The way to a man's heart is through his stomach?: a mixed methods study on causal mechanisms through which cash and in-kind food transfers decreased intimate partner violence

Ana Maria Buller, Melissa Hidrobo, Amber Peterman, Lori Heise, Ana Maria Buller, Melissa Hidrobo, Amber Peterman, Lori Heise

Abstract

Background: Intimate partner violence (IPV) is highly prevalent and has detrimental effects on the physical and mental health of women across the world. Despite emerging evidence on the impacts of cash transfers on intimate partner violence, the pathways through which reductions in violence occur remain under-explored. A randomised controlled trial of a cash and in-kind food transfer programme on the northern border of Ecuador showed that transfers reduced physical or sexual violence by 30 %. This mixed methods study aimed to understand the pathways that led to this reduction.

Methods: We conducted a mixed methods study that combined secondary analysis from a randomised controlled trial relating to the impact of a transfer programme on IPV with in-depth interviews and focus group discussions with male and female beneficiaries. A sequential analysis strategy was followed, whereby qualitative results guided the choice of variables for the quantitative analysis and qualitative insights were used to help interpret the quantitative findings.

Results: We found qualitative and quantitative evidence that the intervention led to reductions in IPV through three pathways operating at the couple, household and individual level: i) reduced day-to-day conflict and stress in the couple; ii) improved household well-being and happiness; and iii) increased women's decision making, self-confidence and freedom of movement. We found little evidence that any type of IPV increased as a result of the transfers.

Discussion: While cash and in-kind transfers can be important programmatic tools for decreasing IPV, the positive effects observed in this study seem to depend on circumstances that may not exist in all settings or programmes, such as the inclusion of a training component. Moreover, the programme built upon rather than challenged traditional gender roles by targeting women as transfer beneficiaries and framing the intervention under the umbrella of food security and nutrition - domains traditionally ascribed to women.

Conclusions: Transfers destined for food consumption combined with nutrition training reduced IPV among marginalised households in northern Ecuador. Evidence suggests that these reductions were realised by decreasing stress and conflict, improving household well-being, and enhancing women's decision making, self-confidence and freedom of movement.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02526147 . Registered 24 August 2015.

Keywords: Cash and in-kind transfers; Domestic violence; Ecuador; Impact evaluation; Intimate partner violence; Mixed methods; Social protection interventions.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Map of intervention provinces and urban centres in Carchi and Sucumbíos
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Pathways flowchart

References

    1. Devries K, Mak J, García-Moreno C, Petzold M, Child J, Falder G, et al. The Global Prevalence of Intimate Partner Violence Against Women. Science. 2013;340(6140):1527–8. doi: 10.1126/science.1240937.
    1. WHO . Global and regional estimates of violence against women: Prevalence and health effects of intimate partner violence and non-partner sexual violence. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2013.
    1. Ellsberg M, Emmelin M. Intimate partner violence and mental health. Glob Health Action. 2014;7.
    1. INEI. Encuesta nacional de relaciones familiares y violencia de genero contra las mujeres, Ecuador (National survey of family dynamics and gender violence against women, Ecuador). 2011. . Accessed 18 Dec 2015.
    1. Ojeda G, Ordóñez M, Hernando Ochoa L. Encuesta Nacional de Demografía y Salud, Colombia (Demographic and Health Survey, Colombia). 2010. . Accessed 18 Dec 2015.
    1. Wirtz A, Pham K, Glass N, Loochkartt S, Kidane T, Cuspoca D, et al. Gender-based violence in conflict and displacement: qualitative findings from displaced women in Colombia. Confl Health. 2014;8(1):10. doi: 10.1186/1752-1505-8-10.
    1. DFID. Cash transfer evidence paper. 2011. . Accessed 18 Dec 2015.
    1. Bobonis G, Gonzalez-Brenes M, Castro R. Public Transfers and Domestic Violence: The Roles of Private Information and Spousal Control. Am Econ J. 2013;5(1):179–205.
    1. Hidrobo M, Hoddinott J, Peterman A, Margolies A, Moreira V. Impact evaluation of cash, food vouchers, and food transfers among Colombian refugees and poor Ecuadorians in Carchi and Sucumbíos: Final Report. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute; 2012.
    1. Perova E. Buying out of abuse: how changes in women’s income affect domestic violence. 2010. . Accessed 18 Dec 2015.
    1. Vaessen J, Leeuw F, Bonilla S, Rivas A, Lukach R, Bastiaensen J et al. The effects of microcredit on women’s control over household spending in developing countries. Protocol. 2012. . Accessed 18 Dec 2015.
    1. Pence E, Paymar M. Education groups for men who batter: The Duluth model. NY: Springer Publishing Company; 1993.
    1. Macmillan R, Gartner R. When she brings home the bacon: Labor-force participation and the risk of spousal violence against women. J Marriage Fam. 1999;61(4):947–58. doi: 10.2307/354015.
    1. Bloch F, Rao V. Terror as a bargaining instrument: A case study of dowry violence in rural India. Am Econ Rev. 2002;92(4):1029–43. doi: 10.1257/00028280260344588.
    1. Vyas S, Watts C. How does economic empowerment affect women’s risk of intimate partner violence in low and middle income countries? A systematic review of published evidence. J Int Dev. 2009;21(5):577–602. doi: 10.1002/jid.1500.
    1. Farmer A, Tiefenthaler J. An economic analysis of domestic violence. Rev Soc Econ. 1997;55:337–58. doi: 10.1080/00346769700000004.
    1. Fox GL, Benson ML, DeMaris AA, Wyk J. Economic distress and intimate violence: Testing family stress and resources theories. J Marriage Fam. 2002;64(3):793–807. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2002.00793.x.
    1. Hidrobo M, Peterman A, Heise L. The effect of cash, vouchers and food transfers on intimate partner violence: evidence from a randomized experiment in Northern Ecuador. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics. In press.
    1. Hidrobo M, Hoddinott J, Peterman A, Margolies A, Moreira V. Cash, Food, or Vouchers? Evidence from a randomized experiment in northern Ecuador. J Dev Econ. 2014;107:144–56. doi: 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2013.11.009.
    1. Fetters MD, Curry LA, Creswell JW. Achieving integration in mixed methods designs—principles and practices. Health Serv Res. 2013;48(6):2134–56. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12117.
    1. Teddlie C, Tashakkori A. Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences. CA: Sage Publications Inc; 2009.
    1. Turan JM, Hatcher AH, Medema-Wijnveen J, Onono M, Miller S, Bukusi EA et al. The role of HIV-related stigma in utilization of skilled childbirth services in rural Kenya: a prospective mixed-methods study. PloS Medicine. 2012;9(8). doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001295.
    1. WHO . Putting women first: Ethical and safety recommendations for research on domestic violence against women. Geneva: World Health Organization, Department of Gender and Women’s Health; 2001.
    1. Ellsberg M, Heise L. Researching violence against women: a practical guide for researchers and activists. Washington, DC: World Health Organization, PATH; 2005.
    1. Straus MA. Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: The conflict tactics (CT) scales. J Marriage Fam. 1979;75–88.
    1. Hindin MJ, Kishor S, Ansara DL. Intimate partner violence among couples in 10 DHS countries: Predictors and health outcomes. Calverton, MD: Macro International Inc; 2008.
    1. Bacchus L, Buller A, Ferrari G, Peters T, Devries K, Sethi C et al. Occurrence and impact of domestic violence and abuse in gay and bisexual men: a cross sectional survey. International Journal of STD & STI. In press.
    1. Buller A. Young men and structural, symbolic and everyday violence in Lima, Peru. In: Parkes J, editor. Gender Violence in Poverty Contexts: The educational challenge. London: Routledge; 2015. pp. 118–34.
    1. van de Venter E, Buller A. Arts on referral interventions: a mixed-methods study investigating factors associated with differential changes in mental well-being. J Public Health. 2015;37(1):143–50. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdu028.
    1. Peterman A, Schwab B, Roy S, Hidrobo M, Gilligan D. Measuring women’s decision making: Indicator choice and survey design experiments from cash and food transfer evaluations in Ecuador, Uganda and Yemen. 2015. . Accessed 5 Nov 2015.
    1. Fehringer JA, Hindin MJ. ‘I Get Angry If He’s Always Drinking and We Have No Money’: Exploring Motivations for Male and Female Perpetrated Intimate Partner Violence in the Philippines. Health Care Women Int. 2014;35(4):476–91. doi: 10.1080/07399332.2013.770003.
    1. Fuller N. She made me go out of my mind: Marital violence from the male point of view. Development. 2001;44(3):25–9. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.development.1110257.
    1. Trindade RFC, Almeida AM, Rozendo CA. Infidelidade masculina e violência doméstica: vivência de um grupo de mulheres (Masculine infidelity and domestic violence: experience of a group of women) Cienc Enferm. 2008;14(2):39–46.
    1. Vyas S. Assessing the implications of women’s economic status on intimate partner violence in urban and rural Tanzania. London: London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine; 2012.
    1. Holmes R, Jones N. Gender and social protection in the developing world. Beyond mothers and safety nets. London: Zed Books; 2013.
    1. Molyneux M, Thomson M. Cash transfers, gender equity and women’s empowerment in Peru. Ecuador Bolivia Gend Dev. 2011;19(2):195–212. doi: 10.1080/13552074.2011.592631.
    1. Patel L, Hochfeld T. It buys food but does it change gender relations? Child Support Grants in Soweto. S Afr Gend Dev. 2011;19(2):229–40. doi: 10.1080/13552074.2011.592633.
    1. Haushofer J, Shapiro J. Welfare Effects of Unconditional Cash Transfers: Evidence from a Randomized Controlled Trial in Kenya. 2014. . Accessed 18 Dec 2015.
    1. Bishop D, Bowman K. Still learning: a critical reflection on three years of measuring women’s empowerment in Oxfam. Gend Dev. 2014;22(2):253–69. doi: 10.1080/13552074.2014.920993.
    1. Carter J, Byrne S, Schrader K, Kabir H, Uraguchi ZB, Pandit B, et al. Learning about women’s empowerment in the context of development projects: do the figures tell us enough? Gend Dev. 2014;22(2):327–49. doi: 10.1080/13552074.2014.920986.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors et collaborateurs

Les conditions médicales

Interventions en matière de drogue

3
S'abonner