Bronchodilator efficacy and safety of indacaterol 150 μg once daily in patients with COPD: an analysis of pooled data

Eugene R Bleecker, Thomas Siler, Roger Owen, Benjamin Kramer, Eugene R Bleecker, Thomas Siler, Roger Owen, Benjamin Kramer

Abstract

Background: Indacaterol is an inhaled, once-daily long-acting β(2)-agonist bronchodilator for regular use in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). As indacaterol is the first once-daily β(2)-agonist to be developed, it is relevant to evaluate its bronchodilator efficacy, safety, and tolerability.

Methods: Data were pooled from three randomized, double-blind, clinical studies in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD treated with indacaterol 150 μg qd (n = 627) or placebo (n = 1021). Bronchodilator efficacy was assessed as trough (24-hour post-dose) forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)) after 12 weeks (primary endpoint in individual studies) and FEV(1) measured serially post-dose. Rescue use of albuterol was monitored.

Results: At week 12, indacaterol increased trough FEV(1) by 160 mL compared with placebo (P < 0.001), exceeding the 120 mL level prespecified as clinically important. FEV(1) during the first 12-hour post-dose at week 12 averaged 210 mL higher with indacaterol than with placebo (P < 0.001). Patients receiving indacaterol recorded 53% of days without use of rescue albuterol, compared with 38% of days in the placebo group (P < 0.001). Adverse events (mostly mild or moderate) were reported for 52% and 46% of patients receiving indacaterol and placebo, respectively, and serious adverse events for 4% and 5%. Worsening of COPD was the most frequent adverse event (10% indacaterol; 15% placebo). Indacaterol had little effect on pulse or blood pressure or measures of systemic β(2)-adrenoceptor activity (blood glucose, serum potassium, and corrected QT interval).

Conclusion: Indacaterol was an effective bronchodilator and was well tolerated, with a good safety profile over 12 weeks of treatment. It should prove a useful treatment for patients with moderate-to-severe COPD.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00393458 NCT00624286.

Keywords: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; inhaled corticosteroids; tolerability.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Trough forced expiratory volume in 1 second: differences between indacaterol and placebo treatment after first dose (measured on day 2) and after 12 weeks’ treatment. Broken line indicates prespecified level of clinical importance. Notes: Data are least squares means and 95% confidence intervals. ***Denotes P < 0.001 vs placebo.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Trough FEV1 after the first dose (day 2) and after 12 weeks of treatment, expressed as change from baseline (absolute (A) and percentage (B)). Note: Data are unadjusted means ± standard error. Abbreviation: FEV1, forced expiratory volume in 1 second.
Figure 3
Figure 3
FEV1 measured at serial time points post-dose on day 1 and week 12. Note: Data are unadjusted means (error bars omitted for clarity). Abbreviation: FEV1, forced expiratory volume in 1 second.
Figure 4
Figure 4
FEV1 measured at serial time points up to 60 minutes post-dose on day 1. Notes: Data are least squares means ± standard error. ***Denotes P < 0.001 vs placebo. Abbreviation: FEV1, forced expiratory volume in 1 second.
Figure 5
Figure 5
FVC measured at serial time points post-dose after 12 weeks in a single study. Notes: Data are least squares means ± standard error. Differences between indacaterol and placebo were statistically significant (P < 0.001) at each time point. Abbreviation: FVC, forced vital capacity.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Percentage of days with no use of rescue albuterol over 3 months of treatment. Notes: Data are least squares means ± standard error. ***Denotes P < 0.001 vs placebo.

References

    1. Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) Global Strategy for the Diagnosis, Management, and Prevention of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. [Accessed March 17, 2011]. Updated 2010. Available from: .
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Deaths from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease – United States, 2000–2005. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2008;57:1229–1232.
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Summary health statistics for US adults: National Health Interview Survey, 2008. Vital and Health Statistics [serial on the Internet]. Series 10. Dec, 2009. [Accessed May 12, 2010]. Available from: .
    1. Thompson WH, St-Hilaire S. Prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and tobacco use in veterans at Boise veterans affairs medical center. Respir Care. 2010;55:555–560.
    1. Schneider KM, O’Donnell BE, Dean D. Prevalence of multiple chronic conditions in the United States’ Medicare population. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2009;7:82.
    1. Barr RG, Celli BR, Mannino DM, et al. Comorbidities, patient knowledge, and disease management in a national sample of patients with COPD. Am J Med. 2009;122:348–355.
    1. Celli BR, MacNee W ATS/ERS Task Force. Standards for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with COPD: a summary of the ATS/ ERS position paper. Eur Respir J. 2004;23:932–946. Erratum in Eur Respir J 2006;27:242.
    1. Feldman G, Siler T, Prasad N, et al. Efficacy and safety of indacaterol 150 microg once-daily in COPD: a double-blind, randomised, 12-week study. BMC Pulm Med. 2010;10:11.
    1. Dahl R, Chung KF, Buhl R, et al. Efficacy of a new once-daily LABA, indacaterol, versus the twice-daily LABA, formoterol, in COPD. Thorax. 2010;65:473–479.
    1. Donohue JF, Fogarty C, Lötvall J, et al. INHANCE Study Investigators. Once-daily bronchodilators for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: indacaterol versus tiotropium. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010;182:155–162.
    1. Barnes PJ, Pocock SJ, Magnussen H, et al. Integrating indacaterol dose selection in a clinical study in COPD using an adaptive seamless design. Pulm Pharmacol Ther. 2010;23:165–171.
    1. Miller MR, Hankinson J, Brusasco V, et al. ATS/ERS Task Force. Standardisation of spirometry. Eur Respir J. 2005;26:319–338.
    1. Cazzola M, MacNee W, Martinez FJ, et al. American Thoracic Society; European Respiratory Society Task Force on outcomes of COPD. Outcomes for COPD pharmacological trials: from lung function to biomarkers. Eur Respir J. 2008;31:416–469.
    1. Connolly CK. Diurnal rhythms in airway obstruction. Br J Dis Chest. 1979;73:357–366.
    1. Dawkins KD, Muers MF. Diurnal variation in airflow obstruction in chronic bronchitis. Thorax. 1981;36:618–621.
    1. Petty TL. Circadian variations in chronic asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Med. 1988;85:21–23.
    1. Calverley PM, Lee A, Towse L, van Noord J, Witek TJ, Kelsen S. Effect of tiotropium bromide on circadian variation in airflow limitation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Thorax. 2003;58:855–860.
    1. Ramsdale EH, Morris MM, Hargreave FE. Interpretation of the variability of peak flow rates in chronic bronchitis. Thorax. 1986;41:771–776.
    1. Meurs H, Postma DS, Koëter GH, et al. The beta-adrenergic system of non-allergic patients with chronic airflow obstruction and early morning dyspnoea. Ann Allergy. 1987;59:417–421.
    1. Partridge MR, Karlsson N, Small IR. Patient insight into the impact of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in the morning: an internet survey. Curr Med Res Opin. 2009;25:2043–2048.
    1. Casaburi R, Mahler DA, Jones PW, et al. A long-term evaluation of once-daily inhaled tiotropium in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Eur Respir J. 2002;19:217–224.
    1. Brusasco V, Hodder R, Miravitlles M, Korducki L, Towse L, Kesten S. Health outcomes following treatment for six months with once daily tiotropium compared with twice daily salmeterol in patients with COPD. Thorax. 2003;58:399–404. Erratum in Thorax 2005;60:105.
    1. Dusser D, Bravo ML, Iacono P. The effect of tiotropium on exacerbations and airflow in patients with COPD. Eur Respir J. 2006;27:547–555. Erratum in Eur Respir J 2006;27:1076.
    1. Donohue JF, van Noord JA, Bateman ED, et al. A 6-month, placebo-controlled study comparing lung function and health status changes in COPD patients treated with tiotropium or salmeterol. Chest. 2002;122:47–55.
    1. Briggs DD, Jr, Covelli H, Lapidus R, Bhattycharya S, Kesten S, Cassino C. Improved daytime spirometric efficacy of tiotropium compared with salmeterol in patients with COPD. Pulm Pharmacol Ther. 2005;18:397–404.
    1. Kornmann O, Dahl R, Centanni S, et al. for INLIGHT-2 (Indacaterol Efficacy Evaluation Using 150-μg Doses with COPD Patients) study investigators. Once-daily indacaterol versus twice-daily salmeterol for COPD: a placebo-controlled comparison. Eur Respir J. 2011;37:273–279.
    1. Chapman KR, Rennard SI, Dogra A, Owen R, Lassen C, Kramer B. Long-term safety and efficacy of indacaterol, a novel long-acting β2-agonist, in subjects with COPD: a randomized, placebo-controlled study. Chest. 2011;140:68–75.
    1. Tsagaraki V, Amfilochiou A, Markantonis SL. Evidence of tachyphylaxis associated with salmeterol treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients. Int J Clin Pract. 2006;60:415–421.
    1. Calverley PM, Boonsawat W, Cseke Z, Zhong N, Peterson S, Olsson H. Maintenance therapy with budesonide and formoterol in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Eur Respir J. 2003;22:912–919. Erratum in Eur Respir J 2004;24:1075.
    1. Partridge MR, Miravitlles M, Ståhl E, Karlsson N, Svensson K, Welte T. Development and validation of the Capacity of Daily Living during the Morning questionnaire and the Global Chest Symptoms Questionnaire in COPD. Eur Respir J. 2010;36:96–104.
    1. Buhl R, Dunn LJ, Disdier C, et al. Blinded 12-week comparison of oncedaily indacaterol and tiotropium in COPD. Eur Respir J. 2011 epub ahead of print. doi: .
    1. Korn S, Kerwin E, Atis S, Amos C, Owen R, Lassen C for the INSIST study group. Indacaterol once-daily provides superior efficacy to salmeterol twice-daily in COPD: a 12-week study. Respir Med. 2011;105:719–726.
    1. Rand CS, Nides M, Cowles MK, Wise RA, Connett J. Long-term metered-dose inhaler adherence in a clinical trial. The Lung Health Study Research Group. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1995;152:580–588.
    1. James PN, Anderson JB, Prior JG, White JP, Henry JA, Cochrane GM. Patterns of drug taking in patients with chronic airflow obstruction. Postgrad Med J. 1985;61:7–10.
    1. Corden ZM, Bosley CM, Rees PJ, Cochrane GM. Home nebulized therapy for patients with COPD: patient compliance with treatment and its relation to quality of life. Chest. 1997;112:1278–1282.
    1. Claxton AJ, Cramer J, Pierce C. A systematic review of the associations between dose regimens and medication compliance. Clin Ther. 2001;23:1296–1310.
    1. Breekveldt-Postma NS, Koerselman J, Erkens JA, Lammers JW, Herings RM. Enhanced persistence with tiotropium compared with other respiratory drugs in COPD. Respir Med. 2007;101:1398–1405.
    1. Tamura G, Ohta K. Adherence to treatment by patients with asthma or COPD: comparison between inhaled drugs and transdermal patch. Respir Med. 2007;101:1895–1902.
    1. Bourbeau J, Bartlett SJ. Patient adherence in COPD. Thorax. 2008;63:831–838.

Source: PubMed

3
S'abonner