Stylet angulation of 70 degrees reduces the time to intubation with the GlideScope®: A prospective randomised trial
Yong-Cheol Lee, Jiwon Lee, Je-Do Son, Jae-Yoon Lee, Hyun-Chang Kim, Yong-Cheol Lee, Jiwon Lee, Je-Do Son, Jae-Yoon Lee, Hyun-Chang Kim
Abstract
Objective The GlideScope® videolaryngoscope provides a good view of the glottis. However, directing and inserting an endotracheal tube is sometimes difficult during intubation with the GlideScope®. In this study, we compared two GlideScope® stylet angulations (90° vs. 70°) in terms of the time to intubation. Methods In total, 162 patients scheduled for elective surgery under general anaesthesia were randomly assigned to one of two groups. In the 90 group ( n = 79), a 90° stylet was used. In the 70 group ( n = 78), a 70° stylet was used. The time to intubation was recorded. The number of intubation attempts was assessed. Results The time to intubation was significantly shorter in the 70 than 90 group [26.0 (23.0-32.0) vs. 37.0 (30.0-43.0) s, respectively]. The first-time intubation success rate was significantly higher and the number of failed intubations was significantly lower in the 70 than 90 group (100% vs. 87% and 0% vs. 6%, respectively). Conclusions This investigation suggests that a 70° angle stylet is superior to a 90° angle stylet for GlideScope® intubation. Trial Registration Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02547064.
Keywords: Laryngoscopic view; difficult airway algorithm; grading; laryngoscopy complications; stylet angulation; time to intubation.
Figures
References
- Nouruzi-Sedeh P Schumann M andGroeben H.. Laryngoscopy via Macintosh blade versus GlideScope: success rate and time for endotracheal intubation in untrained medical personnel. Anesthesiology 2009; 110: 32–37.
- Sun DA, Warriner CB, Parsons DG, et al. . The GlideScope Video Laryngoscope: randomized clinical trial in 200 patients. Br J Anaesth 2005; 94: 381–384.
- Jones PM, Turkstra TP, Armstrong KP, et al. . Effect of stylet angulation and endotracheal tube camber on time to intubation with the GlideScope. Can J Anaesth 2007; 54: 21–27.
- Bader SO Heitz JW andAudu PB.. Tracheal intubation with the GlideScope videolaryngoscope, using a “J” shaped endotracheal tube. Can J Anaesth 2006; 53: 634–635
- Dupanovic M, Isaacson SA, Borovcanin Z, et al. . Clinical comparison of two stylet angles for orotracheal intubation with the GlideScope video laryngoscope. J Clin Anesth 2010; 22: 352–359.
- Medical V. The GlideScope 4-step technique. Canadian product information 2010.
- Benumof JL andCooper SD.. Quantitative improvement in laryngoscopic view by optimal external laryngeal manipulation. J Clin Anesth 1996; 8: 136–140.
- Cormack RS andLehane J.. Difficult tracheal intubation in obstetrics. Anaesthesia 1984; 39: 1105–1011.
- Levitan RM Hollander JE andOchroch EA.. A grading system for direct laryngoscopy. Anaesthesia 1999; 54: 1009–1010.
- Aziz MF, Healy D, Kheterpal S, et al. . Routine clinical practice effectiveness of the Glidescope in difficult airway management: an analysis of 2,004 Glidescope intubations, complications, and failures from two institutions. Anesthesiology 2011; 114: 34–41.
- Mosier JM, Stolz U, Chiu S, et al. . Difficult airway management in the emergency department: GlideScope videolaryngoscopy compared to direct laryngoscopy. J Emerg Med 2012; 42: 629–634.
- Rai MR Dering A andVerghese C.. The Glidescope system: a clinical assessment of performance. Anaesthesia 2005; 60: 60–64.
- Martin LD, Mhyre JM, Shanks AM, et al. 3,423 emergency tracheal intubations at a university hospital: airway outcomes and complications. Anesthesiology 2011; 114: 42–48.
- Mort TC. Emergency tracheal intubation: complications associated with repeated laryngoscopic attempts. Anesth Analg 2004; 99: 607–613.
- Jones PM, Loh FL, Youssef HN, et al. . A randomized comparison of the GlideRite((R)) Rigid Stylet to a malleable stylet for orotracheal intubation by novices using the GlideScope((R)). Can J Anaesth 2011; 58: 256–261.
- Platts-Mills TF, Campagne D, Chinnock B, et al. . A comparison of GlideScope video laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy intubation in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med 2009; 16: 866–871.
- Hardman JG Wills JS andAitkenhead AR.. Factors determining the onset and course of hypoxemia during apnea: an investigation using physiological modelling. Anesth Analg 2000; 90: 619–624.
- Choi GS, Lee EH, Lim CS, et al. . A comparative study on the usefulness of the Glidescope or Macintosh laryngoscope when intubating normal airways. Korean J Anesthesiol 2011; 60: 339–343.
- Cooper RM. Complications associated with the use of the GlideScope videolaryngoscope. Can J Anaesth 2007; 54: 54–57.
- Lieberman D, Littleford J, Horan T, et al. . Placement of left double-lumen endobronchial tubes with or without a stylet. Can J Anaesth 1996; 43: 238–242.
Source: PubMed