effect Studies (CNODES). CNODES: the Canadian Network for Observational Drug Effect Studies. Open Med 2012;6:e134-40..
    1. Herrett E, Gallagher AM, Bhaskaran K, et al. Data resource profile: Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD). Int J Epidemiol 2015;44:827-36. 10.1093/ije/dyv098. .
    1. Pannala R, Basu A, Petersen GM, Chari ST. New-onset diabetes: a potential clue to the early diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. Lancet Oncol 2009;10:88-95. 10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70337-1. .
    1. Suissa S. Novel approaches to pharmacoepidemiology study design and statistical analysis. In: Strom B, ed. Pharmacoepidemiology. 4th ed Wiley, 2005: 811-29.
    1. Essebag V, Platt RW, Abrahamowicz M, Pilote L. Comparison of nested case-control and survival analysis methodologies for analysis of time-dependent exposure. BMC Med Res Methodol 2005;5:5. 10.1186/1471-2288-5-5. .
    1. Suissa S. The quasi-cohort approach in pharmacoepidemiology: upgrading the nested case-control. Epidemiology 2015;26:242-6. 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000221. .
    1. Hall S, Schulze K, Groome P, Mackillop W, Holowaty E. Using cancer registry data for survival studies: the example of the Ontario Cancer Registry. J Clin Epidemiol 2006;59:67-76. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.05.001. .
    1. Inzucchi SE, Bergenstal RM, Buse JB, et al. American Diabetes Association (ADA) European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes: a patient-centered approach: position statement of the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Diabetes Care 2012;35:1364-79. 10.2337/dc12-0413. .
    1. Suissa S, Azoulay L. Metformin and the risk of cancer: time-related biases in observational studies. Diabetes Care 2012;35:2665-73. 10.2337/dc12-0788. .
    1. Nissen SE, Wolski K. Effect of rosiglitazone on the risk of myocardial infarction and death from cardiovascular causes. N Engl J Med 2007;356:2457-71. 10.1056/NEJMoa072761. .
    1. Azoulay L, Yin H, Filion KB, et al. The use of pioglitazone and the risk of bladder cancer in people with type 2 diabetes: nested case-control study. BMJ 2012;344:e3645. 10.1136/bmj.e3645. .
    1. Schneeweiss S, Seeger JD, Maclure M, Wang PS, Avorn J, Glynn RJ. Performance of comorbidity scores to control for confounding in epidemiologic studies using claims data. Am J Epidemiol 2001;154:854-64. 10.1093/aje/154.9.854. .
    1. DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 1986;7:177-88. 10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2. .
    1. Ray WA. Evaluating medication effects outside of clinical trials: new-user designs. Am J Epidemiol 2003;158:915-20. 10.1093/aje/kwg231. .
    1. Johnson JA, Bowker SL, Richardson K, Marra CA. Time-varying incidence of cancer after the onset of type 2 diabetes: evidence of potential detection bias. Diabetologia 2011;54:2263-71. 10.1007/s00125-011-2242-1. .
    1. Benoit SR, Fleming R, Philis-Tsimikas A, Ji M. Predictors of glycemic control among patients with type 2 diabetes: a longitudinal study. BMC Public Health 2005;5:36. 10.1186/1471-2458-5-36. .

Source: PubMed

3
S'abonner