Boosting of Cross-Reactive and Protection-Associated T Cells in Children After Live Attenuated Influenza Vaccination

Kristin G I Mohn, Fan Zhou, Karl A Brokstad, Saranya Sridhar, Rebecca J Cox, Kristin G I Mohn, Fan Zhou, Karl A Brokstad, Saranya Sridhar, Rebecca J Cox

Abstract

Background: Live attenuated influenza vaccines (LAIVs) stimulate a multifaceted immune response including cellular immunity, which may provide protection against newly emerging strains. This study shows proof of concept that LAIVs boost preexisting, cross-reactive T cells in children to genetically diverse influenza A virus (IAV) strains to which the children had not been exposed.

Methods: We studied the long-term cross-reactive T-cell response in 14 trivalent LAIV-vaccinated children using the fluorescent immunospot assay (FluoroSpot) with heterologous H1N1 and H3N2 IAVs and CD8+ peptides from the internal proteins (matrix protein 1 [M1], nucleoprotein [NP], polymerase basic protein 1 [PB1]). Serum antibody responses were determined by means of hemagglutination inhibition assay. Blood samples were collected before vaccination and up to 1 year after vaccination.

Results: Preexisting cross-reactive T cells to genetically diverse IAV strains were found in the majority of the children, which were further boosted in 50% of them after receipt of LAIV. Further analyses of these T cells showed significant increases in CD8+ T cells, mainly dominated by NP-specific responses. After vaccination with LAIV, the youngest children showed the highest increase in T-cell responses.

Conclusion: LAIV boosts durable, cross-reactive T-cell responses in children and may have a clinically protective effect at the population level. LAIV may be a first step toward the desired universal influenza vaccine.

Keywords: Influenza; LAIV; T-cell; cellular immune response; children; cross-reactive; heterologous; protection.; vaccine.

© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Phylogenetic trees for the influenza A H1 and H3 strains. The phylogenic trees show the genetic divergence from the homologous vaccine viruses and the heterologous wild-type strains. The influenza A/H1N1 strains were the California/09(H1N1) vaccine strain and the heterologous historical Solomon Islands/06(H1N1) strain from 2006. The influenza A/H3N2 strains were the homologous Texas/12(H3N2) live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) vaccine strain and the drifted wild-type Switzerland/13(H3N2) strain from 2014–2015, the year after the trial. Phylogenetic trees were built using the neighbor-joining method with Poisson correction in MEGA software, version 6.0.6 [16].
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Hemagglutination inhibition (HI) responses to the homologous and heterologous influenza AHN1 and H3N2 strains. The HI responses after live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) are shown for homologous vaccine strains, California/09(H1N1) (A, B) and Victoria/12-like(H3N2) (equivalent to Texas/12[H3N2]) (E, F) and the heterologous wild-type influenza strains, Solomon06(H1N1) (C, D) and Switzerland/13(H3N2) (G, H). Bars represent geometric mean titers with 95% confidence intervals,* indicating a trend of an increase (P = .09). The HI responses are shown as individual responses; each symbol represents a single child, and a titer of 40, considered the protective level, is indicated by dotted lines. To compare HI responses over time, the nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis test was used, with correction for multiple comparisons; differences were considered significant at P < .05.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Durability of cross-reactive T-cell cytokine responses to heterologous influenza A virus strains after live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV). The long-term responses up to 1 y, for influenza-specific interferon (IFN) γ +, interleukin 2 (IL-2)+, and IFN-γ +IL-2+ T-cell responses after LAIV are indicated per 106 peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). Each symbol represents an individual child, and bars represents group means with standard errors of the mean. For statistical analysis of the heterologous T-cell response after vaccination, the nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis test was used, with correction for multiple comparisons; differences were considered significant at P < .05. * ; ** . Abbreviation: SFUs, spot-forming units.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Long-term and individual influenza-specific CD8+ T-cell responses after live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) vaccination. Influenza-specific interferon (IFN) γ +, interleukin 2 (IL-2)+ and IFN-γ +IL-2+ CD8+T-cell responses up to 1 y after LAIV are indicated per 106 peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). Bars represent means with standard errors of the mean. A–C, The IFN-γ + (A), IL-2+ (B), and IFN-γ +IL-2+ (C) cytokine responses are shown for all children. D–I, The kinetics of the CD8+ T-cell response with individual responses are shown for children <10 y old (n = 10) (D–F) or ≥10 y old (n = 4) (G–I). For statistical analyses of the postvaccination response, the Wilcoxon matched-paired signed rank test was used for the 12 subjects with available samples up to day 180. * ; ** . Abbreviation: SFUs, spot-forming units.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Influenza-specific individual CD8+ peptide responses after live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) vaccination. A, Influenza-specific response to individual peptides covering the NP, M1, and PB1 proteins of influenza A virus, with means and standard errors of the mean. B, Because the dominant response was to the NP peptide, interferon (IFN) γ + NP-specific CD8+ peptide responses are shown according to age ≥10 or <10 y. The total response (NP, M1, and PB1) is shown in A. To compare the response over time between the 2 age groups, the nonparametric Mann-Whitney test was used, with differences considered significant at P < .05. Abbreviations: M1, matrix protein 1; NP, nucleoprotein; PB1, polymerase basic protein 1.

References

    1. Wilkinson TM, Li CK, Chui CS, et al. Preexisting influenza-specific CD4+ T cells correlate with disease protection against influenza challenge in humans. Nat Med 2012; 18:274–80.
    1. Sridhar S, Begom S, Bermingham A, et al. Cellular immune correlates of protection against symptomatic pandemic influenza. Nat Med 2013; 19:1305–12.
    1. World Health Organization. Fact sheet about seasonal influenza. 2014.
    1. D’Mello T, Brammer L, Blanton L, et al.; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Influenza activity—United States, 28 September 2014–21 February 2015. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2015 March 6; 64(8):206–12.
    1. Sridhar S, Brokstad KA, Cox RJ. Influenza vaccination strategies: comparing inactivated and live attenuated influenza vaccines. Vaccines (Basel) 2015; 3:373–89.
    1. McMichael AJ, Gotch FM, Noble GR, Beare PA. Cytotoxic T-cell immunity to influenza. N Engl J Med 1983; 309:13–7.
    1. Hayward AC, Wang L, Goonetilleke N, et al. ; Flu Watch Group Natural T cell-mediated protection against seasonal and pandemic influenza. results of the Flu Watch cohort study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2015; 191:1422–31.
    1. Hoft DF, Babusis E, Worku S, et al. Live and inactivated influenza vaccines induce similar humoral responses, but only live vaccines induce diverse T-cell responses in young children. J Infect Dis 2011; 204:845–53.
    1. Mohn KG, Bredholt G, Brokstad KA, et al. Longevity of B-cell and T-cell responses after live attenuated influenza vaccination in children. J Infect Dis 2015; 211:1541–9.
    1. Tu W, Mao H, Zheng J, et al. Cytotoxic T lymphocytes established by seasonal human influenza cross-react against 2009 pandemic H1N1 influenza virus. J Virol 2010; 84:6527–35.
    1. He XS, Holmes TH, Mahmood K, et al. Phenotypic changes in influenza-specific CD8+ T cells after immunization of children and adults with influenza vaccines. J Infect Dis 2008; 197:803–11.
    1. Wang Z, Kedzierska L, Nuessing S, et al. Establishment of memory CD8+ T cells with live attenuated influenza virus (LAIV) across different vaccination doses. J Gen Virol 2016; 97:3205–14.
    1. Mohn KG, Brokstad KA, Pathirana RD, et al. Live attenuated influenza vaccine in children induces B-cell responses in tonsils. J Infect Dis 2016; 214:722–31.
    1. Trieu MC, Zhou F, Lartey S, et al. Long-term maintenance of the influenza-specific cross-reactive memory CD4+ T-cell responses following repeated annual influenza vaccination. J Infect Dis 2017; 215:740–9.
    1. Ambrose CS, Yi T, Walker RE, Connor EM. Duration of protection provided by live attenuated influenza vaccine in children. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2008; 27:744–8.
    1. Saitou N, Nei M The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 1987; 4:406–25.
    1. Forrest BD, Pride MW, Dunning AJ, et al. Correlation of cellular immune responses with protection against culture-confirmed influenza virus in young children. Clin Vaccine Immunol 2008; 15:1042–53.
    1. Francis TJ. The doctrine of original antigenic sin. P Am Philos Soc 1960: 104:572–578.
    1. Hayward AC, Fragaszy EB, Bermingham A, et al. ; Flu Watch Group Comparative community burden and severity of seasonal and pandemic influenza: results of the Flu Watch cohort study. Lancet Respir Med 2014; 2:445–54.
    1. Pebody R, Sile B, Warburton F, et al. Live attenuated influenza vaccine effectiveness against hospitalisation due to laboratory-confirmed influenza in children two to six years of age in England in the 2015/16 season. Euro Surveill 2017 January 26;22(4):30450. doi:10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2017.22.4.30450.
    1. Pebody RG, Green HK, Andrews N, et al. Uptake and impact of vaccinating school age children against influenza during a season with circulation of drifted influenza A and B strains, England, 2014/15. Euro Surveill 2015;20(39). doi:10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2015.20.39.30029.
    1. Bandell A, Woo J, Coelingh K. Protective efficacy of live-attenuated influenza vaccine (multivalent, Ann Arbor strain): a literature review addressing interference. Expert Rev Vaccines 2011; 10:1131–41.
    1. Chirkova TV, Naykhin AN, Petukhova GD, et al. Memory T-cell immune response in healthy young adults vaccinated with live attenuated influenza A (H5N2) vaccine. Clin Vaccine Immunol 2011; 18:1710–8.
    1. Hillaire ML, van Trierum SE, Bodewes R, et al. Characterization of the human CD8⁺ T cell response following infection with 2009 pandemic influenza H1N1 virus. J Virol 2011; 85:12057–61.
    1. Cheng X, Zengel JR, Suguitan AL, Jr, et al. Evaluation of the humoral and cellular immune responses elicited by the live attenuated and inactivated influenza vaccines and their roles in heterologous protection in ferrets. J Infect Dis 2013; 208:594–602.
    1. Mohn KG, Cox RJ, Tunheim G, et al. ; Norwegian Pandemic Group Immune responses in acute and convalescent patients with mild, moderate and severe disease during the 2009 influenza pandemic in Norway. PLoS One 2015; 10:e0143281.
    1. Mohn KG, Cox RJ, Tunheim G, et al. Immune responses in acute and convalescent patients with mild, moderate and severe disease during the 2009 influenza pandemic in Norway. PLoS One 2015; 10:e0143281.
    1. Townsend AR, Gotch FM, Davey J. Cytotoxic T cells recognize fragments of the influenza nucleoprotein. Cell 1985; 42:457–67.
    1. Belshe RB, Gruber WC, Mendelman PM, et al. Efficacy of vaccination with live attenuated, cold-adapted, trivalent, intranasal influenza virus vaccine against a variant (A/Sydney) not contained in the vaccine. J Pediatr 2000; 136:168–75.
    1. Brokstad KA, Cox RJ, Major D, Wood JM, Haaheim LR. Cross-reaction but no avidity change of the serum antibody response after influenza vaccination. Vaccine 1995; 13:1522–8.
    1. Lee MS, Yang CF. Cross-reactive H1N1 antibody responses to a live attenuated influenza vaccine in children: implication for selection of vaccine strains. J Infect Dis 2003; 188:1362–6.
    1. Sasaki S, Holmes TH, Albrecht RA, et al. Distinct cross-reactive B-cell responses to live attenuated and inactivated influenza vaccines. J Infect Dis 2014; 210:865–74.
    1. Caspard H, Gaglani M, Clipper L, et al. Effectiveness of live attenuated influenza vaccine and inactivated influenza vaccine in children 2–17 years of age in 2013–2014 in the United States. Vaccine 2015; 34:77–82.
    1. Lee N, Chan PK, Hui DS, et al. Viral loads and duration of viral shedding in adult patients hospitalized with influenza. J Infect Dis 2009; 200:492–500.
    1. Chung JR, Flannery B, Thompson MG, et al. Seasonal effectiveness of live attenuated and inactivated influenza vaccine. Pediatrics 2016; 137:e20153279.
    1. Norwegian Institute of Public Health, personal communication.

Source: PubMed

3
S'abonner