Protocol for a prospective, multicentre registry study of stenting for symptomatic intracranial artery stenosis in China

Yilong Wang, Zhongrong Miao, Yongjun Wang, Xingquan Zhao, Peiyi Gao, Liping Liu, Feng Wang, Yajie Liu, Ning Ma, Ziqi Xu, Dapeng Mo, Feng Gao, China registry study group, Yilong Wang, Zhongrong Miao, Yongjun Wang, Xingquan Zhao, Peiyi Gao, Liping Liu, Feng Wang, Yajie Liu, Ning Ma, Ziqi Xu, Dapeng Mo, Feng Gao, China registry study group

Abstract

Introduction: The SAMMPRIS trial suggested that aggressive treatment was superior to endovascular stenting in patients with severe symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS) due to high complication rates in patients in the stenting group. Given that 12.2% patients failed aggressive medical therapy in the SAMMPRIS study, it is imperative to perform a multicentre prospective registry study of stenting for patients with ICAS in China. This study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of endovascular stenting for patients with symptomatic intracranial artery stenosis and poor collaterals in China and to identify the characteristics of the population that would benefit the most from endovascular stenting in Chinese patients.

Methods and analysis: This multicentre prospective registry study will involve 20 stroke centres in China, and plans to recruit 300 patients into the registry. Patients with ≥70% stenosis and symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic disease caused by hypoperfusion combined with poor collaterals who met the inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria would be enrolled for this study. The primary outcome is the target vessel stroke event (including haemorrhagic or ischaemic stroke) or death within 30 days after stenting. The secondary outcomes include the successful recanalisation rate, the incidence of recurrent ischaemic stroke in the territory of the stented artery between 30 days and 1 year postoperatively, the restenosis rate and health-related quality of life.

Ethics and dissemination: The protocol is approved by the ethics committee at the coordinating centre and by the local institutional review board at each participating centre. Findings will be shared with participating hospitals, policymakers and the academic community to promote quality monitoring, quality improvement and the efficient allocation and use of cerebral catheterisation and intracranial artery stenting in China.

Trial registration number: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01968122).

Keywords: Stroke medicine

Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.

References

    1. Redon J, Olsen MH, Cooper RS, et al. Stroke mortality and trends from 1990 to 2006 in 39 countries from Europe and Central Asia: implications for control of high blood pressure. Eur Heart J 2011;32:1424–31
    1. Wong KS, Li H, Lam WW, et al. Progression of middle cerebral artery occlusive disease and its relationship with further vascular events after stroke. Stroke 2002;33:532–6
    1. Kasner SE, Chimowitz MI, Lynn MJ, et al. ; Warfarin Aspirin Symptomatic Intracranial Disease Trial Investigators. Predictors of ischemic stroke in the territory of a symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis. Circulation 2006;113:555–63
    1. Famakin BM, Chimowitz MI, Lynn MJ, et al. Causes and severity of ischemic stroke in patients with symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis. Stroke 2009;40:1999–2003
    1. Fiorella D. Endovascular treatment of intracranial stenosis. World Neurosurg 2011;76(Suppl 6):S66–70
    1. Bose A, Hartmann M, Henkes H, et al. A novel, self-expanding, nitinol stent in medically refractory intracranial atherosclerotic stenoses: the Wingspan study. Stroke 2007;38:1531–7
    1. Zaidat OO, Klucznik R, Alexander MJ, et al. NIH Multi-center Wingspan Intracranial Stent Registry Study Group. The NIH registry on use of the Wingspan stent for symptomatic 70–99% intracranial arterial stenosis. Neurology 2008;70:1518–24
    1. Fiorella DJ, Turk AS, Levy EI, et al. U.S. Wingspan Registry: 12-month follow-up results. Stroke 2011;42:1976–81
    1. Chimowitz MI, Lynn MJ, Derdeyn CP, et al. ; SAMMPRIS Trial Investigators. Stenting versus aggressive medical therapy for intracranial arterial stenosis. N Engl J Med 2011;365:993–1003
    1. Chimowitz MI. The Feinberg award lecture 2013: treatment of intracranial atherosclerosis: learning from the past and planning for the future. Stroke 2013;44:2664–9
    1. Abou-Chebl A, Steinmetz H. Critique of “Stenting versus aggressive medical therapy for intracranial arterial stenosis” by Chimowitz et al in the new England Journal of Medicine. Stroke 2012;43:616–20
    1. Ringer AJ, Khalessi AA, Mocco J, et al. ; Endovascular Neurosurgery Research Group (ENRG). Intervention for intracranial atherosclerosis after SAMMPRIS. World Neurosurg 2012;78:409–12
    1. Abou-Chebl A. Intracranial stenting with Wingspan: still awaiting a safe landing. Stroke 2011;42:1809–11
    1. Derdeyn CP, Fiorella D, Lynn MJ, et al. ; SAMMPRIS Trial Investigators. Impact of operator and site experience on outcomes after angioplasty and stenting in the SAMMPRIS trial. J Neurointerv Surg 2013;5:528–33
    1. Wu Z, Yao C, Zhao D, et al. Sino-MONICA project: a collaborative study on trends and determinants in cardiovascular diseases in China, Part I: morbidity and mortality monitoring. Circulation 2001;103:462–8
    1. Wang Y, Liao X, Zhao X, et al. ; China National Stroke Registry Investigators. Using recombinant tissue plasminogen activator to treat acute ischemic stroke in China: analysis of the results from the Chinese National Stroke Registry (CNSR). Stroke 2011;42:1658–64
    1. Wityk RJ, Lehman D, Klag M, et al. Race and sex differences in the distribution of cerebral atherosclerosis. Stroke 1996;27:1974–80
    1. Jiang WJ, Yu W, Du B, et al. Outcome of patients with ≥70% symptomatic intracranial stenosis after Wingspan stenting. Stroke 2011;42:1971–5
    1. Miao ZR, Feng L, Li S, et al. Treatment of symptomatic middle cerebral artery stenosis with balloon-mounted stents: long-term follow-up at a single center. Neurosurgery 2009; 64:79–84

Source: PubMed

3
S'abonner