Validation of diagnostic characteristics of needle based confocal laser endomicroscopy in differentiation of pancreatic cystic lesions
Somashekar G Krishna, Benjamin Swanson, Phil A Hart, Samer El-Dika, Jon P Walker, Sean T McCarthy, Ahmad Malli, Zarine K Shah, Darwin L Conwell, Somashekar G Krishna, Benjamin Swanson, Phil A Hart, Samer El-Dika, Jon P Walker, Sean T McCarthy, Ahmad Malli, Zarine K Shah, Darwin L Conwell
Abstract
Background and aims: Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided needle-based Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy (nCLE) characteristics of pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs) have been identified in studies where the gold standard surgical histopathology was available in a minority of patients. There are diverging reports of interobserver agreement (IOA) and paucity of intraobserver reliability (IOR). Thus, we sought to validate current EUS-nCLE criteria of PCLs in a larger consecutive series of surgical patients. Methods: A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent EUS-nCLE at a single center was performed. For calculation of IOA (Fleiss' kappa) and IOR (Cohen's kappa), blinded nCLE-naïve observers (n = 6) reviewed nCLE videos of PCLs in two phases separated by a 2-week washout period. Results: EUS-nCLE was performed in 49 subjects, and a definitive diagnosis was available in 26 patients. The overall sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for diagnosing a mucinous PCL were 94 %, 82 %, and 89 %, respectively. The IOA for differentiating mucinous vs. non-mucinous PCL was "substantial" (κ = 0.67, 95 %CI 0.57, 0.77). The mean (± standard deviation) IOR was "substantial" (κ = 0.78 ± 0.13) for diagnosing mucinous PCLs. Both the IOAs and mean IORs were "substantial" for detection of known nCLE image patterns of papillae/epithelial bands of mucinous PCLs (IOA κ = 0.63; IOR κ = 0.76 ± 0.11), bright particles on a dark background of pseudocysts (IOA κ = 0.71; IOR κ = 0.78 ± 0.12), and fern-pattern or superficial vascular network of serous cystadenomas (IOA κ = 0.62; IOR κ = 0.68 ± 0.20). Three (6.1 % of 49) patients developed post-fine needle aspiration (FNA) pancreatitis. Conclusion: Characteristic EUS-nCLE patterns can be consistently identified and improve the diagnostic accuracy of PCLs. These results support further investigations to optimize EUS-nCLE while minimizing adverse events.
Study registration: NCT02516488.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: There are no relevant conflicts of interest to report for any author.
Figures
References
- de Jong K, Nio C Y, Hermans J J. et al.High prevalence of pancreatic cysts detected by screening magnetic resonance imaging examinations. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010;8:806–811.
- Laffan T A, Horton K M, Klein A P. et al.Prevalence of unsuspected pancreatic cysts on MDCT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;191:802–807.
- Tanaka M, Fernandez-del Castillo C, Adsay V. et al.International consensus guidelines 2012 for the management of IPMN and MCN of the pancreas. Pancreatology. 2012;12:183–197.
- Valsangkar N P, Morales-Oyarvide V, Thayer S P. et al.851 resected cystic tumors of the pancreas: a 33-year experience at the Massachusetts General Hospital. Surgery. 2012;152:4–12.
- Gaujoux S Brennan M F Gonen M et al.Cystic lesions of the pancreas: changes in the presentation and management of 1,424 patients at a single institution over a 15-year time period J Am Coll Surg 2011212590–600.; discussion 600–593
- Krishna S G, Lee J H. Appraisal of needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy in the diagnosis of pancreatic cysts. World J Gastroenterol. 2016;22:1701–1710.
- Nakai Y, Iwashita T, Park do H. et al.Diagnosis of pancreatic cysts: EUS-guided, through-the-needle confocal laser-induced endomicroscopy and cystoscopy trial: DETECT study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81:1204–1214.
- Napoleon B, Lemaistre A I, Pujol B. et vivo characterization of pancreatic cystic lesions by needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (nCLE): proposition of a comprehensive nCLE classification confirmed by an external retrospective evaluation. Surg Endosc. 2016;30:2603–2612.
- Napoleon B, Lemaistre A I, Pujol B. et al.A novel approach to the diagnosis of pancreatic serous cystadenoma: needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy. Endoscopy. 2015;47:26–32.
- Krishna S G, Swanson B, Conwell D L. et vivo and ex vivo needle-based confocal endomicroscopy of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;82:571–572.
- Konda V J, Meining A, Jamil L H. et al.A pilot study of in vivo identification of pancreatic cystic neoplasms with needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy under endosonographic guidance. Endoscopy. 2013;45:1006–1013.
- Karia K, Waxman I, Konda V J. et al.Needle-based confocal endomicroscopy for pancreatic cysts: the current agreement in interpretation. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016;83:924–927.
- Modi R M, Swanson B, Muscarella P 2nd. et al.Novel techniques for diagnosis of serous cystadenoma: fern pattern of vascularity confirmed by in vivo and ex vivo confocal laser endomicroscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.07.015.
- Thiberville L, Salaun M, Lachkar S. et al.Confocal fluorescence endomicroscopy of the human airways. Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2009;6:444–449.
- Landis J R, Koch G G. A one-way components of variance model for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:671–679.
- Volkan Adsay N. Cystic lesions of the pancreas. Mod Pathol. 2007;20:71–93.
- de Jong K, Poley J W, van Hooft J E. et al.Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of pancreatic cystic lesions provides inadequate material for cytology and laboratory analysis: initial results from a prospective study. Endoscopy. 2011;43:585–590.
- Ramesh J, Bang J Y, Hebert-Magee S. et al.Randomized trial comparing the flexible 19G and 25G needles for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of solid pancreatic mass lesions. Pancreas. 2015;44:128–133.
- Song T J, Kim J H, Lee S S. et al.The prospective randomized, controlled trial of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration using 22G and 19G aspiration needles for solid pancreatic or peripancreatic masses. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010;105:1739–1745.
Source: PubMed