Perceptions on use of home telemonitoring in patients with long term conditions - concordance with the Health Information Technology Acceptance Model: a qualitative collective case study

Jo B Middlemass, Jolien Vos, A Niroshan Siriwardena, Jo B Middlemass, Jolien Vos, A Niroshan Siriwardena

Abstract

Background: Health information technology (HIT) may be used to improve care for increasing numbers of older people with long term conditions (LTCs) who make high demands on health and social care services. Despite its potential benefits for reducing disease exacerbations and hospitalisations, HIT home monitoring is not always accepted by patients. Using the Health Information Technology Acceptance Model (HITAM) this qualitative study examined the usefulness of the model for understanding acceptance of HIT in older people (≥60 years) participating in a RCT for older people with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and associated heart diseases (CHROMED).

Methods: An instrumental, collective case study design was used with qualitative interviews of patients in the intervention arm of CHROMED. These were conducted at two time points, one shortly after installation of equipment and again at the end of (or withdrawal from) the study. We used Framework Analysis to examine how well the HITAM accounted for the data.

Results: Participants included 21 patients aged between 60-99 years and their partners or relatives where applicable. Additional concepts for the HITAM for older people included: concerns regarding health professional access and attachment; heightened illness anxiety and desire to avoid continuation of the 'sick-role'. In the technology zone, HIT self-efficacy was associated with good organisational processes and informal support; while ease of use was connected to equipment design being suitable for older people. HIT perceived usefulness was related to establishing trends in health status, detecting early signs of infection and potential to self-manage. Due to limited feedback to users opportunities to self-manage were reduced.

Conclusions: HITAM helped understand the likelihood that older people with LTCs would use HIT, but did not explain how this might result in improved self-management. In order to increase HIT acceptance among older people, equipment design and organisational factors need to be considered.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01960907 October 9 2013 (retrospectively registered) Clinical tRials fOr elderly patients with MultiplE Disease (CHROMED). Start date October 2012, end date March 2016. Date of enrolment of the first participant was February 2013.

Keywords: Heath information technology acceptance model; Long term conditions; Older people.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
HITAM (after Kim and Park, 2012)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
HIT equipment used in the CHROMED Study
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
HITAM as applied to older people with LTCs

References

    1. Kitsiou S, Paré G, Jaana M. Effects of Home Telemonitoring Interventions on Patients With Chronic Heart Failure: An Overview of Systematic Reviews. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17:e63. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4174.
    1. Steventon A, Bardsley M, Billings J, Dixon J, Doll H, Hirani S, et al. Effect of telehealth on use of secondary care and mortality: findings from the Whole System Demonstrator cluster randomised trial. BMJ. 2012;344:e3874.
    1. Inglis SC, Clark RA, McAlister FA, Ball J, Lewinter C, Cullington D, et al. Structured telephone support or telemonitoring programmes for patients with chronic heart failure. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;8:CD007228.
    1. Polisena J, Tran K, Cimon K, Hutton B, McGill S, Palmer K, et al. Home telemonitoring for congestive heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Telemed Telecare. 2010;16(2):68–76. doi: 10.1258/jtt.2009.090406.
    1. Calvo GS, Hernández AS, Padilla DL, Ignacio de Granda-Orive J. Clinical Outcomes of Home Telemonitoring in Severe COPD Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. iMedPub Journals. 2016;1(2:10):e1–e7.
    1. Cruz J, Brooks D, Marques A. Home telemonitoring effectiveness in COPD: a systematic review. Int J Clin Pract. 2014;68(3):369–78. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.12345.
    1. Chatwin M, Hawkins G, Panicchia L, Woods A, Hanak A, Lucas R, et al. Randomised crossover trial of telemonitoring in chronic respiratory patients (TeleCRAFT trial) Thorax. 2016;00:1–7.
    1. Cartwright M, Hirani SP, Rixon L, Beynon M, Doll H, Bower P, et al. Effect of telehealth on quality of life and psychological outcomes over 12 months (Whole Systems Demonstrator telehealth questionnaire study): nested study of patient reported outcomes in a pragmatic, cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2013;346.
    1. Hardisty AR, Peirce S, Preece A, Bolton CE, Conley EC, Gray WA, et al. Bridging two translation gaps: A new informatics research agenda for telemonitoring of chronic disease. Int J Med Inform. 2011;80:734–44. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2011.07.002.
    1. Kaufman DR, Patel VL, Hilliman C, Morin PC, Pevzner J, Weinstock RS, et al. Usability in the real world: assessing medical information technologies in patients’ homes. J Biomed Inform. 2003;36:45–60. doi: 10.1016/S1532-0464(03)00056-X.
    1. Sanders C, Rogers A, Bowen R, Bower P, Hirani S, Cartwright M, et al. Exploring barriers to participation and adoption of telehealth and telecare within the Whole System Demonstrator trial: a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12:220–31. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-220.
    1. Annandale J, Lewis KE. Can telehealth help patients with COPD? Nurs Times. 2011;107(15–6):12–14.
    1. Jaana M, Paré G, Sicotte C. Home Telemonitoring for Respiratory Conditions: A Systematic Review. Am J Manag Care. 2009;15:313–20.
    1. Botsis T, Hartvigsen G. Current status and future perspectives in telecare for elderly people suffering from chronic diseases. J Telemed Telecare. 2008;14:195–203. doi: 10.1258/jtt.2008.070905.
    1. Mair FS, Goldstein P, Shiels C, Roberts C, Angus R, O’Connor J, et al. Recruitment difficulties in a home telecare trial. J Telemed Telecare. 2006;12(Suppl 1):S26–S8. doi: 10.1258/135763306777978371.
    1. Davis FD. A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: theory and result: Massachusetts Insitute of Technology. 1986.
    1. Ajzen I, Fishbein M. Attitudinal and normative variables as predictors of specific behavior. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1973;27:41–57. doi: 10.1037/h0034440.
    1. Fishbein M, Ajzen I. Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, Mass. Don Mills, Ontario: Addison-Wesley Pub. Co.; 1975.
    1. Kim J, Park H. Development of a Health Information Technology Acceptance Model Using Consumers’ Health Behavior Intention. J Med Internet Res. 2012;14:e133. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2143.
    1. Rosenstock IM. Historical origins of the Health Belief Model. In MH Becker (Ed)The Health Belief Model and Personal Health Behaviour; 2:328–335 Thorofare, NJ: Charles B.Slack; 1974.
    1. Ajzen I, Driver BL. Prediction of leisure participation from behavioral, normative, and control beliefs: An application of the theory of planned behavior. Leis Sci. 1991;13:185–204. doi: 10.1080/01490409109513137.
    1. Baxter P, Jack S. Qualitative Case Study Methodology: Study Design and Implementation for Novice Researchers. Qual Rep. 2008;13:544–59.
    1. Pompilio P, Zanaboni P, Bergmo T, Grzetic-Romcevic T, Isetta V, Janson C, et al. Randomised controlled trial of telemonitoring with addition of daily forced oscillation in older people with COPD and co-morbidity. Eur Respir J. 2016;48:OA3519.
    1. Ritchie J, Lewis J, editors. Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers. London: Sage; 2003.
    1. Golafshani N. Understanding reliability and validity in qualitative research. The Qualitative Report. 2003;8:597–607.
    1. OECD . Health at a Glance 2011: OECD Indicators, OECD Publishing, Paris. 201127. Glanz K, Rimer BK, Lewis FM. Health Behavior and Health Education. Theory, Research and Practice. San Francisco: Wiley & Sons; 2002.
    1. Glanz K, Rimer BK, Lewis FM. Health Behavior and Health Education. Theory, Research and Practice. San Francisco: Wiley & Sons; 2002.
    1. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev. 1977;84:191–215. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191.
    1. Davis FD. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 1989;13:319–40. doi: 10.2307/249008.
    1. Ajzen I. Perceived Behavioral Control, Self-Efficacy, Locus of Control, and the Theory of Planned Behavior. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2002;32:665–83. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb00236.x.
    1. Hynninen KM, Breitve MH, Wiborg AB, Pallesen S, Nordhus IH. Psychological characteristics of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A review. J Psychosom Res. 2005;59:429–43. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2005.04.007.
    1. Dekker RL, Peden AR, Lennie TA, Schooler MP, Moser DK. Living with depressive symptoms: patients with heart failure. Am J Crit Care. 2009;18:310–8. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2009672.
    1. Delville CL, McDougall G. A Systematic Review of Depression in Adults with Heart Failure: Instruments and Incidence. Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2008;29:1002–17. doi: 10.1080/01612840802274867.
    1. Vuorinen AL, Leppänen J, Kaijanranta H, Kulju M, Heliö T, van Gils M, et al. Use of Home Telemonitoring to Support Multidisciplinary Care of Heart Failure Patients in Finland: Randomized Controlled Trial. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16:e282. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3651.
    1. Palmer J. Homecare Nurses’ Experiences with Home Telemonitoring Systems Honors Projects Overview. 2016.
    1. Harvey J, Dopson S, McManus RJ, Powell J. Factors influencing the adoption of self-management solutions: an interpretive synthesis of the literature on stakeholder experiences. Implement Sci. 2015;10:159. doi: 10.1186/s13012-015-0350-x.
    1. Bowlby J. Attachment, communication, and the therapeutic process.A secure base: Parent–child attachment and healthy human development. New York: Basic Books; 1988. pp. 137–157.
    1. Salmon P, Young B. Dependence and caring in clinical communication: The relevance of attachment and other theories. Patient Educ Couns. 2009;74(3):331–8. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.12.011.
    1. Frederiksen HB, Kragstrup J, Dehlholm-Lambertsen B. Attachment in the doctor–patient relationship in general practice: A qualitative study. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2010;28(3):185–90. doi: 10.3109/02813432.2010.505447.
    1. Wagner N, Hassanein K, Head MC. Computer use by older adults: A multidisciplinary review. Comput Hum Behav. 2010;26:870–82. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.029.
    1. Czaja SJ. Can technology empower older adults to manage their health? Generations. 2015;39:46–51.
    1. Newman SP, Bardsley M, Barlow J, Beecham J, Beynon M, Billings J, et al. WSD Executive Summary. 2013.
    1. Wright P, McCarthy J. Experience-Centered Design: Designers, Users, and Communities in Dialogue Synthesis Lectures on Human-Centered Informatics 2010;3:1–123.
    1. Wherton J, Sugarhood P, Procter R, Hinder S, Greenhalgh T. Co-production in practice: how people with assisted living needs can help design and evolve technologies and services. Implement Sci. 2015;10:75. doi: 10.1186/s13012-015-0271-8.
    1. Elwyn G, Hardisty AR, Peirce SC, May C, Evans R, Robinson DKR, et al. Detecting deterioration in patients with chronic disease using telemonitoring: navigating the ‘trough of disillusionment’. J Eval Clin Pract. 2012;18:896–903. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2011.01701.x.
    1. Bardsley M, Steventon A, Doll H. Impact of telehealth on general practice contacts: findings from the whole systems demonstrator cluster randomised trial. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13:395. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-395.
    1. Chaudhry SI, Mattera JA, Curtis JP, Spertus JA, Herrin J, Lin Z, et al. Telemonitoring in Patients with Heart Failure. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(24):2301–9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1010029.
    1. Henderson C, Knapp M, Fernández J-L, Beecham J, Hirani SP, Cartwright M et al. Cost effectiveness of telehealth for patients with long term conditions (Whole Systems Demonstrator telehealth questionnaire study): nested economic evaluation in a pragmatic, cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2013;346:f1035.
    1. Koehler F, Winkler S, Schieber M, Sechtem U, Stangl K, Böhm M, et al. Impact of Remote Telemedical Management on Mortality and Hospitalizations in Ambulatory Patients With Chronic Heart Failure: the Telemedical Interventional Monitoring in Heart Failure Study. Circulation. 2011;123:1873–80. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.018473.
    1. Pinnock H, Hanley J, McCloughan L, Todd A, Krishan A, Lewis S, et al. Effectiveness of telemonitoring integrated into existing clinical services on hospital admission for exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: researcher blind, multicentre, randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2013;347:f6070. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f6070.

Source: PubMed

3
S'abonner