Innovative gait robot for the repetitive practice of floor walking and stair climbing up and down in stroke patients

Stefan Hesse, Andreas Waldner, Christopher Tomelleri, Stefan Hesse, Andreas Waldner, Christopher Tomelleri

Abstract

Background: Stair climbing up and down is an essential part of everyday's mobility. To enable wheelchair-dependent patients the repetitive practice of this task, a novel gait robot, G-EO-Systems (EO, Lat: I walk), based on the end-effector principle, has been designed. The trajectories of the foot plates are freely programmable enabling not only the practice of simulated floor walking but also stair climbing up and down. The article intended to compare lower limb muscle activation patterns of hemiparetic subjects during real floor walking and stairs climbing up, and during the corresponding simulated conditions on the machine, and secondly to demonstrate gait improvement on single case after training on the machine.

Methods: The muscle activation pattern of seven lower limb muscles of six hemiparetic patients during free and simulated walking on the floor and stair climbing was measured via dynamic electromyography. A non-ambulatory, sub-acute stroke patient additionally trained on the G-EO-Systems every workday for five weeks.

Results: The muscle activation patterns were comparable during the real and simulated conditions, both on the floor and during stair climbing up. Minor differences, concerning the real and simulated floor walking conditions, were a delayed (prolonged) onset (duration) of the thigh muscle activation on the machine across all subjects. Concerning stair climbing conditions, the shank muscle activation was more phasic and timely correct in selected patients on the device. The severely affected subject regained walking and stair climbing ability.

Conclusions: The G-EO-Systems is an interesting new option in gait rehabilitation after stroke. The lower limb muscle activation patterns were comparable, a training thus feasible, and the positive case report warrants further clinical studies.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Wheelchair-bound left hemiparetic patient practising stair climbing. On the gait robot, the therapist assists the extension of the affected knee (left), the same patient practising stair climbing with the help of two therapists (right).
Figure 2
Figure 2
The G-EO-Systems Robot. A three-dimensional view of the new gait robot with freely programmable foot plates, the patient lifter, body weight support system, handrails and the ramp.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Three-dimensional sketch of the motion mechanism of the gait robot. The components are numbered as follows: 1. principal drive, 2. relative drive, 3. drive for the foot angle, 4. principal sledge, 5. relative sledge, 6. linear guide, 7. screw axle.
Figure 4
Figure 4
EMG of the thigh muscles of the affected side in a hemiparetic subject. The left column shows the activation pattern of the muscle during the real condition, the right column refers to the simulated condition. Note a delayed onset and prolonged activity of the thigh muscles on the machine. The blue lines show the EMG activation pattern of the thigh muscles, the green lines represent the standard deviation of the EMG envelope.
Figure 5
Figure 5
EMG of the shank muscles of the affected side in a hemiparetic subject. The left column shows the activation pattern of the muscle during the real condition, the right column refers to the simulated condition. Note the timely correct activation of the Mm. tibialis anterior and the more phasic pattern of the Mm. gastrocnemius on the machine. The blue lines show the EMG activation pattern of the shank muscles, the green lines represent the standard deviation of the EMG envelope.

References

    1. Kolominsky-Rabas PL, Heuschmann PU. Incidence, etiology and long-term prognosis of stroke. Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr. 2002;70:657–62. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-35857.
    1. Jorgensen HS, Nakayama H, Raaschou HO, Olsen TS. Recovery of walking function in stroke patients: the Copenhagen stroke study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1995;76:27–32. doi: 10.1016/S0003-9993(95)80038-7.
    1. Carr J, Shepherd R. Stroke Rehabilitation: Guidelines for exercises and training. London: Butterworth Heinemann; 2003.
    1. Barbeau H, Visintin M. Optimal outcomes obtained with body-weight support combined with treadmill training in stroke subjects. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;84(10):1458–65. doi: 10.1016/S0003-9993(03)00361-7.
    1. Dobkin BH, Apple D, Barbeau H, Basso M, Behrman A, Deforge D, Ditunno J, Dudley G, Elashoff R, Fugate L, Harkema S, Saulino M, Scott M. Methods for a randomized trial of weight-supported treadmill training versus conventional training for walking during inpatient rehabilitation after incomplete traumatic spinal cord injury. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2003;17(3):153–67. doi: 10.1177/0888439003255508.
    1. Colombo G, Joerg M, Schreier R, Dietz V. Treadmill training of paraplegic patients using a robotic orthosis. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2000;37(6):693–700.
    1. Veneman JF, Kruidhof R, Hekman EE, Ekkelenkamp R, Van Asseldonk EH, van der Kooij H. Design and evaluation of the LOPES exoskeleton robot for interactive gait rehabilitation. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2007;15(3):379–86. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2007.903919.
    1. Mankala K, Banala S, Agrawal S. Novel swing-assist un-motorized exoskeletons for gait training. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2009;6:24. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-6-24.
    1. Mantone J. Getting a leg up? Rehab patients get an assist from devices such as HealthSouth's AutoAmbulator, but the robots' clinical benefits are still in doubt. Mod Healthc. 2006;36(7):58–60.
    1. Hesse S, Uhlenbrock D. A mechanized gait trainer for restoration of gait. J Rehab Res Dev. 2000;37(6):701–8.
    1. Schmidt H, Werner C, Bernhardt R, Hesse S, Krüger J. Gait rehabilitation machines based on programmable footplates. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2007;4:2. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-4-2.
    1. Freivogel S, Mehrholz J, Husak-Sotomayor T, Schmalohr D. Gait training with the newly developed 'LokoHelp'-system is feasible for non-ambulatory patients after stroke, spinal cord and brain injury. A feasibility study. Brain Inj. 2008;22(7-8):625–32. doi: 10.1080/02699050801941771.
    1. Husemann B, Müller F, Krewer C, Heller S, Koenig E. Effects of locomotion training with assistance of a robot-driven gait orthosis in hemiparetic patients after stroke. A randomized controlled pilot study. Stroke. 2007;38(2):349–54. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000254607.48765.cb.
    1. Pohl M, Werner C, Holzgraefe M, Kroczek G, Mehrholz J, Wingendorf I, Hoölig G, Koch R, Hesse S. Repetitive locomotor training and physiotherapy improve walking and basic activities of daily living in subacute, nonambulatory stroke patients: a single-blind, randomised multi-centre trial (DEutsche GAngtrainerStudie, DEGAS) Clinical Rehabilitation. 2007;21(1):17–27. doi: 10.1177/0269215506071281.
    1. Regnaux JP, Saremi K, Marehbian J, Bussel B, Dobkin BH. An accelerometry-based comparison of 2 robotic assistive devices for treadmill training of gait. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008;22(4):348–54.
    1. Paolucci S, Braagoni M, Coiro P, De Angelis D, Fusco FR, Morelli D, Venturiero V, Pratesi L. Quantification of the probability of reaching mobility indipendend at discharge from the rehabilitation hospital in non walking early ischemic stroke patient: a multivariate study. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2008;26(1):16–22. doi: 10.1159/000135648.
    1. Schmidt H, Sorowka D, Hesse S, Bernhardt R. Development of a robotic walking simulator for gait rehabilitation. Biomed Tech (Berl) 2003;48(10):281–6. doi: 10.1515/bmte.2003.48.10.281.
    1. Behrman AL, Harkema SJ. Locomotor training after human spinal cord injury: A series of case studies. Physical Therapy. 2000;80(7):688–700.
    1. Winter DA. Foot trajectory in human gait: a precise and multifactorial motor control task. Phys Ther. 1992;72(1):45–53.
    1. Winter DA. Biomechanics and control of human movement. Second. Wiley Inter Science; 1990. pp. 212–32.
    1. Hogan N. The organizing principle for a class of voluntary movements. Journal of Neuroscience. 1984;11(4):2745–54.
    1. Zachazewski JE, Riley PO, Krebs DE. Biomechanical analysis of body mass transfer during stair ascent and descent of healthy subjects. J Rehabil Res Dev. 1993;30(4):412–22.
    1. McFadyen BJ, Winter DA. An integrated biomechanical analysis of normal stair ascent and descent. J Biomech. 1988;21(9):733–44. doi: 10.1016/0021-9290(88)90282-5.
    1. Hidler JM, Wall AE. Alterations in muscle activation patterns during robotic-assisted walking. Clin Biomech. 2005;20:184–93. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2004.09.016.
    1. Giakas G, Baltzopoulos V. A comparison of automatic filtering techniques applied to biomechanical walking data. J Biomech. 1997;30:847–50. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9290(97)00042-0.
    1. Simons W, Yang K. Differentiation of human motion data using combined spline and least squares concept. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering. 1991;113:348–51. doi: 10.1115/1.2894894.
    1. van Asseldonk EH, Veneman JF, Ekkelenkamp R, Buurke JH, van der Helm FC, van der Kooij H. The Effects on Kinematics and Muscle Activity of Walking in a Robotic Gait Trainer During Zero-Force Control. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2008;16(4):360–70. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2008.925074.
    1. Den Otter AG, Guerts AC, Mulder T, Duysens J. Abnormalities in the temporal patterning of lower extremity muscle activity in hemiparetic gait. Gait Posture. 2007;25(3):342–52. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2006.04.007.
    1. Knuttson E, Richards C. Different types of disturbed motor control in gait of hemiparetic patients. Brain. 1979;102:405–30. doi: 10.1093/brain/102.2.405.
    1. Hussein S, Schmidt H, Volkmar M, Werner C, Helmich I, Piorko F, Krüger J, Hesse S. Muscle coordination in healthy subjects during floor walking and stair climbing in robot assisted gait training. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2008. pp. 1961–4.

Source: PubMed

Sponsors et collaborateurs

Les conditions médicales

Interventions en matière de drogue

3
S'abonner