Mono(2-ethyl-5-hydroxyhexyl) phthalate and mono-(2-ethyl-5-oxohexyl) phthalate as biomarkers for human exposure assessment to di-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate

Kayoko Kato, Manori J Silva, John A Reidy, Donald Hurtz 3rd, Nicole A Malek, Larry L Needham, Hiroyuki Nakazawa, Dana B Barr, Antonia M Calafat, Kayoko Kato, Manori J Silva, John A Reidy, Donald Hurtz 3rd, Nicole A Malek, Larry L Needham, Hiroyuki Nakazawa, Dana B Barr, Antonia M Calafat

Abstract

Exposure to di-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) is prevalent based on the measurement of its hydrolytic metabolite mono-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (MEHP) in the urine of 78% of the general U.S. population studied in the 1999-2000 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). However, despite the high level of production and use of DEHP, the urinary MEHP levels in the NHANES samples were lower than the monoester metabolites of phthalates less commonly used than DEHP, suggesting metabolic differences between phthalates. We measured MEHP and two oxidative DEHP metabolites, mono-(2-ethyl-5-oxohexyl) phthalate (MEOHP) and mono (2-ethyl-5-hydroxyhexyl) phthalate (MEHHP) to verify whether these other metabolites account for a greater proportion of DEHP metabolic products in 127 paired human urine and serum samples. We found that the urinary levels of MEHHP and MEOHP were 10-fold higher than levels of MEHP; concentrations of urinary MEOHP and MEHHP were strongly correlated (r = 0.928). We also found that the serum levels of MEOHP and MEHHP were comparatively lower than those in urine. Furthermore, the glucuronide-bound conjugates of the oxidative metabolites were the predominant form in both urine and serum. MEOHP and MEHHP cannot be formed by serum enzymes from the hydrolysis of any contamination from DEHP potentially introduced during blood collection and storage. Therefore, concentrations of MEHHP and MEOHP in serum may be a more selective measure of DEHP exposure than is MEHP. However, additional data on the absorption, distribution, metabolism, and elimination of these oxidative metabolites are needed to completely understand the extent of DEHP exposure from the serum concentrations of oxidative DEHP metabolites.

References

    1. Environ Health Perspect. 1982 Nov;45:129-33
    1. Food Cosmet Toxicol. 1980 Aug;18(4):383-6
    1. Environ Health Perspect. 1986 Dec;70:195-210
    1. Food Addit Contam. 1994 May-Jun;11(3):375-85
    1. Int J Pharm. 1999 Mar 25;180(1):113-21
    1. Toxicol Ind Health. 1999 Jan-Mar;15(1-2):94-118
    1. Toxicol Ind Health. 1999 Jan-Mar;15(1-2):168-79
    1. Anal Chem. 2000 Sep 1;72(17):4127-34
    1. Environ Health Perspect. 2000 Oct;108(10):979-82
    1. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 2002 Mar;68(3):309-14
    1. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2002 Oct 5;778(1-2):99-111
    1. Reprod Toxicol. 2002 Sep-Oct;16(5):529-653
    1. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2003 Jun 15;789(2):393-404
    1. Environ Health Perspect. 2003 Jul;111(9):1148-51
    1. J Anal Toxicol. 2003 Jul-Aug;27(5):284-9
    1. Arch Toxicol. 2003 Oct;77(10):561-7
    1. J Chromatogr. 1973 Feb 28;76(2):321-30
    1. J Chromatogr. 1974 Jul 17;94(0):209-18
    1. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 1974 Apr;11(4):371-8
    1. JAMA. 1975 Dec 1;234(9):948-9
    1. Clin Chem. 1978 Mar;24(3):429-32
    1. Transfusion. 1979 Mar-Apr;19(2):137-46
    1. Anal Chem. 1984 Feb;56(2):247-50

Source: PubMed

3
S'abonner