A cross-sectional study for estimation of associations between education level and osteoporosis in a Chinese men sample

Cai-Xia Yu, Xiu-Zhen Zhang, Keqin Zhang, Zihui Tang, Cai-Xia Yu, Xiu-Zhen Zhang, Keqin Zhang, Zihui Tang

Abstract

Background: The main aim of this study was to evaluate the association between education level and osteoporosis (OP) in general Chinese Men.

Methods: We conducted a large-scale, community-based, cross-sectional study to investigate the association by using self-report questionnaire to assess education levels. The data of 1092 men were available for analysis in this study. Multiple regression models controlling for confounding factors to include education level were performed to explore the relationship between education level and OP.

Results: Positive correlations between education level and T-score of quantitative bone ultrasound (QUS-T score) were reported (β = 0.108, P value < 0.001). Multiple regression analysis indicated that the education level was independently and significantly associated with OP (P < 0.1 for all models). The men with lower education level had a higher prevalence of OP.

Conclusion: The education level was independently and significantly associated with OP. The prevalence of OP was more frequent in Chinese men with lower education level.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02451397 ; date of registration: 05/28/2015).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Comparison of T score among groups according to education level. a, The results of comparison of T-score among groups according to Model 1 (education level were categorized by group 1: primary school, group 2: junior high school, group 3: senior high school, and group 4: college). The mean T-score was −1.42, –1.30, -1.21 and −1.08 in the four groups, respectively. There were significantly differences among the four groups (P value = 0.002). b, The results of comparison of T-score among groups according to Model 2 (education level were categorized by group 1: low education level - primary school and junior high school, and group 2: high education level - senior high school and college). The mean T-score was −1.33 and −1.15 in the two groups, respectively. There were significantly differences between the two groups (P value =0.001). c, The results of comparison of T-score between groups according to Model 3 (education level were categorized by group 1: primary school, and group 2: high school and college). The mean T-score was −1.42 and −1.21 in the two groups, respectively. There were significantly differences between the two groups (P value =0.021)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Comparison of prevalence of osteoporosis among groups according to education level. a, The results of comparison of prevalence of osteoporosis among groups according to Model 1 (education level were categorized by group 1: primary school, group 2: junior high school, group 3: senior high school, and group 4: college). The prevalence of osteoporosis was 17.86, 7.92, 6.35 and 9.03 % in the four groups, respectively. There were significantly differences among the four groups (P value = 0.003). b, The results of comparison of prevalence of osteoporosis among groups according to Model 2 (education level were categorized by group 1: low education level - primary school and junior high school, and group 2: high education level - senior high school and college). The prevalence of osteoporosis was 10.25 % and 7.65 % in the two groups, respectively. There were significantly differences between the two groups (P value = 0.133). c, The results of comparison of prevalence of osteoporosis between groups according to Model 3 (education level were categorized by group 1: primary school, and group 2: high school and college). The prevalence of osteoporosis was 17.86 % and 7.76 % between the two groups, respectively. There were significantly differences between the two groups (P value = 0.001)

References

    1. Lane NE. Epidemiology, etiology, and diagnosis of osteoporosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;194:S3–S11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.08.047.
    1. Drozdzowska B, Pluskiewicz W, Skiba M. Knowledge about osteoporosis in a cohort of Polish females: the influence of age, level of education and personal experiences. Osteoporos Int. 2004;15:645–648. doi: 10.1007/s00198-003-1581-2.
    1. Goddard D, Kleerekoper M. The epidemiology of osteoporosis. Practical implications for patient care. Postgrad Med. 1998;104:54–56. doi: 10.3810/pgm.1998.10.441.
    1. Lips P. Epidemiology and predictors of fractures associated with osteoporosis. Am J Med. 1997;103:S3–S11. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9343(97)90021-8.
    1. Zhang Z, Ho S, Chen Z, Zhang C, Chen Y. Reference values of bone mineral density and prevalence of osteoporosis in Chinese adults. Osteoporos Int. 2014;25:497–507. doi: 10.1007/s00198-013-2418-2.
    1. Allali F, Rostom S, Bennani L, Abouqal R, Hajjaj-Hassouni N. Educational level and osteoporosis risk in postmenopausal Moroccan women: a classification tree analysis. Clin Rheumatol. 2010;29:1269–1275. doi: 10.1007/s10067-010-1535-y.
    1. Castro-Lionard K, Dargent-Molina P, Fermanian C, Gonthier R, Cassou B. Use of calcium supplements, vitamin D supplements and specific osteoporosis drugs among french women aged 75–85 years: patterns of use and associated factors. Drugs Aging. 2013;30:1029–38. doi: 10.1007/s40266-013-0121-9.
    1. Varenna M, Binelli L, Zucchi F, Ghiringhelli D, Gallazzi M, et al. Prevalence of osteoporosis by educational level in a cohort of postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int. 1999;9:236–241. doi: 10.1007/s001980050143.
    1. Okumus M, Ceceli E, Tasbas O, Kocaoglu S, Akdogan S, et al. Educational status and knowledge level of pre-and postmenopausal women about osteoporosis and risk factors: A cross-sectional study in a group of Turkish female subjects. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2013;26:337–343.
    1. Puttapitakpong P, Chaikittisilpa S, Panyakhamlerd K, Nimnuan C, Jaisamrarn U, et al. Inter-correlation of knowledge, attitude, and osteoporosis preventive behaviors in women around the age of peak bone mass. BMC Womens Health. 2014;14:35. doi: 10.1186/1472-6874-14-35.
    1. Ho SC, Y-m C, Woo JL. Educational level and osteoporosis risk in postmenopausal Chinese women. Am J Epidemiol. 2005;161:680–690. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwi047.
    1. Etemadifar MR, Nourian S-M, Fereidan-Esfahani M, Shemshaki H, Nourbakhsh M. Relationship of knowledge about osteoporosis with education level and life habits. World Journal of Orthopedics. 2013;4:139. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v4.i3.139.
    1. Magnus J, Joakimsen R, Berntsen G, Tollan A, Søgaard A. What do Norwegian women and men know about osteoporosis? Osteoporos Int. 1996;6:31–36. doi: 10.1007/BF01626535.
    1. Kim J, Lee J, Shin J-Y, Park B-J. Socioeconomic disparities in osteoporosis prevalence: different results in the overall Korean adult population and single-person households. J Prev Med Public Health. 2015;48:84. doi: 10.3961/jpmph.14.047.
    1. Hamid S, Al-Ghufli FR, Raeesi HA, Al-Dhufairi KM, Al-Dhaheri NS, et al. Women’s knowledge, attitude and practice towards menopause and hormone replacement therapy: a facility based study in Alain, United Arab Emirates. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2014;26:448–454.

Source: PubMed

3
S'abonner