Is a threshold-based model a superior method to the relative percent concept for establishing individual exercise intensity? a randomized controlled trial

Ali E Wolpern, Dara J Burgos, Jeffrey M Janot, Lance C Dalleck, Ali E Wolpern, Dara J Burgos, Jeffrey M Janot, Lance C Dalleck

Abstract

Background: Exercise intensity is arguably the most critical component of the exercise prescription model. It has been suggested that a threshold based model for establishing exercise intensity might better identify the lowest effective training stimulus for all individuals with varying fitness levels; however, experimental evidence is lacking. The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of two exercise training programs for improving cardiorespiratory fitness: threshold based model vs. relative percent concept (i.e., % heart rate reserve - HRR).

Methods: Apparently healthy, but sedentary men and women (n = 42) were randomized to a non-exercise control group or one of two exercise training groups. Exercise training was performed 30 min/day on 5 days/week for 12weeks according to one of two exercise intensity regimens: 1) a relative percent method was used in which intensity was prescribed according to percentages of heart rate reserve (HRR group), or 2) a threshold based method (ACE-3ZM) was used in which intensity was prescribed according to the first ventilatory threshold (VT1) and second ventilatory threshold (VT2).

Results: Thirty-six men and women completed the study. After 12weeks, VO2max increased significantly (p < 0.05 vs. controls) in both HRR (1.76 ± 1.93 mL/kg/min) and ACE-3ZM (3.93 ± 0.96 mL/kg/min) groups. Repeated measures ANOVA identified a significant interaction between exercise intensity method and change in VO2max values (F = 9.06, p < 0.05) indicating that VO2max responded differently to the method of exercise intensity prescription. In the HRR group 41.7 % (5/12) of individuals experienced a favorable change in relative VO2max (Δ > 5.9 %) and were categorized as responders. Alternatively, exercise training in the ACE-3ZM group elicited a positive improvement in relative VO2max (Δ > 5.9 %) in 100 % (12/12) of the individuals.

Conclusions: A threshold based exercise intensity prescription: 1). elicited significantly (p < 0.05) greater improvements in VO2max, and 2). attenuated the individual variation in VO2max training responses when compared to relative percent exercise training. These novel findings are encouraging and provide important preliminary data for the design of individualized exercise prescriptions that will enhance training efficacy and limit training unresponsiveness.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: ID NCT02351713 Registered 30 January 2015.

Keywords: Cardiorespiratory fitness; Cardiovascular Disease; Exercise prescription; Primary prevention; VO2max.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow chart of experimental procedures and exercise prescription for each of the two exercise training groups. HR, heart rate; HRR, heart rate reserve; VT1, first ventilatory threshold; VT2, second ventilatory threshold
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Individual variability in relative VO2max response (% change) to exercise training in the HRR (A) and ACE-3ZM (B) groups

References

    1. Blair SN, Kampert JB, Kohl HW, 3rd, Barlow CE, Macera CA, Paffenbarger RS, Jr, Gibbons LW. Influences of cardiorespiratory fitness and other precursors on cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality in men and women. JAMA. 1996;276:205–210. doi: 10.1001/jama.1996.03540030039029.
    1. Williams PT. Physical fitness and activity as separate heart disease risk factors: A meta-analysis. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001;33:754–761. doi: 10.1097/00005768-200105000-00012.
    1. Pescatello LS, editor. ACSM’s Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription. 9. Baltimore, MD: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2014.
    1. Garber CE, Blissmer B, Deschenes MR, Franklin BA, Lamonte MJ, Lee I, Nieman DC. Quantity and quality of exercise for developing and maintaining cardiorespiratory, musculoskeletal, and neuromotor fitness in apparently healthy adults: guidance for prescribing exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011;43:1334–1359. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e318213fefb.
    1. Katch V, Weltman A, Sady S, Freedson P. Validity of the relative percent concept for equating training intensity. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1978;39:219–227. doi: 10.1007/BF00421445.
    1. Scharhag-Rosenberger F, Walitzek S, Kindermann W, Meyer T. Differences in adaptations to 1 year of aerobic endurance training: individual patterns of nonresponse. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2012;22:113–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2010.01139.x.
    1. Weltman A, Weltman J, Rutt R, Seip R, Levine S, Snead D, Kaiser D, Rogol A. Percentages of maximal heart rate, heart rate reserve, and VO2max for determining endurance training intensity in sedentary women. Int J Sports Med. 1989;10:212–216. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1024903.
    1. Weltman A, Snead D, Seip R, Schurrer R, Weltman J, Rutt R, Rogol A. Percentages of maximal heart rate, heart rate reserve and VO2max for determining endurance training intensity in male runners. Int J Sports Med. 1990;11:218–222. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1024795.
    1. Meyer T, Gabriel HH, Kindermann W. Is determination of exercise intensities as percentages of VO2max or HRmax adequate? Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1999;31:1342–1345. doi: 10.1097/00005768-199909000-00017.
    1. Mann TN, Lamberts RP, Lambert MI. High responders and low responders: factors associated with individual variation in response to standardized training. Sports Med. 2014;44:1113–24. doi: 10.1007/s40279-014-0197-3.
    1. Bryant CX, Green DJ. ACE personal trainer manual. San Diego, CA: American Council on Exercise; 2010.
    1. Shephard MD, Mazzachi BC, Shephard AK. Comparative performance of two point-of-care analysers for lipid testing. Clin Lab. 2007;53:561–566.
    1. Dale RA, Jensen LH, Krantz MJ. Comparison of two point-of-care lipid analyzers for use in global cardiovascular risk assessments. Ann Pharmacother. 2008;42:633–639. doi: 10.1345/aph.1K688.
    1. Bachorik PS, Ross JW. National cholesterol education program recommendations for measurement of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol: Executive summary. The national cholesterol education program working group on lipoprotein measurement. Clin Chem. 1995;41:1414–1420.
    1. Wasserman K, McIlroy MB. Detecting the threshold of anaerobic metabolism in cardiac patients during exercise. Am J Cardiol. 1964;14:844–852. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(64)90012-8.
    1. Skinner JS, Jaskolski A, Jaskolska A, Krasnoff J, Gagnon J, Leon AS, et al. Age, sex, race, initial fitness, and response to training: the HERITAGE Family Study. J Appl Physiol. 2001;90:1770–1776.
    1. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.) New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers; 1988.
    1. Dalleck LC, Allen BA, Hanson BA, Borresen EC, Erickson ME, De Lap SL. Dose–response relationship between moderate-intensity exercise duration and coronary heart disease risk factors in postmenopausal women. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2009;18:105–13. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2008.0790.
    1. Katch VL, Sady SS, Freedson P. Biological variability in maximum aerobic power. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1982;14:21–25. doi: 10.1249/00005768-198201000-00004.
    1. Astorino TA, Schubert MM. Individual responses to completion of short-term and chronic interval training: a retrospective study. PLoS One. 2014;9:e97638. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0097638.
    1. Kohrt WM, Malley MT, Coggan AR, Spina RJ, Ogawa T, Ehsani AA, Bourey RE, Martin WH, 3rd, Holloszy JO. Effects of gender, age, and fitness level on response of VO2max to training in 60–71 year olds. J Appl Physiol (1985) 1991;71:2004–11.
    1. Skinner JS, Wilmore KM, Krasnoff JB, Jaskólski A, Jaskólska A, Gagnon J, Province MA, Leon AS, Rao DC, Wilmore JH, Bouchard C. Adaptation to a standardized training program and changes in fitness in a large, heterogeneous population: the HERITAGE Family Study. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000;32:157–61. doi: 10.1097/00005768-200001000-00023.
    1. Bouchard C, Rankinen T. Individual differences in response to regular physical activity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001;33(6 Suppl):S446–51. doi: 10.1097/00005768-200106001-00013.
    1. Bouchard C, An P, Rice T, Skinner JS, Wilmore JH, Gagnon J, Pérusse L, Leon AS, Rao DC. Familial aggregation of VO(2max) response to exercise training: results from the HERITAGE Family Study. J Appl Physiol (1985) 1999;87:1003–8.
    1. Sisson SB, Katzmarzyk PT, Earnest CP, Bouchard C, Blair SN, Church TS. Volume of exercise and fitness nonresponse in sedentary, postmenopausal women. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009;41:539–45. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181896c4e.
    1. Scharhag-Rosenberger F, Meyer T, Gässler N, Faude O, Kindermann W. Exercise at given percentages of VO2max: heterogeneous metabolic responses between individuals. J Sci Med Sport. 2010;13:74–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2008.12.626.
    1. Buford TW, Roberts MD, Church TS. Toward exercise as personalized medicine. Sports Med. 2013;43:157–165. doi: 10.1007/s40279-013-0018-0.
    1. Blair SN. Physical inactivity: the biggest public health problem of the 21st century. Br J Sports Med. 2009;43:1–2.
    1. Lobelo F, Pate R, Dowda M, Liese A, Daniels S. Cardiorespiratory fitness and clustered cardiovascular disease risk in U.S. adolescents. J Adolesc Health. 2010;47:352–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.04.012.
    1. Barlow CE, Defina LF, Radford NB, Berry JD, Cooper KH, Haskell WL, et al. Cardiorespiratory fitness and long-term survival in “low-risk” adults. J Am Heart Assoc. 2012;1:e001354. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.112.001354.
    1. Kraus WE, Torgan CE, Duscha BD, Norris J, Brown SA, Cobb FR, et al. Studies of a targeted risk reduction intervention through defined exercise (STRRIDE) Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001;33:1774–1784. doi: 10.1097/00005768-200110000-00025.
    1. Blair SN, Kohl HW, III, Paffenbarger RS, Clark DG, Cooper KH, Gibbons LW. Physical fitness and all-cause mortality: a prospective study of healthy men and women. JAMA. 1989;262:2395–2401. doi: 10.1001/jama.1989.03430170057028.
    1. Gulati M, Pandey DK, Arnsdorf MF, Lauderdale DS, Thisted RA, Wicklund RH, Al-Hani AJ, Black HR. Exercise capacity and the risk of death in women: the St James Women Take Heart Project. Circulation. 2003;108:1554–1559. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000091080.57509.E9.
    1. Franklin BA. Fitness: the ultimate marker for risk stratification and health outcomes? Prev Cardiol. 2007;10:42–6. doi: 10.1111/j.1520-037X.2007.05759.x.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors et collaborateurs

Les conditions médicales

Interventions en matière de drogue

3
S'abonner